← Back to Rankings

BROBrown & Brown, Inc.

Fundamentals Score: 62.6/100 (Good Fundamentals) · Financial Services

Description

Brown & Brown, Inc. operates as an insurance brokerage firm, providing a diverse range of products and services throughout the United States, Bermuda, Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the Cayman Islands. The company's operations are strategically divided into four primary segments: Retail, National Programs, Wholesale Brokerage, and Services.

Score Breakdown

Growth
67.0/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
55.8/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
67.6/100
weight: 15%
* Debt/equity and current ratio excluded: sector 'Financial Services' runs balance-sheet leverage (deposits, policy reserves) that these industrial-style thresholds aren't built for
* Stockholders' equity moved +70% between 2025-03-31 and 2025-06-30 (vs. +4% for the same quarter a year earlier) in its reported financials - possibly a divestiture, spinoff, or major acquisition rather than organic performance. Growth/trend comparisons spanning this point may be distorted.
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral

Live Market DataPrice updated: 40m ago

P/E (TTM)
19.8
Yield
0.93%
RSI (14)
52.0
vs SMA20
-0.08%
vs SMA50
+2.50%
vs SMA200
+3.38%
Analyst Target
$73
+1.0%
2 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$80
+10.9%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, Brown & Brown traded at $71.39, down 1.9% on the day, with a market cap of ~$23.9B. The stock sits ~27% below its 52-week high and just below the consensus price target of ~$72.50, with RSI at 52.3 and price hovering around its 20-day moving average.

AI Sentiment:Neutral

Recent sentiment is cautious/neutral: Q2 2026 revenue and adjusted EPS missed consensus, organic revenue declined 0.7% YoY, and the departure of P. Barrett Brown added leadership uncertainty. Offsetting that, large institutional buyers like BlackRock added stakes, and the stock has stabilized above its 200-day moving average.

Quarterly Trend

Total revenue has stepped up sharply from ~$1.0B per quarter in 2023 to ~$1.7B in 2026, but the jump is almost entirely M&A-driven, especially the Accession acquisition. Q2 2026 revenue rose 34% YoY, yet core organic revenue fell 0.7%, exposing the lack of underlying growth. Adjusted EBITDAC margin compressed 100bps to 35.7%, and EPS growth has lagged net income due to a ~14% increase in diluted shares. This looks like a cyclical/integration trough rather than a structural collapse, but the next two quarters need to show organic growth reaccelerating.

Valuation Assessment

At 19.7x trailing EPS and 3.5x sales, BRO looks cheap versus its own 5-year averages of 26.7x and 5.2x. Forward P/E on next-year EPS of $4.49 is ~15.9x, but that estimate may embed margin improvements that haven't materialized. The discount is justified given the organic growth stall, but the valuation is more 'fair to cheap' than a deep value trap.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

At $71.39, the stock is pricing in continued flat-to-negative organic growth and margin pressure. If organic growth turns positive in Q3/Q4 2026 and Accession synergies show up, the forward earnings power of $4.49 could support double-digit upside. If organic stays negative, the current ~20x trailing multiple may be slightly rich. The market is waiting for evidence of an inflection rather than paying up for potential.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI was 52.3, neutral. Price is essentially flat versus the 20-day SMA (-0.15%), 4.1% above the 50-day, and 2.5% above the 200-day—a range-bound, basing pattern. The stock has recovered from the 52-week low of $53.81 but still hasn't reclaimed the $75-80 zone. A break above $73.50 would be a constructive signal, while a drop below $68 would negate the base.

Macro Factors
  • Moderating P&C insurance pricing cycle: premium rate increases are slowing, directly pressuring commission-based organic growth.
  • Higher cost of capital: BRO's M&A-heavy model relies on debt and equity issuance; expensive capital makes deals less accretive.
  • Persistent talent wars and wage inflation in the insurance brokerage industry.
  • Florida property insurance exposure remains a regional overhang on risk models.
  • AI transformation and technology partnerships (Anthropic, Accenture) could improve margins but carry near-term integration costs.
Key Catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings (late October): organic revenue turning positive and EBITDAC margin stabilization would be key confirmations.
  • Accession integration milestones and early metrics from AI workflow automation.
  • Any new M&A or share buyback announcements that signal management confidence.
Key Risks
  • Organic growth remains negative and the broader P&C pricing cycle keeps softening.
  • M&A-driven share dilution and debt could continue to weigh on EPS growth.
  • Leadership turnover: P. Barrett Brown's resignation may indicate cultural or strategic strain.
  • Integration and transformation programs may fail to deliver projected cost savings.
Investment Thesis

This is not a clear-cut buy, but BRO has de-rated to a P/E roughly 25% below its 5-year average while still generating strong free cash flow (~$1.4B TTM) and maintaining high margins. The key swing factor is whether organic growth reaccelerates. I lean positive because the market appears to be pricing in a permanently impaired growth profile, and the historical valuation suggests some mean reversion if the operational wobble passes.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Applying a 22x P/E multiple to TTM EPS of $3.619—a discount to BRO's 5-year average of 26.7x to reflect negative organic growth, yet above the current 19.7x to reflect strong FCF, high margins, and likely mean reversion—yields $79.62. This is roughly 11% above the current price and the consensus target.

AI Lean: BullishConfidence: Low

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Partially Agree

The deterministic score of 62.6 (Good Fundamentals) is broadly directionally right, but I would shade the growth pillar lower: total revenue growth overstates health because it's acquisition-driven, while organic revenue contracted in Q2 2026. Quality, profitability, and FCF are solid, so the band stays 'Good'—but the score should be closer to 55-58 to reflect the organic stall, margin compression, and management transition. This is a temporary integration/cyclical pressure point, not a structural decline, so I wouldn't move it two tiers.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.