#455S&P 500 rank

CPT — Camden Property Trust

2-yr score: 39.1/100 (Bottom 10%)Real Estate14d
$100.19+0.42%
Description

Camden Property Trust, an S&P 400 listed entity, specializes in real estate, primarily through the ownership, operation, development, renovation, purchase, and building of multi-family residential complexes. Currently, Camden possesses stakes in and manages 167 properties housing 56,850 apartment units throughout the United States.

Score breakdownLatest quarter45.6 · Fair
Growth
32.1
Quality / Profitability
49.2
Financial health
60.7
Ratio screener
47.9
Track record: 2-yr avg 39.1 (Weak, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 44.7 (Weak, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Nov 5, 2026 (in 14 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:24 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
33.2
Yield
3.69%
RSI (14)
54.1
vs SMA20
+2.53%
vs SMA50
-1.91%
vs SMA200
-5.67%
Analyst target
$112
+12.1%
12 analysts
AI theoretical price
$112
+11.8%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, CPT traded at $103.01, near the bottom of its $96.53–$119.81 52-week range, with RSI(14) at 31.73 and the shares sitting 3.3% below the 20-day, 6.6% below the 50-day and 4.0% below the 200-day SMA. The business itself is flat, not broken: trailing-twelve-month revenue of ~$1.57B with essentially zero growth, operating margin compressed to ~17.8%, a 3.69% dividend yield, and a freshly deleveraged balance sheet following the $1.625B California portfolio sale that closed 2026-07-29.

AI sentimentNeutral

Sentiment as of 2026-09-13 is neutral-to-cautious, and the tape shows it: CPT was down 10.41% over three months and 4.95% over one month, with RSI at 31.73 and price below all three major moving averages. The sell-side consensus is literally 'Hold' (18 Buy / 20 Hold / 3 Sell), with a consensus target of $114.25 and recent target trims (Wells Fargo cut $113 to $110 while staying at Hold; BofA sits higher at $132). The July 29, 2026 close of the 11-community, 3,620-unit California sale for ~$1.625B and the ~$0.9B debt paydown is a strategic positive but is also near-term FFO-dilutive and has removed a chunk of earnings, which explains why the stock de-rated even as management reiterated that Q3 2026 is tracking in line with guidance at the September Evercore, Barclays and BofA conferences. Nothing here is panic selling; it is a sector-digesting-supply, wait-and-see tape.

Quarterly trend

The three-year trend is stagnation, not deterioration and not growth. Revenue has been pinned in a $383M–$397M quarterly band since Q3 2023: $390.8M (Q3 2023) vs. $395.5M (Q2 2026), which is -0.25% year over year against Q2 2025's $396.5M. That is why the deterministic score's growth pillar is only 32.1 — the formula is reading reality correctly. Operating income is the softer line: it has slid from $83.5M in Q3 2023 and $82.2M in Q4 2023 to $63.1M in Q2 2026, with operating margin compressing from ~21.4% to ~16.0% (TTM 17.8%). That is a real, multi-year margin compression driven by the multifamily supply wave capping rent growth, not a one-quarter blip. Reported GAAP earnings are noisy and should be discounted: EPS swung from $2.03 (Q4 2023, gain-heavy) to -$0.04 (Q3 2024) to $1.43 (Q4 2025, again gain-heavy) to $0.18 (Q2 2026) on a $187.9M-to-$18.8M net income swing — buy/sell gains and JV income, not operations. Cash flow is the sturdier line: TTM operating cash flow of $807.4M is up modestly from $792.8M for the prior-year four quarters, though free cash flow is lumpy (negative -$41.8M in Q1 2026 on $189.9M of capex, +$65.7M in Q2 2026). One data caveat a reader should not misread: gross profit prints negative in Q1 2026 (-$60.1M) and Q2 2026 (-$71.7M) while operating income stays positive — that is an FMP presentation/reclassification artifact (likely tied to the held-for-sale California assets), not a collapse in property economics. Accruals ratio is -2.04% as of 2026-06-30, i.e. cash earnings exceed reported net income, which is the conservative/healthy pattern. Also worth flagging: stockholders' equity fell from $4.98B (Dec 2023) to $3.80B (Jun 2026) as dividends outran GAAP earnings.

