← Back to Rankings

BALLBall Corporation

Fundamentals Score: 66.1/100 (Good Fundamentals) · Consumer Cyclical

Description

Ball Corporation serves as a global provider of aluminum packaging solutions for a broad spectrum of industries, including beverages, personal care items, and household goods. Its extensive reach covers the United States, Brazil, and numerous international markets.

Score Breakdown

Growth
76.2/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
57.3/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
59.4/100
weight: 15%
* Stockholders' equity moved -6% between 2024-12-31 and 2025-03-31 (vs. +94% for the same quarter a year earlier) in its reported financials - possibly a divestiture, spinoff, or major acquisition rather than organic performance. Growth/trend comparisons spanning this point may be distorted.
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral

Live Market DataPrice updated: 3m ago

P/E (TTM)
17.8
Yield
1.49%
RSI (14)
47.2
vs SMA20
-0.44%
vs SMA50
-0.51%
vs SMA200
+5.90%
Analyst Target
$76
+20.6%
3 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$72
+15.4%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, Ball Corporation trades at $63.37, down about 1.1% from the prior close, after a Q2 2026 earnings beat and six consecutive quarters of volume growth. The stock is roughly 7% below its 52-week high of $68.29 and trades at about 15.8x forward earnings.

AI Sentiment:Bullish

Market tone is positive: Q2 2026 adjusted EPS of $1.03 beat the $0.99 consensus on revenue of $3.99B versus $3.68B expected, and BALL posted its sixth straight quarter of positive volume growth. Analyst coverage skews Buy-heavy with price targets averaging around $75, and the stock remains above all major moving averages despite a small pullback on the analysis date.

Quarterly Trend

The trend is clearly accelerating, not just a blip. Revenue grew from a low of $2.878B in Q4 2024 to $3.997B in Q2 2026, with YoY revenue growth accelerating from roughly 9% in Q3 2025 to 16% in Q4 2025, 16% in Q1 2026, and about 20% in Q2 2026. Operating margins also inflected higher, from 5.4% in Q2 2025 to 12.8% in Q2 2026, though Q1 quarters are seasonally softer. The Q1 2024 net income spike of $3.685B and EPS of $11.70 is a one-off divestiture gain and should be excluded from underlying trend analysis.

Valuation Assessment

Cheap versus its own history and reasonable in absolute terms. As of 2026-08-27, trailing P/E was 17.95x versus the 5-year average of 20.8x, and price/sales was 1.18x versus the 5-year average of 1.47x. Forward P/E is about 15.8x using next-fiscal-year consensus EPS of $4.02. The 0.22 PEG ratio is distorted by the post-divestiture earnings base and should not be taken literally. The 1.49% dividend yield adds a modest floor.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

At $63.37, the market is pricing in a decent but not exciting outcome: roughly $4.00 of forward EPS at about 16x, below the stock's own 5-year average of nearly 21x. If BALL delivers its guided 10%+ EPS growth and more than $900M of free cash flow, the multiple should normalize toward 18x, putting fair value in the $72-$75 zone. If volume growth disappoints or aluminum costs squeeze margins, the current multiple is roughly fair. The asymmetry looks favorable.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI(14) was 52.8, squarely neutral — neither overbought nor oversold. The $63.37 price sat 0.4% above the 20-day SMA, 1.4% above the 50-day SMA, and 8.1% above the 200-day SMA. That is a healthy uptrend, not an extended one, and suggests patient buyers may get better entries near the 50-day rather than needing to chase.

Macro Factors
  • Aluminum input costs and supply chain dynamics; pass-through contracts help but create timing lags.
  • Interest rates: with $6.5B of long-term debt and a 1.26 debt-to-equity ratio, higher-for-longer rates pressure interest expense and valuation multiples.
  • Sustainability and regulatory tailwinds: plastic bans and circular-economy targets continue to support aluminum beverage can share gains.
  • Consumer spending: global beverage volumes are resilient, but a demand slowdown would hit can shipments and price/mix.
  • Inflation in labor, energy, and freight can squeeze margins between contract resets.
Key Catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings expected in early November: investors will watch for a seventh consecutive quarter of volume growth and confirmation of 10%+ EPS growth and >$900M FCF.
  • Capital returns: completion of the $800M+ buyback and dividend commitment in 2026, plus any sign of a higher dividend or expanded repurchase authorization.
Key Risks
  • High leverage: long-term debt of $6.53B and debt-to-equity of 1.26x leave limited cushion if cash flow stalls; interest expense is the main bridge between strong operating income and more modest net income.
  • Aluminum cost pass-through lags can compress margins between contract resets.
  • Customer concentration: a small number of large global beverage customers drive much of the volume; losing a major account or a destocking cycle would hurt.
  • Demand cyclicality: if consumer beverage spending weakens or sustainability-driven can substitution slows, the current volume growth streak could reverse.
Investment Thesis

At $63.37, BALL looks like a good investment: accelerating volume, roughly 20% YoY revenue growth in Q2 2026, improving margins, stronger free cash flow, and a multiple below its own 5-year average. The leveraged balance sheet is the main qualifier, but the risk/reward skews positive. This is analysis, not personalized investment advice.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Applied an 18.0x justified P/E to consensus forward EPS of $4.02 — a discount to Ball's 20.8x 5-year average P/E to account for 1.26x debt/equity and packaging cyclicality, but a premium to the current ~15.8x forward multiple given accelerating volumes and >$900M FCF guidance. 18.0 × $4.02 ≈ $72.41.

AI Lean: BullishConfidence: Low

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Agree

The 66.1 Good Fundamentals score is a fair, slightly conservative read. The deterministic formula is backward-looking and its quality/profitability component is partly penalized by the mid-2025 margin trough — Q2 2025 operating margin was just 5.4% — and by the equity discontinuity caused by the Q1 2024 divestiture gain. Live data through Q2 2026 shows 20% revenue growth and a 12.8% operating margin, which would push my independent score a few points higher, but not enough to change the Good band. I agree with the score rather than treating its blind spots as a reason to override it.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.