#68S&P 500 rank

CF — CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

2-yr score: 62.7/100 (Next 20%)Basic Materials13d
$116.30−1.38%
Description

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. is a global producer and distributor of hydrogen and nitrogen-based products. These essential chemicals serve a variety of purposes worldwide, including energy generation, agricultural fertilization, environmental emissions reduction, and numerous other industrial applications.

Score breakdownLatest quarter67.3 · Good
Growth
70.1
Quality / Profitability
65.2
Financial health
88.1
Ratio screener
63.7
Track record: 2-yr avg 62.7 (Good, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 53.4 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Nov 4, 2026 (in 13 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:23 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
8.6
Yield
1.78%
RSI (14)
43.5
vs SMA20
+0.03%
vs SMA50
-5.72%
vs SMA200
+1.14%
Analyst target
$128
+10.2%
6 analysts
AI theoretical price
$135
+16.1%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, CF trades at $133.05 (market cap ~$20.4B) with a 9.84x trailing P/E and a 0.13 PEG, sitting 21.9% above its 200-day SMA after a 21.6% three-month rally. It just posted record-level Q2 2026 results (EPS $4.73, net income $727M) driven by wide nitrogen margins and a low-cost North American gas position, even as Wall Street debates whether those margins are a cyclical peak.

AI sentimentNeutral

Sentiment is genuinely split. The tape is constructive - CF is up 21.6% over three months and 10.9% over one month as of 2026-09-13, and the sell-side consensus rating is still Buy (21 Buy / 14 Hold / 6 Sell). But the enthusiasm is capped by three things: (1) Q2 2026 EPS of $4.73 missed the $5.65 consensus even though net income was strong; (2) the stock at $133 is trading ABOVE both the consensus target of $126.17 and the recent-average target of $122.83, meaning the price has run past where most analysts see fair value; and (3) a fresh bearish datapoint - KeyBanc initiated with an Underweight and $115 target on 2026-09-10, warning nitrogen tailwinds are fading and 2027-28 supply will pressure EBITDA, echoed by UBS's Neutral/$123 and Freedom Broker's downgrade to Hold. Meanwhile, the bullish camp points to the 20% dividend hike (to $0.60/qtr), the new $2.0B buyback, and the low-cost structural moat.

Quarterly trend

The trajectory is a clear cyclical upswing that is still inflecting higher into 2026, not a secular growth story. Revenue bottomed at $1.27B in Q3 2023, ground through the $1.4-1.6B range through 2024, then accelerated: $1.66B (Q1'25), $1.89B (Q2'25), $1.66B (Q3'25), $1.87B (Q4'25), $1.99B (Q1'26), $2.22B (Q2'26). Q2 2026 revenue was +17.6% YoY and Q1 2026 was +19.4% YoY - a genuine re-acceleration after the flat 2024. Earnings power has moved even faster: diluted EPS went from $0.85 (Q3'23) and $1.03 (Q1'24) to $1.85 (Q1'25), $2.37 (Q2'25), $2.59 (Q4'25), $3.98 (Q1'26) and $4.73 (Q2'26). Q2 2026 net income of $727M was roughly double the $386M of Q2 2025. Margins expanded sharply - Q2 2026 gross margin was 51.5% ($1,145M / $2,222M) and operating margin 47.3%, versus 44.8%/39.4% in Q2 2025. Free cash flow confirms the quality: trailing-four-quarter FCF (Q3'25-Q2'26) is ~$1.91B ($717M + $313M + $273M + $607M), with H1 2026 alone throwing off $880M. The key caveat: this ramp is margin-driven, not volume-driven, and the driver (geopolitically tight nitrogen supply plus a wide US-vs-Europe gas spread) is a cycle, not a permanent ratchet - so the recent strength is a cyclical peak-level blip more than a durable trend line.

Valuation assessment

Fair, with the case cutting both ways. On earnings it looks cheap: 9.84x trailing P/E (EPS $13.665), only ~8.9x the $15.00 next-FY consensus EPS, a 0.13 PEG, and a 9.3% trailing FCF yield on the $20.4B market cap. That is below the 5-year average P/E of 10.62x. On sales it looks rich: 2.64x P/S against a 5-year average of only 2.11x, which is the tell that the market knows current margins are elevated and the earnings multiple is optically low precisely because peak earnings are in the denominator. The deterministic valuation context labels it 'Neutral vs. its own history,' and that is the right read - cheap on a P/E you can't fully trust, rich on a P/S that assumes margins hold. At $133.05 as of 2026-09-13, the stock already sits above the $126.17 consensus target, so a lot of the good news is in the price.

