BRK-B — Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Berkshire Hathaway Inc., established in 1998 and headquartered in Omaha, Nebraska, operates as a vast global conglomerate with diverse business interests. Its core operations primarily encompass insurance, freight rail transportation, and utility services.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, BRK-B traded at $510.37 (market cap ~$1.10T, beta 0.61), which is 1.47x Q2 2026 book value of $750.2B and about 5% below its 52-week high of $537.74. Q2 2026 revenue grew 10.0% YoY and operating earnings rose 16.3%, but the stock has gone nearly nowhere for a month (+0.07%) while the tech-led index ran.
The market's mood on Berkshire as of 2026-09-13 is politely indifferent rather than bearish. Q2 2026 (reported August 8) beat handily - operating earnings of $12.98B, up 16.3% YoY, and operating EPS of ~$6.02 vs ~$5.13 consensus - and management did two things bulls have waited years for: it repurchased ~$4.5B of stock in Q2 alone (~$4.8B in H1) and was a net buyer of public equities for the first time in 14-15 quarters, cutting cash/T-bills from a ~$397B peak to ~$366B, plus closing the $8.5B Taylor Morrison homebuilder deal on July 24, 2026. Yet the sell-side still says 'Hold' (4 Buy, 6 Hold, 0 Sell) and the stock is flat over one month and lagging a momentum-driven index, which is the classic Berkshire pattern during tech-led bull runs. Analyst targets ($594.50 recent average, $604 high/consensus, but only two price-target contributors) sit 16-18% above the 2026-09-13 price, so the market is splitting the difference between 'fortress, buybacks, optionality' and '1.47x book, ~23x operating earnings.'
The trend inflected upward over the last three quarters after a flat-to-soft 2024-2025 stretch. Revenue YoY went from -1.2% (Q2 2025) and -0.7% (Q4 2025) to +2.1% (Q3 2025), +4.4% (Q1 2026) and then +10.0% in Q2 2026 ($101.8B vs $92.5B) - the strongest print in the three-year window. Operating income confirms it: $17.49B in Q2 2026 vs $15.58B a year ago (+12.2%), and $15.37B in Q1 2026 vs $12.71B (+20.9%). Operating margin was 17.18% in Q2 2026 versus 16.85% in Q2 2025 (+33bps) - modest expansion, not a step-change, and roughly in line with the 17.55% posted in Q3 2025. Free cash flow is the cleanest improvement: TTM FCF through Q2 2026 is ~$24.2B versus ~$8.2B a year earlier (+194%), because the two negative-FCF quarters (Q3 2024 -$2.90B, Q4 2024 -$0.73B) have rolled out of the window. Important caveat: GAAP net income is nearly useless as a trend signal here - it swings from -$12.77B (Q3 2023) to +$37.57B (Q4 2023) to +$30.80B (Q3 2025) on mark-to-market equity gains. Judge this company on operating earnings and book value, both of which are improving steadily.
Not cheap, and modestly rich against its own history. As of 2026-09-13 the headline TTM P/E was 12.84x on $39.75 of TTM GAAP EPS - but that EPS is inflated by unrealized investment gains, and the honest number is the ~23.0x forward multiple on the $22.18 next-FY operating EPS estimate. The 5-year average P/E of 10.69x (4 years of data used) and 5-year average P/S of 2.48 vs. current 2.864 both say the stock sits at a premium to its recent norms, which is why the deterministic model labels it 'Rich vs. its own history.' P/B of 1.466x is mid-to-upper range versus the ~1.2-1.6x band Berkshire has occupied for a decade. PEG of 0.354 looks spectacular but is an artifact of GAAP earnings volatility and should be ignored. The offsetting point: on the ex-cash math the brief cites, stripping ~$366B of cash/T-bills from a $1.10T market cap leaves ~$735B for ~$48B of operating earnings, or ~15x - genuinely reasonable for a 0.61-beta fortress. Net: fairly valued at best on headline multiples, arguably 5-10% cheap only if you give full credit to the cash pile.
