#170S&P 500 rank

BF-B — Brown-Forman Corporation

2-yr score: 54.6/100 (Middle 40%)Consumer Defensive
$28.18+0.28%
Description

Brown-Forman Corporation, along with its subsidiaries, operates globally within the alcoholic beverage industry. The company is actively involved in the production, distillation, bottling, international trade (importing and exporting), marketing, and sale of a diverse portfolio of alcoholic products.

Score breakdownLatest quarter52.0 · Fair
Growth
37.2
Quality / Profitability
50.7
Financial health
84.1
Ratio screener
54.3
Track record: 2-yr avg 54.6 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 55.1 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Dec 3, 2026 (in 42 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:23 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
18.3
Yield
3.36%
RSI (14)
61.2
vs SMA20
+4.63%
vs SMA50
+4.21%
vs SMA200
+4.57%
Analyst target
N/A
AI theoretical price
$29
+2.9%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, BF-B traded at $26.22 (market cap ~$12.2B), a 17.0x trailing P/E against a 5-year average of 27.3x, yielding 3.36%, and sitting in the lower-middle of its $22.61-$31.92 52-week range after a -6.09% month. The stock is cheap versus its own history but is being held down by flat-to-declining volumes and a post-earnings drift following the September 2 Q1 FY27 report.

AI sentimentNeutral

Sentiment as of 2026-09-13 is neutral-to-cautious, matching the Street's consensus 'Hold' (24 Holds, 5 Buys, 7 Sells). The September 2, 2026 Q1 FY27 print was a mixed bag: net sales of $911M fell 1% YoY and slightly missed (~$915-918M expected), but EPS of $0.38 beat ($0.37 expected), gross margin expanded to ~60.2%, and management reaffirmed full-year guidance toward the favorable end of its range. Wall Street targets are genuinely split (UBS at $30 citing a deep valuation discount versus JPMorgan 'Underweight' at $25 on weak developed-market volumes), which is why the stock has drifted -6.09% over the past month without collapsing. Two overhangs add uncertainty rather than clarity: the July 2026 unsolicited acquisition proposal from Sazerac, and the pending retirement of CEO Lawson Whiting.

Quarterly trend

The three-year trend is stabilization at a lower level, not accelerating growth. Quarterly revenue has drifted from $1,107M (Oct-2023) to $911M (Jul-2026), but the YoY path is uneven rather than a straight decline: -5.4% in the Jan-2026 quarter ($1,036M vs $1,095M), then +2.0% in Apr-2026 ($912M vs $894M), +2.0% in Jan-2026 vs prior year, and -1.4% in the Jul-2026 quarter ($911M vs $924M). Margins are the better story: gross margin has run 57-63% and expanded YoY in the most recent quarter to ~60.2% from ~59.7%, with TTM operating margin a healthy 28.6% and net margin 18.4%. The EPS series (0.50, 0.60, 0.56, 0.41, 0.55, 0.57, 0.31, 0.36, 0.47, 0.56, 0.12, 0.38) shows one clear outlier: the Apr-2026 quarter earned $54M net income on $216M operating income — a ~$115M below-the-line hit that is almost certainly a one-off item and is what dragged TTM EPS to $1.572. Ex that quarter, underlying earnings are roughly flat to modestly up, and Q1 FY27 net income rose 3.5% YoY ($176M vs $170M) with FCF of $161M. Verdict: cyclical trough with early stabilization signals, not (yet) an inflection.

