#443S&P 500 rank

CSX — CSX Corporation

2-yr score: 40.5/100 (Lower 20%)Industrials
$48.40+0.67%
Description

CSX Corporation, operating through its subsidiaries, stands as a leading provider of rail-based cargo transportation services. The company offers a wide range of services, including general rail freight, the movement of intermodal containers and trailers, and specialized transport solutions such as efficient rail-to-truck transfers and the handling of bulk commodities.

Score breakdownLatest quarter49.3 · Fair
Growth
70.8
Quality / Profitability
57.3
Financial health
51.7
Ratio screener
36.0
Track record: 2-yr avg 40.5 (Weak, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 46.2 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:24 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
28.0
Yield
1.09%
RSI (14)
54.6
vs SMA20
+1.92%
vs SMA50
-0.56%
vs SMA200
+7.47%
Analyst target
$55
+13.0%
9 analysts
AI theoretical price
$47
-2.9%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, CSX traded at $48.95 (market cap ~$90.7B), roughly 8.7% below its late-July 52-week high of $53.60, after delivering a record Q2 2026 (revenue $3.94B, +10% YoY; operating margin 38.3%) and raising full-year guidance. Sentiment is constructive but the tape has cooled: RSI 42.1, price 2.4% under its 20-day and 2.5% under its 50-day SMA, though still 12.6% above its 200-day.

AI sentimentBullish

The prevailing market read on CSX as of 2026-09-13 is bullish, even though the tape has softened. The Q2 2026 print (released 2026-07-22) beat on both lines - revenue $3.935B vs ~$3.6B a year ago, EPS $0.54 vs $0.44, operating margin 38.3% vs 35.9% - and management raised FY guidance to mid-to-high single-digit revenue growth, >350bps operating margin expansion, and >80% FCF growth. Analysts followed: Barclays went $55 to $60, BofA $53 to $56, RBC $51 to $54, with a 16-analyst consensus target of ~$51-52 and a Buy rating (27 buy / 17 hold / 2 sell). The stock ran to $53.60 and then gave back ~9% into mid-September, so the last month (-2.26%) looks like profit-taking after the news rather than a change in story. The 6-month return of +24.55% tells you which direction the crowd has been leaning.

Quarterly trend

The three-year quarterly record shows a clear two-year fade followed by an inflection in 2026. Revenue was essentially flat through 2023-2024 ($3.68B Q1 2024 to $3.539B Q4 2024), bottomed at $3.423B in Q1 2025, and has now accelerated for three straight quarters: $3.587B (Q3 2025), $3.508B (Q4 2025), $3.482B (Q1 2026), $3.935B (Q2 2026, a record and +10.1% YoY). The margin story is the same shape. Operating margin peaked at 38.7% in Q2 2024 ($1.432B op income), slid to 30.4% in Q1 2025 and 30.3% in Q3 2025, then rebuilt to 36.0% in Q1 2026 ($1.253B, +20% YoY) and 38.3% in Q2 2026 ($1.506B, +17.4% YoY). EPS followed: $0.45 (Q2 2024) to $0.34 (Q1 2025 trough) to $0.43 then $0.54. Free cash flow is the most dramatic tell - FY2025 collapsed to roughly $946M as quarterly capex spiked (Q3 2025 capex alone was $1.495B, producing -$158M FCF), while H1 2026 has already produced $1.48B ($729M + $751M) versus just $395M in H1 2025. This is not a one-quarter blip: two consecutive quarters of YoY margin expansion, a record revenue quarter, and a guidance raise indicate a genuine cyclical turn, not noise.

Valuation assessment

Expensive relative to its own history, and only defensible if the margin recovery sticks. As of 2026-09-13 the stock carried a TTM P/E of 28.3x against a 5-year average of 19.76x, a P/S of 6.25x against a 5-year average of 5.01x, a PEG of 4.61, and P/B of 6.45x. Forward math is kinder but still full: at $48.95 against the ~$2.008 FY2026 consensus EPS, the forward P/E is about 24.4x - roughly 23% above the trailing 5-year average. EV/EBITDA of 16.3x is also a premium to the 12-14x that Class I railroads have historically commanded. The counter-argument is that the trailing numbers are depressed: TTM EPS of $1.737 will grow to ~$2.01 in FY2026 (+30%), so on FY2027 numbers (~$2.20 by my estimate) the multiple compresses toward 22x. Even so, paying a premium multiple for high-single-digit EPS growth leaves no room for error.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The stock is pricing in an inflection that has only two quarters of evidence behind it. At $48.95 the market is paying ~24.4x FY2026E EPS of $2.008 and ~22x my FY2027E of ~$2.20. That means H2 2026 and the Q3 print must validate management's raised bar: mid-to-high single-digit revenue growth, >350bps of margin expansion, and >80% FCF growth. If H2 volumes stall and FY2026 EPS lands near $2.01 with FY2027 near $2.15, a de-rating to the 5-year average of ~20x trailing - call it 21x forward - implies roughly $44-45, about 8-10% downside. If margin expansion overshoots and EPS runs to $2.25 in FY2027, a 24x multiple gets you to ~$54 and the current consensus target near $51-52 looks conservative. The asymmetry is roughly balanced to slightly negative at today's price; the payoff improves meaningfully below $45.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, CSX showed a cooling uptrend rather than a broken one. RSI(14) sat at 42.11 - mildly weak, not oversold. Price was 2.43% below the 20-day SMA (~$50.17) and 2.52% below the 50-day SMA (~$50.22), but 12.64% above the 200-day SMA (~$43.46), and the 6-month return was +24.55% against a 1-month return of -2.26%. Translation: the intermediate trend is still up, but short-term momentum has flipped negative after the post-earnings run to $53.60. This is not a washed-out entry point - RSI would need to be in the 30s with price near the 200-day to call it that. Practically, a reclaim of the 50-day near $50.20 would confirm the uptrend resuming; a drift toward the $45-47 zone (or a deeper flush toward the 200-day in the low $40s) would be the better risk/reward entry.

