#135S&P 500 rank

ABT — Abbott Laboratories

2-yr score: 56.9/100 (Next 20%)Healthcare
$100.57−1.84%
Description

Abbott Laboratories, along with its affiliated entities, is a global healthcare enterprise dedicated to the research, development, manufacturing, and worldwide distribution of a diverse portfolio of health solutions. The company operates through four primary divisions: Established Pharmaceutical Products, Diagnostic Products, Nutritional Products, and Medical Devices.

Score breakdownLatest quarter55.5 · Fair
Growth
61.8
Quality / Profitability
46.9
Financial health
77.6
Ratio screener
52.8
Track record: 2-yr avg 56.9 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 57.7 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:23 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
32.3
Yield
2.78%
RSI (14)
44.0
vs SMA20
-0.31%
vs SMA50
-4.72%
vs SMA200
-1.90%
Analyst target
$124
+23.7%
5 analysts
AI theoretical price
$121
+20.3%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, Abbott traded at $101.96 (down 1.35% on the day), sitting in the lower third of its $81.97-$137.49 52-week range and 8.1% lower over the prior month as the market digests GAAP dilution from the $21B Exact Sciences acquisition. Sell-side remains constructive (Buy consensus, $123.64 average target) and management has raised FY2026 adjusted EPS guidance to $5.45-$5.60.

AI sentimentNeutral

Signals diverge as of 2026-09-13. The sell-side is clearly bullish - 32 Buy vs 9 Hold vs 0 Sell ratings, a $123.64 average target (~21% above the $101.96 price), $135 targets from firms like TD Cowen, and fresh catalysts (FDA approvals for the TactiFlex Duo dual-energy ablation catheter and Libre Duo glucose-ketone sensor, plus a Google Health partnership for the Lingo biowearable). The tape disagrees: -8.08% over one month, -5.89% over one week, RSI 33.57, and a price below every key moving average. Bullish fundamental narrative colliding with weak price action nets out to genuinely neutral sentiment.

Quarterly trend

Revenue has climbed steadily from ~$10.1B in Q3 2023 to $12.59B in Q2 2026, but the last two prints carry an acquisition boost: Q2 2026 revenue rose 13.0% YoY (vs Q1 2026's +7.8%), largely from Exact Sciences consolidation, while management's comparable-sales guidance is a more modest 6.5-7.5%. The GAAP profit trend looks like deceleration - operating margin fell to 14.2% in Q2 2026 from 18.4% in Q2 2025, and diluted EPS halved to $0.53 from $1.01 - but that is overwhelmingly acquisition amortization and integration charges, not organic erosion; on an adjusted basis management actually RAISED FY2026 EPS guidance to $5.45-$5.60. One caution: Q4 2024 shows $9.23B net income / $5.27 EPS, a one-time item that distorts every trailing YoY comparison and is why the reported PEG ratio is negative. Net read: organic growth is stable-to-accelerating, GAAP margins are temporarily compressed by deal accounting, and the reported decline is largely optical.

Valuation assessment

Mixed but roughly fair. As of 2026-09-13, at $101.96, the TTM P/E is 32.8x - a premium to the 5-year average of 29.0x - but that trailing EPS ($3.11) is depressed by Exact Sciences amortization, so the headline multiple overstates expensiveness. On the company's raised FY2026 adjusted EPS of ~$5.50 the forward P/E is only ~18.5x, and P/S of 3.79x sits BELOW the 5-year average of 4.91x. Trailing EV/EBITDA of 20.6x looks rich, but against forward EBITDA it is closer to 14-15x. Verdict: fairly valued - not the bargain the forward P/E implies, not as expensive as the trailing P/E suggests.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market is struggling with Abbott's GAAP-to-adjusted bridge. Because reported EPS is being mechanically halved by acquisition accounting while cash generation stays robust (TTM FCF ~$7.9B, ~4.5% yield), the 32.8x trailing multiple makes ABT look far more expensive than the ~18.5x forward earnings power justifies. The setup: if integration synergies and cancer-diagnostics/CGM growth land as guided, the forward multiple should compress (price up or estimates up) - but if the market keeps anchoring on depressed GAAP EPS, the stock can stay range-bound. Watch the Q3 2026 report (projected Oct 14, 2026, consensus ~$1.38-$1.42) for evidence the adjusted-vs-GAAP gap is narrowing, and treat any further GAAP-driven selloff as a potential entry rather than a thesis-breaker.

Technical picture

Weak near-term momentum. As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) was 33.57 - approaching but not yet at oversold - and the $101.96 price sat below all three key averages: -7.88% vs the SMA20, -3.18% vs the SMA50, and -3.68% vs the SMA200. The stock is down 5.89% in a week and 8.08% in a month, though still +15.62% over three months. Read: a name that ran up into mid-2026 and is now in a sharp pullback, sitting in the lower third of its 52-week range. Entry implication: RSI near 34 hints a near-term bounce is possible, but with price below every moving average there is no confirmed support; a patient buyer could scale in, while momentum buyers should wait for a reclaim of the SMA20.

