#105S&P 500 rank

CMG — Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

2-yr score: 59.2/100 (Next 20%)Consumer Cyclical6d
$28.09−5.26%
Description

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., along with its affiliated companies, oversees the ownership and daily running of Chipotle Mexican Grill eateries. By February 15, 2022, its global presence included roughly 3,000 restaurant locations spread across the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and other parts of Europe.

Score breakdownLatest quarter50.5 · Fair
Growth
56.3
Quality / Profitability
58.2
Financial health
33.7
Ratio screener
47.3
Track record: 2-yr avg 59.2 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 64.2 (Good, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 28, 2026 (in 6 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Favorable (oversold / below trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:24 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
25.8
Yield
N/A
RSI (14)
26.8
vs SMA20
-9.36%
vs SMA50
-16.67%
vs SMA200
-18.40%
Analyst target
$42
+48.1%
14 analysts
AI theoretical price
$40
+40.6%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, Chipotle traded at $36.21 with a $46.4B market cap, a 33.2x trailing P/E and a 31.5x forward P/E on next-FY EPS of $1.15 — roughly mid-range in its 52-week band of $28.04–$42.82. Revenue growth is accelerating (Q2 2026 +9.3% YoY) while operating margin and EPS are compressing, leaving the stock cheap versus its own five-year average multiple but only fair versus its current growth rate.

AI sentimentNeutral

As of 2026-09-13 the tape was constructive but not committed: RSI(14) sat at 51.08 (dead center), the price was -0.74% versus its 20-day SMA yet +3.22% versus the 50-day and +3.55% versus the 200-day, with a +10.91% one-month return offset by -2.06% in the final week. The analyst community is more bullish than the tape — 46 Buy / 21 Hold / 0 Sell with a $42.41 consensus target and a recent average near $42.75 — following the late-July Q2 2026 beat (revenue +9.3% to $3.35B, comps +2.2%, FY comp guidance raised, 100 new units opened). The catch, and the reason sentiment hasn't run further, is that Q2 operating margin fell to 15.7% from 18.8% a year ago and net income dropped 7.5% YoY — investors believe the top line but are not yet willing to pay up for the bottom line.

Quarterly trend

Revenue is accelerating; earnings are not. Quarterly revenue grew from $2,471.9M in Q3 2023 to $3,348.6M in Q2 2026 (roughly a 10.7% three-year CAGR), and the YoY cadence has actually strengthened through 2026: +4.9% in Q4 2025, +7.5% in Q3 2025, +7.4% in Q1 2026, then +9.3% in Q2 2026. Margins are moving the other way. Operating margin was 18.8% in Q2 2025 and 15.7% in Q2 2026 (-307bp), and 17.2% in Q1 2025 versus 13.6% in Q1 2026 (-362bp); gross margin fell to 25.2% in Q2 2026 from 27.4% a year earlier. The result: Q2 2026 net income of $403.5M versus $436.1M (-7.5% YoY) and Q1 2026 net income of $302.8M versus $386.6M (-21.7% YoY), with diluted EPS of $0.32 in Q2 2026 exactly flat YoY and $0.23 in Q1 2026 versus $0.28. This is a classic cost-inflation squeeze rather than a demand problem — comps were positive, transactions grew ~1%, average check ~1.2%, and free cash flow is still healthy (TTM FCF of $1,569M through Q2 2026, up ~7.0% from the prior-year TTM of $1,466M). The honest read: the top-line trend is real and improving, but the margin trend has been negative for four straight quarters and there is no evidence yet in the numbers that it has troughed. That is the single swing factor for the equity.