Macro factors
  • Trucking capacity cycle: a relatively tight truckload market has been pushing highway-to-rail intermodal conversions, which drove the 9% intermodal volume surge in Q2 2026 - if truck spot rates collapse, that tailwind reverses and intermodal pricing power weakens.
  • Industrial and construction demand: manufacturing activity, data-center build-outs, and infrastructure projects feed the merchandise segment (chemicals, aggregates, steel, automotive), which is the margin-rich core of the franchise.
  • Interest rates and the cost of capital: CSX carries $17.162B of long-term debt against $14.082B of equity (D/E 1.375), and rail capex is enormous, so rates affect both interest expense and the relative attractiveness of railroad equities versus bonds.
  • Coal's secular decline: utility and export coal volumes keep eroding as natural gas and renewables displace coal-fired generation, permanently shrinking a historically significant revenue line.
  • Trade policy and regulation: tariffs and cross-border flows with Canada and Mexico affect volumes, while Surface Transportation Board oversight of rates and potential reciprocal-switching rules remain an evergreen regulatory overhang for all Class I rails.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings (historically mid-to-late October 2026) - the first hard test of the raised guidance for H2 volume growth and >350bps of full-year operating margin expansion.
  • Weekly and monthly AAR carload/intermodal traffic reports, which give a real-time read on whether the 6% total volume growth and 9% intermodal growth from Q2 are holding.
  • Continued intermodal conversion wins if truckload capacity stays tight, plus any incremental industrial reshoring or data-center construction freight announcements.
  • Capital return: buybacks have reduced the share count (market cap of $90.7B at $48.95 implies ~1.85B shares), and the 1.089% dividend yield is covered roughly 2x by FY2026E free cash flow - a raise or an accelerated repurchase would be a positive.
Key risks
  • Valuation risk is the single biggest: 28.3x trailing and ~24.4x forward versus a 5-year average P/E of 19.76x means any disappointment in the H2 volume or margin story can trigger an outsized de-rating.
  • Volume cyclicality cuts both ways - the 2024-2025 experience shows how fast margins compress. Operating margin fell to 30.3% in Q3 2025 from 37.5% in Q3 2024; a repeat of that freight recession would gut the recovery narrative.
  • Balance sheet leverage: $17.162B of long-term debt, D/E of 1.375, current ratio of 0.82 and quick ratio of 0.72 - low current ratios are normal for railroads, but the debt load is real and interest-rate sensitive.
  • Coal's structural decline and any deterioration in export coal demand from weaker global industrial activity.
  • Cost inflation in labor, fuel, and equipment maintenance, plus the risk that trucking capacity normalizes and erodes the intermodal pricing advantage that has been driving the current beat.
Investment thesis

CSX is a genuinely high-quality, wide-moat eastern railroad in a real operating recovery - record Q2 2026 revenue of $3.935B, operating margin back to 38.3% from 30.3% a year and a half ago, free cash flow swinging from -$141M to +$751M year over year, and guidance raised. The problem is price, not business quality: at $48.95 on 2026-09-13 you are paying ~24.4x forward earnings against a 5-year average trailing P/E of 19.76x, so most of the recovery is already in the stock. This is a good business at a full price - own it on a pullback toward the mid-$40s or wait for another quarter or two of proof, not at today's level.

AI theoretical price methodology

Two independent methods averaged. (1) P/E: a 22x forward multiple (a premium to the 19.76x five-year trailing average, justified by the margin inflection but below the current 24.4x forward) applied to a blended forward EPS of ~$2.10 - the $2.008 FY2026 consensus plus my FY2027 estimate of ~$2.20, built from ~5% revenue growth to roughly $16B at a ~37% operating margin, ~$0.78B interest expense and ~1.82B shares - gives $46.20. (2) EV/EBITDA: 14.5x FY2026E EBITDA of ~$7.2B (FY2026E revenue of ~$15.2B at a ~36.5% operating margin plus ~$1.65B of D&A), less ~$16.2B of net debt on 1.85B shares, gives $47.60. Average = $47, which sits about 4% below the 2026-09-13 price of $48.95 and well under the ~$51-52 analyst consensus.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The deterministic score lands at 49.3 ('Fair Fundamentals'), a 50/50 blend of a fundamentals-only score of 62.6 (growth 70.8, quality/profitability 57.3, financial health 51.7) and a ratio screener score of just 36.0. That ratio leg is the whole problem: it penalizes CSX on P/B (6.46x), quick ratio (0.72), current ratio (0.82) and D/E (1.375) against the full S&P 500 population - but those are structural features of a capital-intensive railroad with a buyback-heavy capital return policy, not signs of distress. Meanwhile the growth and quality legs are structurally backward-looking and have no way to credit the turn that is already visible: Q2 2026 revenue +10.1% YoY to a record $3.935B, operating margin 38.3% vs 35.9%, FCF of +$751M vs -$141M, and a healthy negative accruals ratio of -0.73% (cash earnings running ahead of reported net income). I would shade this to roughly 57-60, which is one band higher than 'Fair,' hence Partially Agree rather than Agree - though I stop short of Disagree, because the valuation is genuinely rich on every lens (28.3x trailing vs 19.76x 5-year average; 6.25x P/S vs 5.01x), so the score's 'not cheap' conclusion is correct even if the band is a tier too harsh. Per the mapping rules I did not deviate from the given table: the only dated event in the brief is the 2026-07-22 Q2 earnings beat, which is an ordinary quarterly result, not an acquisition, bankruptcy, restatement, or fraud disclosure.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.