DG — Dollar General Corporation
Dollar General Corporation is a prominent discount retail chain that offers a wide array of merchandise across the southern, southwestern, Midwestern, and eastern regions of the United States. Its extensive product assortment primarily features consumable items.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, Dollar General traded at $124.58 (market cap ~$27.5B, 52-week range $95.11-$158.23), about 16.1x trailing EPS of $7.72 and ~15.8x the $7.90 forward consensus, with a 2.0% dividend yield. The stock is digesting a strong late-August Q2 FY26 report (EPS $2.48 vs ~$2.01 expected; FY26 EPS guidance raised to $7.80-$8.00), sitting with RSI at 49.09, down 6.48% over the prior week but up 8.52% over three months.
The news flow is unambiguously good: Q2 FY26 (reported 2026-08-27) showed sales +5.2% to $11.29B, diluted EPS +33% to $2.48, comps +3.5% on a fifth consecutive quarter of positive traffic, gross margin up to 32.6%, and FY26 EPS guidance raised from $7.20-$7.45 to $7.80-$8.00 - which drew upgrades and target hikes from Goldman, Citi, Telsey and Argus. The tape disagrees with the fundamentals: as of 2026-09-13 DG had fallen 6.48% in the prior week and was -5.51% over six months, with the price flat against its 20-, 50- and 200-day averages. The market is treating part of the beat as non-recurring (about $0.25 of the $2.48 EPS came from net tariff refunds), insider selling appeared in early September 2026 (EVP Kathleen Reardon, 5,578 shares), and the ~$137 average price target implies only ~10% upside - hence neutral rather than bullish.
Revenue growth is stable, not accelerating: every quarter in the 12-quarter window lands between +3.4% and +5.9% YoY, with Q2 FY26 at +5.2% ($11.29B) after a softer +3.4% in Q1 FY26. The real story is margin, and it is a genuine inflection off a trough rather than a blip. Gross margin bottomed at 27.2% in Q4 FY23 / 27.8% in Q1 FY24, then ran 29.4% (Q4 FY24), 31.0%, 31.3%, 29.9%, 30.5%, 31.6%, and finally 32.6% in Q2 FY26 - the best of any quarter shown and +126bp YoY. Operating margin traces the same arc: 4.47% (Q3 FY23) -> 3.18% (Q3 FY24) -> 2.86% (Q4 FY24, the bottom) -> 5.52% -> 5.55% -> 4.00% -> 5.56% -> 5.92% (Q1 FY26) -> 6.81% (Q2 FY26), the highest in three years. Net income went from $191M in Q4 FY24 to $550M in Q2 FY26 (+34% YoY), and TTM free cash flow has climbed from $1.85B to $2.70B (+46%). Caveat worth repeating: roughly $0.25 of the $2.48 Q2 EPS came from net tariff refunds, so underlying EPS growth is closer to +20% than +33%.
Cheap versus its own history, only modestly cheap in absolute terms. As of 2026-09-13 the stock trades at 16.1x TTM EPS of $7.72 versus a 5-year average P/E of 18.79x, and ~15.8x forward EPS of $7.90 - roughly a 15% discount to its own norm. P/S of 0.63 sits well below the 5-year average of 0.93, and P/B is 2.96x on a 17.8% ROE. The PEG of 0.376 is optically absurd because the denominator is recovery-driven earnings growth, not a durable growth rate. On a lease-inclusive basis EV/EBITDA of 12.85x is not cheap for a 5.6% operating-margin retailer, ROIC of 6.6% is barely at cost of capital, and the 2.0% dividend yield is modest. Verdict: a fair-to-mildly-attractive multiple for a levered, low-margin, mid-single-digit grower that is currently earning below its own potential.
The single most telling figure in the dataset is that the street's forward EPS estimate ($7.90) is essentially identical to the midpoint of FY26 guidance ($7.90) - consensus is modeling flat earnings into the next fiscal year. That looks too conservative against five straight quarters of positive traffic, 3.5% comps and +126bp gross-margin expansion; the model implicitly assumes the tariff refund and cost-control benefits fully reverse and nothing else improves. So the setup is asymmetrically skewed: a beat-and-raise Q3 in December 2026 looks more likely than a miss, and even a modest FY27 EPS of $8.40-$8.60 (not yet in consensus) at today's 16x would be $134-$138. The risk side is equally clear - the stock is already +8.52% over three months, and any evidence that the margin gain was refund-driven rather than structural would compress the multiple quickly. This is 'priced for no progress, upside if progress continues,' not 'priced for perfection.'
Range-bound and directionless as of 2026-09-13. RSI(14) at 49.09 is dead neutral. Price is 0.46% below its 20-day average (implied ~$125.2), 0.90% above its 50-day (~$123.5), and 1.57% below its 200-day (~$126.6) - coiled in a ~$123-$127 band inside the far wider $95.11-$158.23 52-week range, with a 0.235 beta and -6.48% one-week / +8.52% three-month returns that cancel out into chop. Entry implication: neither urgency nor capitulation. A close and hold above the 200-day (~$126.6) would confirm the recovery trend and open the $135-$140 zone; a break below the 50-day (~$123.5) likely retests $110-$115.
- Lower- and middle-income consumer stress: persistent cost-of-living pressure keeps driving trade-down traffic into discount formats (DG's core tailwind), but the same squeeze suppresses basket size on seasonal and discretionary goods.
