#348S&P 500 rank

CARR — Carrier Global Corporation

2-yr score: 45.5/100 (Middle 40%)Industrials7d
$56.47+0.53%
Description

Carrier Global Corporation is a worldwide provider of advanced technological solutions covering heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), refrigeration, fire safety, security, and intelligent building automation. Its operations are structured across three primary business segments: HVAC, Refrigeration, and Fire & Security.

Score breakdownLatest quarter50.1 · Fair
Growth
61.1
Quality / Profitability
45.6
Financial health
62.4
Ratio screener
45.1
Track record: 2-yr avg 45.5 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 51.3 (Fair, 31 quarters ≈ 7.8 yrs) · next earnings Oct 29, 2026 (in 7 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:23 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
38.9
Yield
1.42%
RSI (14)
53.2
vs SMA20
+1.89%
vs SMA50
-1.33%
vs SMA200
-8.57%
Analyst target
$69
+22.2%
6 analysts
AI theoretical price
$67
+18.6%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, Carrier Global trades at $57.46 with a $47.4B market cap, RSI(14) of 36.7, and price below its 20-, 50- and 200-day moving averages - roughly 25% below the $76.76 52-week high. Trailing data scores as merely fair (deterministic value score 50.1/100, 'Fair Fundamentals'), but the Q2 2026 print delivered the first real top-line and order inflection of the cycle while margins are still compressing.

AI sentimentBearish

The tape is decisively negative as of 2026-09-13: CARR is down 3.77% in a week, 8.91% in a month and 17.81% over three months, closing at $56.64 on the prior session and trading 3.13% / 9.52% / 6.59% below its 20-, 50- and 200-day SMAs with RSI at 36.7. That weakness came despite good news - on 2026-07-28 CARR beat on Q2 2026 revenue ($6.35B, +4% YoY) and adjusted EPS ($0.86 vs $0.82 consensus) and raised full-year guidance to ~$23B sales and ~$2.90 adjusted EPS - because investors zeroed in on the 190bp compression in adjusted operating margin (to 17.2%) from mix and input costs. The sell-side is far more constructive than the tape (consensus Buy, 14 Buys / 11 Holds / 1 Sell, average target $74.75; RBC reiterated Buy with $82), so the gap is really 'order momentum and data-center story' versus 'show me the margin.'

Quarterly trend

Revenue bottomed in Q4 2025 at $4.84B (-6.0% YoY, reflecting the Fire & Security and Commercial Refrigeration exits) and has inflected: Q1 2026 +2.4% YoY to $5.34B, then Q2 2026 +3.9% YoY to $6.35B - the highest quarter in the entire three-year series and above every 2024 peak. Margins are the problem, not the top line. GAAP operating margin fell YoY in each of the last four quarters: Q3'25 8.9% vs 12.8%, Q4'25 1.1% vs 7.4%, Q1'26 4.5% vs 10.8%, Q2'26 12.1% vs 13.0%; Q2'26 gross margin was 27.2% (=$1.728B) versus 28.9% (=$1.769B) a year earlier. GAAP diluted EPS follows: $0.60 in Q2'26 vs $0.70 in Q2'25, and $0.28 in Q1'26 vs $0.47. Cash generation is the genuine bright spot - Q2'26 operating cash flow of $927M (+43% YoY) and FCF of $810M put trailing-twelve-month FCF at $1.90B versus just $549M a year earlier. One important distortion: Q2'24 and Q4'24 net income of $2.337B and $2.551B sit against operating income of only $724M and $379M, i.e. roughly $4.9B of cumulative divestiture gains - those quarters say nothing about recurring earnings power and they contaminate every TTM/5-year-average multiple in the dataset. Verdict: a real demand inflection (Q2 total orders +40% YoY, commercial HVAC orders +65%, data center cooling +300%, backlog above $8B) that has not yet reached the margin line; the earnings trend is still down YoY but the guidance raise to ~$2.90 adjusted EPS implies the trough was Q4'25-Q1'26.