Valuation assessment

Cheap versus its own history, fair versus the market. As of 2026-09-13 the trailing P/E was 33.2x against a five-year average of 51.2x, and P/S was 3.74x against a five-year average of 5.76x — a genuine de-rating of roughly 35% on earnings and 35% on sales. The forward P/E of 31.5x (on next-FY EPS of $1.15) is only modestly below the trailing figure, which tells you the Street is not modeling a margin snapback. The PEG of -9.38 is meaningless as a value signal here because the trailing earnings growth input is negative (net income fell YoY in each of the last two quarters) — it is a warning about declining profits, not a bargain flag. Two things keep me from calling this outright cheap: (1) the de-rating is mostly rational, since revenue growth has stepped down from the mid-teens to high-single-digits and EPS growth has gone to roughly zero, so 51x was never a sustainable anchor; and (2) at 31.5x forward, CMG still carries a meaningful premium to the broad market for a business the consensus models growing revenue ~4.9% and EPS ~4.4% next year. Net: not expensive on its own history, not a steal on its own growth.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The stock is priced for 'no margin recovery, no growth acceleration, and no multiple expansion' — which is the interesting part. Consensus next-FY revenue of $13.03B implies only +4.9% growth versus the $12.42B TTM run-rate, a deceleration from the +9.3% just reported, and consensus next-FY EPS of $1.15 implies just +4.4% over the $1.102 TTM figure. In other words, the sell-side is assuming that Q2 2026's depressed 15.7% operating margin persists indefinitely and that cost inflation keeps eating the operating leverage. If Chipotle simply holds a ~16% operating margin on a FY2027 revenue base near $14B, EPS could plausibly reach the $1.35–1.40 range — roughly 20% above the current consensus number, which is where the analyst $42–44 targets are implicitly coming from. The asymmetry: estimates look conservative on the top line but embedded margin pessimism is doing all the work. The risk to that setup is that the 33x trailing multiple is itself the thing that gives — a flat-EPS year at 33x is a de-rating candidate if inflation persists into 2027.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 51.08 — neither overbought nor oversold, no signal. The price of $36.205 was -0.74% below the 20-day SMA but +3.22% above the 50-day and +3.55% above the 200-day, which is the signature of a recovery that is intact but has stalled near-term. Multi-period returns confirm the same pattern: +10.91% over one month, +12.32% over three months, +11.32% over six months, and -2.06% over the last week. The stock has climbed well off its $28.04 52-week low and sits in the middle of the $28.04–$42.82 range. Timing implication: there is no technical edge in either direction right now. A decisive reclaim of the 20-day SMA and the $37–38 zone would confirm the uptrend is resuming; a break back below the 200-day would say the six-month recovery has failed and the margin story is dominating again. Trading on this chart alone is a coin flip — wait for the Q3 print on October 28.

Macro factors
  • Persistent food, beverage, paper and labor inflation is the dominant swing factor: it drove the Q2 2026 operating margin down 307bp YoY to 15.7% and gross margin down 214bp to 25.2%, and management has explicitly flagged continued cost headwinds on recent calls.
  • A value-conscious consumer: the fast-casual and QSR sector is being driven by promotions and discounting, and while Chipotle has protected average check (+1.2% in Q2 2026) and positive transactions (~1%), it remains exposed to lower-income cohorts trading down or eating out less.
  • Labor market and wage dynamics: minimum wage pressure and competition for hourly restaurant workers raise the cost base in a business that is labor-intensive at the store level; Chipotle's answer is scaling high-efficiency kitchen packages (dual-sided planchas, optimized rice cookers) to lift throughput per labor hour.
  • Consumer discretionary spending and rate sensitivity: with a beta of 0.937 CMG behaves closer to a defensive name, but any recession or sharp consumer pullback would hit restaurant traffic and simultaneously compress the multiple on a stock trading at 31.5x forward earnings.
  • Input-cost and cross-border exposure: commodity volatility in avocado, beef and dairy, plus the new Mexican market entry (first unit opened July 2026 in Nuevo León) introducing FX and cross-border supply complexity into what was a purely domestic operator.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings on October 28, 2026 — the near-term swing event. Watch comparable sales, unit growth (management has been running near 100 openings per quarter) and, most importantly, whether restaurant-level and operating margins have troughed after four consecutive quarters of YoY compression.
  • Any evidence of margin inflection — moderating food/labor inflation, or measurable throughput gains from the high-efficiency kitchen equipment rollout — would be the fastest route to an EPS estimate revision cycle and a multiple re-rating.
  • Continued international build-out, anchored by the July 2026 Mexican market entry, which extends the unit-growth story beyond the domestic footprint and supports a longer-duration growth narrative.
  • Menu innovation (high-protein campaigns, limited-time sauces) supporting average check and traffic without relying on discounting — the key differentiator in a promotional fast-casual environment.
  • Capital return and cash generation: TTM free cash flow of $1,569M with zero funded long-term debt gives management room for continued buybacks, which mechanically supports EPS even in a flat-earnings year.
Key risks
  • Structural rather than cyclical margin compression: operating margin has fallen from 18.8% to 15.7% YoY in Q2 2026 and from 17.2% to 13.6% in Q1 2026. If inflation proves sticky and throughput gains don't offset it, EPS stays flat and the 33x trailing multiple continues to grind lower.
  • Decelerating growth assumptions already embedded in the sell-side model: consensus next-FY revenue of $13.03B implies only +4.9% growth versus the current +9.3% reported rate — if the Street is right, the 'growth premium' justification for a market-beating multiple weakens considerably.
  • Consumer weakness: transaction growth of roughly 1% means comps are leaning heavily on price. A pullback in discretionary restaurant spending, particularly from lower-income consumers, would hit both traffic and the ability to take further price.
  • Valuation risk even after the de-rating: at 31.5x forward EPS on ~4–5% expected earnings growth, CMG still trades at a premium to the broad market with EPS growth below the market's — there is room for further multiple compression if the margin story doesn't improve.
  • Balance-sheet optics: a current ratio of 0.715 and a reported debt-to-equity of 2.464 (largely operating-lease obligations rather than funded borrowings) give less cushion than the headline numbers suggest if free cash flow were to slow materially.
Investment thesis

