BEN — Franklin Resources, Inc.
Fundamentals Score: 41.6/100 (Weak Fundamentals) · Financial Services
Franklin Resources, Inc. is a publicly owned asset investment manager. Through its subsidiaries, the firm provides its services to individuals, institutions, pension plans, trusts, and partnerships.
Score Breakdown
Live Market DataPrice updated: 3h ago
AI Deep-Dive Analysis
Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market dataAs of 2026-08-27, BEN traded at $34.82 — near its 52-week high of $36.28 and 23.5% above its 200-day SMA — with RSI at 59.8 and a 3.95% dividend yield. The Q3 FY26 adjusted EPS beat and roughly $1.8T AUM support positive momentum, but the analyst consensus is Hold with an average target near the current price.
The market is cautiously optimistic, not exuberant: the stock has rallied after a Q3 FY26 adjusted EPS beat ($0.72 vs. $0.66 expected), AUM reached ~$1.8T, and institutional flows look supportive. But the analyst breakdown is 6 buys, 16 holds, and 5 sells, and the consensus price target of ~$34.6 is essentially in line with the $34.82 quote — so sentiment is positive on the tape but neutral on forward return potential.
Revenue has inflected upward: Q3 FY26 revenue rose to $2.358B, up 14.3% year-over-year from $2.064B, and is the highest quarter in the dataset. TTM operating margin improved to roughly 9.7% (TTM operating income of $905.5M on $9.324B revenue) from roughly 4.3% a year earlier, though quarterly margins remain bumpy — Q3 FY26 came in at 9.2% versus Q2 FY26's 14.1%. TTM net income is about $891M. The last four reported GAAP EPS prints were $0.31, $0.52, $0.46, and $0.21, showing a recovery off 2024-2025 one-off charges, but the gap between reported EPS and adjusted EPS is still large, so earnings quality has not fully caught up with the momentum.
On trailing GAAP, BEN looks expensive: P/E of 23.2x versus the 5-year average of 16.0x, and P/S of 1.94x versus 1.42x. Those trailing multiples are distorted by charges and impairments, however. Against the next-FY estimated EPS of $2.892, the stock trades around 12.0x forward earnings, and the 3.95% dividend yield provides a floor. Net-net, valuation is fair-to-rich: not a deep value on forward adjusted numbers, but clearly rich versus its own history on trailing fundamentals.
At $34.82, the stock is already pricing in a meaningful earnings recovery to roughly $2.89 of forward EPS. It is not pricing in runaway growth; rather, it is betting that reported GAAP earnings converge upward to adjusted EPS and that organic outflows stabilize. If that recovery materializes, the stock is roughly fairly valued. If the GAAP/adjusted gap persists or flows worsen, there is room to re-rate toward the low-$30s.
As of 2026-08-27, RSI was 59.8 — firm but not overbought. Price was 1.6% above the 20-day SMA, 3.5% above the 50-day SMA, and 23.5% above the 200-day SMA. That is a strong uptrend, but after moving from a $21.11 low to near the $36.28 high, the reward/risk for a fresh entry is poor without a pullback. Support is roughly at the 50-day SMA near $33.6, then the 200-day SMA near $28.2.
- Secular shift from active mutual funds to passive ETFs continues to pressure Franklin's traditional fund flows and fee rates.
- Interest-rate path matters: higher-for-longer supports cash and fixed-income products but can restrain risk appetite and pressure private-credit valuations.
- Private credit and secondaries demand is a tailwind — the August 2026 $1.5B collateralized fund obligation close shows institutional appetite for high-margin alternatives.
- Global equity valuations are near highs; a market drawdown would directly reduce AUM, fee revenue, and performance fees.
- Q4 FY2026 earnings in late October/early November 2026 — any FY2027 guidance will test the ~$2.89 forward EPS estimate.
- Monthly AUM reports: a sustained turn to organic net inflows would be the strongest bull catalyst.
- Further private-markets expansion, including additional CFO/private-credit/secondaries fund closes from Lexington Partners and Benefit Street Partners.
- Dividend mechanics: ex-dividend date September 30, 2026, payable October 9, 2026.
- Persistent organic net outflows in active equity and mutual fund products; roughly half of AUM beating peer medians is not a compelling performance story.
- Re-rating risk: at 23.2x trailing P/E and 1.94x trailing P/S versus 5-year averages of 16.0x and 1.42x, there is little valuation cushion if estimates slip.
- Elevated leverage: long-term debt of $13.33B versus $11.74B of equity raises interest expense and financial flexibility concerns.
- Private credit and secondaries are credit-sensitive; a downturn could expose the recent expansion to losses or redemptions.
- GAAP earnings remain volatile; future one-off charges or fair-value marks could keep reported EPS well below adjusted EPS.
BEN is a 'show me' stock, not a buy at $34.82. The private-markets pivot is real and the Q3 FY26 beat is encouraging, but the combination of a rich valuation versus the company's own history, structurally challenged organic flows, and a leveraged balance sheet skews risk/reward to the downside until either the price compresses or organic inflows and clean GAAP earnings confirm the recovery.
Calculated as 11.5x next-FY estimated EPS of $2.892. The 11.5 multiple is a deliberate discount to BEN's 5-year average P/E of 16.0x and the current ~12.0x forward multiple, reflecting structural outflows, $13.33B of long-term debt, and the fact that the $2.892 estimate is an adjusted/recovery number versus $1.73 of trailing GAAP EPS. 11.5 × $2.892 = $33.26.
AI Review of the Deterministic Score
The deterministic score of 41.6 ('Weak Fundamentals') is directionally fair but a bit too harsh. The formula is backward-looking and penalizes the 2024-2025 trough caused by charges and impairments; current evidence — revenue up 14.3% YoY, TTM operating margin up to roughly 9.7%, the Q3 FY26 adjusted EPS beat, and the $1.5B private-markets close — points to an earnings inflection the formula cannot see. I would shade the score into the mid-50s, which would lift the band from Weak to Fair. I would not move it higher, because the score correctly flags weak free-cash-flow seasonality, high leverage, and a rich trailing valuation.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.