#168S&P 500 rank

AJG — Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.

2-yr score: 54.7/100 (Middle 40%)Financial Services7d
$258.37−0.34%
Description

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., alongside its various subsidiaries, operates globally, providing a wide array of services that encompass insurance brokerage, expert consulting, and outsourced claims settlement and administration.

Score breakdownLatest quarter57.7 · Fair
Growth
75.4
Quality / Profitability
39.0
Financial health
91.7
Ratio screener
52.0
Track record: 2-yr avg 54.7 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 52.4 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 29, 2026 (in 7 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:23 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
42.4
Yield
1.09%
RSI (14)
66.2
vs SMA20
+9.20%
vs SMA50
+4.84%
vs SMA200
+11.44%
Analyst target
$284
+10.0%
12 analysts
AI theoretical price
$292
+12.8%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, AJG trades at $240.32 (market cap $61.7B), about 23% below its 52-week high of $313.55 and down 8.52% over the prior week, with RSI(14) at 36.83. Valuation looks split depending on the earnings basis: 39.4x trailing GAAP EPS of $6.11 versus roughly 18.1x the $13.25 next-FY consensus EPS estimate.

AI sentimentNeutral

The Street remains constructive - 19 Buy / 9 Hold / 1 Sell, consensus target $284.5 (recent-average $287.25) - and the Q2 2026 print (July 30, 2026) showed continued mid-single-digit organic growth alongside a steady bolt-on cadence (Apollo Insurance Solutions on Aug 5, 2026; W.N. Tuscano on July 21, 2026; Med James and Wilson M. Beck). But the tape has clearly turned: as of 2026-09-13 the stock had fallen 8.52% in a week and 5.93% in a month, and sits 6.83% below its 20-day and 5.69% below its 50-day SMA, even while still +15.58% over six months. Positive analyst base plus deteriorating short-term price action is why sentiment reads Neutral rather than Bullish or Bearish.

Quarterly trend

Reported revenue is accelerating hard: Q2 2026 revenue of $4.003B was +24.3% YoY (vs $3.221B), Q1 2026 $4.758B was +27.7% (vs $3.727B), Q4 2025 $3.628B was +33.6% (vs $2.716B), and Q3 2025 $3.366B was +19.9% (vs $2.807B). But a large chunk of that is acquired, not organic - stockholders' equity jumped from $12.18B to $20.15B (+65%) between 2024-09-30 and 2024-12-31 while long-term debt rose from $7.79B to $12.73B, consistent with the AssuredPartners-scale deal referenced in the brief; the brief pegs organic growth at mid-single digits. Critically, earnings are NOT tracking revenue: TTM net income through Q2 2026 was $1.569B, about 4% BELOW the $1.641B TTM through Q2 2025, and TTM EPS slipped from $6.63 to $6.04. Reported operating margin compressed - Q2 2026 operating income of $588M on $4.003B revenue is 14.7%, versus Q2 2025's $624M on $3.221B (19.4%) and Q1 2026's $1.218B on $4.758B (25.6%). Some of that is textbook seasonality (Q4 is always weakest - Q4 2025 net margin 4.2%; Q4 2023 was an outright $32.2M loss) and some is likely non-cash intangible amortization and integration charges, which is the only way to bridge GAAP TTM EPS of $6.11 to the $13.25 forward estimate. One caveat: the gross-profit line in the source data is internally inconsistent across quarters, so it should not be relied on. Bottom line: strong top line, messy and currently compressing GAAP margins, heavy Q1-weighted seasonality, and the forward estimate assumes the drag is transitional.

