#366S&P 500 rank

AXP — American Express Company

2-yr score: 44.5/100 (Lower 20%)Financial Services1d
$323.61+1.66%
Description

Operating globally, American Express Company and its affiliated entities deliver a comprehensive suite of charge and credit payment card solutions, alongside a variety of travel-related offerings. Its business structure is organized into three primary divisions: the Global Consumer Services Group, Global Commercial Services, and Global Merchant and Network Services.

Score breakdownLatest quarter53.5 · Fair
Growth
53.9
Quality / Profitability
58.3
Financial health
78.7
Ratio screener
47.7
Track record: 2-yr avg 44.5 (Weak, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 44.3 (Weak, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 23, 2026 (tomorrow)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:23 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
19.6
Yield
1.01%
RSI (14)
63.8
vs SMA20
+4.75%
vs SMA50
+1.07%
vs SMA200
-1.31%
Analyst target
$362
+11.8%
10 analysts
AI theoretical price
$370
+14.2%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, AXP trades at $324.69 (market cap ~$219B) — about 19.7x trailing EPS of $16.88 and ~18.4x the FY2026 EPS guidance midpoint of $17.60 — with RSI(14) at 40.56 and price sitting 2.1% / 4.5% / 3.6% below its 20-, 50- and 200-day SMAs after a -5.64% one-month pullback.

AI sentimentNeutral

The market is lukewarm rather than bearish. Q2 2026 (reported 2026-07-24) beat on EPS and management raised FY26 revenue growth guidance to roughly 10%, yet as of 2026-09-13 the shares had fallen 5.64% over the trailing month and sat below every key moving average. The cause is mix, not demand: EPS guidance was held at $17.30-$17.90 while management flagged a ~10% sequential step-up in H2 marketing spend and card-member service costs that jumped 50% year-over-year to $1.95B, so investors are reading the revenue raise as cost-funded rather than operating leverage. Sell-side consensus is 'Hold' (23 buy / 30 hold / 4 sell) with a $378 consensus target — constructive on value, unconvinced on near-term catalysts. The 6-month return is still +8.24%, so this is a pullback inside an uptrend, not a broken chart.

Quarterly trend

Revenue has compounded smoothly: $17.18B in Q3 2023 to $21.60B in Q2 2026, with YoY growth clustered in a tight 8-10% band across the last eight quarters (+9.3%, +8.3%, +6.3%, +8.3%, +9.5%, +9.5%, +10.3%, +8.3%). Note the research brief quotes ~$19.6B and +10% for Q2 2026 — that is revenue net of interest expense versus the gross-revenue basis in the FMP data, a definitional difference rather than a discrepancy. Growth did tick down from +10.3% YoY in Q1 2026 to +8.3% in Q2 2026; that is deceleration but within normal quarterly noise, not a structural break. Earnings are the more honest signal and they are clearly decelerating at the margin: net income grew +15.0% YoY in Q1 2026 and +13.5% in Q4 2025 but only +7.8% in Q2 2026 ($3.110B), because the reinvestment caught up with the top line — diluted EPS still rose +12.3% to $4.58 on buybacks. One data caution: the reported operating-income line is unusable (Q2 2026 operating income of $9.34B versus $3.55B a year earlier while net income rose only 8%) — ignore it and read net income/EPS. Gross margin is stable at ~84-86%, the accruals ratio is -0.73% (cash generation exceeds reported net income, a conservative, healthy earnings pattern), and quarterly operating cash flow is extremely lumpy (Q3 2024: -$2.27B; Q3 2025: +$5.58B) because it swings with cardmember receivables and deposits — not a meaningful trend indicator for a lender.