Macro factors
  • Interest rates / cost of capital: higher hurdle rates keep scrutiny on the $21B Exact Sciences deal and on the sustainability of Abbott's 50+ year dividend-growth streak.
  • Sector rotation and procedure volumes: strong elective-procedure trends underpin double-digit electrophysiology and structural-heart growth, while ABT's low 0.586 beta makes it a defensive holding in risk-off tape.
  • FX volatility: a large overseas revenue base exposes results to currency swings, a stated headwind in current guidance.
  • Healthcare regulation/reimbursement: potential expanded reimbursement for non-insulin Type 2 diabetes biowearables is a meaningful swing factor; localized pricing pressure in diabetes care persists.
  • Medtech consolidation/M&A cycle: large-cap device makers are consolidating, and successful Exact Sciences integration is the key swing - the deal roughly doubled long-term debt to $29.6B from $10.8B at end-2025.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings (projected Oct 14, 2026; consensus EPS ~$1.38-$1.42) - the first clear read on whether the Exact Sciences-adjusted earnings bridge improves.
  • Commercial rollouts of the FDA-approved TactiFlex Duo dual-energy ablation catheter and the Libre Duo 10-day glucose-ketone biowearable sensor.
  • Reimbursement decisions on non-insulin Type 2 diabetes biowearables, a potential volume catalyst for Libre/Lingo.
  • Exact Sciences integration synergies and accelerated Cologuard / cancer-diagnostics growth.
  • Annual dividend increase (typically late in the year), extending the 50+ year streak.
Key risks
  • Exact Sciences integration and leverage: long-term debt jumped to $29.6B in Q2 2026 from $10.8B at end-2025; if synergies disappoint, both further dilution and balance-sheet risk are real.
  • Persistent GAAP margin/EPS compression from amortization and integration charges keeps the headline multiple elevated and sentiment weak.
  • Product-liability litigation over preterm-infant specialty formulas (partially resolved, not fully).
  • Competitive pressure in CGM (Dexcom, Medtronic) and diagnostics, plus FX and diabetes-care pricing pressure.
  • Premium trailing valuation (32.8x TTM) leaves little cushion if execution slips, and the stock trades below all key moving averages, so momentum is fragile.
Investment thesis

Abbott is a high-quality, diversified healthcare compounder going through a deliberately noisy transition. The ugly GAAP optics - Q2 2026 operating margin down to 14.2%, EPS halved to $0.53 - are acquisition accounting, not organic decay: comparable sales are guided to 6.5-7.5%, adjusted EPS guidance was raised to $5.45-$5.60, and cash flow remains strong (~$7.9B TTM FCF, 4.5% yield). At $101.96 (2026-09-13) the stock trades ~18.5x forward EPS with a clear gap to the $123.64 analyst target, but the Exact Sciences integration is unproven, leverage doubled, and the technicals are weak (RSI 33.6, below every moving average). This is a reasonable accumulate-on-weakness candidate for a patient investor rather than a table-pounding buy, and the fundamentals-plus-valuation combination nets to a Neutral directional lean.

AI theoretical price methodology

Method: a 22x forward P/E applied to FY2026 adjusted EPS of ~$5.50 (midpoint of the raised $5.45-$5.60 guidance / $5.517 consensus) - a multiple justified by Abbott's premium-quality diversified medtech mix, low 0.586 beta and 2.78% dividend yield, but tempered for acquisition integration risk and $29.6B long-term debt. Cross-checks land nearby: ~15x forward EV/EBITDA implies ~$115 and ~4.7x P/S versus the 5-year average of 4.91x implies ~$126, so the ~$121 figure sits just below the $123.64 sell-side consensus and ~19% above the 2026-09-13 price of $101.96.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The deterministic score (55.5, 'Fair Fundamentals') is arithmetically sound but structurally blind to the distortion that matters most here: the $21B Exact Sciences acquisition closed earlier in 2026, and its intangible amortization and integration charges are crushing the trailing GAAP metrics the formula leans on. Q2 2026 operating margin fell to 14.2% from 18.4% a year earlier and GAAP EPS halved to $0.53 even as revenue rose 13% YoY - a mechanical deal effect, not organic decay - which drags the quality/profitability leg to 46.9 and ROIC to a depressed 8.4%. Meanwhile management reaffirmed 6.5-7.5% comparable sales growth, RAISED FY2026 adjusted EPS to $5.45-$5.60, and the stock trades at ~18.5x that forward figure on a ~4.5% TTM FCF yield, with a negative accruals ratio (-1.43%) confirming cash is running ahead of reported profit. I would nudge the fair score into the low-60s, one tier higher ('Good'), reflecting a franchise that is temporarily obscured by acquisition accounting; the 50/50 blend with the ratio screener keeps the point impact modest, which is why this is a partial rather than full disagreement - the trailing GAAP premium is real and the leverage/integration risk is genuine. Note this is not the classic cyclical-trough trap the methodology warns about (Abbott is not a commodity or semiconductor name), but it is an analogous case: trailing metrics are temporarily depressed by an accounting event, not a structural decline.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.