#225S&P 500 rank

CASY — Casey's General Stores, Inc.

2-yr score: 52.0/100 (Middle 40%)Consumer Cyclical
$695.19+1.56%
Description

Casey's General Stores, Inc. engages in the provision of management and operation of convenience stores and gasoline stations. It provides self-service gasoline, a wide selection of grocery items, and an array of freshly prepared food items.

Score breakdownLatest quarter52.5 · Fair
Growth
65.1
Quality / Profitability
48.5
Financial health
53.8
Ratio screener
48.3
Track record: 2-yr avg 52.0 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 46.3 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Dec 8, 2026 (in 47 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:23 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
33.3
Yield
0.27%
RSI (14)
63.4
vs SMA20
+8.74%
vs SMA50
+0.12%
vs SMA200
-5.87%
Analyst target
$814
+17.0%
15 analysts
AI theoretical price
$640
-7.9%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, Casey's trades at $615.47 (market cap $22.8B), 33.7% below its 52-week high of $927.85 and down 31.2% over three months, including a 14-17% post-earnings drawdown on September 8 despite a $7.37 Q1 FY2027 EPS beat. RSI(14) at 18.98 and a price 24.6% below the 50-day SMA put the shares in deeply oversold territory.

AI sentimentBearish

As of 2026-09-13 the tape is unambiguously bearish: shares fell 18.6% in the past week, 26.7% in the past month and 31.2% in three months, with RSI at 18.98 and price 20.4% below its 20-day SMA. The September 8, 2026 Q1 FY2027 print was the trigger - EPS of $7.37 beat the ~$6.68 consensus by roughly 10% and revenue rose 24.3% to $5.68B, but investors fixated on a -0.3% YoY same-store fuel gallon decline, remodel disruption from the CEFCO/Fikes integration, and the quality of the beat (fuel margins of 47.8 cpg are well above normalized levels). Sell-side targets were trimmed (JPMorgan to $833 from $975) though the consensus stays Buy with an $823.57 average target, and the August 26, 2026 Bloomberg 500 index addition did nothing to arrest the slide - a classic good-print, bad-reaction de-rating.

Quarterly trend

Revenue growth has re-accelerated but it is acquisition-driven, not organic: total revenue went from $4,064M in Q2 FY2024 (Oct 2023) to $5,678M in Q1 FY2027 (Jul 2026), with YoY growth of +24.3% (Q1 FY27), +14.5% (Q4 FY26), +0.3% (Q3 FY26), +14.2% (Q2 FY26) and +11.5% (Q1 FY26) - the near-flat Q3 FY2026 quarter shows how much of the top line is CEFCO/Fikes consolidation rather than same-store sales. Earnings quality is genuinely strong: EPS printed $7.37 in Q1 FY2027 (+27.7% YoY) after +66.2% in Q4 FY2026 and +49.8% in Q3 FY2026 (both against easy FY2025 comparisons), and the accruals ratio of -1.21% as of 2026-07-31 confirms net income is backed by cash rather than accounting. The caution flags are margin and cash: gross margin compressed to 19.8% in Q1 FY2027 from 22.0% a year earlier as lower-margin acquired fuel volume diluted the mix, operating margin slipped to 6.50% from 6.68%, and TTM free cash flow actually fell 2.6% YoY to $649M even as revenue rose 24%, because capex jumped to $194M in the July quarter versus $110M a year earlier for the remodel program. Read this as growth that is real but decelerating in quality - the September drawdown was the market repricing that, not a sudden business collapse.