Price vs. earnings playbook

Right now the market is doing two contradictory things at once. It is paying up on momentum (up 21.6% in 3 months) for earnings that HAVE shown up - H1 2026 EPS of $8.71 is nearly double H1 2025's $3.98 - but it is doing so at a price above where the average analyst models fair value. The honest framing: the market is not underpricing a turnaround (the turnaround already happened), and it is not obviously overpricing unproven growth either (forward EPS of $15.00 implies only ~10% growth over TTM). The real debate is duration - whether 2027 EPS holds near $15 or rolls over toward mid-cycle as new global ammonia capacity comes online. Watch the spread between the $145 high target and $115 low target as the market's way of pricing that uncertainty; a Q3 report (Nov 4, 2026) that shows a firm UAN order book and healthy fall ammonia demand would validate the bulls, while soft pricing commentary would let the bear case run.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, the technicals are constructive but not stretched. RSI(14) stood at 56.9 - neutral to mildly bullish, with room before overbought. Price was above every key moving average: +3.1% vs the 20-day (SMA20 ~$129), +7.8% vs the 50-day (SMA50 ~$123.4), and +21.9% vs the 200-day (SMA200 ~$109). The stock is in a firm uptrend and sits in the upper part of its 52-week range ($75.42-$141.96), but the 21.9% extension above the 200-day is the warning flag - momentum chasers are paying up well above trend. Entry-timing implication: the trend-following signal is positive, but the risk/reward for a fresh position is mediocre right here; a pullback toward the 50-day (~$123) would offer a materially better entry and roughly coincides with the recent analyst target cluster.

Macro factors
  • Natural gas cost spread - US Henry Hub feed-gas versus elevated European/Asian prices is the core of CF's structural cost advantage; any narrowing of that spread compresses margins directly.
  • Global nitrogen supply cycle - new ammonia/UAN capacity (including Middle East and other export-oriented projects) is expected to pressure 2027-2028 pricing, the central bear thesis behind KeyBanc's Underweight.
  • Geopolitical supply shocks - the Iran-related conflict temporarily tightened global nitrogen supply and inflated H1 2026 margins; prices are already normalizing back toward pre-conflict levels, so this tailwind is fading.
  • Agricultural economics - farmer affordability, crop prices and fall-fill/application demand drive offtake; demand is currently solid but sensitive to row-crop profitability.
  • Low beta / defensive-rotation angle - beta of 0.399 makes CF a relatively defensive holding in a basic-materials sleeve, but it also means it will lag a broad risk-on rotation.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings on Nov 4, 2026 (call Nov 5) - focus on UAN order book, fall ammonia demand, realized pricing, and any 2027 capex/guidance commentary.
  • Blue Point One low-carbon ammonia project - groundbreaking occurred Aug 26, 2026 with JERA and Mitsui; construction milestones and capex deployment are multi-year growth catalysts.
  • Continued capital returns - the July 2026 20% dividend hike (to $0.60/qtr) and new $2.0B buyback authorization shrink the share count and support EPS.
  • Nitrogen price and new-supply announcements - any confirmation of accelerating global capacity additions or, conversely, further supply disruptions.
Key risks
  • Cyclical margin normalization - Q2 2026 gross margin of 51.5% is well above the ~35-45% seen through 2024; a reversion toward mid-cycle would cut EPS materially and the 9x P/E would no longer look cheap.
  • Looming new global nitrogen supply pressuring 2027-2028 pricing and EBITDA, as flagged by KeyBanc's Underweight initiation.
  • Natural gas spread compression or a US gas price spike would erode CF's core cost advantage.
  • Price has run above consensus targets ($126.17 avg, $122.83 recent) - a stock that has already priced in good execution is vulnerable to any earnings or pricing disappointment.
Investment thesis

CF is a genuinely high-quality, low-cost nitrogen producer: 47% operating margins in Q2 2026, a 4.86 current ratio, net debt of only ~$0.7B, ~$1.9B trailing FCF, and aggressive buybacks plus a freshly hiked dividend. The fundamentals are real and the balance sheet is fortress-grade. The problem is price and timing: at $133.05 as of 2026-09-13, after a 21.6% three-month run and trading above the $126 consensus target, with nitrogen margins at cyclical highs and new supply looming for 2027-28, the market is already paying for a lot of that quality. This is a good business at a fair-to-full price - a reasonable core holding to accumulate on weakness, not a fat pitch right here.

AI theoretical price methodology

I applied a ~9.0x multiple to the next-FY consensus EPS of $15.00 ($15.00 x 9.0 = $135.00). The multiple is deliberately set below the stock's 5-year average P/E of 10.62x to discount the risk that current peak-level nitrogen margins and the ~47% Q2 2026 operating margin are not durable and that 2027-2028 global supply additions will compress earnings, while staying above trough multiples because of CF's low-cost US gas position, fortress balance sheet, buyback-driven share-count reduction, and 1.78% dividend yield. This lands roughly in line with the current $133.05 price (as of 2026-09-13), implying the stock is close to fairly valued.

AI lean: BullishConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

The deterministic score of 67.3 ('Good Fundamentals') is a fair read of this business, and my independent view lands within a few points of it, so I agree. The one thing the formula structurally cannot see is the mirror of its known blind spot: it penalizes cyclical troughs, but here CF looks close to a cyclical PEAK, and its entirely backward-looking inputs (trailing YoY growth, trailing margins, trailing ROIC) are flattered by peak nitrogen prices. That argues for shaving maybe 3-5 points off the quality/growth legs for durability risk, but not enough to change the 'Good Fundamentals' band - the balance sheet (current ratio 4.86, net debt ~$0.7B), real FCF (~$1.9B trailing), and low-cost moat are genuinely strong regardless of where the cycle lands. I would not move this two or more tiers. No single dated material event (no acquisition, restatement, or bankruptcy) justifies deviating from the prescribed mapping, so I keep the mandated Bullish lean even while noting the peak-cycle caveat.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.