ACN — Accenture plc
Accenture plc is a global professional services firm that delivers a wide array of strategy, consulting, interactive, technology, and operations services worldwide. Its comprehensive offerings include application services such as agile transformation, DevOps implementation, application modernization, enterprise architecture, software and quality engineering, and data management.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-10-04, Accenture trades at $198.90 (feed shows TTM P/E of 14.56 and ~13.5x forward FY27 EPS of $14.69) after a +44.8% three-month rally off a 52-week low of $118.15. The move followed an Oct 1, 2026 Q4 FY26 beat (revenue $18.7B, diluted EPS $3.29) and FY27 guidance of 3-6% local-currency revenue growth at 15.9-16.1% operating margin. Note the same feed lists a prior close of $212.30, a -6.3% one-day move that is inconsistent with the +12.94% one-week return; treat the exact spot price as noisy.
Sentiment flipped hard positive on the Oct 1, 2026 print: Q4 revenue of $18.7B beat the high end of guidance, GAAP EPS of $3.29 topped the $3.18 consensus, Q4 bookings were $22.2B (+5% local currency), and management added 400+ AI clients in FY26. The stock jumped roughly 15-20% and is up 44.81% over three months (per the 2026-10-04 technical feed), with sell-side targets chased higher - Goldman Sachs $230 to $260, Argus to $260, UBS reiterating $275, Jefferies $190 to $220. The rally is explicitly a refutation of the 'GenAI eats billable hours' bear case, not just an earnings beat.
Stable mid-single-digit grower with real margin expansion, not an accelerating story. Revenue YoY: Q1 FY26 +5.9%, Q2 FY26 +8.3%, Q3 FY26 +5.6%, Q4 FY26 +6.2% - FY26 totaled $74.18B, +6.5% reported / +5% local currency, versus FY25's +7.4%. Sequential Q4 revenue was essentially flat (-0.2% vs Q3's $18.72B). The profit line is the better story: FY26 operating margin was 15.8% (OI $11.71B) versus 14.7% in FY25, roughly +110bp, and Q4 FY26 operating margin of 15.5% compares to a distorted 11.6% in Q4 FY25 (that quarter carried an $817M 'R&D expense' line that appears nowhere else in the 12-quarter set). FY26 diluted EPS of $13.56 (+11.6%) accelerated over FY25's $12.15 (+6.3%). Cash flow: FY26 FCF $11.62B vs $10.87B (+6.9%) and FY26 OCF $12.36B (+7.7%) - but Q4 FY26 OCF fell 20.9% YoY ($3.095B vs $3.914B) against an unusually strong prior-year quarter. Verdict: durable, modest growth plus margin/cash discipline; the Q4 OCF dip is a comparison blip, not a deterioration, but nothing here says reacceleration either.
Cheap versus its own history, and cheap versus its quality metrics. As of 2026-10-04, at $198.90: TTM P/E 14.56 against a 5-year average of 24.17; P/S 1.64 against a 5-year average of 2.67; forward P/E of ~13.5x on next-FY consensus EPS of $14.692; PEG 1.31; EV/EBITDA 8.60; P/B 3.79 with ROE of 26.5% and ROIC of 16.8%. FY26 FCF of $11.62B on a ~$121.7B market cap is a ~9.5% free-cash-flow yield - unusually high for a net-cash, 16%-ROIC services franchise. The data feed reports a 4.69% dividend yield, but the announced $1.71/quarter dividend ($6.84 annualized, a 5% raise, ~50% of FY26 GAAP EPS) implies ~3.4% at $198.90; I'd treat the 4.69% figure as stale/price-mismatched. Even at 3.4%, this is a low-teens-earnings-multiple, high-cash-return setup - the discount is the market's price for unresolved AI-disruption risk, not a data error.
The 44.81% three-month gain was mostly multiple, not earnings. Three months ago the implied price was ~$137 (198.90 / 1.4481) on FY25 EPS of $12.15 - roughly 11x. Today it is 14.56x TTM and 13.5x forward on EPS of $14.692. So the market moved from pricing terminal AI-driven decline to pricing a normal low-teens grower, without any change in the FY27 revenue guide, which is 3-6% local currency (midpoint 4.5%, i.e. a slight deceleration from FY26's +5% local currency). Read it this way: earnings are being delivered (EPS +11.6% in FY26, dividends +5%, $11.5B returned to shareholders), but the stock now needs bookings and AI revenue to keep validating the re-rating. If FY27 bookings fail to accelerate past +5% local currency, the multiple has no further room; if AI programs convert as management claims, 13.5x forward is the mispricing.
