BBY — Best Buy Co., Inc.
Best Buy Co., Inc. operates as a prominent technology retailer across the United States and Canada. Its business structure is segmented into Domestic and International operations.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, BBY traded at $90.80 (market cap $19.1B), pinned to the top of its 52-week $55.10-$91.37 range after a +45.1% six-month run. The 2026-08-27 Q2 FY27 beat-and-raise (comps +4.1%, EPS $1.48, FY27 EPS guidance lifted to $6.70-$6.90) is the story; the sell-side is notably less convinced, with a Hold consensus and an average target ($84-$88) below the current price.
As of 2026-09-13 the tape is decisively bullish: +9.4% in one month, +15.6% in three months, +45.1% in six months, and a +3.1% single-day move to $90.80 on the snapshot date. The driver is the 2026-08-27 Q2 FY27 print - revenue $9.78B (+3.6% YoY vs. ~$9.59B expected), comps +4.1%, adjusted EPS $1.47-$1.48 vs. the $1.37-$1.39 consensus, plus raised FY27 comp (1.9-3.0%) and EPS ($6.70-$6.90) guidance. The caveat is that professionals are not chasing: the analyst consensus rating is Hold (0 strong buy / 11 buy / 24 hold / 6 sell) and the average target of $84.08 ($88.45 recent average, $60-$100 range) sits below the 2026-09-13 price - here the market, not the sell-side, is setting the pace.
Trailing three years are flat; the last two quarters are an inflection, not a blip. Revenue: FY25 (ended Feb 2025) $41.5B vs. FY26 (ended Jan 2026) $41.7B - essentially no growth, with mixed quarterly YoY into early 2026 (Q3 FY26 +2.4%, Q4 FY26 -1.0%). Then Q1 FY27 (quarter ended 2026-05-02) grew +1.9% to $8.94B and Q2 FY27 (2026-08-01) grew +3.6% to $9.78B - two consecutive quarters of accelerating top line, and management raised FY27 comp guidance to +1.9-3.0%. Margins are moving the right way with it: gross margin 23.91% in Q2 FY27 vs. 23.25% a year earlier (+66bps), operating margin 4.31% vs. 3.87% (+44bps); TTM operating margin is 4.4% and net margin 3.0% - both thin and structurally capped, but the direction is up. EPS is where the inflection is loudest: $1.48 in Q2 FY27 vs. $0.88 a year ago (+68%), and $1.31 in Q1 FY27 vs. $0.95 (+38%). Two distortions matter when reading the raw series: Q4 FY25 (2025-02-01) operating income was crushed to $217M (1.56% margin) by a charge, which flatters the Q4 FY26 comp ($693M, 5.02% margin); and Q3 FY26 (2025-11-01) GAAP EPS fell to $0.66 from $1.26 even though revenue rose 2.4% and operating income rose 4.0% - that gap is a below-the-line item, so the GAAP EPS history understates the operating trend. Cash generation is real: TTM FCF $1.77B, with normal retail seasonality (negative in the November quarter on inventory build, big generation in the January quarter). Verdict: an early-cycle acceleration on top of a structurally flat, low-margin base.
Fair, not cheap. As of 2026-09-13, the TTM P/E of 15.08 is above BBY's own 5-year average of 13.88, and P/S of 0.453 is ~10% above the 5-year average of 0.41 - on trailing numbers you are paying a premium to this company's own recent history. Forward numbers look better: $90.80 / $6.807 next-FY consensus EPS = ~13.3x, and $90.80 / $6.80 (midpoint of the raised FY27 guidance) = ~13.4x, i.e., roughly in line with and slightly below the 13.88x 5-year average. The cash-flow metrics are the most supportive: TTM FCF $1.77B on a $19.1B market cap is a ~9.2% FCF yield, the dividend is ~4.2% at $90.80 ($0.96/quarter; FMP's 5.112% yield appears to be struck off a lower/lagged price), and the balance sheet carries net cash ($2,255M cash vs. $1,158M long-term debt). Ignore the 0.232 PEG - Best Buy has never grown EPS fast enough to justify a PEG that low; the recent recovery is distorting it. P/B of 6.03 is an artifact of buybacks shrinking equity to $3.18B, not a quality signal. Net: fairly valued for a no-moat, ~3% net-margin, low-single-digit-growth retailer, with cash flow the bull case and trailing multiples the bear case.