Valuation assessment

Not cheap, but no longer expensive. As of 2026-09-13 the shares trade at 29.5x TTM EPS of $20.91, roughly a 6% premium to the 5-year average P/E of 27.83x, with PEG at 0.887, P/B at 5.56, EV/EBITDA at 17.4x, and P/S at 1.22 versus a 5-year average of 0.95. On my forward estimate of about $23.00 NTM EPS the multiple is ~26.8x, essentially in line with its own history, and on the $21.385 next-FY consensus EPS it is 28.8x. The P/S richness is largely an artifact of the CEFCO/Fikes deal adding huge low-margin fuel revenue to the denominator of a market-cap ratio, so the earnings multiples deserve more weight. Verdict: fair to marginally rich - the 31% three-month drawdown removed the excess, not the value.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market is pricing a deceleration the reported numbers have not yet delivered. Q1 FY2027 EPS beat consensus by ~10% and grew 27.7% YoY, yet the stock fell 14-17% on volume softness and remodel disruption - the market is extrapolating one weak gallon quarter and the eventual normalization of 47.8 cpg fuel margins (closer to ~40 cpg historically, worth roughly $3-5 of annual EPS) straight into the forward curve. The asymmetry: if gallons stabilize and fuel margins hold in the mid-40s, ~27x forward earnings is too low for a business compounding EPS in the mid-teens and a move back toward the $800s (where sell-side targets sit) is plausible; if fuel margins revert and the low-income consumer keeps trading down, $615 still isn't cheap enough. Net, the price is discounting the bear case harder than the base case.

Technical picture

Deeply oversold with a broken trend. As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 18.98 - the sort of reading that has historically marked capitulation lows in CASY - with shares 20.4% below the 20-day SMA (~$773), 24.6% below the 50-day (~$816) and 15.6% below the 200-day (~$729). Returns of -18.6% (1 week), -26.7% (1 month) and -31.2% (3 months) describe a violent, one-directional de-rating rather than a grind. Entry-timing implication: an oversold bounce is likely and forward risk/reward is better than a month ago, but there is no bottom confirmation yet - the 200-day at ~$729 is now overhead resistance, so scale in on stabilization (a higher low, a reclaim of the 20-day) rather than catching the falling knife.

Macro factors
  • Low-income U.S. consumer stress from persistent inflation - Casey's core rural Midwest/South customer is buying fewer gallons per fill-up and trading down from premium fuel, visible in the -0.3% same-store gallon print.
  • Fuel margin mean-reversion risk - Q1 FY2027 fuel margins of 47.8 cpg are well above the ~35-40 cpg historical norm; Middle East geopolitical volatility cuts both ways, but the base case is normalization that directly hits EPS.
  • Interest rates and cost of capital - long-term debt of $2.33B (up from $1.40B two years ago) to fund CEFCO/Fikes and Pak-A-Sak makes refinancing and further M&A more expensive if rates stay elevated.
  • Convenience-retail consolidation - CEFCO, Fikes and the August 2026 Pak-A-Sak deal show the roll-up is still running; Casey's owned real estate and self-distribution give it a structural cost advantage versus asset-light peers during consolidating rent inflation.
  • Sector classification and rotation - CASY is tagged Consumer Cyclical despite defensive demand characteristics, leaving it exposed to retail multiple compression and rotation into AI/tech, which is what a 33.7% drawdown from the 52-week high looks like.
Key catalysts
  • Q2 FY2027 earnings in early December 2026 (tentatively December 8-13) - the single most important test: does same-store fuel gallons recover, and do the Fikes/CEFCO remodel disruptions subside?
  • Progress on the 3-year strategic plan unveiled in June 2026, particularly inside-store same-store sales acceleration and Casey's Rewards digital loyalty expansion.
  • Integration of the 24-store Pak-A-Sak acquisition in northern Texas (announced 2026-08-12) and any further bolt-on M&A that adds scale to the distribution platform.
  • Fuel margin trajectory - holding near 47.8 cpg would be a meaningful positive surprise versus consensus expectations of normalization toward ~40 cpg.
  • Analyst estimate revisions - FY2027 consensus EPS of $21.385 looks stale next to the $7.37 Q1 print, and upward revisions would mechanically cut the forward multiple and could narrow the gap to the $823.57 average price target.
Key risks
  • Same-store fuel gallon declines (-0.3% YoY in Q1 FY2027) hardening into a sustained negative trend as low-income consumers cut discretionary driving; the model is volume-driven.
  • Fuel margin normalization from 47.8 cpg toward ~40 cpg - this alone is worth several dollars of annual EPS and would compress the multiple simultaneously.
  • Balance sheet leverage: long-term debt up 66% to $2.33B in two years, current ratio of 1.02, debt-to-equity of 0.705 - little cushion if an acquisition underperforms or rates rise.
  • Integration and remodel execution risk - CEFCO/Fikes conversion disruption is already suppressing traffic; a longer drag would weigh on same-store sales through FY2027.
  • Thin margins (5.9% TTM operating, 4.1% net) mean small shocks to labor, food input or insurance costs swing EPS hard - a 100bp operating margin move is roughly a 25% change in operating profit.
  • Valuation risk: 29.5x trailing earnings and 17.4x EV/EBITDA leave limited room for a growth disappointment, even after the drawdown.
Investment thesis