Valuation assessment

As of 2026-09-13 AJG screens expensive on trailing GAAP and reasonable on forward adjusted. Trailing P/E is 39.4x on $6.112 EPS versus a 5-year average P/E of 42.12x - a modest discount to its own history, not a bargain. PEG is -4.035, which is meaningless here and simply reflects that trailing EPS growth is negative. P/S is 3.919 versus a 5-year average of 4.77 (about 18% below own history), and P/B is 2.601. The number that matters is forward: at $240.32, the stock trades at ~18.1x the $13.251 next-FY estimate, toward the low end of what a low-beta (0.506) brokerage compounder normally commands and below the 20-24x typical of broker peers. The deterministic model labels this "Cheap vs. its own history" (65.2). The honest caveat: the entire cheapness case rests on the gap between GAAP ($6.11 TTM) and adjusted ($13.25 forward) EPS being closed by adding back intangible amortization and deal costs - if that add-back stops being accepted by the market, the stock is not cheap at all.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market is valuing AJG off forward adjusted EPS (~18x), not trailing GAAP (39x) - that 117% bridge from $6.11 to $13.25 is the whole story. The practical read: the current 8.5% weekly drawdown is a multiple/sentiment event tied to the softening P&C pricing cycle and to GAAP optics, not an earnings-miss event - Q2 revenue actually came in at $4.003B, up 24% YoY. That creates a two-sided setup. If the FY2027 $13.25 estimate holds and integration charges fade on schedule, $240 is discounting a re-rating that analysts already reflect in their $284.5 target. If instead organic growth slides toward low single digits as pricing softens, or if intangible-amortization add-backs get discounted by the market, GAAP EPS stays stuck near $6 and a 39x trailing multiple is a valuation trap. Watch Q3 2026 (late October) for two things: the organic growth number and whether operating margin recovers toward the Q1 2026 25.6% level or stays near Q2's 14.7%.

Technical picture

Weak short-term, still intact long-term. As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 36.83 - weak but not yet oversold (the 30 line hasn't been hit). Price was 6.83% below the 20-day SMA (~$258) and 5.69% below the 50-day (~$255), but still 2.79% ABOVE the 200-day SMA (~$234), meaning this is a short-term downtrend inside a longer-term uptrend, not a broken chart. Momentum is clearly negative on the short horizon (-8.52% 1 week, -5.93% 1 month) yet positive over 3 months (+9.89%) and 6 months (+15.58%). Entry implication: there is no bottoming signal yet, so a buyer here is catching a falling knife; the cleaner setup is either a stabilization at the ~$234 200-day line with RSI turning back above 40, or a genuine flush toward RSI 30. A decisive close below the 200-day would put the $190.75 52-week low back in play and invalidate the trend read.

Macro factors
  • Softening P&C pricing cycle: after several years of hard-market, double-digit commercial rate increases, the market is transitioning to a softer pricing environment. This directly caps organic commission growth for brokers even when exposure units grow.
  • Interest rates and fiduciary investment income: brokers earn interest on premium float before remitting to carriers, so a rate plateau or cuts trim a tailwind that has flattered earnings; any renewed rate strength would do the opposite.
  • Client cost inflation in health care and liability: persistent medical, retention, and liability cost pressure is pushing corporate clients toward consulting and risk-mitigation services, supporting demand for Gallagher's advisory and benefits work.
  • M&A financing conditions: AJG's growth engine depends on a steady stream of tuck-in deals; higher-for-longer funding costs or a tighter credit market slows the pipeline that has been adding ~5-7 points of annual revenue.
  • Defensive rotation: with a beta of 0.506, AJG is a classic low-volatility holding - it tends to attract flows when macro uncertainty rises and to lag in strong risk-on rallies, which partly explains the recent pullback after a strong six-month run.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings, expected late October 2026: the key reads are organic growth rate, commentary on P&C rate velocity, and margin trajectory after Q2's 14.7% operating margin.
  • AssuredPartners and bolt-on integration metrics: how quickly the large acquisition plus recent deals (Apollo Insurance Solutions, W.N. Tuscano, Med James, Wilson M. Beck) convert into margin and EPS.
  • Any narrowing of the GAAP-to-adjusted EPS gap - if intangible amortization and deal charges roll off as planned, reported EPS could move sharply toward the $13.25 estimate and force a re-rating.
  • AI-enabled benefits tools and the 2026 US Workforce Trends Report: early signs of whether these become incremental fee revenue or remain marketing.
  • Fed rate path and fiduciary investment income: a cut cycle would trim float income; a hold or hike would preserve it.
Key risks
  • The soft P&C pricing cycle compressing organic commission growth, which is the single biggest swing factor for the multiple.
  • Acquisition and integration risk: the balance sheet moved violently (equity +65% between 2024-09-30 and 2024-12-31; long-term debt from $7.79B to $12.73B), so an integration misstep or goodwill impairment would hit both earnings and sentiment.
  • GAAP earnings quality divergence: TTM EPS fell to $6.04 from $6.63, and the accruals ratio of +0.38% means reported net income is running slightly ahead of operating cash flow - not alarming, but not a clean cash-backed earnings picture either.
  • Valuation risk if adjusted-EPS estimates are cut: the trailing P/E is 39.4x, the PEG is negative, and the entire "cheap" narrative depends on the $13.25 forward number holding.
  • Reporting opacity in the source data: long-term debt swings from $12.62B (Q4 2025) to $497M (Q2 2026) between quarters, making true leverage difficult to verify independently.
Investment thesis