The stock trades above where the average analyst thinks it will be in 12 months ($90.80 as of 2026-09-13 vs. a $84.08 consensus target, $88.45 recent average, $60-$100 range), which tells you the market has already paid for the FY27 recovery management just guided to. Because the forward multiple is only ~13.3-13.4x, the risk isn't multiple excess - it's estimate durability: FY28 consensus EPS of $6.807 is essentially flat with FY27's guided midpoint of $6.80, so the Street is modeling the recovery as a one-year event. Read it this way: if comps keep running above the +1.9-3.0% FY27 guide on the AI-PC/phone refresh cycle, estimates have room to ratchet up and this grinds higher on beats; if Q2 FY27 proves to be a replacement-cycle bump that fades in FY28, the stock is at full value today and downside points to the high-$70s/low-$80s, where a 12-13x multiple on $6.30-$6.50 of earnings would sit. Also respect the GAAP/adjusted gap - Q3 FY26 headline EPS of $0.66 against operating income that actually rose 4% shows how much a single quarter's below-the-line item can mislead.
As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 60.19 - firm, not overbought - with the $90.80 price at +4.97% vs. the 20-day SMA, +6.85% vs. the 50-day, and +26.54% vs. the 200-day, essentially at the top of the $55.10-$91.37 52-week range. That is a textbook uptrend that is also stretched: 26.5% above the 200-day is a lot of distance, and there is no obvious nearby support until roughly the mid-$80s where the 50-day sits - which happens to coincide with where sell-side targets cluster ($84-$88). Implication: the trend favors holders, but this is a poor spot to initiate. Either wait for a pullback into the mid-$80s or size small with a stop below the 50-day and accept whipsaw risk; RSI rolling back below ~50 while price holds the 50-day would be the healthier entry setup.
- Consumer electronics replacement cycle: an early-stage cyclical recovery and product refresh (computing, phones, AI-enabled PCs) is the single biggest swing factor in BBY comps and the direct cause of the Q2 FY27 inflection.
- Interest rates and big-ticket discretionary demand: moderating rate expectations support appliance and premium-TV financing and purchases, but renewed inflation or a rate backup hits precisely BBY's highest-ticket categories.
- Tariffs and imported-electronics cost inflation: a large share of the product sold is imported, and tariff-driven cost pass-through can compress a 4.4% operating margin very quickly - a live risk to the FY27 margin guide.
- Competition from Amazon/Walmart and e-commerce price transparency: this structurally caps gross margin near 23% and is the main reason BBY does not earn a premium multiple regardless of where the cycle is.
- Housing turnover: appliance and installation/services revenue tracks home sales, which remain subdued - a slow-burn headwind to mix and attach rates.
- CEO transition effective 2026-11-01: Jason Bonfig succeeds Corie Barry, with Anne Bramman having taken over as CFO on 2026-08-19 - a full leadership reset that investors will read for any change in strategy or capital allocation priorities.
- Q3 FY27 earnings in late November 2026: first look at back-to-school results, holiday inventory health, and promotional intensity, plus an early read on whether comps can hold above the FY27 guide.
- Holiday 2026 sell-through of AI-enabled PCs and phones: the clearest test of whether the Q2 acceleration is a durable replacement cycle or a one-quarter bump.
- Further upward revisions to FY27 guidance (currently comps +1.9-3.0%, EPS $6.70-$6.90) or an initial FY28 framework that shows growth beyond the flat $6.807 consensus.