Valuation assessment

Cheap versus its own history, fair-to-slightly-cheap in absolute terms as of 2026-09-13. The trailing P/E of 17.0x is a ~38% discount to the 5-year average of 27.3x, and P/S of 3.12x is a ~45% discount to the 5-year average of 5.65x — levels not seen since the financial crisis era. The PEG ratio of -1.219 is mathematically meaningless here (negative growth denominator), so ignore it. Forward math is more informative: FY27 consensus EPS of $1.707 puts the stock at ~15.4x forward earnings, with a 3.36% dividend yield covered roughly 2.2x by TTM free cash flow (~$925M, a ~7.6% FCF yield on a $12.2B market cap). EV/EBITDA of ~13.3x is not distressed and sits near global spirits peers (Diageo/Pernod in the mid-to-high teens P/E), so this is a de-rating to a new normal baseline more than an obvious mispricing. The discount is real but largely earned by low growth.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market has already repriced BF-B from a premium compounder multiple (27x) to a mature-staples multiple (17x trailing / 15.4x forward), so the volume-decline narrative is substantially in the price — that is the bullish case for patient money. The catch: the forward number itself is optimistic. With Q1 FY27 EPS at $0.38, hitting the $1.707 full-year estimate requires the remaining three quarters to deliver roughly $1.33 versus $1.15 in the comparable prior-year quarters — about +15% YoY — off a base where revenue is declining. If US takeaway and European volumes do not firm into the holiday season, the 'cheap' forward P/E gets revised higher rather than the price getting revised lower. Buyers here are underwriting a second-half FY27 volume/margin recovery plus a one-off-charge-free year; sellers are underwriting structural volume decline. Watch the December print for which one is winning.

Technical picture

Weak but not washed out as of 2026-09-13. RSI(14) was 41.22 — below neutral, above oversold. The stock was 4.28% below its 20-day SMA, 3.51% below its 50-day, and 3.66% below its 200-day, with -6.09% over one month and -1.91% over one week, even though it is still +11.62% over six months. Those three moving averages cluster tightly around $27.17-$27.39 (implied), so the $27.2-$27.4 zone is the line in the sand: a reclaim would signal the six-month basing pattern is intact, while continued failure there keeps the stock range-bound between $22.61 and $31.92 with a downward bias. This is not an oversold bounce setup; it is a 'wait for a higher low or a reclaim of the 200-day' setup. Entry-timing implication: scale in on weakness near the low-to-mid $20s or wait for confirmation above ~$27.3.

Macro factors
  • Post-pandemic spirits demand normalization: volumes are contracting across developed markets as consumers trade down and pull back on discretionary on-premise spend, with US takeaway only gradually recovering from a soft winter trough.
  • RTD (ready-to-drink) is the one genuinely growing spirits category and is acting as Brown-Forman's top-line buffer via Jack Daniel's Tennessee Blackberry (30+ markets) and New Mix innovation.
  • Developed international consumer retrenchment and FX: European and other developed-market weakness dragged organic volumes and helped create the gap between reported operating income (-7% YoY in Q1 FY27) and the ~4% organic operating income gain management cited.
  • Defensive sector rotation: with a 0.331 beta and a 3.36% dividend, BF-B periodically catches safety-driven inflows during macro volatility, oil spikes and inflation anxiety, which is part of why the stock is +11.62% over six months despite flat fundamentals.
  • Rate and regulatory sensitivity: a bond-proxy staples profile makes the shares sensitive to rate moves, while excise/regulatory pressure and health-and-moderation trends (including GLP-1-driven reduced alcohol consumption) weigh on the long-term volume outlook for the whole category.
Key catalysts
  • Q2 FY27 earnings in early December 2026 (provisionally Dec 3-9): holiday-season takeaway in the US and Europe, plus confirmation or revision of the reaffirmed FY27 guidance and the ambitious ~+15% YoY implied EPS run-rate for the remaining three quarters.
  • CEO succession: formal announcement and timeline for replacing retiring CEO Lawson Whiting; the incoming CEO's capital-allocation stance (brand reinvestment vs. cost discipline vs. M&A) is a genuine strategy fork.
  • Any renewal or resolution of the July 2026 unsolicited Sazerac acquisition proposal — a live (if informal) takeover interest that gives the stock a strategic floor it did not have a year ago.
  • Innovation/RTD execution: whether Jack Daniel's Tennessee Blackberry, New Mix and the revived Kentucky Boy bourbon can offset core whiskey and tequila volume declines, plus whether gross margin holds at ~60%.
  • Multiple re-rating potential: at 15.4x forward earnings versus a 5-year average of 27.3x trailing, even a partial re-rating plus modest earnings growth would produce a solid total return — but only if volume growth stops going backwards.
Key risks
  • The decline may be structural, not cyclical. Moderation, GLP-1 usage and younger consumers drinking less could make the current 17x multiple deserved rather than a discount, in which case 'cheap vs. its own history' is a value trap.
  • Earnings-quality/fresh-charge risk: the Apr-2026 quarter showed $54M net income against $216M operating income — a large below-the-line hit. If similar charges, impairments or write-downs recur, the $1.572 trailing EPS and the 15.4x forward P/E both understate how expensive the stock really is.
  • Guidance execution risk: FY27 consensus EPS of $1.707 requires ~15% YoY growth across the remaining three quarters while revenue is flat-to-down; a single soft holiday quarter likely forces estimate cuts.
  • Leadership/governance risk: CEO transition plus a family-controlled dual-class A/B structure during a demand downturn creates execution and capital-allocation uncertainty.
  • International and FX risk: European and developed-market consumer weakness and currency translation have already created a roughly 11-point gap between reported and organic operating performance in the latest quarter.
  • Sector de-rating risk: at ~13.3x EV/EBITDA, BF-B is not obviously cheap versus spirits peers on that metric; further peer compression would cap upside regardless of BF-B's own execution.
Investment thesis

