CME — CME Group Inc.
World-Class Margins, Little Margin for Error
Record Q3 volumes and 65%-plus operating margins, but near-flat forward EPS growth keeps the shares fairly valued.
CME Group Inc., through its various subsidiaries, manages international marketplaces for the exchange of futures and options on futures contracts worldwide. Its extensive array of product offerings includes futures and options linked to a broad spectrum of underlying assets, such as interest rates, equity indices, foreign exchange, agricultural commodities, energy, and metals, alongside fixed-income products.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-10-21, CME Group traded at $295.31 (market cap $106.2B), or 24.1x trailing EPS of $12.29 and 23.9x the $12.33 consensus next-FY EPS, with a 4.11% dividend yield. The stock had just posted a record Q3 2026 (revenue +13% YoY to $1.74B, adjusted EPS $3.02 vs. $2.98 expected) and stood at an RSI of 71.95, roughly 7.4% above both its 20- and 50-day moving averages.
The tape is doing the talking: as of 2026-10-21 the stock was up 24.4% over three months, 6.99% over one month and 6.22% in the prior week, and sits near the top of its $218.31–$329.16 52-week range despite a roughly 2% dip on the Q3 print. Record Q3 ADV of 29.4M contracts (up double digits across all six asset classes), international ADV of 9M and record market-data revenue of $243M (+20% YoY) gave buyers a clean story. The sell-side is more muted than the tape: consensus is Hold (14 buy / 18 hold / 5 sell) with a $298.71 average target that is barely above the current price — so the market is paying up on record volumes and volatility, while analysts see the shares as roughly fully valued.
Revenue is lumpy and volatility-driven rather than smoothly compounding: YoY growth ran +6.0% (Q4'24), +10.4% (Q1'25), +10.4% (Q2'25), -2.9% (Q3'25), +8.1% (Q4'25), +14.5% (Q1'26), +0.8% (Q2'26) and +13.0% (Q3'26). That means the headline +13% Q3 2026 figure is flattered by an easy comparison against the -2.9% quarter a year earlier — Q2 2026 grew only 0.8% YoY. TTM revenue is $6.97B, and the consensus next-FY estimate of $7.06B implies just ~1.3% growth, so the forward curve being priced in is close to flat, not accelerating. Operating margin has been range-bound at 61–70% with Q1 the seasonal peak: 60.0% (Q4'23) → 65.3% (Q2'24) → 66.7% (Q2'25) → 69.7% (Q1'26) → 64.9% (Q2'26) → 65.7% (Q3'26), a real but modest ~2.5pt expansion versus Q3 2025's 63.2%. EPS is similarly uneven: +16.1% YoY in Q3'26 and +21.4% in Q1'26, but only +2.5% in Q2'26, and Q4'25's $3.24 was inflated by non-operating items (net income of $1,168.0M exceeded operating income of $1,019.6M). Verdict: stable-to-slowly-improving profitability on a cyclical, record-high volume base — not a structural acceleration.
Fair, not cheap. As of 2026-10-21 the trailing P/E was 24.09x versus a five-year average of 25.22x — a modest discount to its own history — and the forward P/E on the $12.33 next-FY consensus EPS was 23.9x, against an implied forward growth rate of under 2%. PEG of 1.29 is undemanding for a 65%+ operating-margin franchise but not a bargain. On the other hand, price-to-sales at 15.23x sits ~6% above its five-year average of 14.34x, and trailing free cash flow of roughly $4.2B (through Q2 2026) on a $106.2B market cap is only a ~4.0% FCF yield — and since the 4.11% dividend consumes essentially all of earnings, total return depends almost entirely on earnings growth rather than compounding retained capital. Net-net: roughly fairly valued, with the P/E saying slight discount and the P/S and FCF yield saying slight premium.
At $295.31 the stock is within ~1% of the $298.71 consensus target and ~2% below the recent average target of $300.57 (range $270–$337), meaning the market has already paid for the record-volume story. The Q3 beat was small — $3.02 adjusted vs. $2.98 expected — and the stock still slipped on expense/guidance sensitivity, which tells you expectations are high. The key asymmetry: consensus next-FY EPS of $12.33 vs. trailing $12.29 assumes essentially zero EPS growth, so any sustained ADV records or continued 20% data-revenue growth would force upward revisions and justify a higher multiple; conversely, if volatility compresses back toward 2024-25 levels, revenue reverts toward the flat Q2'26 pattern and a 24x multiple on flat earnings has no cushion. This is a stock priced for volatility to stay elevated, not for a turnaround that hasn't shown up.
Overbought and stretched. As of 2026-10-21, RSI(14) stood at 71.95, with the price +7.36% above its 20-day SMA, +7.39% above its 50-day SMA and +5.88% above its 200-day SMA — implying those averages sit clustered around roughly $275–$279, well below the $295.31 last price. The shape is a long flat base followed by a sharp breakout: six-month return of only +3.84% against a three-month return of +24.4%. Entry-timing implication: chasing at RSI 72 after a 7% two-day pop is poor risk/reward; a reset back toward the $275 area where the 20/50/200-day averages converge, or simply an RSI cooling below 60, would offer a far better entry for anyone adding.
