#159S&P 500 rank

DHI — D.R. Horton, Inc.

2-yr score: 55.3/100 (Middle 40%)Consumer Cyclical7d
$138.98−0.85%
Description

Established in Arlington, Texas, in 1978, D.R. Horton, Inc. operates as a prominent residential construction enterprise.

Score breakdownLatest quarter52.7 · Fair
Growth
28.5
Quality / Profitability
41.8
Financial health
72.8
Ratio screener
64.8
Track record: 2-yr avg 55.3 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 57.7 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 29, 2026 (in 7 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:24 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
13.2
Yield
1.23%
RSI (14)
51.2
vs SMA20
+1.44%
vs SMA50
-1.49%
vs SMA200
-5.97%
Analyst target
$159
+14.4%
8 analysts
AI theoretical price
$145
+4.3%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, DHI traded at $137.89 (market cap ~$38.6B), about 22% below its 52-week high of $177.58 and only ~4.7% above the 52-week low of $131.75, following a July 2026 full-year guidance cut and a third consecutive quarter of year-over-year EPS decline. The balance sheet is fortress-grade (0.30 debt/equity, 9.84 current ratio) and free cash flow is strong (~$3.18B TTM), but earnings are in a clear cyclical downswing.

AI sentimentBearish

The tape is unambiguously negative as of 2026-09-13: DHI is down 10.51% over 3 months, 5.44% over 1 month, 3.4% over 1 week, and sits below its 20-, 50- and 200-day moving averages while printing an RSI(14) of 40.12. The fundamental trigger was the late-July 2026 cut to full-year revenue guidance ($32.5-33B vs. prior consensus), blamed on affordability, soft consumer sentiment and elevated mortgage rates, plus Q3 FY26 EPS of $3.18 versus $3.36 a year earlier with gross margin (23.3%) down ~320bps from the prior-year quarter. Sell-side has settled on a Hold consensus (25 holds vs. 23 buys, 3 sells, 2 strong buys) even though the $160 consensus price target implies meaningful upside — a classic 'cheap but no reason to hurry' stance. Note this is grinding bearishness, not capitulation: RSI has not broken 30 and the stock has not made a new 52-week low.

Quarterly trend

This is a cyclical deceleration that is now showing early signs of bottoming, not a structural collapse. Revenue went from a $10.50B peak in Q4 FY23 and $10.00B in Q4 FY24 to year-over-year declines of -9.5% (Q1 FY26, $6.89B vs. $7.61B) and -2.3% (Q2 FY26, $7.56B vs. $7.73B), then flattened to +0.02% in Q3 FY26 ($9.227B vs. $9.226B) — the YoY gap has closed for three straight quarters. Margins tell the same story in sharper relief: operating margin fell from 18.9% in Q4 FY23 and 17.7% in Q3 FY24 to a trough of 10.58-10.59% in Q1/Q2 FY26 (roughly 800bps of compression), then rebounded to 13.29% in Q3 FY26. Gross margin went from 26.5% in Q3 FY24 to 23.3% in Q3 FY26, but the last three quarters have been stable-to-improving (23.16% → 22.53% → 23.26%), suggesting the incentive/buydown burden may be peaking. EPS traced a clean arc: peak $4.10 in Q3 FY24, trough $2.03 in Q1 FY26, back to $3.18 in Q3 FY26 — still -5.4% YoY but up 42% sequentially. Cash generation has not broken: TTM operating cash flow through 2026-06-30 was $3.35B versus $2.91B in the comparable prior-year TTM, and FCF was $3.18B, an ~8.2% FCF yield. Verdict: decelerating trend that is inflecting, with the trough roughly two quarters behind us in margin terms — but no confirmed recovery in volume or pricing yet.

Valuation assessment

Fair, with a mechanically distorted headline. As of 2026-09-13, DHI's trailing P/E was 13.1x against a 5-year average of 9.36x — a ~40% premium that sounds alarming until you note the 5-year average was set while EPS sat at a cyclical peak (~$14.36 in FY24); applying a peak-cycle multiple to trough-cycle earnings double-penalizes. Forward P/E on next-FY consensus EPS of $10.47 is ~13.2x, i.e. the market is paying a market-ish multiple for zero expected growth (the PEG ratio of -0.817 is meaningless here precisely because growth is negative). The cross-checks are friendlier: P/S of 1.16x is slightly BELOW the 5-year average of 1.21x, price/book of 1.66x pairs with a 14.8% ROE and 10.1% ROIC, and TTM FCF of $3.18B on a $38.6B market cap is an ~8.2% free-cash-flow yield. Net: not cheap on earnings, not expensive on sales, assets or cash flow. This is a fair-value stock with a trough-inflated P/E, and the deterministic score's 'Rich vs. its own history' label is being driven entirely by that P/E artifact.