At $510.37 on 2026-09-13 you are paying ~23x forward operating earnings for a business compounding operating earnings in the high single digits. That means the stock is not discounting a growth surprise - it is discounting the balance sheet. The upside case is not an earnings beat; it is (a) deployment of the ~$366B liquidity into something accretive, (b) a market dislocation that lets Berkshire buy assets cheap, or (c) continued multiple creep as investors pay up for a 0.61-beta defensive in a fragile tape. The downside case is equally mechanical: if operating earnings grow ~7% and the multiple compresses back toward 20x, you get roughly flat returns. Watch two things quarterly: the pace of buybacks (management's own tell on intrinsic value - they bought at roughly 1.40-1.50x book in Q2 2026) and the change in cash/T-bill balances. Rising cash in a rising market is a warning; falling cash funded by acquisitions or equities is the bull case showing up in the numbers. With $4.8B of H1 2026 repurchases and the first net equity-buying quarter in 14-15 quarters, the tape currently supports the bull read - but neither is yet large enough to move a $1.1T market cap.
As of 2026-09-13, BRK-B was in a mild, orderly uptrend, not an overbought one. RSI(14) was 57.47 - above neutral, comfortably below 70. The price sat 1.31% above its 20-day SMA, 1.29% above its 50-day SMA and 3.63% above its 200-day SMA, so all three trend measures are positively stacked but the extensions are small, which is typical for a low-beta name. Performance was +0.86% over one week, +0.07% over one month, +4.32% over three months and +4.15% over six months - a slow grind, with the last month essentially flat and the 3-month gain front-loaded. The 52-week range of $464.01-$537.74 puts the stock about 5% below the high and about 10% above the low, i.e., in the upper-middle of a well-defined range. Practical read: no urgency to chase, and no technical reason to avoid. The 200-day SMA sits roughly 3.6% below the market price, so a pullback into the $480-495 zone would be the higher-conviction entry; a decisive break above $537.74 would signal the market is finally willing to pay up for the defensive/optionality trade.
- Short-term interest rates and T-bill yields: Berkshire's ~$366B liquidity book is directly levered to the Fed - elevated rates generate enormous risk-free interest income today, while a cutting cycle would trim that income but simultaneously lift the mark-to-market value of the equity portfolio and book value.
- Equity market level and concentration: because the investment portfolio is marked to market through GAAP earnings, a broad drawdown (especially in mega-cap tech) hits reported net income and book value immediately, even though it is also the environment in which Berkshire's cash pile becomes most valuable.
- US housing and consumer cyclicality: the $8.5B Taylor Morrison acquisition completed July 24, 2026 plus Clayton Homes and building-products exposure make Berkshire increasingly levered to mortgage rates and household formation, for better or worse.
- Freight, industrial demand and tariffs: BNSF volumes and pricing track industrial production and trade flows, so tariff-driven shifts in goods movement are a direct earnings variable for the largest non-insurance subsidiary.
- Insurance cycle and catastrophe load: GEICO auto margins and reinsurance pricing are cyclical, and Berkshire Hathaway Energy carries meaningful wildfire/liability tail risk - a single large catastrophe quarter can swamp an otherwise good operating print.
- Q3 2026 earnings, expected early November 2026 - the next real read on Greg Abel's pace of cash deployment, GEICO underwriting, BNSF volumes, and whether the net-buyer posture on equities continues.
- Continued share repurchases - roughly $4.8B was executed in H1 2026 ($4.5B+ in Q2 alone); a sustained multi-billion-per-quarter pace is management's clearest public statement that the stock trades below intrinsic value.
- 13F and portfolio disclosures - the expanded Delta Air Lines stake and a newly disclosed Alphabet position (initiated under Buffett) show a willingness to put money to work; further large additions would validate the 'cash is a call option' thesis.
- Rate cuts or a market dislocation - either could finally convert the ~$366B cash/T-bill pile from an earnings drag into an acquisition engine, which is the single largest source of upside optionality.
- Integration of Taylor Morrison ($8.5B, closed July 24, 2026) into an eventual housing-cycle recovery, which would mark a shift from pure financial-asset accumulation toward hard-asset, cash-generating operating earnings.
- Valuation risk: at 1.47x book and roughly 23x forward operating earnings, the stock has no real margin of safety - the bull case depends on either multiple persistence or a genuinely accretive use of the $366B cash pile, and the deterministic model's own reading is 'Rich vs. its own history.'