Chipotle is a genuinely high-quality business hitting a margin air pocket, not a demand wall: 19% ROIC, 54% ROE, $1,569M of TTM free cash flow through Q2 2026, essentially no funded long-term debt, 100 new units per quarter, and revenue growth that is actually accelerating (+4.9% → +7.5% → +7.4% → +9.3% YoY through the last four quarters). The problem is that EPS is flat-to-down — Q2 2026 net income fell 7.5% YoY and diluted EPS was exactly $0.32 both years — and the market has already done the work of re-rating the multiple from 51x to 33x. At $36.21 on 2026-09-13, you are paying about 31.5x next-FY earnings for a company the consensus models growing EPS roughly 4.4%. That is not a bargain unless you underwrite margin recovery, and there is no evidence in the numbers yet that the trough is in. I'd call it a fair-value hold: own it for the unit-growth runway and the option value of margin normalization, but don't pay up before Q3 results show restaurant-level margins stabilizing, and don't expect the old 50x multiple to come back.

AI theoretical price methodology

I applied a 31x forward P/E to my FY2027E EPS estimate of $1.27 (built off the $1.15 consensus next-FY figure plus a modest ~10% step-up as unit growth compounds and margin compression moderates), giving $39.37 — a multiple deliberately below the five-year average of 51.2x to reflect the growth step-down, but above the broad market for a 19%-ROIC, essentially debt-free compounder. I cross-checked it against a required FCF yield approach: roughly $1.62B of normalized free cash flow capitalized at a 3.2% required yield implies a ~$50.6B equity value, or about $39.4 per share on 1.283B shares — the two methods converge at $39–40.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

My independent read lands close to the deterministic 50.5 ('Fair Fundamentals'), so I agree with the band, though I'd nudge the number slightly higher. Two specific adjustments: (1) the financial-health pillar (score 33.7, 15% weight) is punishing what is really a negative-working-capital model — Chipotle carries zero funded long-term debt, generates $1,569M of TTM free cash flow, and its 0.715 current ratio is a structural feature of a business that converts inventory to cash in days, not a distress signal; that leg is plausibly 15–25 points too low, worth roughly +3 points on the blended score. (2) The score is entirely backward-looking, and its growth and quality legs are being dragged by a margin air pocket that may be cyclical inflation rather than structural erosion, given that revenue growth is accelerating and transactions turned positive. The counterweight, which keeps me from going further, is that the 'Cheap vs. its own history' tag (33.2x vs 51.2x five-year average) reflects a largely rational de-rating — forward EPS of $1.15 implies only ~4.4% growth, so there is no obvious mispricing in the multiple. Net-net I'd put the score around 53–55, still Fair Fundamentals, a move under 10 points. Note also that Chipotle is only mildly cyclical and this is a ~300bp margin dip, not a semiconductor-style collapse in profitability, so the 'depressed cyclical at the trough' adjustment is real but modest here — it argues for a small upward nudge, not a re-rating to 'Good.' No single dated material event (acquisition, bankruptcy, restatement, fraud disclosure) appears in the research brief, so I applied the band-to-lean mapping exactly: Fair Fundamentals maps to Neutral regardless of the cheap-vs-history valuation label.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.