Valuation assessment

Fair, with a modest premium to its own history. As of 2026-09-13, the TTM P/E is 19.69 versus a 5-year average of 18.63 (~6% above), while P/S of 2.608 is essentially identical to the 5-year average of 2.60. Forward numbers look cheaper than the trailing multiple implies: ~18.4x the FY2026 guidance midpoint of $17.60, and roughly 16.7x my 2027 EPS estimate of $19.45. A PEG of 1.221 on low-to-mid-teens EPS growth is reasonable for a franchise earning a 32.4% ROE. The 6.42x price-to-book looks alarming against a bank, but it is the arithmetic of buybacks plus a closed-loop network (equity of $34.3B against a $219B market cap), not a valuation signal — AXP earns 32 cents of profit per dollar of retained equity. Not cheap, not stretched: you are paying a fair price for a high-quality grower.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The stock is priced for roughly what the company is delivering — ~10% revenue growth and low-to-mid-teens EPS growth. The tension is that price fell 5.64% in the month into 2026-09-13 despite a Q2 EPS beat and a raised revenue guide, which means the market is discounting the margin story rather than the top line. H2 2026 is therefore an 'investment vs. expense' referendum: if the ~10% sequential marketing step-up and the 50% YoY increase in card-member service costs convert into billed business and a 2027 EPS beat, then ~17x 2027 earnings is too cheap and the multiple re-rates; if they don't, EPS guidance gets trimmed and an 18-19x multiple compresses alongside it. Q3 results on 2026-10-23 (consensus ~$4.58 EPS on ~$20.09B revenue) is where that resolves. At $324.69 you are paying for delivery, not for a rescue — there is no distressed optionality embedded in the price.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 40.56 — weak but not oversold — and price was 2.12% below the 20-day SMA (~$331.7), 4.49% below the 50-day (~$340), and 3.56% below the 200-day (~$336.7), putting every significant trend line overhead as resistance. The stock is mid-range in its 52-week band of $290.97-$387.49, roughly 16% below the high and ~12% above the low. The 6-month return is +8.24% while the 1-month is -5.64%, which reads as a pullback within an uptrend rather than a breakdown — but at RSI 40 there is no capitulation signal either. Entry timing: you are not being paid to catch this knife. Better setups are either RSI below 30 / a test of the $300-310 zone, or a decisive reclaim of the 50-day near $340 that confirms the pullback has ended.

Macro factors
  • Federal Reserve rate path — AXP is both an issuer (net interest income, where cuts compress NIM) and a closed-loop network (where cuts tend to support spending volume and credit quality); the net effect is mixed and rate-dependent, which is why the stock trades with rate expectations.
  • Consumer credit normalization — AXP's high-income/high-FICO cardmember skew insulates it from lower-income credit strain, but provisions and delinquency trends remain the single biggest swing factor in quarterly EPS and the main thing that would break the 'quality' narrative.
  • Premium rewards competition — Chase Sapphire, Capital One Venture X and ongoing co-brand refreshes keep customer acquisition costs structurally elevated, which is exactly the pressure showing up in the 50% YoY jump in card-member service costs and the planned H2 marketing step-up.
  • Payments structure and regulation — interchange scrutiny, mobile wallets, real-time payment rails and BNPL are long-duration threats to discount revenue; AXP's AI/agentic commerce developer-kit investments are the defensive response.
  • Financial sector rotation and capital return — financials are sensitive to curve steepening and deregulatory sentiment; AXP's Berkshire Hathaway association, ~1.0% dividend yield and steady buyback are a floor under sentiment during drawdowns.
  • Sector-specific data distortions — the deterministic screener's bank-style leverage and book-value tests are structurally awkward for AXP (11.1% equity/assets, 6.4x book), so parts of the ratio-based read overstate risk.
Key catalysts
  • Barclays Global Financial Services Conference on 2026-09-16 — management's operational update is the first chance to clarify whether the H2 marketing step-up is a temporary investment or the new run-rate of customer acquisition cost.
  • Q3 2026 earnings on 2026-10-23 — consensus is ~$4.58 EPS on ~$20.09B revenue; the key tells are billed business growth, the trajectory of card-member service costs, and whether FY26 EPS guidance of $17.30-$17.90 holds.
  • Conversion of H2 2026 reinvestment into 2027 revenue — if the marketing spend produces billings, 2027 EPS estimates move toward/above $20 and the ~16.7x forward multiple re-rates.
  • Capital return — continued buybacks plus a ~1.0% dividend yield; a year-end dividend increase or accelerated repurchase authorization would be a clean sentiment catalyst.
  • TheFork acquisition integration — small in dollar terms against a $219B market cap, but a signal on how aggressively management is building ecosystem engagement beyond the card.
  • Rate cuts — would pressure NIM but typically lift spending volume and ease credit; a soft-landing path is the most favorable macro setup for AXP's premium cardmember base.
Key risks
  • Reinvestment-driven margin compression — card-member service costs up 50% YoY to $1.95B and a ~10% sequential marketing increase could cap EPS upside in H2 2026 even if revenue keeps beating, which is precisely what the last month of price action is warning about.
  • Credit deterioration — a weakening labor market would raise provisions and hit EPS directly; AXP's premium skew makes it more resilient than mass-market issuers, but not immune, and the market is unlikely to wait for evidence before discounting it.
  • Premium rewards competition — sustained customer acquisition cost inflation would structurally lower the operating leverage that justifies a ~19x earnings multiple.
  • Rate and NIM sensitivity — the lending book's economics are tied to the Fed path; a faster-than-expected cutting cycle compresses net interest income even as spending holds up.
  • Multiple risk — at 19.69x TTM earnings, 6.42x book and a 32.4% ROE, the valuation embeds continued mid-teens EPS growth; a slowdown to high-single-digit growth would compress the multiple and the earnings estimate at the same time. Consensus is only 'Hold' with four sell ratings, so there is no valuation cushion if the reinvestment case fails.
  • Data-quality friction — the reported operating-income series is not internally consistent with net income, and operating cash flow swings violently quarter to quarter, making the headline numbers harder than average to read cleanly.
Investment thesis