Brown-Forman is a high-quality, cash-generative, low-beta franchise with a fortress balance sheet (current ratio 3.26x, debt/equity 0.62, ~$925M TTM free cash flow) and a well-covered 3.36% dividend, trading at 17x trailing and ~15.4x forward earnings versus a 27.3x five-year average — but the discount is earned, not gifted. Revenue is flat-to-down, developed-market volumes are contracting, and the forward EPS number embeds a ~15% YoY second-half recovery that is not visible in the top line. At $26 the stock is a reasonable income/value holding with a favorable risk/reward skew versus its own history and a live takeover-flavored floor, but it is not a compelling growth story and there is no technical or fundamental confirmation of a turn yet.

AI theoretical price methodology

I applied a justified 17.0x forward P/E to next-FY consensus EPS of $1.707, giving $29.02 (rounded to $29.00). The 17x multiple is deliberately below the stock's 5-year average of 27.3x trailing — reflecting a structurally slower growth profile than the 2019-2023 premium era — but above the current 15.4x forward, because Jack Daniel's brand strength, a 28.6% operating margin, a 13.3% ROIC and a fortress balance sheet warrant a modest premium to the global spirits peer group. Cross-checking with a 13x forward EV/EBITDA on ~$1.19B of forward EBITDA less ~$2.1B net debt implies roughly $28.70 of equity value per share, which corroborates the P/E-based figure within ~1%.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

The 52.0 / 'Fair Fundamentals' band is an honest read on a mature, low-growth spirits business, and I would not move it a full tier. My independent adjustments are real but modest (under ~10 points): the growth score of 37.2 legitimately reflects flat-to-down revenue, but it is a backward-looking lens applied to a sector in a post-pandemic demand-normalization trough (US takeaway recovering, RTDs growing, gross margin +40bps to 60.2%, organic operating income +4%), and the quality score of 50.7 is dragged by a quarter (Apr-2026) where $216M of operating income produced only $54M of net income — a below-the-line one-off that depressed TTM EPS to $1.572 and mechanically worsened trailing metrics. Accruals of 0.04% and financial health of 84.1 are legitimately strong and I would not touch them. Re-scoring growth to ~50 and quality to ~60 on a trough-adjusted basis lifts the fundamentals-only pillar to the high-50s and the blended composite to roughly 57 — still 'Fair,' so I agree rather than partially agree. The excluded 'cheap vs. its own history' overlay (98.6) does not change the band but does tilt the entry math favorably. Note on the mandated mapping: I considered the July 2026 unsolicited Sazerac proposal, but as an unsolicited approach that was addressed by the board and never became an announced transaction, it does not meet the bar for a dated-event deviation — so the Fair Fundamentals + Cheap valuation combination maps to Neutral exactly as the table requires.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.