AJG is a genuinely high-quality, asset-light, low-beta (0.506) insurance broker with sticky fee and commission revenue, mid-single-digit organic growth, a proven bolt-on M&A machine, and $2.29B of TTM free cash flow. The problem is not the business, it is the optics and the cycle: reported revenue is growing 20-30% but that is mostly bought, GAAP EPS is actually declining, and the soft P&C pricing market is a real headwind to the organic number. At ~18x forward adjusted EPS the stock is not expensive if the adjusted-earnings story holds, but the entire valuation case rests on trusting a bridge from $6.11 GAAP TTM EPS to $13.25 forward adjusted EPS. My read: a solid, unspectacular long-term compounder at a fair-to-slightly-attractive price, best accumulated on further weakness rather than chased on this bounce attempt. Analysis, not personalized advice.

AI theoretical price methodology

Applied a 22x fair forward P/E to the $13.251 next-FY consensus EPS estimate (22 x 13.251 = $291.52). The 22x is a modest premium to insurance-broker peers (typically 20-22x) justified by AJG's 0.506 beta, recurring commission revenue, and M&A-driven EPS growth, but a discount to its own 5-year average P/E of 42.1x because that average was set during a harder P&C pricing cycle. Cross-checked against the 5-year average P/S of 4.77 (current 3.919 applies to forward revenue per share of ~$64.93 for ~$279) and the $284.5 street consensus target; my figure intentionally sits a few dollars above consensus because I weight the residual margin recovery from the integration charges more heavily.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Low
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

The deterministic 57.7 / "Fair Fundamentals" band is a defensible landing spot, and I would land within a few points of it - so I agree, but for partly offsetting reasons rather than by rubber-stamp. Two things the formula gets wrong in opposite directions: (1) the quality/profitability pillar (39.0) is unfairly harsh on AJG. An asset-light commission broker carrying $20B+ of acquisition goodwill will always print a poor reported ROIC (5.2%) and ROE (6.4%) because the denominator is stuffed with intangibles, and the GAAP numbers also absorb non-cash amortization and one-off deal/integration charges; true returns on tangible capital are far higher, and I would score this pillar closer to 55-60, which alone is worth roughly +4 points on the total. (2) Conversely, the growth pillar (75.4) over-credits what is largely acquired revenue - the +65% jump in stockholders' equity between 2024-09-30 and 2024-12-31 flags a major deal, so the 24-34% headline growth is not organic and I would shade growth down. Net-net I would put the score near 60 versus 57.7 - same band, well inside the ~10-point "Agree" threshold. Note explicitly that the backtest warning about cyclical troughs does NOT apply here: insurance brokerage is not a commodity cyclical at a cycle low, so there is no case for lifting the score on "temporarily depressed, about to turn" logic. The genuinely low-confidence element is the data itself, not the business - the equity jump distorts the trend legs, debt fields are inconsistent across quarters, and the company is mid-integration on a very large acquisition, all of which is why I mark confidence Low.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.