Valuation assessment

On the company's own history, CPT screens cheap, and the deterministic score agrees ('Cheap vs. its own history,' 81.5). As of 2026-09-13 the stock traded at 34.1x TTM EPS versus a 5-year average of 42.76x, and 6.58x TTM sales versus a 5-year average of 9.43x. I would discount both: GAAP EPS for a REIT is distorted by depreciation (depressing) and by episodic gains (inflating — Q4 2025's $1.43 EPS and Q4 2023's $2.03 were gain-heavy), and the 5-year P/S average was set in a 2020–2021 era when apartment REITs traded at 20x+ FFO. The forward EPS estimate of $1.076 is not a usable number for a REIT. The lenses that actually work: TTM price/OCF of ~12.8x, an estimated ~16x P/AFFO (TTM OCF of $807.4M less ~$150M maintenance capex, on ~102M shares, implies ~$6.40/share), a 3.69% dividend yield versus a 5-year average nearer 3.3–3.5%, and FMP's reported EV/EBITDA of 13.88x (note: FMP defines EV as market cap + total liabilities - cash, which overstates true EV by ~$0.7B of non-debt liabilities). Net: fair-to-modestly-cheap, roughly 10–12% below my estimate of intrinsic value, with the 'cheap vs. history' label directionally right but partly an artifact of a higher-multiple prior era.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market as of 2026-09-13 is pricing a flat-to-dilutive earnings path: investors are capitalizing a business with zero revenue growth, ~16% operating margins, and a portfolio that just shrank by ~3,620 units, and they are paying roughly 16x estimated AFFO for it. That is not pricing in a recovery in rent growth, and it is barely paying for the post-sale interest-expense savings from retiring ~$0.9B of unsecured revolver/commercial paper balances. The setup is asymmetric only if Q3/Q4 2026 core FFO holds near the mid-$6s per share and 2027 brings a rollover in the Sun Belt delivery pipeline — that is when estimate revisions turn positive and a 16x AFFO multiple can drift toward 17–18x. The bear case is equally mechanical: EPS/FFO estimates are cut again if rent growth stays flat-to-negative into 2027, and the ~$0.7B+ of remaining sale proceeds gets redeployed at yields below the disposition cap rate, making the sale FFO-dilutive rather than accretive. Watch the Q3 2026 print for two things — same-store revenue growth and any buyback authorization — not the headline EPS.

Technical picture

Clearly negative trend, not yet a confirmed bottom. As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) was 31.73 — near oversold but above the sub-30 washout zone — and price was 3.27% below the 20-day, 6.57% below the 50-day and 4.03% below the 200-day SMA, which is a textbook stacked-downtrend configuration. Momentum is deteriorating on every window shorter than six months: -2.54% over one week, -4.95% over one month, -10.41% over three months, versus +2.39% over six months — meaning the entire spring bounce has been given back. Entry-timing implication: there is no technical evidence of accumulation yet. The levels that matter are the 52-week low of $96.53 (a break there opens the $90s) and a reclaim of the 50-day SMA (roughly $110) as first confirmation of a trend change. For income-oriented buyers, RSI under 35 with a 3.69% yield has historically been a reasonable accumulation zone for apartment REITs, but scale in and leave room; do not treat $103 as a floor.

