BMY — Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Fundamentals Score: 45.3/100 (Fair Fundamentals) · Healthcare
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company operates as a global biopharmaceutical entity, actively involved in the research, development, licensing, production, and worldwide commercialization of its medicinal portfolio. The company's therapeutic areas span hematology, oncology, cardiovascular health, immunology, fibrotic conditions, neuroscience, and infectious diseases like COVID-19.
Score Breakdown
Live Market DataPrice updated: 19h ago
AI Deep-Dive Analysis
Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market dataAs of 2026-08-27, BMY trades at $66.95, near the top of its 52-week range ($42.52–$68.64) after a Q2 2026 beat and raised FY2026 guidance. RSI was 60.2 and price sat above its 20-, 50-, and 200-day moving averages.
Q2 2026 adjusted EPS of $2.04 beat the ~$1.60 consensus and revenue grew 5.7% YoY to $12.97B. Management raised FY2026 revenue guidance to $49–50B and adjusted EPS to $6.75–$7.00, while the Growth Portfolio (+15% YoY to $7.6B) and Eliquis (+21% to $4.5B) are offsetting Revlimid erosion. That combination has pushed the stock near its 52-week high and keeps Wall Street broadly constructive.
The inflection is real but only one quarter old: YoY revenue growth was +0.6% in Q2 2025, roughly +1–3% in Q3/Q4 2025, +2.6% in Q1 2026, then accelerated to +5.7% in Q2 2026. Operating margin has improved from the low-20s in 2024 and the charge-hit Q4 2025 to roughly 29–31.5% in H1 2026. GAAP net income is noisy due to one-off items — Q1 2024 was a -$11.9B loss and Q4 2025 was depressed to $1.09B — so adjusted/forward metrics matter more than trailing GAAP. Free cash flow remains strong but lumpy: TTM FCF is ~$11.4B versus ~$12.8B in FY2025.
At $66.95, BMY trades at 14.7x trailing GAAP EPS versus a 5-year average of 18.2x, but trailing EPS understates earnings power because of charges. Using the raised FY2026 adjusted EPS midpoint of $6.875, forward P/E is roughly 9.7x. Price/sales of 2.78x is only slightly above the 5-year average of 2.66x, and the 4.32% dividend yield plus low PEG make the stock look fair-to-cheap on forward earnings — with the discount reflecting patent-cliff and balance-sheet risk.
The stock has rallied sharply in 2026 and as of 2026-08-27 trades just below the consensus target of $69, with the high target at $75. The market is beginning to price in the growth portfolio offsetting Revlimid, but it is not yet paying up for sustained EPS acceleration. If Q3 2026 confirms the raised $49–50B revenue and $6.75–$7.00 EPS guidance, the stock can grind toward the $72–75 area; if momentum stalls, the low forward multiple offers only modest downside protection because expectations have already reset upward.
As of 2026-08-27, RSI(14) was 60.21 — bullish but not overbought. Price was +2.19% vs the 20-day SMA, +8.97% vs the 50-day, and +16.32% vs the 200-day, so the trend is clearly up after a large 2026 rally. Entry timing is less favorable here: chasing after a 16% premium to the 200-day near the 52-week high carries pullback risk; a dip toward the 20/50-day moving averages would offer a better risk/reward.
- Stabilizing interest rates are driving income rotation into high-dividend large-cap pharma; BMY yields ~4.3%.
- Roughly 70% of sales are U.S.-based, exposing BMY to domestic drug-pricing and IRA negotiation headlines.
- Patent-cliff dynamics — Revlimid still -49% YoY in Q2 2026 and Eliquis long-term LOE risk — keep a structural discount on the multiple.
- Large-cap pharma M&A and pipeline licensing remain sector themes, though BMY's debt load limits but does not eliminate dealmaking.
- Healthcare sector momentum and broader risk appetite are supporting the stock after its strong YTD run.
- Q3 2026 earnings in late October 2026 — the key test of whether the Q2 beat and raised guidance are durable.
- Continued Growth Portfolio momentum: Reblozyl +29%, Breyanzi +41%, Camzyos +59%, Opdivo Qvantig, and KarXT ramp.
- Pipeline readouts and trial initiations, including EDG-15400 Phase II in HFpEF expected in 2H 2026.
- Debt reduction and cash generation: TTM FCF ~$11.4B supports deleveraging and the dividend.
- Revlimid's -49% erosion continues, and eventual Eliquis LOE or U.S. pricing pressure could re-accelerate revenue decline.
- High leverage: debt-to-equity ~1.93 and long-term debt of $42.1B; rising rates or a credit downgrade would pressure the story.
- Execution/integration risk on new launches and pipeline; a clinical or regulatory setback would dent the growth thesis.
- The stock has already repriced from $42.52 to ~$67, leaving limited upside to the $69 consensus and $75 high target.
BMY is a financially healthy pharma with a visible growth inflection — Q2 beat, raised guidance, Growth Portfolio +15%, forward P/E ~9.7x, and a 4.3% dividend yield — but the patent cliff, ~$42B debt, and the fact the stock has already rallied to near analyst targets make the current risk/reward balanced rather than compelling. It is a reasonable core income/defensive holding, not an obvious high-conviction buy at $66.95.
Fair value = FY2026E adjusted EPS midpoint of $6.875 × a justified P/E of 10.9x. I used 10.9x — well below BMY's 5-year average of 18.2x — to reflect patent-cliff exposure, ~1.9x debt/equity, and U.S. pricing risk, while still crediting the 4.3% dividend yield, ~30% operating margin, and growth portfolio inflection. That yields roughly $75, above the $69 consensus target but below any historical-multiple-based bull case.
AI Review of the Deterministic Score
The deterministic 45.3 'Fair Fundamentals' score is entirely backward-looking and is dragged down by noisy GAAP history — the huge 2024 charges, lumpy FCF, and the equity discontinuity flagged in the notes. It cannot see the Q2 2026 beat, the raised guidance, or the growth portfolio inflection. I would nudge the score up by roughly 10–15 points into the mid-to-high 50s because forward adjusted EPS power and a ~9.7x forward P/E look better than trailing trends suggest. However, 1.9x debt/equity, Eliquis/Revlimid cliff risk, and the stock's run-up to near analyst targets keep it from being a 'Strong' fundamental picture. Net: Partially Agree — the Fair band is directionally right, but the number underrates just how much the operating trajectory has improved.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.