- Scaling of Best Buy Ads and the Marketplace platform - higher-margin revenue that could lift the 4.4% operating margin structurally rather than cyclically.
- No moat and structurally thin economics: 4.4% TTM operating margin, 3.0% net margin, and revenue flat for three years ($41.5B FY25 vs. $41.7B FY26) with Amazon and Walmart on both sides of the business.
- FY28 consensus EPS of $6.807 is flat with FY27's guided midpoint of $6.80 - if the refresh cycle is one-and-done, estimates and the multiple compress at the same time.
- Valuation and technical stretch: +45.1% in six months, +26.5% above the 200-day, and an average analyst target ($84.08) below the 2026-09-13 price of $90.80 - momentum reversals in names like this are fast and unforgiving.
- Tariff/import cost inflation squeezing a 4.4% operating margin: these margins are too thin to absorb much cost pressure without a guidance cut.
- Leadership transition risk: a new CEO (Nov 1, 2026) and a new CFO (Aug 19, 2026) within roughly ten weeks of each other is a lot of simultaneous change for a business that runs on execution discipline.
- Balance-sheet optics: $12.9B of liabilities against $3.18B of equity, current ratio 1.117 and quick ratio 0.412 - manageable for a retailer that turns inventory quickly, but there is little cushion if operating cash flow turns.
Best Buy just printed a real inflection - comps +4.1%, EPS +68% YoY, gross margin +66bps, guidance raised - and generates roughly $1.77B of TTM free cash flow against a $19B market cap, with net cash on the balance sheet. Nothing here is broken. But as of 2026-09-13 at $90.80, up 45% in six months and trading above the average sell-side target, that recovery is already in the price, and the Street's FY28 EPS estimate of $6.807 is flat with FY27's guided midpoint. The honest read: a fairly valued, cash-generative, low-growth retailer - not a buy at this level, but a defensible hold with a buy-the-pullback bias into the mid-$80s.
Applied a ~13.5x forward P/E - just below BBY's own 5-year average of 13.88x, reflecting flat FY28 consensus EPS growth ($6.807 vs. FY27 guidance midpoint of $6.80) but supported by net cash ($2,255M cash vs. $1,158M long-term debt) and a ~4.2% dividend at the 2026-09-13 price - to forward EPS of $6.80 (13.5 x 6.80 = $91.80, rounded to $92). Cross-checked with cash flow: normalizing FCF to ~$1.6B (between FY26's $1.26B and the $1.77B TTM) at an 8-8.5% FCF yield brackets $89-$95 per share, so $92 sits mid-range and lands almost exactly on top of the 2026-09-13 price of $90.80 - i.e., the stock is close to fairly valued, not cheap.
The 50.9 / 'Fair Fundamentals' score is directionally right, and the quality pillar (60.5) correctly credits a 17.4% ROIC and a -3.76% accruals ratio on the 2026-08-01 quarter (cash earnings running well ahead of reported net income). I would nudge the score higher - to roughly 55-57, still 'Fair' - for two reasons the formula cannot see. First, the ratio screener (45.8, half the blended score) penalizes a 6.07x P/B and 0.41 quick ratio that are artifacts of buyback-shrunk equity ($3.18B) and inventory-heavy retail working capital, not financial distress. Second, the growth pillar (52.3) is purely trailing, so it is blind to the Q2 FY27 inflection (comps +4.1%, EPS +68% YoY, GM +66bps, guidance raised) and equally blind to the below-the-line item that depressed Q3 FY26 GAAP EPS while operating income actually rose 4%. That is a <10-point adjustment, so Agree rather than Partially Agree - and the band stays 'Fair.' Note on the deviation rule: the 2026-11-01 CEO succession is a dated event, but it is a leadership change, not an announced acquisition, bankruptcy, restatement, or fraud disclosure, so I am applying the mandated band-to-lean mapping (Fair Fundamentals -> Neutral) exactly rather than deviating. If the refresh cycle persists into FY28, this score will look stale within two quarters.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.