← Back to Rankings

CEGConstellation Energy Corporation

Fundamentals Score: 39.5/100 (Weak Fundamentals) · Utilities

Description

Constellation Energy Corporation operates as a U.S.-based firm dedicated to producing and distributing electricity. Its activities are organized across five primary geographical segments: the Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, New York, ERCOT, and various other power markets.

Score Breakdown

Growth
35.9/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
40.7/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
47.5/100
weight: 15%
* Revenue moved +104% between 2025-12-31 and 2026-03-31 (vs. +26% for the same quarter a year earlier) in its reported financials - possibly a divestiture, spinoff, or major acquisition rather than organic performance. Growth/trend comparisons spanning this point may be distorted.
* Stockholders' equity moved +131% between 2025-12-31 and 2026-03-31 (vs. -2% for the same quarter a year earlier) in its reported financials - possibly a divestiture, spinoff, or major acquisition rather than organic performance. Growth/trend comparisons spanning this point may be distorted.
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral

Live Market DataPrice updated: 3m ago

P/E (TTM)
29.1
Yield
0.62%
RSI (14)
66.7
vs SMA20
+7.28%
vs SMA50
+12.21%
vs SMA200
+0.88%
Analyst Target
$350
+17.1%
11 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$270
-9.7%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, CEG trades at $282.41, roughly 32% below its 52-week high of $412.70, with RSI at 60.4 and a forward P/E around 23x. The AI/nuclear demand story remains intact and Wall Street has a Buy consensus, but the Calpine acquisition has made reported financials messy and recent quarterly free cash flow is negative.

AI Sentiment:Bullish

As of 2026-08-27, sell-side sentiment is solidly constructive: 15 Buy ratings, 6 Holds, zero Sells, consensus target $354.50 and recent average target $350.09. Q2 2026 adjusted EPS of $2.55 beat Street estimates, and management raised full-year 2026 adjusted EPS guidance to $11.50-$12.50. The offset is that price targets have been trimmed from the stock's $412.70 peak and price is still below the 200-day SMA, so the market is bullish on the thesis but not aggressively chasing the stock.

Quarterly Trend

The trend data is distorted by the Calpine acquisition: reported revenue jumped from $5.46B in Q4 2025 to $11.12B in Q1 2026, then settled to $7.51B in Q2 2026; stockholders' equity jumped from $14.5B to $33.5B over the same period. TTM revenue through Q2 2026 is roughly $31.3B. GAAP EPS has been lumpy — Q1 2026 $4.49, Q2 2026 $1.45 — but adjusted operating EPS of $2.55 in Q2 2026 beat consensus and the full-year guidance was raised. GAAP operating margin compressed to 7.7% in Q2 2026 from 15.6% a year earlier, reflecting seasonality, acquisition-related costs, and integration noise more than structural deterioration. On an adjusted-earnings basis, the trajectory is inflecting upward.

Valuation Assessment

At $282.41, CEG trades at about 27.4x trailing GAAP EPS and roughly 23.4x forward EPS using the $12.00 midpoint of FY2026 guidance or the $12.045 consensus estimate. Price-to-sales is 3.24x versus the 5-year average of 2.14x, and the stated trailing PEG is 3.76, although forward PEG is closer to ~1.0 using 2026 EPS growth to ~$12. TTM free cash flow is only about $0.3B against a $101B market cap, so on cash and sales multiples the stock is rich. On forward adjusted earnings, it is more reasonable but still not cheap.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

The stock has already de-rated from about 34x forward earnings at the $412.70 high to roughly 23x forward earnings at $282.41. That means the current price is no longer pricing in flawless execution; it is pricing in solid delivery of the AI/PJM/nuclear thesis. If CEG hits the upper half of the $11.50-$12.50 guidance and continues signing long-term nuclear PPAs, a re-rate toward the $350 average target is plausible. If guidance slips or FCF stays negative, the multiple could compress toward 18-20x, implying $216-$240. This is an execution-dependent stock, not a deep-value situation.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI is 60.4, price is +3.3% above the 20-day SMA (~$273) and +6.7% above the 50-day SMA (~$265), but still -5.3% below the 200-day SMA (~$298). That is a rebound within a longer-term downtrend rather than a confirmed new uptrend. The key technical level is roughly $298; reclaiming the 200-day would turn the chart positive. Failure there could lead to another test of $265-$273. RSI has room before overbought, so momentum can continue, but the entry timing is not ideal until the 200-day is reclaimed or a lower-risk pullback appears.