- Interest-rate volatility and the path of central-bank policy: CME's flagship rates complex (Treasury and SOFR futures/options) is the single biggest volume driver, and persistent macro uncertainty is currently a tailwind rather than a headwind.
- Equity and index volatility (VIX regime): low-volatility regimes compress equity-derivative volumes and fee revenue, so a return to 2024-style calm would hit the record ADV narrative directly.
- Regulatory scrutiny of central counterparty (CCP) resiliency, Basel capital-adequacy frameworks and crypto-derivatives oversight — higher capital and compliance costs for clearing members, though CME's scale insulates it better than smaller venues.
- Competitive entry in US Treasury futures and crypto derivatives from rival exchange ventures and crypto-native venues, the main long-term threat to CME's rates franchise economics.
- Cloud migration with Google Cloud plus hybrid co-location, which lowers long-term infrastructure overhead but carries near-term transition and expense risk — the exact area the market flagged after the Q3 print.
- Next earnings report on 2027-02-03 (estimated): confirmation of Q4/FY2026 volume records, the expense trajectory behind the post-Q3 guidance sensitivity, and whether the 20%+ growth in market-data revenue sustains.
- Continued record ADV — especially international (9M contracts in Q3 2026) and crypto product suites — plus scaling of the $100B daily capital efficiencies from portfolio margining that keep clients on the platform.
- A macro volatility spike (rate decision surprises, geopolitical shocks, elections) that would drive a step-change in hedging volume and force consensus EPS revisions above the current near-flat $12.33.
- Full commercial rollout of cloud-based client access and hybrid exchange services, which could re-rate the market-data/technology revenue mix over time.
- Volume mean reversion: Q3 2026's +13% revenue growth came against a -2.9% comp, and Q2 2026 grew only +0.8% YoY — the underlying base rate is mid-single-digit, not low-teens.
- Expense and margin pressure — the stock fell ~2% on the Q3 print on guidance/cost sensitivity even though the quarter beat, showing how little room there is for cost slippage at 24x earnings.
- A ~100% payout ratio: the 4.11% yield (which includes CME's variable annual dividend) consumes essentially all of earnings, so a down year in volumes mechanically cuts the dividend and leaves no retained-capital buffer.
- Competitive erosion in Treasury futures and crypto derivatives from new entrants, plus adverse CCP/Basel capital rules that could raise clearing-member costs.
- Valuation and technicals: at roughly the consensus price target with RSI 71.95 and price 7.4% above its 50-day average, near-term upside is limited and the stock is vulnerable to any volatility compression.
CME is a genuinely superb franchise — 82.5% gross, 65.7% operating and 63.1% net margins, debt-to-equity of 0.13, a 0.27 beta and a 4.1% dividend yield — but at $295.31 and ~24x earnings (23.9x forward), with a Hold consensus and a $298.71 average target essentially at the current price, the record-volume story is already in the stock. The business is not cheap enough to buy on quality alone and not cheap at all on a 4% FCF yield with consensus modeling flat forward EPS growth. This is a fairly valued quality compounder with a stretched short-term chart — a name to own on pullbacks toward the high-$270s, not to chase at RSI 72.
I applied a 24.5x multiple — deliberately between the current 24.1x trailing and the five-year average of 25.22x, appropriate for a ~65% operating-margin franchise growing EPS in the mid-single digits with a 4.1% dividend yield — to the $12.33 consensus next-FY EPS, giving $302. Cross-checking with EV/EBITDA: enterprise value of ~$107.4B ($106.2B market cap + $3.43B long-term debt - $2.20B cash) on ~$5.0B of TTM EBITDA is 21.5x, and at that same multiple the equity value lands near $296/share — so $302 sits at the reasonable midpoint of the two methods and implies ~2% upside from the $295.31 price as of 2026-10-21.
The deterministic 53.3 ('Fair Fundamentals') undersells CME by roughly one band, and I'd put my own score in the high-60s ('Good Fundamentals'). The specific distortion is the ROIC leg: the formula computes 8.4% on a capital base that includes a $192.1B balance sheet dominated by clearinghouse performance-bond assets and liabilities, which are pass-through and not operating capital. On the capital CME actually employs, it earns a 63.1% net margin and ~$4.4B of TTM net income on $26.6B of equity, and that one leg alone is what drags quality/profitability to 56.6 despite operating margins that should max out the margin sub-score. Second, the growth score of 49.5 partly reflects the lumpy volatility-driven revenue pattern (Q2'26 +0.8% YoY vs. Q3'26 +13.0%), which is mean-reverting rather than deteriorating. The 0.05% accruals ratio is essentially neutral — not a red flag. I would not push the score higher than high-60s, though: the ~100% payout ratio and 23.9x forward multiple leave no valuation cushion. Importantly, this is not the cyclical-trough pattern the backtest warns about — CME is at a volume and price peak, not a trough, so the backward-looking formula is not unfairly penalizing it here; if anything it is flattering the growth leg. No single dated event (acquisition, restatement, bankruptcy) justifies deviating from the band/valuation mapping, so the Neutral lean stands as the table dictates.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.