Macro factors
  • Multifamily supply wave: record Sun Belt completions in 2024–2026 are the direct cause of CPT's flat rent growth and ~5-point operating margin compression; the pipeline is expected to taper into 2027, which is the single biggest swing factor for the stock.
  • Interest rates and cap rates: elevated rates keep borrowing costs and cap rates high, compress REIT net asset values, and make CPT's deleveraging (via the July 2026 California sale) the right capital-allocation move rather than debt-funded acquisition.
  • Housing affordability: single-family ownership remains out of reach for many renters and wage growth has outpaced rent inflation in key metros, which is keeping occupancy and rental demand resilient even as asking rents stall.
  • State-level regulatory and cost divergence: the exit from California removes a chunk of regulatory friction, insurance cost and tax exposure, concentrating the portfolio in lower-friction Sun Belt markets — a structural quality improvement the P&L won't show for several quarters.
  • Defensive/income rotation: with a 0.782 beta and a 3.69% dividend yield, CPT is a candidate for defensive income flows if growth expectations soften, but it also loses relative appeal if long yields rise and yield-hungry capital rotates to bonds.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings (late October/early November 2026): the first full quarter reflecting the closed California sale and the ~$0.9B debt paydown — the key read on core FFO per share, same-store revenue growth, and interest expense.
  • Deployment of the remaining California proceeds (~$0.7B+): development starts, share buybacks, or further debt reduction — management commentary here is the clearest signal on whether the sale was FFO-accretive.
  • 2027 supply rollover: if Sun Belt deliveries peak and decline as expected, pricing power and rent growth should reaccelerate, which would drive positive estimate revisions after two years of flat revenue.
  • Leadership transition: D. Keith Oden's retirement from his executive role effective 2026-08-31 (he remains on the Board) completes a long-planned succession — low-probability but non-zero strategic/portfolio implications.
  • Further portfolio pruning or JV activity: CPT has repeatedly recycled capital out of slower-growth markets; additional dispositions at premiums to implied public-market value would be a NAV-unlocking catalyst.
Key risks
  • The supply overhang lasts longer than expected, keeping rent growth flat-to-negative into 2027 and forcing further FFO/estimate cuts — the stock is cheap on trailing numbers but not obviously cheap if 2027 numbers come down.
  • Rate risk cuts both ways: sustained high rates widen cap rates and compress NAV, and CPT's cost of capital stays elevated, limiting the accretiveness of any redeployment.
  • Earnings dilution from the California sale: ~$1.625B of assets were sold at an implied cap rate that may be below where remaining proceeds can be redeployed, making the transaction NAV-positive but FFO-per-share-negative near term.
  • Balance sheet and liquidity: debt-to-equity of 1.275, $4.85B of long-term debt at 2026-06-30 (pre-sale; roughly $3.9B pro forma for the paydown), and only $44.7M of cash — a capital-intensive business with thin cash on hand and heavy capex ($532M TTM, including development).
  • Earnings-quality noise: net income routinely includes JV income and real estate gains (net income of $326.2M TTM exceeded operating income of $280.2M TTM), and the negative gross-profit prints in Q1/Q2 2026 make the reported trend harder to read — a reminder to underwrite cash flow and FFO, not GAAP EPS.
Investment thesis

CPT is a high-quality, well-operated, defensively positioned Sun Belt apartment REIT that is currently delivering a mediocre trailing financial story: zero revenue growth, operating margin compressed from ~21% to ~16% since 2023, and a portfolio mid-restructuring after the July 2026 California exit. At $103.01 on 2026-09-13, roughly 16x estimated AFFO with a 3.69% dividend yield and a freshly deleveraged balance sheet, you are paying a fair-to-slightly-cheap price for a business whose trough-level rent growth and margin pressure are sector-wide (supply wave) rather than company-specific — but there is no catalyst forcing a re-rating in the next quarter and no technical bottom yet. Own it for income and mean-reversion potential toward the low $110s, not for near-term upside; I would be a buyer on weakness toward the $96-$100 area or on a 50-day reclaim near $110, not chase it here.

AI theoretical price methodology

Estimated TTM AFFO of ~$6.40/share (TTM operating cash flow of $807.4M less ~$150M of maintenance/ recurring capex, divided by ~102M shares) multiplied by a 17.5x target P/AFFO — a modest premium to the current ~15–17x apartment REIT range and a discount to CPT's own long-run P/FFO, justified by the A-quality Sun Belt portfolio, the post-California deleveraged balance sheet and the 3.69% dividend yield. Cross-checking against a normalized 3.4% dividend yield on the $3.80/share payout gives ~$112, and FMP's reported EV/EBITDA of 13.88x on 2026-09-13 is below where a portfolio of this quality has historically cleared, both corroborating the same figure.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The 45.6 / 'Fair Fundamentals' read is directionally honest on the trailing data — flat revenue, ~5 points of operating-margin compression since 2023, ROIC of 3.3%, and a growth pillar of 32.1 all reflect a business digesting a record multifamily supply wave. But the formula is 100% backward-looking and cannot see three things: (1) the July 29, 2026 California sale closed for ~$1.625B with ~$0.9B of debt retired — a dated, material deleveraging/portfolio-pivot event that the Q2 2026 balance sheet (as of 2026-06-30) predates, and which should lift the financial-health and quality pillars forward; (2) GAAP EPS and margins for a REIT are distorted by depreciation and episodic gains (Q4 2025's $1.43 and Q4 2023's $2.03 EPS were gain-heavy, and Q2 2026's $0.18 is depreciation-depressed); (3) the accruals ratio of -2.04% is the healthy, conservative pattern, arguing reported earnings are not running ahead of cash. I would nudge the score into the mid-50s (10–12 points higher) — the band likely stays 'Fair,' with an outside chance of tipping toward 'Good' on a forward view. I'm not deviating from the mandated Neutral lean: the California sale cuts both ways (NAV/deleveraging positive, near-term FFO dilution negative) and does not by itself justify overriding the Fair-Fundamentals mapping.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.