Price vs. earnings playbook

At $137.89, the market is capitalizing next-FY consensus EPS of $10.47 at 13.2x — and critically, that consensus embeds no recovery: next-FY revenue of $32.77B is actually BELOW the ~$33B midpoint of current FY26 guidance. So the stock is not pricing in a housing rebound; it is pricing in stagnation and applying a slightly-above-history multiple to it. That cuts both ways. If mortgage rates ease and FY27-28 EPS re-rates toward $12-plus, the multiple on today's price compresses to ~11.5x and the stock looks cheap in hindsight. If EPS instead breaks below $10 (another guidance cut on October 29, deeper buydowns, tariff-driven cost inflation), 13x on $9.50 is ~$124, and the stock has downside toward the 52-week low of $131.75. The asymmetry tilts modestly positive but the catalyst is macro (rates), not company-specific execution — which is exactly why I would not pay up here.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, the technical picture is a clean, unremarkable downtrend with no oversold trigger. RSI(14) stood at 40.12 — weak, but genuinely NOT oversold; there has been no RSI sub-30 washout, so there is no classic capitulation-bounce setup. Price was 4.85% below the 20-day SMA (implied ~$144.9), 6.40% below the 50-day (~$147.3) and 7.94% below the 200-day (~$149.8) — note how tightly those three averages are clustered in the $145-150 zone, which is also right around my estimate of fair value. That clustering means the entire $145-150 band is now overhead resistance. Entry-timing read: no trend reversal signal exists yet; the first real evidence of a change would be a reclaim of the 50-day around $147, and a push back above the 200-day near $150 would confirm it. Until then, buying here is catching a falling knife on a macro call, not a technical one.

Macro factors
  • Mortgage rates and the Fed path — the single biggest swing factor. Periodic soft labor prints (like the weak July jobs report) spark brief rallies on rate-cut hopes, but as of 2026-09-13 mortgage rates remain high enough to strain buyer purchasing power and DHI is explicitly citing this in guidance.
  • Affordability and the structural cost of incentives — heavy mortgage rate buydowns and shrinking square footage preserve order volume but cap gross margin at ~23% versus 26-27% in FY24; this looks semifunctional rather than temporary until rates fall.
  • Construction cost inflation and tariff exposure on lumber/materials — sticky input costs are compressing both gross and operating margin independent of the rate cycle.
  • Structural US housing undersupply — a genuine multi-year tailwind that underwrites long-term demand, and DHI's skew toward entry-level/Express product positions it to take share when affordability improves.
  • Existing-home supply and the mortgage lock-in effect — as sellers eventually list, competitive resale inventory rises, which could blunt new-home pricing even if rates fall.
  • Homebuilder beta and sector rotation — DHI's 1.371 beta means it amplifies both housing-sector drawdowns and rate-cut-driven rallies; the stock will likely move on macro headlines before it moves on company fundamentals.
Key catalysts
  • Q4 and full-year FY26 earnings on Wednesday, October 29, 2026 (pre-market) — the single most important near-term event. The initial FY27 outlook, autumn selling-season commentary, and any evidence that gross margin has inflected (Q3 FY26's 23.26% was the best since Q4 FY25) will drive the next leg.
  • Federal Reserve rate cuts / falling mortgage rates — a direct affordability tailwind that would raise absorption and let DHI reduce incentive spend, lifting both volume and margin simultaneously.
  • Continued large-scale capital return — stockholders' equity fell from $25.31B (2024-09-30) to $23.82B (2026-06-30) despite roughly $5.7B of net income over that span, implying substantial buybacks plus the 1.23% dividend; a meaningful shareholder yield at these prices.
  • Margin-trough confirmation — three consecutive quarters of stable-to-rising gross margin (23.16% → 22.53% → 23.26%) would, if it holds, be the signal that the earnings estimate floor has been set.
  • Sector rotation into rate-sensitive cyclicals if the labor market softens enough to force faster cuts — historically the fastest way a homebuilder re-rates.
Key risks
  • Mortgage rates staying elevated into FY27 — would prolong the affordability crunch, force deeper incentive usage and push gross margin below the 22.5% Q2 FY26 level, invalidating the trough thesis.
  • Another guidance cut on October 29, 2026 — consensus next-FY EPS of $10.47 already assumes no growth; if management guides below that, the 13.2x forward multiple has no cushion, especially versus the 9.36x 5-year average.
  • Inventory and land impairment risk — $34.6B of current assets (mostly land, WIP and finished homes) against $23.8B of equity; a prolonged downturn could force write-downs that the strong current ratio (9.84) does not protect against.
  • Tariff and materials cost inflation — an exogenous cost shock that hits margin regardless of demand, and one the company has already cited as a Q3 FY26 pressure.
  • Valuation asymmetry — a 13.1x trailing P/E versus a 9.36x 5-year average means the multiple, not just the earnings, can compress; if earnings fall 10% and the multiple normalizes to 11x, that is roughly $115-120.
  • Negative growth momentum in the analyst model itself — a negative PEG (-0.817) and a next-FY revenue estimate ($32.77B) below current-year guidance means the sell-side model is not yet calling a turn; being early on a cyclical call is expensive.
  • High beta (1.371) amplifies any broad market or housing-sector drawdown, so even a correct company-level thesis can produce a painful paper loss.
Investment thesis

