← Back to Rankings

AWKAmerican Water Works Company, Inc.

Fundamentals Score: 54.4/100 (Fair Fundamentals) · Utilities

Description

American Water Works Company, Inc. operates across the United States, delivering essential water and wastewater solutions via its various subsidiary companies. Its operations extend to around 1,700 communities situated across 14 states, catering to an active customer base of roughly 3.4 million.

Score Breakdown

Growth
62.2/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
55.6/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
27.8/100
weight: 15%
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral

Live Market DataPrice updated: 5h ago

P/E (TTM)
24.3
Yield
2.53%
RSI (14)
60.7
vs SMA20
+2.41%
vs SMA50
+4.14%
vs SMA200
+6.97%
Analyst Target
$140
-0.7%
3 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$146
+3.8%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, AWK trades at $136.69, near the middle of its $120.57–$145.64 52-week range, with RSI at 52.74 and price just above its 20-, 50-, and 200-day moving averages. It carries a 23.65x trailing P/E, roughly 22.5x forward EPS, and a 2.53% dividend yield.

AI Sentiment:Neutral

As of 2026-08-27, sentiment is cautious/neutral: Q2 2026 adjusted EPS of $1.61 beat consensus and management reaffirmed 7–9% long-term growth, but the analyst landscape is split (14 Buy, 14 Hold, 2 Sell), and the consensus target of $137.50 is only ~0.6% above the current price. RSI at 52.74 and modest positive moving-average slope confirm there is no crowded bullish or bearish position.

Quarterly Trend

Revenue growth has been steady and slightly accelerating: Q2 2026 revenue rose 6.2% y/y to $1.355B, Q1 2026 +5.7%, Q4 2025 +5.8%, and Q3 2025 +9.7%. Q2 2026 EPS of $1.61 grew ~9% y/y, operating margin improved to ~40.0% from ~38.3%, and net margin improved to ~23.2% from ~22.6%. This is a regulated-compounder profile—consistent mid-single-digit to high-single-digit growth with margins expanding modestly—not a cyclical turn or a deteriorating trend.

Valuation Assessment

As of 2026-08-27, AWK is slightly cheap relative to its own history: trailing P/E is 23.65 versus the 5-year average of 26.8, and P/S is 5.14 versus 6.44. On consensus forward EPS of $6.08, the forward P/E is about 22.5. That is a reasonable multiple for a regulated water utility targeting 7–9% EPS growth, though it is not a deep-value price and the 2.53% yield is modest.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

At $136.69, the market is paying roughly 23.6x trailing and 22.5x forward earnings—essentially in line with a 7–9% grower. The stock is not discounting a major acceleration or disaster. If AWK delivers the top of guidance and the multiple normalizes toward its 5-year 26.8x average, the stock can reach the low-to-mid $150s; if regulatory or merger execution disappoints, the downside is toward the $120–$130 area. At the current price, upside and downside are roughly balanced.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI is 52.74 (neutral), price is +0.64% vs the 20-day SMA, +2.28% vs the 50-day SMA, and +4.12% vs the 200-day SMA. That is a mildly positive but non-trending technical setup, with no oversold entry and no overbought warning. A pullback toward the 50-day or 200-day SMA would offer a more attractive entry than buying at $136.69.

Macro Factors
  • Interest rates: with ~$14.0B long-term debt and ~58% debt-to-capital, higher-for-longer rates raise financing costs and compress utility multiples.
  • Regulatory rate recovery: authorized rate increases add revenue (e.g., $216M since Jan 2026), but outcomes vary by state and can be delayed or disallowed.
  • Infrastructure tailwinds: aging pipes, PFAS remediation, and climate resilience force heavy capex, which expands rate base and supports long-term earnings growth.
  • M&A landscape: the pending Essential Utilities merger is a potential growth step-change but also adds regulatory and integration uncertainty.
  • Inflation/O&M: Q2 2026 O&M was flat y/y, but cost inflation and weather-driven demand variability remain margin risks.
Key Catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings (expected October 28, 2026): investors will look for O&M discipline and confirmation of the ~$3.7B capex plan.
  • Essential Utilities merger: further state approvals and progress toward the Q1 2027 target close.
  • New rate cases in Missouri and Kentucky, plus potential settlement in other jurisdictions.
  • Financing activity (debt/equity issuance) that could shift dilution and interest-cost expectations.
Key Risks
  • Regulatory disallowances or slow rate-case decisions could reduce allowed returns on invested capital.
  • High leverage (D/E 1.38, current ratio 0.52) combined with persistent negative free cash flow requires continuous external financing.
  • Merger/integration execution risk: the Essential Utilities deal could be delayed, renegotiated, or fail, consuming management attention.
  • Interest-rate-driven de-rating: a 23.6x P/E utility is sensitive to rising Treasury yields.
  • Operational/PFAS/weather risks could cause volume or cost surprises.
Investment Thesis

AWK is a high-quality regulated water monopoly with dependable 6–10% revenue growth, a 7–9% long-term EPS/dividend growth plan, and a valuation below its own 5-year averages. The offset is that the model requires enormous capex, produces negative free cash flow, and carries substantial debt, and the pending mega-merger makes the 2027 outlook harder to handicap. As of 2026-08-27, the risk/reward is balanced—not a compelling buy, not an obvious sell.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

I applied a 24.0x forward P/E to consensus 2026 EPS of $6.08—a ~10% discount to AWK's 5-year average P/E of 26.8 to reflect higher interest rates and merger uncertainty—yielding $146.0. A cross-check on P/S (5.5x TTM revenue of ~$5.28B against ~198.7M shares) gives roughly $145–$146, so the two approaches align.

AI Lean: NeutralConfidence: Low

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Agree

The deterministic 54.4 'Fair Fundamentals' score is a fair starting point. I would nudge it a few points higher—Q2 beat, flat O&M, multiple rate-case wins, and a negative accruals ratio point to good earnings quality—but the balance-sheet drag and structural negative FCF are real, so the Fair band still holds. I don't see enough qualitative evidence to move the score by more than ~10 points; the pending merger is material but its outcome is genuinely uncertain, so I can't treat it as a clear upgrade either.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.