#482S&P 500 rank

AEE — Ameren Corporation

2-yr score: 35.3/100 (Bottom 10%)Utilities14d
$106.48+0.24%
Description

Operating across the United States, Ameren Corporation functions as a utility holding company. The enterprise organizes its operations into four primary divisions: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission.

Score breakdownLatest quarter26.5 · Poor
Growth
20.0
Quality / Profitability
54.4
Financial health
10.6
Ratio screener
20.7
Track record: 2-yr avg 35.3 (Weak, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 34.3 (Weak, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Nov 5, 2026 (in 14 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:23 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
18.6
Yield
2.77%
RSI (14)
62.1
vs SMA20
+4.26%
vs SMA50
+1.97%
vs SMA200
-1.50%
Analyst target
$115
+8.4%
13 analysts
AI theoretical price
$112
+5.2%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, Ameren trades at $104.90 with an 18.31x trailing P/E and a 2.77% dividend yield, sitting 11.4% below its 52-week high of $118.32 and 8.6% above its low of $96.57. Q2 2026 diluted EPS of $1.13 beat the $1.08 consensus and rose 11.9% year-over-year, with full-year 2026 guidance of $5.25-$5.45 reaffirmed.

AI sentimentNeutral

The sell side and the tape are pointed in opposite directions as of 2026-09-13. Analysts are constructive - a 'Buy' consensus across 13 buy / 10 hold / 1 sell ratings, with a $121 consensus target and a $120.29 recent average - while the stock has bled steadily lower: -1.47% over 1 week, -3.60% over 1 month, -3.76% over 3 months, and -6.37% over 6 months, with RSI at 35.19 and price below the 20-, 50-, and 200-day moving averages. The fundamentals themselves are neither a blow-up nor a breakout: a clean Q2 beat, reaffirmed guidance, and a real data-center load pipeline, offset by a $900M junior subordinated note deal priced at 6.45%, a $1.2B forward common stock sale earlier in the year, and negative free cash flow that makes every unit of growth dependent on capital markets. That combination - bullish sell side, deteriorating price trend, stable but capital-hungry operations - reads as genuinely neutral sentiment rather than conviction in either direction.

Quarterly trend

Revenue growth has clearly decelerated, but the deceleration is largely a weather and pass-through artifact rather than demand deterioration. Quarterly revenue went from +31.2% YoY in Q2 2025 to -5.8% YoY in Q2 2026 ($2,221M to $2,092M); Q1 revenue growth also cooled from +15.5% YoY in Q1 2025 to +3.8% YoY in Q1 2026 ($2,176M), and Q4 flipped from +20.0% YoY in 2024 to -8.2% YoY in 2025 ($1,941M to $1,782M). The Q3 2025 quarter was an outlier - revenue of $2,699M and EPS of $2.35 on a hot summer - and the 2026 comps are measured against it. Earnings tell a better story than revenue: diluted EPS grew +19.6% YoY in Q1 2026 ($1.28 vs $1.07) and +11.9% YoY in Q2 2026 ($1.13 vs $1.01), and operating margin expanded year-over-year for three straight quarters (Q4 2025 at 20.2% vs 10.2%; Q1 2026 at 24.4% vs 20.5%; Q2 2026 at 21.9% vs 18.5%). Over the full three years, operating margin has been stable-to-improving in a 20-25% band outside of seasonal Q4 troughs, and the accruals ratio of -0.89% as of 2026-06-30 says reported profit is backed by cash, not accounting. The critical caveat: TTM EPS of $5.651 is flattered by the weather-boosted Q3 2025, and consensus FY2026 EPS of $5.39 implies H2 2026 EPS of roughly $2.98 versus $3.27 in H2 2025 - an expected ~9% decline, driven by dilution and higher interest costs. So the honest read is: stable, cash-backed, low-single-digit earnings compounding underneath noisy weather-driven revenue, with a genuinely declining forward EPS comparison baked in.