DHI is a best-in-class, cash-generative market leader sitting in a real but ordinary housing downcycle — not a broken business. The balance sheet is immaculate (0.30 debt/equity, 9.84 current ratio, net debt of roughly $3.7B against $23.8B of equity), it throws off an ~8.2% free-cash-flow yield, and the operating margin trajectory (10.6% trough in Q1/Q2 FY26 to 13.3% in Q3 FY26) plus flattening revenue YoY suggest the worst of the compression may be behind it. But at 13.2x flat forward earnings versus a 9.36x five-year average, with consensus modeling zero FY27 growth and no confirmed volume recovery, there is no margin of safety being offered — you are paying a fair-to-full price for an unproven inflection whose catalyst (rate cuts) is entirely outside the company's control. This is a reasonable long-term hold and a decent watchlist name, not a compelling buy at $137.89; I would want either a pullback toward the $125-130 zone or hard evidence of a margin bottom on October 29 before getting constructive.

AI theoretical price methodology

Blended four-way intrinsic estimate as of 2026-09-13, weighted toward normalized earnings: (1) mid-cycle EPS of ~$12.43 (midpoint of FY24's peak $14.36 and the current ~$10.50 run-rate) at a justified 11.5x mid-cycle multiple = $143; (2) TTM FCF of $3.18B capitalized at an 8% fair free-cash-flow yield = $142/share; (3) 1.75x price/book on BVPS of $85.16 (equity $23.82B / ~280M shares) = $149; (4) 14x forward P/E on next-FY consensus EPS of $10.47 = $147. A 40/20/20/20 weighting of those gives ~$145, which sits just above the current $137.89 and inside the tightly clustered $145-150 SMA20/50/200 resistance band — i.e. modest upside to fair value, no valuation cushion, consistent with a Neutral lean.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

My independent read confirms the 52.7 / 'Fair Fundamentals' band, so I land on Agree — but for reasons the formula cannot articulate. The score correctly captures the tension: financial health is genuinely excellent (72.8 on a 0.30 debt/equity, 9.84 current ratio, and improving FCF) and the ratio screener is solid (64.8), while growth (28.5) and quality/profitability (41.8) are genuinely weak. What the formula cannot see is that BOTH weak legs are being mechanically depressed by a cyclical downturn rather than structural deterioration — revenue YoY has tightened from -9.5% to -2.3% to +0.02% across the last three quarters, operating margin has rebounded from a 10.6% trough to 13.3%, TTM operating cash flow is actually UP year over year ($3.35B vs. $2.91B), and the accruals ratio of +1.28% is mild rather than alarming. This is precisely the cyclical-trough pattern the methodology warns about: a backward-looking growth/margin/ROIC score will penalize a homebuilder hardest right as margins bottom. Conversely, I'd push back on the valuation_context 'Rich vs. its own history' label: it is driven entirely by P/E (13.1x vs. a 9.36x 5-year average) that is inflated by depressed earnings, while P/S of 1.16x is actually BELOW its 1.21x 5-year average — a distinction a single P/E-based overlay cannot draw. Netting those two effects, I'd move the score modestly higher to the mid-to-upper 50s, which keeps it inside 'Fair Fundamentals' and leaves the band intact. No dated, material, formula-invisible event (acquisition, restatement, bankruptcy, fraud) is present in the live research, so the Neutral lean follows directly from the published mapping table with no deviation.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.