#324S&P 500 rank

CAH — Cardinal Health, Inc.

2-yr score: 46.9/100 (Middle 40%)Healthcare14d
$257.46−0.03%
Description

Cardinal Health, Inc. operates as a global, integrated provider of healthcare services and products, with its reach spanning the United States, Canada, Europe, Asia, and other international markets. The company delivers bespoke support to a diverse clientele, including hospitals, healthcare networks, pharmacies, outpatient surgical centers, clinical labs, physician practices, and individuals receiving care at home.

Score breakdownLatest quarter46.9 · Fair
Growth
44.0
Quality / Profitability
52.7
Financial health
50.5
Ratio screener
45.4
Track record: 2-yr avg 46.9 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 45.8 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Nov 5, 2026 (in 14 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:23 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
35.4
Yield
0.86%
RSI (14)
74.7
vs SMA20
+8.54%
vs SMA50
+9.34%
vs SMA200
+16.70%
Analyst target
$276
+7.1%
11 analysts
AI theoretical price
$243
-5.6%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, Cardinal Health traded at $234.57 (market cap ~$54.9B), roughly 9% below its 52-week high of $258.30 and 61% above its 52-week low of $145.87, with RSI(14) at 47.1 after a -5.1% week. FY2026 (ended 6/30/26) closed with ~$254B revenue (+14%), ~$4.5B of free cash flow, and management guiding FY2027 to ~4% revenue and ~14% adjusted EPS growth.

AI sentimentBullish

As of 2026-09-13 the Street is bullish on the FY2026 results delivered 8/11/26: Q4 adjusted EPS rose ~40% YoY, FY26 revenue reached ~$254B (+14%) with ~30% adjusted operating earnings growth to ~$3.6B, FY27 guidance targets ~14% adjusted EPS growth, and the board added $5.0B to the buyback (total $6.4B) after a $350M accelerated repurchase. Ten analysts carry a consensus Buy with an average target of $273.22 (range $250-$292), and the shares had rallied ~29% over the prior four months into late summer. Two honest caveats: the week into 2026-09-13 was -5.1% with RSI at 47.1, i.e. momentum cooling right under the $258.30 high; and the FMP rating breakdown (0 strong buy / 18 buy / 15 hold) is noticeably more muted than the '14-15 strong buys' framing in the news flow - a real 15 holds is a lot of side-line money at 18.7x forward earnings.

Quarterly trend

Revenue growth is decelerating hard, but for a benign reason. YoY revenue: Q1 FY26 (Sep-25) $64.0B, +22.4%; Q2 (Dec-25) $65.4B, +18.4%; Q3 (Mar-26) $60.9B, +11.0%; Q4 (Jun-26) $63.9B, +6.1% - a clean straight-line slowdown. That tracks falling wholesale acquisition costs under IRA drug-pricing changes, not weak unit demand, and the margin line confirms it: gross profit rose +21.9%, +13.9%, +17.7% and +24.7% YoY across those same four quarters, with Q4 gross margin at 4.30% vs 3.66% a year earlier. FY26 revenue was ~$254B (+14%) and GAAP operating income $2.61B vs $2.28B (+14.9%), though management reported adjusted operating earnings up ~30% to ~$3.6B - a ~$1B exclusion bridge that is the single biggest quality-of-earnings question here. EPS was lumpy: $1.88, $1.97, a soft $1.69 in Q3 (operating income fell to $509M from $730M) before Q4 stabilized at $1.69 with operating income back to $729M; FY26 GAAP EPS $7.23 vs $6.45 in FY25 (+12%), TTM $7.263. Cash is the standout: FY26 free cash flow $4.53B vs $1.85B in FY25 and $3.25B in FY24, albeit with violent working-capital swings (Sep-24 -$1.74B and Dec-24 -$0.50B quarters). Structural read: the mix shift into specialty, nuclear and at-home care is genuinely expanding gross margin; the top line is shrinking in price terms by design.

