← Back to Rankings

DLTRDollar Tree, Inc.

Fundamentals Score: 60/100 (Good Fundamentals) · Consumer Defensive

Description

Dollar Tree, Inc. (DLTR) operates as a leading discount retailer, managing its extensive operations through two principal divisions: Dollar Tree and Family Dollar. The Dollar Tree segment distinguishes itself by offering all its merchandise at a consistent price of $1.25.

Score Breakdown

Growth
62.4/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
61.7/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
48.1/100
weight: 15%
* Revenue moved -34% between 2024-11-02 and 2025-02-01 (vs. +18% for the same quarter a year earlier) in its reported financials - possibly a divestiture, spinoff, or major acquisition rather than organic performance. Growth/trend comparisons spanning this point may be distorted.
* Stockholders' equity moved +8% between 2025-11-01 and 2026-01-31 (vs. -48% for the same quarter a year earlier) in its reported financials - possibly a divestiture, spinoff, or major acquisition rather than organic performance. Growth/trend comparisons spanning this point may be distorted.
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral

Live Market DataPrice updated: 21h ago

P/E (TTM)
16.0
Yield
N/A
RSI (14)
54.2
vs SMA20
+0.78%
vs SMA50
+3.23%
vs SMA200
+12.22%
Analyst Target
$136
+3.2%
17 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$132
+0.7%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, DLTR trades at $127, down about 3.9% after a Q2 FY2026 headline EPS beat that was flattered by a $1.31 per-share tariff refund, offset by a weak Q3 guidance range of $0.80–$0.95 versus the $1.39 consensus. The stock sits below its 20-day SMA but above its 50- and 200-day SMAs.

AI Sentiment:Neutral

The Q2 beat and raised FY2026 adjusted EPS guidance were overshadowed by the Q3 guide miss and the realization that reported EPS included a large, non-recurring IEEPA tariff refund. The post-earnings pullback to $127 reflects skepticism about the reinvestment-driven margin drag. FMP's analyst file is mixed-to-positive — roughly 25 Buy, 20 Hold, 4 Sell — with a consensus target near $131, but the live brief characterizes near-term sentiment as Hold-like, so the market is not pricing in a clean acceleration.

Quarterly Trend

Reported revenue is distorted by the Family Dollar divestiture: revenue stepped down from $7.3–$7.6B in late-2024 quarters to roughly $4.6–$5.5B afterward, so comparisons should be made on the post-divestiture base. On that basis, growth is stable-to-accelerating: Q1 FY2026 revenue rose ~7.2% YoY and Q2 FY2026 rose ~7.0% YoY, with comps up 3.7% in Q2. Reported operating margins improved from 4.9% in Q2 FY2025 to 14.1% in Q2 FY2026, but the 14.1% includes a $368.7M tariff credit; ex-refund operating margin was roughly 6.6%, still up YoY but down sequentially from Q1's 9.5%. GAAP EPS swung from $0.91 in Q2 FY2025 to $2.70 in Q2 FY2026, but adjusted EPS ex-tariff was $1.39, up 53% YoY. The trend is a genuine post-divestiture recovery, with the caveat that one-time items are making the most recent quarter look stronger than the underlying run rate.

Valuation Assessment

As of 2026-08-27, the stock is cheap versus its own history: TTM P/E is 15.5 and P/S is 1.22, versus 5-year averages of 20.6 and 1.45. The PEG ratio of 0.07 is not meaningful given distorted EPS and divestiture noise. A cleaner read is forward P/E: using the next-FY consensus EPS of $7.07, the stock trades around 18x forward earnings — modestly below the historical average but not a deep bargain once the one-time tariff refund is stripped out. The low multiple is partly deserved because of high leverage and the Q3 guidance drag, so I'd call it fair-to-cheap, not a screaming value.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