- Key-person and transition risk: Greg Abel is now running capital allocation, and while the buyback and equity-purchase activity in Q2 2026 is encouraging, his judgment is unproven across a full cycle relative to the Buffett track record that produced the valuation premium he is now inheriting.
- Earnings-quality optics: the accruals ratio of +1.14% as of 2026-06-30 (net income exceeding operating cash flow) reflects mark-to-market equity gains flowing through GAAP income - structurally unavoidable here, but it means reported earnings will keep diverging violently from cash generation and can mask genuine operating issues.
- Mark-to-market / concentration risk in the equity portfolio: reported net income and book value swing on the mark (a single quarter printed +$30.8B in Q3 2025), so a tech-led drawdown would dent book value and the multiple at the same time.
- Scale and cash drag: at a $1.10T market cap with $365B+ in short-duration instruments, a falling-rate environment shrinks interest income meaningfully while the sheer size of the company makes any acquisition big enough to matter increasingly hard to find; ROE of 9.3% and ROIC of 4.1% already show the drag.
Berkshire is a genuinely high-quality, low-beta compounder whose operating momentum re-accelerated sharply in Q2 2026 - revenue +10.0% YoY, operating income +12.2% YoY, TTM free cash flow up roughly 194% YoY - and management is finally signaling conviction with ~$4.8B of buybacks in H1 2026 and its first net equity-buying quarter in 14-15 quarters. The problem is the price: 1.47x book and ~23x forward operating earnings is the high end of Berkshire's own historical range, and the GAAP P/E of 12.84x that makes it look cheap is distorted by investment gains. You are buying a superb balance sheet and a $366B option on a market dislocation at a full-but-not-crazy price; I would own it as a defensive core holding and add on pullbacks toward $480-495, not chase it at $510. Expected return from here is modest - high single digits - not the 16-18% implied by the $594-604 sell-side targets.
Two-metric blend, averaged 50/50. (1) Earnings leg: forward operating EPS of $22.18 (the next-FY consensus estimate, which reconciles with ~$48B of normalized after-tax operating earnings on ~2.157B B-share equivalents) at 22.5x - the midpoint of Berkshire's recent 18-25x operating-earnings range, with a small premium for the 0.61 beta and $366B liquidity offset by a 9.3% ROE - giving $499. (2) Book leg: Q2 2026 book value of $347.8 per B-share ($750.2B / 2.157B shares) grown ~10% to a 12-month-forward $382, at 1.50x P/B, a multiple supported by management's own revealed willingness to repurchase stock at roughly 1.40-1.50x book in Q2 2026, giving $574. Average = $536, about 5% above the 2026-09-13 price of $510.37 and well below the two-analyst $594.50-604 consensus, which I view as too generous relative to Berkshire's historical multiple range.
My independent read lands close to the deterministic 61.7 / 'Good Fundamentals' band, so I agree - but the composite is modestly conservative for reasons the formula cannot see. The quality/profitability pillar scores only 41.7 (at 40% weight) largely because of two structural artifacts: ROIC of 4.1% is not meaningful for a company whose denominator is a $1.26T balance sheet dominated by insurance float and a securities portfolio, and the +1.14% accruals ratio (as of 2026-06-30) is nearly guaranteed for Berkshire because unrealized equity gains flow through GAAP net income but never through operating cash flow. Working the math, fully neutralizing just the accruals leg would lift the overall score only about 5 points, to roughly 67 - still 'Good,' so the band is right and the gap is inside the ~10-point threshold for Agreement. Financial health at 63.8 also rests entirely on FCF (debt/equity and current ratio were excluded for the financial sector, a by-design structural exclusion rather than a data gap), and that leg now looks better than the score suggests: TTM FCF of ~$24.2B is up ~194% YoY as the negative 2024 quarters roll off. Net: I would rate it around 66-68 rather than 61.7, which is a nudge, not a disagreement. The bigger caveat is the separate valuation_context label of 'Rich vs. its own history' - I think that is directionally correct on P/S (2.86 vs 2.48) but overstated on P/E, because the 10.69x five-year average is built from GAAP earnings that include investment gains; on forward operating earnings the stock is ~23x, expensive but not egregious for a 0.61-beta fortress. No single dated event in the brief (the July 24, 2026 Taylor Morrison close, the Q2 buyback, the Abel transition) is material enough to justify overriding the band/valuation mapping.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.