Valuation assessment

Headline trailing multiples look expensive: P/E 39.5x versus a 5-year average of 23.0x, P/B 3.63x, EV/EBITDA 21.6x, PEG -0.58 (meaningless given negative/distorted trailing growth). But TTM EPS of $1.467 is not representative - it includes a $0.06 EPS quarter (Q4'25, operating income of just $54M) and a $0.28 quarter (Q1'26, $240M operating income), both charge-heavy. On the forward number the picture flips: $57.46 / $2.896 next-year EPS estimate = 19.8x, which is BELOW the stock's own 5-year average P/E of 23.0x, and P/S of 2.14x is below the 5-year average of 2.32x. Forward EV/EBITDA is roughly 14x on my estimate of ~$4.3B forward EBITDA versus 21.6x trailing. Verdict: fairly valued to modestly cheap on forward earnings and cash flow for a business with a multi-year data-center order backlog; the deterministic overlay's 'Rich vs. its own history' label (reference score 29.8) is driven by the trailing GAAP P/E, which is an artifact of depressed TTM earnings, not a genuine valuation signal.

Price vs. earnings playbook

At $57.46 on 2026-09-13 the market is paying ~19.8x the $2.90 adjusted EPS management just guided to, versus a 23.0x five-year average - the tape is pricing continued margin erosion and skepticism that 40% order growth converts into profit, while the sell-side (consensus $74.75, RBC $82, low target $62) is pricing a re-rating. Both cannot be right. The asymmetry is clean: simply restoring the 23.0x average multiple on the SAME $2.90 EPS is $66.70 (+16% from $57.46), and that requires no estimate increase at all - just the market believing the number is repeatable rather than a peak. Conversely, if Q3/Q4 gross margin keeps sliding from 27.2%, the market will treat $2.90 as a cyclical top and today's 19.8x will look justified. Watch gross margin and the data-center revenue conversion line far more than the headline sales number.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 36.7 - weak, but not yet at the sub-30 capitulation reading that typically marks tradeable lows in this name. Price was 3.13% below the 20-day SMA, 9.52% below the 50-day SMA and 6.59% below the 200-day SMA, a textbook downtrend confirmed by negative 1-week (-3.77%), 1-month (-8.91%) and 3-month (-17.81%) returns. The 52-week range is $50.24-$76.76, so CARR sits in the bottom third of its range and about 25% below the high. Entry-timing implication: there is no momentum confirmation yet - the 50-day is falling and price is under all three averages - so this is a scale-in / wait-for-a-higher-low setup rather than a chase. The $50.24 low is the level that defines whether this is a base or a breakdown.

Macro factors
  • AI/data-center infrastructure build-out is the dominant secular tailwind: commercial HVAC orders +65% YoY in Q2 2026, data-center cooling demand up over 300%, and backlog crossing $8B - this is offsetting weakness in traditional construction markets.
  • Interest rates and housing: elevated borrowing costs and high 30-year mortgage rates continue to depress residential and light commercial (RLC) HVAC volumes, though distributor destocking has eased and the residential market is showing early stabilization signs.
  • Refrigerant and efficiency regulation (HFC phasedown toward A2L low-GWP alternatives, heat-pump incentives) favors Carrier's R&D scale over time but carries near-term factory retooling costs that feed the current margin compression.
  • Input cost and tariff pressure: management explicitly attributed the 190bp adjusted operating margin compression in Q2 2026 to unfavorable business mix and rising input costs - a macro-driven drag outside the company's control.
  • Grid electrification and virtual power plant demand: Carrier was named launch partner for PG&E's SHARE battery-enabled grid-flexible heat pump project in California (September 2026), a small but strategically relevant new demand channel.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings, expected late October 2026 - the single most important datapoint: does gross margin stop falling (27.2% in Q2'26 vs 28.9% a year ago) and does the $8B+ backlog convert into data-center revenue?
  • Management appearance at Morgan Stanley's 14th Annual Laguna Conference in September 2026 for a post-NORESCO / post-Riello portfolio update and any incremental capital-allocation commentary.
  • Order-to-revenue conversion in commercial HVAC and data-center cooling - orders are running +65% YoY in commercial HVAC, and the gap between order growth and revenue growth is the entire bull case.
  • Further portfolio shaping or capital returns: after completing the NORESCO sale to OPTERRA (2026-08-03) and exiting Riello (2026-07-01), CARR has a cleaner, higher-margin mix and optionality on buybacks or bolt-ons.
  • Deleveraging progress: long-term debt has already come down from $11.78B (Dec 2025) to $10.31B (Jun 2026); continued paydown would lift the financial-health read and reduce interest-rate sensitivity.
Key risks
  • Margin compression is the live risk and it is not obviously over: gross margin fell ~170bp YoY in Q2 2026 and GAAP operating margin has declined YoY for four consecutive quarters. If Q3/Q4 does not stabilize, the $2.90 adjusted EPS guide becomes questionable and today's 19.8x forward multiple expands mechanically on a falling number.
  • Residential and light commercial HVAC demand remains levered to housing turnover and mortgage rates - a soft new-construction cycle could cap the recovery regardless of the data-center story.
  • Valuation risk from headline distortion cuts both ways: with TTM P/E at 39.5x, any miss against forward EPS invites a violent de-rating because the trailing number offers no optical support.
  • Balance sheet has limited slack - $10.31B long-term debt against $1.34B cash, current ratio 1.02 and quick ratio 0.72, with total liabilities of $23.9B against $13.1B of equity (D/E 0.94). This is manageable but leaves little cushion if FCF disappoints.
  • Competitive intensity in data-center cooling (Vertiv, Trane, JCI, Schneider) and the risk that hyperscaler capex digests - order growth of this magnitude is rarely linear, and a single capex pause would hit sentiment hardest where the multiple is highest.
  • The deterministic score's low quality/profitability read (45.6/100) reflects a genuinely mediocre trailing ROIC of 5.4% and TTM operating margin of 7.1%; if the 'adjusted' margin bridge never closes to GAAP, the quality case weakens structurally rather than cyclically.
Investment thesis