AXP is a high-quality, cash-generative franchise grinding out 8-10% revenue growth and low-to-mid-teens EPS growth with a 32.4% ROE, negative accruals (earnings backed by cash) and a fortress premium cardmember base — but at $324.69 on 2026-09-13 it trades at ~18.4x FY26 guidance and ~16.7x my 2027 estimate, which is a fair price for that quality rather than a discount. The near-term set-up is genuinely two-sided: management raised revenue guidance but held EPS guidance while deliberately spending more on marketing and card-member service, so H2 2026 is a referendum on whether that spend is investment or cost inflation. With RSI at 40.56, price below all three key moving averages and consensus only 'Hold,' there is no urgency to own it here; the trade improves materially either on a pullback toward $300-310 / RSI near 30, or on evidence at Q3 (2026-10-23) that the reinvestment is converting into billings. This is analysis, not personalized financial advice.

AI theoretical price methodology

Forward P/E on FY2027 earnings: I took FY2026 EPS at the $17.60 guidance midpoint (the FMP 'next FY' consensus of $17.648 is effectively FY2026 given the ~$79.5B revenue estimate matches management's ~10% growth guide on ~$72B net revenue), grew it 10.5% — below the ~14% implied for 2026 — to $19.45 to reflect the H2 2026 marketing and card-member service cost step-up, then applied a 19.0x justified forward multiple (above the 18.63x 5-year average trailing P/E and below the 19.69x current TTM, supportable on 32.4% ROE, negative accruals and ~10% revenue growth, discounted for a 'Hold' consensus and premium-rewards competition). 19.0 x $19.45 ≈ $369.6, about 14% above the 2026-09-13 price of $324.69 and modestly below the $378 sell-side consensus target.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The 53.5 / 'Fair Fundamentals' band is directionally right but I would adjust it ~10 points higher, to roughly 62-64, and I would not treat it as a cyclical-trough misread — this is not a commodity or semiconductor name at the bottom of a cycle; revenue growth is stable at 8-10% and credit is healthy, so the backward-looking penalty is not hiding a turn. Two specific formula artifacts understate AXP. First, the growth leg (53.9) leans on operating cash flow YoY, which is close to noise for a lender: OCF fell 47% YoY in Q4 2025 and 20% in Q1 2026 purely on receivables/deposit swings while net income rose 13-15% and the accruals ratio sat at -0.73% (cash exceeding reported profit) — the opposite of an earnings-quality problem. Second, the ratio screener (47.7) penalizes P/B of 6.42 and P/C of 4.83, which are structural consequences of buybacks and a closed-loop network with a 32.4% ROE, not evidence of overvaluation; a bank-style book multiple applied to a premium card network misfires. Working the other way, the 15.0% → 7.8% YoY net-income deceleration and the planned H2 marketing/service-cost step-up are real reasons the score should not be pushed to 'Good' outright. Net: the band plausibly sits at the Fair/Good boundary, which is a one-tier shift at most. I checked the permitted deviation — the only dated event in the brief is the TheFork acquisition, which is immaterial against a $219B market cap and not a basis for overriding the fixed mapping, so overall_lean stays Neutral per the 'Fair Fundamentals' rule even though my score adjustment leans modestly more constructive than the raw 53.5.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.