Macro Factors
  • AI/data-center baseload demand: hyperscalers need 24/7 carbon-free power, making nuclear PPAs strategically scarce.
  • PJM capacity auction prices: structurally higher clearing prices directly boost merchant revenue for CEG's fleet.
  • Nuclear Production Tax Credits: federal support for existing nuclear generation underpins cash-flow visibility.
  • Interest rates: higher-for-longer rates pressure capital-intensive, high-multiple clean-energy equities and raise Calpine integration financing costs.
  • Natural gas prices: lower gas can pressure power prices and spark spreads for the acquired Calpine gas fleet, while high gas makes nuclear more valuable.
Key Catalysts
  • More long-term nuclear PPA announcements — CEG added 920 MW in Q2 2026 with an average contract length of ~18.5 years.
  • Crane Clean Energy Center restart progress, including FERC, NRC, and construction milestones.
  • Q3 2026 earnings in late October/early November, testing progress toward the $11.50-$12.50 EPS guidance.
  • Closing of the Brazos Valley divestiture for $860 million and use of proceeds to pay down debt.
  • Future PJM capacity auction results and license extension decisions for New York nuclear units.
Key Risks
  • Calpine integration and leverage: long-term debt is ~$19.1B and TTM FCF is only ~$0.3B, leaving limited cushion if integration stumbles.
  • Crane restart execution risk: cost overruns, regulatory delays, or operational issues would hit earnings and credibility.
  • Merchant power and capacity-price reversal: PJM capacity prices and power prices can normalize lower, pressuring a capital-intensive fleet.
  • Policy/tax-credit risk: changes to nuclear PTCs or NRC licensing timelines would weaken the bull case.
  • Valuation/multiple risk: with P/S near 3.2x and a 0.6% dividend yield, the stock relies on growth; any disappointment invites sharp de-rating.
Investment Thesis

CEG owns the scarce asset — the largest US nuclear fleet — at a time when the market wants 24/7 carbon-free power, and management is executing on that with a Q2 beat, higher guidance, and more PPAs. But as of 2026-08-27, the stock is not a clear buy: reported financials are distorted by Calpine, free cash flow is weak, debt is high, and the valuation still assumes meaningful future execution. I would wait for a lower entry closer to the $250s or for evidence of improved cash conversion before putting new money to work.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Fair value is calculated by applying a 22.5x multiple to the $12.00 midpoint of FY2026 adjusted EPS guidance. That multiple is about a 25% discount to the stock's 3-year average P/E of ~29.9, justified by weak free cash flow, $19.1B of long-term debt, merchant power cyclicality, and Calpine integration risk; successful execution could support a higher multiple, but 270 is the conservative intrinsic estimate as of 2026-08-27.

AI Lean: BearishConfidence: Low

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Partially Agree

The 39.5 'Weak Fundamentals' score is directionally defensible if you trust only trailing GAAP and cash-flow data: TTM FCF is only ~$0.3B, ROIC is ~4%, and Q2 2026 GAAP operating margin compressed to 7.7%. But the formula cannot adjust for the Calpine acquisition distorting revenue, equity, and capex, nor can it see the Q2 2026 adjusted EPS beat, raised FY2026 guidance to $11.50-$12.50, or the structural AI/PJM demand tailwind. I would nudge the fair score into the low-50s, so 'Fair' rather than 'Weak,' but not to 'Good' because cash conversion and integration execution are not yet proven. That is roughly a 10-15 point upward adjustment, so I only partially agree with the exact score.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.