Valuation assessment

Fair-to-full, not cheap. As of 2026-09-13 the stock traded at 32.3x trailing GAAP EPS of $7.263 (vs a 5-year average P/E of 40.4, itself inflated by opioid-era charges), 2.61x PEG, and 0.216x sales versus a 5-year average P/S of just 0.14 - a ~54% premium to its own history. On the $12.544 FY2027 consensus EPS the forward P/E is 18.7x, which is reasonable IF you accept an adjusted number that sits far above GAAP earnings; that same EPS would require a ~73% jump from the $7.26 TTM print. The debt-adjusted picture is less kind: EV/EBITDA screens at ~17.4x, rich for a business with 3.8% gross margins, 1.0% operating margins, and a 13.2% ROIC. P/B (-19.2x), ROE (-59.5%) and D/E are unusable because book equity is -$2.88B. Net: the multiple has expanded faster than earnings, and the 52-week range (145.87-258.30) says the market has already re-rated this name hard.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market is pricing in the mid-teens adjusted EPS growth path, the specialty/nuclear/at-home margin mix, and the buyback - not a reacceleration in revenue. At the 2026-09-13 close of $234.57 you are paying 18.7x the FY27 consensus $12.544 and ~25-26x a more conservative ~$9 GAAP-consistent run-rate. So the asymmetry is skewed: with management guiding only ~4% revenue and ~14% adjusted EPS growth for FY2027, the stock needs multiple stability to work - a de-rating to 16x FY27 consensus alone would take it to roughly $200. Upside surprise has to come from gross-margin mix and buyback accretion, not the top line, and the wide adjusted-vs-GAAP bridge means 'beat' headlines may not convert into GAAP earnings. Conversely, if the ~$1B of excluded items shrink, GAAP EPS closes the gap toward adjusted and the valuation looks materially less stretched - that is the real bull case, and it is not in the deterministic score.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13: RSI(14) 47.1 (dead neutral), price $234.57 vs SMA20 -1.09% (below), vs SMA50 +0.13% (flat), vs SMA200 +8.42% (well above). Returns: -5.1% 1-week, +0.18% 1-month, +4.79% 3-month, +8.06% 6-month. The read is a longer-term uptrend that has lost short-term momentum just under the 52-week high of $258.30 - the 20-day has rolled over and the 50-day (~$234) is the line in the sand. Not oversold, not overbought; beta of 0.52 means it is not a name that tends to crash. Entry-timing implication: no urgency to buy here. A flush toward the 200-day with RSI in the mid-30s is the better risk/reward setup; chasing a flat 50-day into a decelerating top line is not.

Macro factors
  • IRA drug-pricing reform: lower wholesale acquisition costs cut reported revenue (YoY growth slid from +22.4% in Q1 FY26 to +6.1% in Q4) without cutting unit volumes - a mechanical top-line drag that will keep headline revenue growth in the ~3-5% guided range.
  • Tariffs and input costs: the Global Medical Products segment absorbed roughly $200M of tariff-related costs in FY2026, compressing that segment's gross profit even as the overall company margin expanded.
  • Demographics and utilization: aging population and rising prescription volumes are a durable volume tailwind for a distributor with fixed-cost infrastructure.
  • Mix shift to higher-margin care: specialty pharma, nuclear medicine and at-home services are structurally lifting gross margin (Q4 FY26 4.30% vs 3.66% YoY) - unusual for distribution and the core of the re-rating thesis.
  • Rates and balance-sheet structure: $6.86B of long-term debt (down from $8.98B at 9/30/25), $4.86B cash, negative book equity of -$2.88B, and a 0.883 current ratio mean refinancing costs and buyback capacity are rate-sensitive; beta of 0.52 keeps it a defensive holding in risk-off tape.
Key catalysts
  • Q1 FY2027 earnings on October 29, 2026 - first hard read on the ~14% adjusted EPS growth guide, organic volume growth, and integration of the Strive Medical and AdaptHealth Diabetes Health tuck-ins.
  • Fall healthcare conferences (Morgan Stanley, Baird, Wells Fargo, mid-September 2026) - management visibility into the specialty/at-home/nuclear strategy and any update to long-range margin targets.
  • Capital return: $6.4B total buyback authorization including a $350M accelerated share repurchase, plus the 0.861% dividend - direct EPS accretion at a 234M share count.
  • Continued tuck-in M&A in high-margin at-home and specialty care, and evidence that the ~$1B GAAP-to-adjusted operating bridge is narrowing (which would raise GAAP EPS without any change in the business).
Key risks
  • Earnings quality: FY26 GAAP operating income of $2.61B versus management's ~$3.6B adjusted is a ~$1B exclusion base on a company with 1.0% operating margins - the headline growth rate is softer than it looks.
  • Structural margin fragility: 3.8% gross margin and 1.0% operating margin mean a small pricing or mix error swings net income hard; Q3 FY26 operating income already fell to $509M from $730M YoY before rebounding.
  • Revenue deceleration and generic/IRA WAC deflation: YoY growth has fallen from +22.4% to +6.1% in four quarters and management guides ~4% for FY27 - if volumes soften on top of price deflation, the top line could stall.
  • Balance sheet: -$2.88B stockholders' equity, 0.883 current ratio, 0.489 quick ratio and $6.86B long-term debt leave little cushion; customer concentration in Pharmaceutical Distribution is an ongoing structural exposure.
  • Valuation/de-rating risk: EV/EBITDA ~17.4x, P/S 0.216 vs 0.14 five-year average, and a price only ~9% below the 52-week high while the 200-day sits 8.4% lower - multiple compression, not fundamentals, is the most likely source of a 15-20% drawdown.
Investment thesis