At $127, the market is paying about 18x forward EPS of $7.07 and roughly 16x the midpoint of FY2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $7.70–$8.05. That is not pricing in much optimism; it is pricing in execution risk around the Q3 reinvestment drag and the multi-price conversion. If management delivers the guided FY26 EPS and Q3 is just a temporary trough, the stock likely works higher toward the $130–$140 area. If the reinvestment fails to sustain traffic and the Q3 weakness extends into Q4, the cheap multiple will get cheaper for a reason.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI stood at 47.1, neutral — not oversold, not overbought. Price was 2.45% below the 20-day SMA, 1.32% above the 50-day SMA, and 9.15% above the 200-day SMA. The post-earnings drop broke short-term momentum, but the medium-term uptrend is intact; support is roughly the 50-day around $125 and the 200-day around $116, while resistance is the $130–$132 zone. For timing, a close back above the 20-day would signal the pullback has run its course.

Macro Factors
  • Tariff policy: the IEEPA refund gave Q2 a one-time $1.31/share benefit; future tariff changes could add or remove margin pressure quickly.
  • Two-speed consumer: lower-income shoppers remain cost-of-living constrained, which helps dollar-store traffic, while higher-income shoppers are incrementally testing multi-price formats.
  • Interest rates: elevated rates pressure retail multiples even for defensive names, making earnings delivery more important than multiple expansion.
  • Competitive intensity: Walmart, Target, and online discounters are all fighting for value-conscious spend, pressuring dollar-store pricing power.
  • Inflation/margin mix: wage, shrink, and logistics costs remain structural margin headwinds for discount retail.
Key Catalysts
  • Q3 FY2026 earnings in late November / early December 2026 — key test of whether traffic and margins hold through the tariff-refund reinvestment phase.
  • Multi-price format expansion: ~710 stores converted or added in Q2, with full-year productivity benefits still ahead.
  • Deployment of the $2.5B share repurchase authorization could provide ongoing per-share support.
  • Further tariff developments — additional refunds or new duties could swing quarterly EPS by more than a dollar.
Key Risks
  • Q3 EPS guidance of $0.80–$0.95 is well below the $1.39 consensus; if reinvestment drag is worse or comps fade, the stock could stay range-bound or break lower.
  • The $1.31 tariff benefit is non-repeatable, inflating TTM GAAP EPS and making historical multiples look cheaper than the underlying run rate.
  • Balance sheet leverage is elevated: debt/equity is 2.24 and the current ratio is 1.13, leaving less room for error.
  • Competitive and shrink/labor pressures could keep operating margins below pre-divestiture norms.
  • Historical data is distorted by the Family Dollar divestiture, making trend extrapolation riskier than it appears.
Investment Thesis

As of 2026-08-27, DLTR looks like a reasonable, modestly undervalued turnaround rather than a broken business: post-divestiture revenue growth is ~7%, same-store sales are positive, FCF is solid, and the buyback adds support. The Q3 guide is the main near-term speed bump, but the raised FY2026 guidance and multi-price expansion argue for a cautious bullish view for patient investors, acknowledging that tariff noise and leverage make this a lower-conviction position.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Applied an 18.5x P/E to normalized TTM EPS of $7.15 — TTM EPS of $8.46 less the $1.31 one-time IEEPA tariff benefit — which is roughly a 10% discount to DLTR's 5-year average P/E of 20.57 and reflects the higher leverage and tariff noise. This yields $132.28; cross-checking with next-FY consensus EPS of $7.07 at about 18.7x gives a similar figure.

AI Lean: BullishConfidence: Low

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Agree

The deterministic score of 60.0 / Good Fundamentals is broadly fair. I would shade it slightly lower — maybe a few points — because the backward-looking formula sees the $2.70 Q2 GAAP EPS and 14.1% operating margin at face value, while the underlying ex-tariff Q2 EPS was $1.39 and the Q3 guide implies a temporary margin reset. That said, the post-divestiture revenue growth and FCF are real, the accruals ratio is healthy, and the score already discounts financial health for elevated leverage. This is not a trough-cyclical situation warranting a low score; it is a recovery that is further along on the top line than on clean margins, and the Good band still fits.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.