← Back to Rankings

AOSA. O. Smith Corporation

Fundamentals Score: 45.4/100 (Fair Fundamentals) · Industrials

Description

A. O.

Score Breakdown

Growth
31.5/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
50.3/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
74.2/100
weight: 15%
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral

Live Market DataPrice updated: 5h ago

P/E (TTM)
16.8
Yield
2.39%
RSI (14)
46.9
vs SMA20
-1.86%
vs SMA50
-1.38%
vs SMA200
-7.24%
Analyst Target
$74
+21.8%
3 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$67
+11.1%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, A. O. Smith trades at $61.95 with an $8.59B market cap, a 2.4% dividend yield, and a TTM P/E of 17.3x. The stock is near the lower half of its 52-week range with neutral technicals and a cautious Hold analyst consensus.

AI Sentiment:Neutral

Sentiment is cautious but not panicked. Q2 2026 revenue beat and adjusted EPS beat consensus, but guidance was lowered and margins fell year-over-year on input costs and weak China demand. The stock is down roughly 13% over the past year, analysts are split between Buys, Holds, and Sells, and no strong bullish catalyst is currently visible.

Quarterly Trend

Revenue has been essentially flat-to-slightly negative: Q2 2026 revenue of $1,004M was down about 0.7% from $1,011M in Q2 2025, and Q1 2026 revenue was down 1.9% year-over-year. Margins are more clearly compressing: operating margin fell from 20.4% in Q2 2025 to 16.7% in Q2 2026, and diluted EPS fell from $1.07 to $0.90. TTM EPS is $3.61, and full-year 2025 EPS of roughly $3.86 was up from about $3.63 in 2024, so the deterioration is a 2026 phenomenon rather than a multi-year collapse. The picture is a high-quality industrial in a cyclical demand soft patch, not a structurally broken business.

Valuation Assessment

The stock is cheap versus its own history: TTM P/E of 17.3x versus the 5-year average of 24.8x, and price-to-sales of 2.26x versus 5-year average of 2.90x. Forward P/E on consensus next-fiscal-year EPS of $3.734 is about 16.6x. The PEG ratio is unhelpful because trailing growth is negative, but the multiple is low enough to be reasonable even with flat earnings. This is not a deep-value stock, but it is historically cheap for a company with 29% ROE and 24% ROIC.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

The market is not pricing in growth; it is pricing in continued softness and China risk. If management's 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $3.70-$3.85 holds and North American residential demand stabilizes, $61.95 is an undemanding entry. If China deteriorates further or margins keep falling, the low multiple could still go lower and become a value trap. The key is whether the next few quarters confirm stabilization rather than continued deterioration.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI stood at 49.86, essentially neutral. Price was 0.77% below its 20-day SMA, 1.18% above its 50-day SMA, and 5.23% below its 200-day SMA. The stock is range-bound and consolidating below its long-term trend line, so there is no momentum signal. For an individual investor, the technical picture supports patience or partial accumulation rather than aggressive entry.

Macro Factors
  • Persistent China consumer and property-sector weakness, which directly drags on AOS's Rest of World segment.
  • Inflation and tariff-driven input-cost pressure squeezing gross and operating margins.
  • US residential construction and replacement demand tied to interest rates and housing turnover.
  • Regulatory and consumer shift toward energy-efficient and heat-pump water heaters, a long-term tailwind.
  • Emerging-market water treatment demand in India and elsewhere provides structural growth optionality.
Key Catalysts
  • Completion of the strategic review of China operations, which could trigger restructuring, footprint rationalization, or divestiture.
  • Q3 2026 earnings in late October/early November 2026, which will show whether North American residential demand is stabilizing.
  • Successful CFO transition and any clarity on capital allocation, including buybacks or M&A.
  • Further commercial boiler and water treatment growth, helped by recent bolt-on acquisitions like Leonard Valve.
Key Risks
  • China remains a structural drag if recovery in consumer confidence and property stays weak.
  • Input-cost inflation, tariffs, or pricing pressure could keep compressing operating margins.
  • Residential water heater demand could weaken further if US housing and remodeling activity deteriorates.
  • Management and CFO transitions create some execution and strategy-transition risk.
Investment Thesis

A. O. Smith is a genuinely high-quality industrial with strong returns, a clean balance sheet, and a shareholder-friendly dividend. The problem is near-term growth: revenues are flat, margins are compressing, and China is an ongoing drag. At $61.95 the stock is reasonably valued, but there is no urgent catalyst to buy now; it is a patient hold or a starter position for value-oriented investors willing to wait for stabilization.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

I applied an 18.0x forward P/E to consensus next-fiscal-year EPS of $3.734. That multiple is above the current 17.3x TTM multiple but far below the 24.8x five-year average, reflecting AOS's high returns and balance-sheet quality while respecting near-zero near-term growth.

AI Lean: NeutralConfidence: High

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Agree

The deterministic score of 45.4 and 'Fair Fundamentals' band align with my independent read. The formula correctly penalizes flat revenue, declining operating cash flow, and margin compression, while the strong ROE, ROIC, low leverage, and positive free cash flow keep the score from falling into Weak territory. I would not move the score by more than a few points; if the China review leads to a cleaner asset base, the forward risk/reward improves, but trailing fundamentals today are fairly described as Fair.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.