Valuation assessment

Fair, not cheap - and the headline P/E understates it. As of 2026-09-13, at $104.90, AEE trades at 18.31x TTM EPS ($5.651) versus a 5-year average of 19.93x, an ~8% discount to its own history, while P/S of 3.32x sits above the 5-year average of 3.04x - so 'Neutral vs. its own history' is the right label. But because consensus FY2026 EPS of $5.39 is below the TTM figure, the forward P/E is actually 19.5x, a premium to trailing, which is the opposite of the usual 'forward multiple looks cheaper' setup. The 0.721 PEG ratio should be discounted heavily: it implies ~25% long-term EPS growth, while management's own long-term CAGR framework runs in the 6-8% range and the fact set points to mid-single-digit EPS compounding. Against a 6-8% grower, 19.5x forward earnings is a full multiple, not a bargain; the 2.77% dividend yield is also below what a bond-proxy utility has historically offered when rates are elevated. Analyst targets around $120 imply ~22x FY2026E EPS, which requires either a materially raised long-term growth rate or multiple expansion - plausible, but not something the current numbers justify on their own.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market is doing two things at once and neither is fully consistent. It has marked the stock down 6.37% over six months even as Q2 2026 beat and full-year guidance was reaffirmed - meaning the tape is looking through the weather-flattered TTM EPS of $5.651 and correctly discounting the expected ~9% H2 2026 EPS decline from dilution (the $1.2B forward equity sale) and interest expense (the $900M junior sub at 6.45%). What the price is NOT yet reflecting is the load-growth pipeline: 3.4 GW of executed construction agreements, 2.8 GW of signed Energy Supply Agreements, and a projected 60% increase in annual electricity sales by 2029, tied to hyperscaler projects representing $25B of combined investment in Missouri. Analysts at $120 are effectively capitalizing that 2028-2029 rate base at ~19-20x well before the earnings arrive. The clean way to read this: at $104.90 you are paying roughly fairly for the utility as it exists today, and getting the data-center optionality for free - but if the Q3 2026 call shows financing needs growing faster than rate base and a diluted 2026-2030 CAGR below the current 6-8% framework, that free option gets repriced to zero and the stock is worth less than today's price.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, the technical setup is a mild, persistent downtrend rather than a washout. RSI(14) stood at 35.19 - weak, but above the 30 oversold threshold, so there is no capitulation signal to buy against. The price was 2.03% below its 20-day SMA, 4.19% below its 50-day SMA, and 2.74% below its 200-day SMA - a fully bearish moving-average stack, though the gaps are modest, consistent with a slow grind lower rather than a breakdown. At $104.90 the stock sits about 8.6% above the 52-week low of $96.57 and 11.4% below the high of $118.32, effectively mid-range with a bearish tilt. Entry-timing implication: there is no urgency to buy here. The better risk/reward for an income-oriented buyer is either a push toward the high-$90s (near the 52-week low, which would put the yield closer to 3.0%) or a confirmed reclaim of the 50-day SMA, which would signal the drift has stopped. RSI rolling below 30 without a fundamental change would be the more actionable setup.

Macro factors
  • Interest rates remain the dominant swing factor: utilities are bond proxies, so a higher 10-year Treasury compresses the multiple even when earnings are fine. Ameren's own funding costs are visible in the September 2026 pricing of $900M of junior subordinated notes due 2057 at 6.45% - that is an expensive cost of capital that flows straight into the rate base funding math.
  • Data center and electrification load growth in Missouri is a structural demand tailwind (Google and Amazon projects totaling roughly $25B, 3.4 GW of executed construction agreements, 60% projected electricity sales growth by 2029), but it is also politically charged - the question of how much of the grid upgrade is funded by residential ratepayers versus hyperscalers is unresolved and sits directly in front of regulators.
  • Regulatory proceedings are live on both sides of the footprint: a $343M Missouri electric rate increase filed in late June 2026 (final PSC order anticipated by May 2027) and, in Illinois, a $2.75B multi-year grid investment plan for 2028-2031 plus annual reconciliation adjustments with ICC decisions due by December 2026.
  • Sector rotation between defensive bond proxies and AI/growth momentum: when the market chases technology, utilities like AEE underperform and get used as a funding source; when growth wobbles, the 2.77% yield and 0.47 beta attract a defensive bid. This rotation, more than company-specific news, explains a lot of the -6.37% six-month move.
  • Negative free cash flow as a structural condition: capex of $1,057M in Q2 2026 against operating cash flow of $770M produced -$287M FCF, continuing a pattern of negative FCF in 9 of the last 12 quarters. Growth is entirely capital-markets-dependent, so credit conditions and equity issuance windows are a live macro variable, not a footnote.
  • Weather normalization risk cuts both ways: Q3 2025's $2.35 EPS quarter was heat-driven revenue, and consensus already models H2 2026 EPS down ~9% YoY as that comp rolls off. A mild summer or warm winter would widen that gap; an extreme one would close it.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings call, scheduled for late October/early November 2026, featuring an official update to the 2026-2030 EPS CAGR outlook, revised sales forecasts reflecting data center expansions, updated generation buildout plans, and long-term financing assumptions. This is the single most important near-term event - a raised CAGR is the clearest path to multiple expansion; a lowered one re-rates the stock down.
  • Missouri PSC final order on the $343M electric rate increase request, expected by May 2027, covering grid-hardening and solar investments with data center savings offsets and customer protections built in.
  • Illinois Commerce Commission decisions by December 2026 on annual reconciliation adjustments and stakeholder engagement on the $2.75B multi-year grid investment plan for 2028-2031 - an adverse outcome here would pressure the Illinois rate base growth story.
  • Conversion of the 2.8 GW of signed Energy Supply Agreements and 3.4 GW of executed construction agreements into rate-based capital and additional hyperscaler contracts, which would validate the 60% electricity sales growth projection for 2029.
  • Continued capital markets execution at reasonable cost - the next debt or equity raise will show whether the 6.45% junior sub pricing was a one-off or the new normal for Ameren's funding stack.
Key risks
  • Forward EPS is expected to decline, not grow: consensus FY2026 EPS of $5.39 is below TTM EPS of $5.651, implying H2 2026 EPS of roughly $2.98 versus $3.27 in H2 2025. The trailing numbers investors may anchor on are flattered by an unrepeatable weather-driven Q3 2025.
  • Dilution and financing drag: a $1.2B forward common stock sale earlier in 2026 plus $900M of junior subordinated notes at 6.45% priced in September 2026 mean share count and interest expense are both rising faster than the earnings they fund, at least near-term.
  • Balance sheet and liquidity profile is thin by S&P 500 standards: debt-to-equity of 1.593, current ratio of 0.531, quick ratio of 0.37, and cash of just $12M at 2026-06-30. Free cash flow was negative in 9 of the last 12 quarters, including -$287M in Q2 2026 and -$1,175M in Q1 2026.
  • Regulatory outcome risk on two fronts: a stingy Missouri PSC order (May 2027) or an unfavorable ICC decision on the $2.75B Illinois grid plan and December 2026 reconciliation would directly hit allowed returns and the growth trajectory.
  • Rate sensitivity: at 19.5x forward earnings with a 2.77% yield, the stock has limited cushion if long rates back up further; a rising risk-free rate pressures both the multiple and Ameren's cost of incremental debt.
  • Customer cost-allocation politics around the data center buildout could slow or reshape the load-growth pipeline, converting the primary bull case into a headline risk.
Investment thesis