As of 2026-10-04, RSI(14) stood at 59.07 - firm but not overbought. Price was +7.34% above its 20-day SMA (~$185), +10.44% above its 50-day (~$180), and +1.52% above its 200-day (~$196), i.e. a fresh bullish MA stack after a long downtrend, with the 200-day just reclaimed. Returns: +12.94% one week, +5.98% one month, +44.81% three months, -1.21% six months, inside a 52-week range of $118.15-$291.09. The stock fell roughly 60% from its 52-week high before this rally, so the current level is a recovery, not a breakout to new highs. Entry implication: level matters a lot - buying mid-rally after a 45% three-month move is chasing; the higher-probability add zones are a retest of the 200-day (~$196) or the $175-180 area, and the 52-week high at $291 is the obvious overhead reference. Also be aware the feed's own price ($198.90) versus prior close ($212.30) shows a -6.3% day that contradicts the +12.94% week, so don't over-trust any single print.
- Enterprise IT budget mix is rotating from traditional consulting/run-rate work into GenAI programs - Accenture is capturing share of that shift (400+ AI clients added in FY26, emerging alliances with Nvidia, OpenAI, Palantir, Anthropic) rather than losing it, but the mix shift pressures legacy billable-hour pricing.
- The GenAI disintermediation thesis (AI automating the labor Accenture sells) is the single biggest driver of the stock's multiple - it took the shares from $291 to $118 before FY26 results partially refuted it; it is not resolved, only deferred.
- Government and public-sector demand was a notable FY26 tailwind but is politically volatile - US federal cost-cutting initiatives and shifting fiscal/regulatory backdrops make those contracts lumpy, and some analysts explicitly warn certain government tailwinds may not repeat in FY27.
- Rate and duration sensitivity: with a ~9.5% FCF yield and a 3.4% dividend yield on 50%-of-EPS payout plus heavy buybacks, ACN trades partly as a cash-return/duration asset - moves in the discount rate and equity risk premium re-rate this stock as much as earnings do.
- Currency: roughly half of revenue is non-USD, and FY26 local-currency growth of +5% came in below the +6.5% reported figure, so FX was a reported-revenue tailwind; a reversal in the dollar, plus Indian delivery-cost wage inflation, would hit reported growth and margin simultaneously.
- Investor & Analyst Day on 2026-10-14 - management's platform for multi-year growth targets, margin-expansion path, and the new Accenture Construct (capital projects) unit; a soft multi-year framework would undercut the re-rating.
- Q1 FY27 earnings on 2026-12-17 (estimated) - the first hard test of the 3-6% local-currency FY27 guide and, more importantly, whether the $22.2B Q4 bookings pace and AI revenue disclosures keep compounding.
- AI alliance monetization at scale - Nvidia, OpenAI, Palantir, the Anthropic safety partnership, and the AWS Marketplace mid-market cloud/AI rollout are the forward indicators of whether AI pilots convert into the large transformation contracts management claims.
- Continued capital return - the 5% dividend raise to $1.71/quarter (payable 2026-11-13) and a record $11.5B returned in FY26; further buyback acceleration at a 13.5x forward multiple would be highly accretive.
- Multiple re-rating optionality - at 13.5x forward versus a 24.17x 5-year average, even a partial normalization toward a 16-18x forward multiple is worth 15-30% without any earnings upgrade.
- AI cannibalization of traditional consulting and managed-services revenue remains the core unresolved bear case - FY26 pushed it back but did not kill it, and any quarter showing decelerating bookings or AI-driven pricing deflation would hit the multiple hard.
- Growth is decelerating at the margin: FY27 guidance of 3-6% local currency (midpoint 4.5%) is below FY26's +5% local currency achievement, and Q4 bookings growth of +5% local currency is not the acceleration a 14x+ multiple now requires.