FY2026 was a genuinely good year - ~$254B revenue, $4.53B of free cash flow, gross margin up ~64bps in Q4, a ~30% jump in adjusted operating earnings, and a real mix shift into higher-margin specialty, nuclear and at-home care. But at $234.57 on 2026-09-13 you are paying 18.7x a FY2027 consensus EPS that requires a ~73% jump from TTM GAAP earnings, and the stock sits 54% above its own five-year average P/S near the top of its 52-week range. The business is fine; the price already reflects it. I would not be a buyer here - I would want either a pullback toward the 200-day with RSI in the 30s, or evidence the $1B adjusted-vs-GAAP gap is closing.

AI theoretical price methodology

Weighted blend of three methods, all run off 2026-09-13 data: 50% weight to 19.5x FY2027 consensus EPS of $12.544 ($244.61), a modest discount to the Street's implied ~21.8x given the wide adjusted-vs-GAAP bridge; 30% to capitalizing the three-year average free cash flow of $3.21B (FY24 $3.25B, FY25 $1.85B, FY26 $4.53B) at a 5.25% required FCF yield ($260.80, on 234.2M shares); and 20% to 16x EV/EBITDA on ~$3.26B EBITDA less $2.01B net debt ($214.40). Weighted result is $243.43, implying ~19.4x FY27 consensus EPS and about 3.6% above the $234.57 close.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Low
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

My independent read first: FY26 gross profit grew +13% to +25% YoY every single quarter, free cash flow hit $4.53B (vs $1.85B in FY25), ROIC is 13.2% and the accruals ratio is a healthy -2.27% - this is a cash-generative, margin-mixing business, and I would put it at the top of the Fair band, roughly 57-59 against the formula's 46.9. The 50%-weighted ratio screener is penalizing liquidity ratios (0.883 current, 0.489 quick) that are structurally normal for drug distribution, where inventory turns in weeks and payables fund the balance sheet, and the growth leg is reading IRA-driven WAC price deflation as demand weakness. Two things stop me pushing the score higher than ~12 points: EV/EBITDA of ~17.4x and P/S of 0.216 vs a 0.14 five-year average say the multiple, not the business, is the problem; and the ~$1B gap between FY26 GAAP operating income ($2.61B) and adjusted (~$3.6B) means headline EPS growth is softer than reported. I also note the score's own caveat that debt/equity had to be excluded because book equity is -$2.88B - which nulls three inputs inside the 50%-weighted ratio screener and is the main reason I treat this composite as directional rather than precise.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.