CRL — Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
Fundamentals Score: 42.4/100 (Weak Fundamentals) · Healthcare
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. operates as a contract research organization (CRO), providing essential preclinical services to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Its core business revolves around assisting clients with drug discovery, non-clinical development, and thorough safety testing, with its services extending globally across the United States, Europe, Canada, and the Asia Pacific region.
Score Breakdown
Live Market DataPrice updated: 4h ago
AI Deep-Dive Analysis
Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market dataAs of 2026-08-27, CRL trades at $296.41 after a strong Q2 2026 beat and guidance raise; the stock is up roughly 50% from its 52-week low of $144.26 and sits in overbought territory with RSI of 73.88.
The Q2 2026 earnings reaction was sharply positive: revenue beat by roughly $25M, non-GAAP EPS came in at $3.02 versus $2.73 expected, DSA book-to-bill reached about 1.2x (highest in nearly four years), and management raised FY2026 revenue, EPS, and free cash flow guidance. Analysts responded with target increases into the $282-$300 range. That said, bullishness is now visible in the tape: as of 2026-08-27, price is +50.8% above its 200-day SMA and RSI is 73.88, so the recovery is already partly priced in.
Revenue has essentially flat-lined around $1.0B per quarter for three years; Q2 2026 was down 2.7% year-over-year after roughly -0.5% to +1% in prior quarters, so there is no organic growth yet. GAAP net income is polluted by large impairments in Q4 2024 (-$215.7M) and Q4 2025 (-$276.6M), but operating income troughed at $74.7M (7.6% margin) in Q1 2025 and has stabilized around $120M per quarter (~12% margin) for the last three quarters. Gross margin jumped to 36.2% in Q2 2026 from about 28% in Q1 2026, and Q2 free cash flow was $148.6M versus -$14.8M in Q1 2026. This is a cyclical stabilization/inflection, not yet a steady-growth story.
As of 2026-08-27, the trailing GAAP P/E of -61.2x is meaningless because impairment-driven losses distort EPS. On forward numbers, at $296.41 the stock trades about 26.2x FY2026 non-GAAP EPS of $11.32 and about 23.7x FY2027 EPS of $12.49. Price-to-sales of 3.57x is about 12% above CRL's own 5-year average of 3.19x. Despite the deterministic label 'Cheap vs. its own history,' the stock is not cheap on forward earnings; it is roughly full, with the analyst consensus price target of $267.6 sitting below the current price.
The price has moved well ahead of reported earnings and is pricing in a successful cyclical recovery before revenue has turned positive. If DSA book-to-bill stays above 1.0x and FY2027 EPS of about $12.49 materializes, $296 is defensible at roughly 24x forward earnings. If the biotech funding thaw stalls, downside is toward the $263-$280 analyst range. The stock is no longer underpricing the turnaround; it is paying up for it.
As of 2026-08-27, RSI-14 is 73.88, price is +7.28% above the 20-day SMA, +22.02% above the 50-day SMA, and +50.81% above the 200-day SMA. That is a powerful uptrend but also an overbought and extended one. Entry timing is poor until RSI cools or price pulls back toward the 20- or 50-day moving averages.
- Biotech funding thaw: improving VC and secondary equity issuance is refilling preclinical pipelines after a multi-quarter drought.
- Interest rates: gradual cuts have stabilized clients' cost of capital, the key driver for early-stage outsourced R&D demand.
- NHP supply and regulation: secure non-human primate sourcing is a structural moat but also a regulatory and geopolitical concentration risk.
- Pharma AI/ML partnerships: collaborations like Lilly's TuneLab could expand the market for nonclinical safety data.
- Outsourcing trend: cost pressure at large pharma continues to favor external CRO partners over in-house capacity.
- Q3 2026 earnings (late October/early November 2026): need to see DSA book-to-bill hold above 1.0x and revenue growth turn positive.
- FY2026 guidance follow-through: non-GAAP EPS of $11.15-$11.45 and FCF of $400M-$420M; upside if biotech funding accelerates.
- Expanded NGS and AI/ML data partnerships (Medigen, Arovella, Lilly TuneLab) and potential new framework deals.
- Recovery reversal: if biotech funding or order flow re-freezes, book-to-bill and revenue guidance will disappoint.
- Leverage: long-term debt of $2.62B and debt-to-equity of 1.07x leave limited balance-sheet flexibility if rates rise or EBITDA contracts.
- Impairment/GAAP loss risk: the company has taken large charges in two of the last six quarters; further write-downs would pressure book value and sentiment.
- Valuation/mean-reversion: with RSI at 73.88 and price above the consensus target, a pullback is the more likely near-term scenario.
The underlying business is turning: order book, guidance, and free cash flow all improved in Q2 2026. But at $296.41 as of 2026-08-27, that recovery is largely reflected in the price—roughly 26x this year's non-GAAP EPS, above the average analyst target, and technically overbought. I would not chase here; a pullback toward the $260s or evidence of positive revenue growth would make the risk/reward meaningfully better.
I blended 24.0x FY2026 non-GAAP EPS of $11.32 ($272) with 23.0x FY2027 EPS of $12.49 ($287), weighting them roughly equally to get about $279. The multiple is below historical euphoric levels because revenue growth is still near zero and debt-to-equity is above 1.0x, but above the current GAAP multiple because impairment-weighted trailing earnings understate normalized profitability.
AI Review of the Deterministic Score
The 42.4 'Weak Fundamentals' score is too harsh as a read on the operating business because it is entirely backward-looking and weights the impairment-heavy trailing GAAP results. Underlying operations are stabilizing—operating income has been roughly $120M for three consecutive quarters, Q2 2026 FCF was $149M, and the DSA book-to-bill inflection points to an order-driven recovery. I would raise the score by roughly 10-15 points, probably into the low-to-mid 50s (Fair), because the cyclical trough and forward guidance are not visible in the formula. However, the score is right that reported growth is still near zero and leverage is real, so I would not move it multiple tiers higher.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.