- Government contract lumpiness - FY26 public-sector strength that analysts flag as possibly non-repeating, plus ongoing US federal cost-cutting pressure, could leave a hole in FY27 bookings.
- Unexplained balance-sheet shift: long-term debt nearly doubled to $9.999B in Q4 FY26 from $5.029B in Q3 FY26, while the net-cash cushion narrowed to ~$2.8B from ~$6.4B a year earlier - the research brief does not explain it, and if it funds a large acquisition, integration and dilution risk follow.
- Cash-conversion wobble - Q4 FY26 operating cash flow fell 20.9% YoY to $3.095B; one quarter is noise against a strong comparable, but two in a row would undermine the cash-return story that supports the valuation.
- The recent 44.81% three-month move was multiple-driven - if AI spending conversion stalls, there is little earnings cushion underneath, and the 52-week low of $118.15 is a live reference point.
This is a fair-quality business at a genuinely discounted price, and the honest read is that it is a reasonable risk/reward rather than a screaming buy after a 45% three-month run. The numbers are solid, not spectacular: FY26 revenue +6.5% reported / +5% local currency, operating margin up ~110bp to 15.8%, EPS +11.6% to $13.56, FCF of $11.62B (a ~9.5% yield), ROIC of 16.8%, net cash, and $11.5B returned to shareholders against a 13.5x forward multiple and a 24.17x 5-year average. What is unresolved - and what the price ultimately hinges on - is whether GenAI makes Accenture's billable hours redundant or makes it the integrator that monetizes them; FY26 bookings and 400+ new AI clients argue for the latter, but FY27 guidance of 3-6% is not the profile of a company already winning big. I would own it on weakness (200-day near $196, or the $175-180 zone) rather than chase it here, and I would want the Oct 14, 2026 Analyst Day multi-year framework before sizing up.
I applied a justified forward P/E of 16.0x to next-FY (FY27, Aug-2027) consensus EPS of $14.692, giving $235.10 - a ~34% discount to Accenture's 5-year average P/E of 24.17x to reflect the durable step-down to 3-6% local-currency growth, but a clear premium to the 13.5x forward it trades at on 2026-10-04 given 16.8% ROIC, net cash, ~110bp of FY26 margin expansion, and negative accruals (cash ahead of earnings). Cross-checking on cash: FY26 FCF of $11.62B on ~612M shares is ~$19.00/share; a 16x-earnings valuation implies an ~8.1% FCF yield, versus ~9.6% at the current $198.90 - i.e. 16x is the conservative end of the range rather than a stretch, and a 7% fair FCF yield would imply closer to $270.
The deterministic 52.9 ('Fair Fundamentals') is directionally right but reads the growth leg too harshly, and I would push the score roughly 10 points higher into the low-60s ('Good') - hence Partially Agree, a one-tier adjustment, not a different verdict. The growth leg of 32.2 is dragged down by trailing pieces the formula can't contextualize: Q4 FY26 operating cash flow fell 20.9% YoY to $3.095B against an unusually strong Q4 FY25 ($3.914B), while full-year OCF still rose 7.7% and FCF rose 6.9% to $11.62B - a comparison artifact, not deterioration. The quality leg (60.0) is the trustworthy one: an accruals ratio of -1.44% means cash generation runs ahead of reported net income, exactly the conservative pattern the Sloan check is designed to reward, and ROIC of 16.8% is solid. Financial health at 66.7 is fair but the formula sees the year-end balance sheet, where long-term debt jumped to $9.999B from $5.029B sequentially with no explanation in the brief - a genuine unknown that justifies not scoring higher. What the entirely backward-looking formula structurally cannot see is the forward AI-booking inflection ($22.2B Q4 bookings, +5% local currency, 400+ AI clients, Anthropic/OpenAI/Nvidia alliances) and the fact that the disintermediation bear case took the stock to $118 before partially reversing. That combination, plus margin expansion of ~110bp in FY26, is worth a modest positive adjustment - not enough to call the score wrong, but enough that 'Fair' understates the setup. The formula is also right that this is not a cyclical-trough misread: ACN is not a commodity business at a cycle low, it is a structurally questioned compounder whose de-rating is a narrative call, so I'm not invoking the trough exception.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.