- Tariff policy: Q2 FY26 gross margin benefited from net tariff refunds worth about $0.25 of EPS - a policy-driven swing factor that could as easily reverse in FY27 and is entirely outside management control.
- Wage inflation, retail shrink and supply-chain cost volatility: on a 5.6% TTM operating margin, small cost movements swing earnings materially, and these remain the institutional concerns flagged in the brief.
- Interest rates and rate-path uncertainty: DG carries $4.42B of long-term debt plus very large operating-lease obligations (total debt/equity 1.68x), so refinancing costs matter, and rotation in and out of consumer defensives has repeatedly moved the shares despite the tiny 0.235 beta.
- Discount-retail competition and rural saturation: Walmart, Dollar Tree/Family Dollar, Aldi and online discounters all chase the same trade-down shopper, and with roughly 20,000 stores DG increasingly competes with itself.
- Q3 FY2026 earnings in early-to-mid December 2026 - the critical test of whether 3.5% comps and a 32.6% gross margin survive the holiday quarter without the tariff-refund tailwind.
- FY2027 guidance (likely March 2027): consensus currently stands at roughly flat $7.90, so any guidance above that forces immediate upward estimate revisions.
- RELEX AI-driven forecasting and replenishment rollout - if it reduces out-of-stocks and inventory, it is a real gross-margin and working-capital lever across the store base.
- Continued expansion of the $1 value aisle beyond 9,000 stores plus the ongoing remodel program - traffic and basket-size drivers that support the comps narrative.
- Analyst target revisions and sector rotation into consumer defensives if the rate path turns more accommodative; also watch further insider sales after the early-September 2026 Reardon transaction.
- Earnings quality: about $0.25 of Q2 FY26's $2.48 EPS was a net tariff refund, so clean EPS growth was nearer +20% than +33%; a reversal makes FY27 comps significantly harder.
- Balance sheet: total debt/equity of 1.68x including lease liabilities, a quick ratio of just 0.31, and ROIC of only 6.6% leave thin cushion if the recovery stalls or rates rise.
- Core-customer fragility: DG's shopper is the most inflation- and employment-sensitive cohort in retail, so a weakening labor market hits consumables volume quickly.
- Competitive and saturation risk: Walmart, Dollar Tree/Family Dollar, Aldi and online discounters, plus self-cannibalization across ~20,000 stores concentrated in small rural markets.
- Execution risk that the traffic inflection reverses - five straight quarters of positive traffic is the entire bull case, and FY24 demonstrated how fast shrink, store closures and impairments can gut margins (Q4 FY24 operating margin: 2.86%).
At $124.58 on 2026-09-13, roughly 16x trailing and 15.8x forward earnings against an 18.79x five-year average, Dollar General offers a mildly favorable but not compelling risk/reward. The last two quarters are a real inflection: Q2 FY26 operating margin of 6.81% was the best in three years, EPS rose 33% (~20% excluding the tariff refund), comps grew 3.5% on a fifth straight quarter of positive traffic, and TTM free cash flow is up 46% to $2.70B. Against that, 6.6% ROIC and 1.68x lease-inclusive leverage confirm this is a structurally modest-quality, capital-intensive retailer whose recovery leans on cost control that could reverse, and the mechanical value score still reads Weak Fundamentals. I'd want either a pullback into the low $110s or one more clean quarter before treating this as more than a modest, income-supported holding.
I applied a 17.0x multiple to forward EPS of $7.90 (the midpoint of FY26 guidance and the analyst consensus) to get $134.30; the 17.0x is a deliberate ~10% discount to DG's own 5-year average P/E of 18.79x, because that historical average is inflated by trough earnings and today's 6.6% ROIC and 1.68x lease-inclusive leverage argue against paying the full historical multiple. A lease-inclusive EV/EBITDA cross-check (~12.9x) and the 2.0% dividend yield support a value modestly above the $124.58 price but well below the ~$143 recent average sell-side target.
The 39.7 / Weak Fundamentals score is directionally defensible but roughly two quarters stale: because it is built entirely on trailing YoY revenue and operating cash flow, trailing margins and trailing ROIC, it is still largely measuring the FY24/early-FY25 trough (Q4 FY24 operating margin 2.86%, Q3 FY24 EPS $0.89) rather than the current inflection. Re-scoring the legs for what the data shows today - revenue +5.2% YoY with five straight quarters of positive traffic, TTM operating cash flow up ~39% and TTM free cash flow up 46% to $2.70B, operating margin +126bp YoY to 6.81%, and a healthy negative accruals ratio of -0.72% (cash earnings running ahead of reported net income) - I'd put the fundamentals-only score in the low-to-mid 50s, which blended with the ratio screener's 39.7 lands the overall score around 48-50. That is roughly a 10-point upgrade, shifting the band one tier from Weak to Fair Fundamentals, which is why this is Partially Agree and not Agree. The formula is right about the structural weaknesses (6.6% ROIC, a 0.31 quick ratio, lease-heavy 1.68x leverage) and right that the tariff refund flatters the latest quarter, but its backward-looking construction cannot see the margin and traffic turn. Note the mandatory band/valuation mapping still yields a Cautiously Bearish overall lean because the given band is Weak while the valuation label is Cheap vs. its own history - that is a mechanical output of the trailing score, and my own read of the business is closer to neutral-to-mildly-positive than that label implies. No deviation is warranted under the permitted-exception rule: the late-August 2026 earnings beat and guidance raise are ordinary corporate events, not an acquisition, bankruptcy, restatement or fraud disclosure.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.