Not a buy at $615.47 as of 2026-09-13, but not a sell either - this looks like a fairly valued, defensive compounder that was de-rated from an expensive starting point rather than a broken business. Execution is intact (Q1 FY2027 EPS +27.7% YoY, inside-store margins of 42.2%, accruals ratio of -1.21% showing the earnings are cash-backed), but margins are structurally thin, TTM free cash flow fell 2.6% YoY to $649M as capex climbed, and leverage is up sharply - and at ~27x my NTM EPS estimate the stock is roughly at fair value, not at a discount. I would want either a lower entry (closer to $560-580, a mid-20s forward multiple) or evidence in the December print that same-store gallons have stabilized before committing new capital; the deeply oversold RSI makes a tradeable bounce likely, but that is a trading setup, not a value thesis.

AI theoretical price methodology

I applied a 27.8x multiple - Casey's own 5-year average trailing P/E of 27.83x, a level the market has paid through a full cycle - to my NTM EPS estimate of $23.00 (built from the actual Q1 FY2027 print of $7.37, plus roughly $15.6 for the remaining FY2027 quarters at 10-12% YoY growth and about $8.30 for Q1 FY2028), giving 27.83 x $23.00 ~ $640, about 4% above the 2026-09-13 price of $615.47. A cross-check at ~16x EV/EBITDA on TTM EBITDA of roughly $1.5B (operating income of $1,097M plus ~$400M D&A) less ~$1.94B of net debt implies $605-625, so the two methods bracket the current price and I set fair value modestly above it rather than discounting below it.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

My independent read lands modestly above the formula's 52.5 ('Fair Fundamentals') - I would put it around 60-62, roughly +10 points, which is why this is Partially Agree rather than Agree. Two things the fixed arithmetic cannot see: first, the margin leg structurally penalizes a convenience/fuel retailer whose 5.9% TTM operating margin is a feature of the business model rather than a flaw, and the same model produced an 18.1% ROE with a -1.21% accruals ratio as of 2026-07-31 (cash earnings running ahead of reported net income); second, the 'Rich vs. its own history' valuation tag leans on P/S of 1.22 versus a 5-year average of 0.95, but that ratio is distorted by the CEFCO/Fikes acquisitions, which bolted on large volumes of low-margin fuel revenue and mechanically inflate sales per dollar of market cap - on earnings the premium is only ~6% (29.5x TTM vs a 27.83x 5-year average) and roughly nil on my forward estimate. I would not, however, push this into 'Good' with conviction: long-term debt grew from $1.40B (July 2024) to $2.33B (July 2026), TTM free cash flow fell 2.6% YoY to $649M as capex climbed to $194M in the July quarter, and same-store fuel gallons turned negative - real deterioration the formula correctly flags. I checked for a single dated event material enough to justify deviating from the band-to-lean mapping (the only candidates are the Q1 FY2027 report on 2026-09-08 and the 24-store Pak-A-Sak deal announced 2026-08-12) and neither is material enough, so I applied the mapping table exactly as written.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.