#288S&P 500 rank

BG — Bunge Global S.A.

2-yr score: 48.6/100 (Middle 40%)Consumer Defensive7d
$102.23−0.75%
Description

Bunge Global S.A., established in 1818 and headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, operates as a prominent international agribusiness and food corporation.

Score breakdownLatest quarter53.3 · Fair
Growth
90.2
Quality / Profitability
36.2
Financial health
65.6
Ratio screener
41.6
Track record: 2-yr avg 48.6 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 45.1 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 29, 2026 (in 7 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Favorable (oversold / below trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:23 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
19.7
Yield
2.48%
RSI (14)
36.1
vs SMA20
-3.99%
vs SMA50
-9.13%
vs SMA200
-12.72%
Analyst target
$140
+36.9%
3 analysts
AI theoretical price
$124
+21.0%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, BG trades at $122.41, up 9.54% over the past month and above its 20/50/200-day moving averages, after a Q2 2026 earnings beat and a raised FY26 adjusted EPS guide of $9.25-$9.75. Trailing P/E is 23.8x on depressed TTM EPS of $5.153, while forward P/E on the $9.517 next-FY estimate is about 12.9x.

AI sentimentNeutral

Sell-side consensus remains Buy (21 buy / 4 hold) with price targets around $140-$151.67, but sentiment is tempered: UBS trimmed its target to $115 and Zacks downgraded BG to Hold on valuation. The stock has rallied 9.54% in the last month but is still down 3.74% over three months, reflecting mixed conviction on whether Q2 2026 processing-margin strength and Viterra synergies are durable.

Quarterly trend

Revenue stepped up from roughly $11.6B-$13.5B per quarter pre-Q3 2025 to $21.9B-$24.0B thereafter, clearly driven by Viterra consolidation rather than organic growth. Underlying earnings are cyclical: EPS was $4.19 in Q4 2023, then fell to $0.48 in Q2 2024, $0.85 in Q3 2025, $0.49 in Q4 2025, and $0.35 in Q1 2026 before rebounding to $3.46 in Q2 2026. Q2 2026 operating margin of 4.5% and net margin of 2.8% are well above the TTM operating margin of 2.3%, suggesting a cyclical inflection, but grain merchandising remains weak and the TTM trend is still depressed.

Valuation assessment

As of 2026-09-13, at $122.41, BG trades at 23.8x TTM EPS of $5.153 and about 12.9x the $9.517 next-FY EPS estimate. That is rich versus its own 5-year average P/E of 10.0x on trailing numbers, but the forward multiple is only a modest premium and is below the 14x+ implied by analyst targets. P/B is 1.50 and P/S is 0.256 versus a 5-year average P/S of 0.22. I would call it fairly valued to slightly expensive: the stock already discounts a meaningful earnings recovery.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The stock is not pricing a no-growth commodity processor; it is pricing a recovery from depressed TTM EPS. If BG hits the raised FY26 guidance midpoint of about $9.50, the P/E compresses to roughly 12.9x, which is reasonable for a cyclical agribusiness with Viterra synergies. If soybean/softseed crush margins normalize or grain merchandising stays weak, the trailing P/E of 23.8x will look justified and the shares could re-rate lower. Q3 earnings are the key near-term confirmation point.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI is 59.43, positive but not overbought. The stock sits 4.53% above its 20-day SMA, 6.54% above its 50-day SMA, and 6.65% above its 200-day SMA, which is a moderate uptrend with positive momentum. However, BG is in the upper half of its 52-week $76.01-$134.87 range. Entry-timing implication: do not chase; wait for a pullback toward the 20/50-day SMA or a post-Q3 earnings confirmation.

Macro factors
  • U.S. biofuel policy, especially EPA 100% SRE reallocation, could structurally lift domestic soybean/softseed crush demand and processing margins.
  • Global crop supplies remain ample, pressuring grain merchandising margins and making commodity price direction a key swing factor.
  • Ocean freight and supply-chain volatility affect global agricultural flows, working capital, and merchandising profitability.
  • Interest rates and credit conditions matter: BG carries $9.426B of long-term debt with D/E of 1.054, and negative H1 2026 free cash flow can pressure financing costs.
  • Glencore's post-Viterra ownership stake is an overhang that could create share-supply pressure as it reduces its position.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings release expected late October 2026: read-through on H2 processing margins, Viterra synergy capture, and any further guidance changes.
  • EPA SRE reallocation implementation: a potentially underappreciated upside driver for domestic crush demand and earnings.
  • Viterra integration: management raised its synergy target to $350M; further progress would support EPS and cash flow.
  • Continued share buybacks, capital returns, and an eventual orderly reduction of Glencore's stake.
Key risks
  • Commodity and processing margin volatility: Q2 2026 strength may not persist if soybean/softseed crush margins normalize.
  • Grain merchandising headwinds from ample global crop supplies and volatile ocean freight costs.
  • Execution risk integrating Viterra; revenue and equity trends are distorted by the acquisition.
  • Thin margins and weak returns: TTM net margin 1.1%, operating margin 2.3%, ROIC 2.7%, leaving little cushion.
  • Balance sheet and cash flow: negative FCF in Q1 and Q2 2026 (-$877M and -$1,028M), D/E 1.054, and $9.426B long-term debt.
  • Valuation: trailing P/E of 23.8x versus a 5-year average of 10.0x means the stock is not cheap if earnings disappoint.
Investment thesis

Bunge is a cyclical agribusiness showing a real Q2 2026 earnings inflection and Viterra-driven scale, but the stock at $122.41 already reflects much of that recovery. Forward P/E near 13x is fair rather than cheap, while thin through-cycle margins, negative H1 free cash flow, and commodity volatility cap the risk/reward. I would not chase here; it is a neutral/hold, with a better entry on a pullback or clearer evidence that crush margins and synergies are sustainable.

AI theoretical price methodology

Applied 13x to FMP's next-FY EPS estimate of $9.517. The multiple is a modest premium to BG's 5-year average P/E of 10.0x to reflect raised FY26 guidance, Viterra synergies, and biofuel tailwinds, but it is below the 14x+ implied by analyst targets given thin margins and cyclicality. 13 x $9.517 = $123.72.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Low
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The deterministic 53.3/Fair band is broadly reasonable, but the component mix is distorted. The growth score of 90.2 is heavily flattered by Viterra consolidation, not organic performance, while the quality/profitability score of 36.2 reflects trough TTM margins (operating margin 2.3%, ROIC 2.7%) and a positive accruals ratio of 2.7%. Forward EPS of $9.517 and raised FY26 guidance suggest quality metrics could improve as crush margins recover, so I would nudge the fair score toward the upper-50s/low-60s rather than treat the trailing weakness as permanent. I still would not push it into a high-quality band given structurally thin margins and negative H1 2026 FCF.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.