Ameren is a decent regulated utility priced roughly at fair value, not a compelling buy at $104.90 as of 2026-09-13. The business is genuinely stable - 17.9% net margin, 10.9% ROE, negative accruals (-0.89%) meaning earnings are cash-backed, three consecutive quarters of YoY operating margin expansion, and a reaffirmed guidance range - but it is also a company whose trailing EPS is inflated by a weather-boosted Q3 2025, whose forward EPS is consensus-modeled to decline ~9% in H2 2026, and whose growth depends entirely on continuous equity and debt issuance at a moment when its junior sub debt prices at 6.45%. The data-center load pipeline (3.4 GW executed, 2.8 GW signed ESAs, 60% sales growth targeted by 2029) is real and genuinely unusual for a utility, but it is not yet in earnings and it requires rate cases to be won first. My calculated fair value of about $112 implies roughly 7% upside, which is close to the return you could get from the dividend alone plus modest multiple recovery - not enough compensation for a stock in a confirmed downtrend with RSI at 35 and price below all three major moving averages. Better entry points: the high-$90s, or confirmation from the Q3 2026 call that the 2026-2030 EPS CAGR is being raised rather than trimmed.

AI theoretical price methodology

Growth-adjusted P/E on forward earnings: consensus FY2026 EPS of $5.39 (consistent with the upper half of reaffirmed guidance of $5.25-$5.45) grown at 7%, the midpoint of management's 6-8% long-term CAGR framework, gives FY2027E EPS of about $5.76. I applied a justified 19.5x multiple - slightly below the 5-year average of 19.93x to reflect today's higher risk-free rate versus the 2020-2021 portion of that window, but supported by above-average data-center load growth - producing ~$112. Cross-check: enterprise value of ~$48.1B (market cap $29.0B plus long-term debt $19.1B less cash) on ~$3.9B TTM EBITDA is 12.2x, and 12.5x on forward EBITDA implies an equity value in the $110-$115 range, consistent with the P/E-derived figure.

AI lean: BearishConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The 26.5 / 'Poor Fundamentals' band is directionally defensible on the inputs it measures - Q2 2026 revenue genuinely fell 5.8% YoY, operating cash flow fell 10.7% YoY ($770M vs $862M), free cash flow was -$287M, debt-to-equity is 1.593, and the quick ratio is 0.37. But the formula is structurally mismatched to a regulated utility: the financial health leg (10.6) and ratio screener (20.7) are penalizing a capital structure that is the regulatory design, not a defect - negative free cash flow during a rate-base buildout, a sub-1.0 current ratio funded with short-term debt, and 1.6x debt-to-equity are normal for this industry and would be red flags only in a non-regulated business. What the score cannot see is that Q2 2026 operating margin expanded YoY (21.9% vs 18.5%), EPS grew 11.9% YoY, the accruals ratio is -0.89% (cash exceeds reported income, the healthy pattern), guidance was reaffirmed at $5.25-$5.45, and management has 3.4 GW of executed data center construction agreements and 2.8 GW of signed ESAs behind a 60% 2029 sales-growth projection. It also cannot see that AEE is not a cyclical at a trough in the commodity sense - it is a weather-sensitive but structurally stable regulated monopoly - though the trailing numbers ARE distorted, in the opposite direction from a trough: Q3 2025's $2.35 EPS quarter inflates the trailing comparison. Net, I would move the score up roughly 12-18 points into the high-30s/low-40s, which is one tier better (Weak rather than Poor), still below average for an S&P 500 comparison set - hence Partially Agree rather than Agree. Note that the mandatory lean mapping (Poor band + Neutral valuation context = Bearish) is applied exactly as specified; my disagreement is with the band's calibration for this sector, not with the table.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.