Not a table-pounding buy, but the risk/reward is improving: this is a post-portfolio-surgery HVAC pure-play at 19.8x forward EPS against its own 5-year average of 23.0x, with Q2 2026 revenue at a three-year high, total orders +40%, commercial HVAC orders +65%, data-center cooling up over 300% and an $8B+ backlog - a classic cyclical trough turning up that the entirely backward-looking score cannot see. The catch is that gross margin is still compressing, the tape is in a downtrend below all three moving averages, and the earnings turn is promised rather than proven, so the honest stance is wait-for-confirmation rather than chase. Fair value around $67 implies ~17% upside, but you are paying in advance for a margin inflection that has to show up in the Q3 and Q4 prints.

AI theoretical price methodology

Blended forward valuation as of 2026-09-13: (a) applying the stock's own 5-year average P/E of 23.0x to the $2.896 forward EPS estimate gives $66.70 - justified because the headline TTM P/E of 39.5x is distorted by charge-heavy Q4'25/Q1'26 quarters and by ~$4.9B of 2024 divestiture gains, making the own-history average the cleaner anchor; and (b) an EV/EBITDA cross-check of 15x on ~$4.3B of forward EBITDA ($64.5B enterprise value less $8.97B net debt = $55.5B equity, divided by ~824M shares) gives $67.37. Both legs land at $66.70-$67.37, so I set fair value at $67.00, roughly 17% above the $57.46 price and below the $74.75 sell-side consensus.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

As a mechanical read of the trailing data the 50.1 ('Fair Fundamentals') is defensible, but the trailing data for CARR is unusually distorted and the formula cannot see it. Two specific problems: (1) the 2024 earnings base is contaminated by roughly $4.9B of divestiture gains - Q2'24 net income of $2.337B and Q4'24 net income of $2.551B came against operating income of only $724M and $379M - which inflates the denominator behind the 5-year average P/E, while Q4'25 ($54M operating income) and Q1'26 ($240M) are charge-heavy quarters that drag the TTM margin (7.1%), ROIC (5.4%) and EPS ($1.47) well below earning power; and (2) the score is entirely backward-looking for a business that just posted its first positive organic growth in several quarters with total orders +40% YoY and an $8B+ backlog - the classic cyclical-trough case the methodology itself warns about. On my own read I would move the score from 50.1 to roughly the mid-60s (one tier up, to 'Good Fundamentals'), supported by accruals running the healthy way (accruals ratio -1.14%, cash exceeding reported income) and by the fact that forward P/E of 19.8x sits BELOW the 5-year average of 23.0x, not above it. I stop at 'Partially Agree' rather than 'Disagree' because the bear case is not just a data artifact: the 190bp adjusted margin compression is real, leverage is meaningful ($10.31B long-term debt, quick ratio 0.72), and the score's 'Rich vs. its own history' overlay would only fully reverse if the margin turn actually shows up in Q3/Q4.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.