DOC — Healthpeak Properties, Inc.
Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is an S&P 500 constituent operating as a fully integrated real estate investment trust (REIT). The firm is dedicated to the acquisition, management, and development of premier properties essential for both medical research and the provision of healthcare services.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, Healthpeak trades at $20.30 (market cap ~$14.0B), about 12% below its 52-week high of $22.95 and 29% above its low of $15.70, on a 5.93% dividend yield and roughly 11.6x the midpoint of management's raised 2026 FFO guidance of $1.73-$1.77.
The market is split rather than scared. The August 4, 2026 Q2 print (net income $0.08/sh, adjusted FFO $0.46/sh) came with a raised FY26 FFO guide, RBC reiterated Outperform and lifted its target to $24, and the July 2026 $2.1B Brookfield joint venture was well received - yet as of 2026-09-13 the shares were $20.30 with a -1.74% one-month and -1.88% three-month return and RSI at 36.0. The analyst stack is a genuine coin-flip (20 Buy, 21 Hold, 0 Sell; consensus rating 'Hold'; average target $22.38, recent-target average $23.33 versus a $19 low). The +19.55% six-month return against a slightly negative three-month return tells the same story: a strong first half of 2026 followed by a summer of digestion, with income buyers holding and growth buyers waiting for the November print.
Revenue stepped up from $556M (Q3 2023) to roughly $700M when the Physicians Realty merger closed in Q1 2024, then went flat for five quarters ($694M-$706M from Q2 2024 through Q2 2025), and has since re-accelerated: $719.4M (Q4 2025), $753.0M (Q1 2026), $771.6M (Q2 2026). Year-over-year revenue growth across those four prints runs +0.8%, +3.1%, +7.1%, +11.1% - that is a real inflection, not a blip. The profit line has not followed: operating income fell year over year in Q2 2026 ($131.5M to $124.9M), so operating margin compressed from 18.9% to 16.2% even as revenue rose 11.1%, and Q1 2026 showed the same pattern (19.2% to 15.5%). FCF swung to -$522.5M in Q2 2026 because capex jumped to $883.6M (versus $24.0M in Q1 2026) - that is development/JV funding, not decay, but it does mean the cash-flow line is volatile. GAAP EPS is noise for a REIT here (-$0.17 in Q3 2025, $0.28 in Q1 2026, $0.08 in Q2 2026), and the gross-profit line is unusable altogether (negative $627.3M in Q4 2025, negative $150.4M in Q1 2026 - a reclassification artifact); FFO of $0.46 in Q2 2026 and the raised $1.73-$1.77 guidance (~4% growth) are the real scorecard. Verdict: revenue is inflecting up, margins have not turned yet, and trailing operating cash flow is roughly flat (TTM $1,231.1M versus $1,244.6M a year earlier).
The trailing P/E of 58 and PEG of -0.133 are meaningless for a REIT - GAAP EPS is crushed by depreciation and one-off impairments. On the metrics that matter, DOC screens cheap: $20.30 divided by the $1.75 midpoint of raised 2026 FFO guidance is 11.6x, versus the 13-15x range where stabilized healthcare REITs generally trade and versus the company's own 5-year average P/S of 6.16x against a current 4.74x (the deterministic model's own label is 'Cheap vs. its own history'). Price/book is 1.785x, EV/EBITDA 12.7x (net debt of $7.65B plus a $14.0B market cap against ~$2B of EBITDA), and the dividend yield of 5.93% is roughly 150-200bp above the healthcare-REIT average. The analyst forward EPS estimate of $0.448 (45x) is another reminder not to use EPS on this name. Net: cash-flow cheap, optically expensive, and the ~70% FFO payout leaves the dividend well covered but not bulletproof.
As of 2026-09-13, $20.30 embeds about 11.6x 2026 FFO with ~70% of that paid out as dividends - the market is pricing steady-state, not growth. It is not pricing the four-quarter revenue re-acceleration (+0.8% to +11.1%) or the balance-sheet de-risking from the July 2026 Brookfield JV (long-term debt down from $10.14B at 2025-12-31 to $9.28B at 2026-06-30, cash up to $1.63B). A plain re-rate to 12.5x on the $1.75 guidance midpoint is $21.88, and 13x on a ~$1.82 2027 FFO is ~$23.70 - which is where the $22.38 consensus and $23.33 recent-average targets cluster. On the downside, 10-11x FFO is $17.50-$19.25, and in that scenario the 5.9% yield is your entire return. So the setup is mildly asymmetric to the upside, but the upside mechanism is multiple expansion, not an earnings surprise - which means it needs either falling rates or proof that lab leasing and margins are turning.
As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) was 36.0, price was 2.9% below the 20-day SMA and 5.34% below the 50-day, but still 8.74% above the 200-day (implying an SMA200 near $18.70 and an SMA50 near $21.45). Weak short-term momentum inside an intact long-term uptrend is the classic definition of a consolidation pullback rather than a breakdown, and the +19.55% six-month return versus -1.88% over three months confirms it. RSI in the mid-30s is neither a capitulation buy nor a momentum sell. Timing implication: there is no urgency to chase; the high-$19s/low-$20s region toward the 200-day is a more sensible accumulation zone than $20.30 in the middle of the recent range, and a reclaim of the 50-day (~$21.45) would be the signal that the pullback is done.
- Interest rates and the 10-year Treasury: DOC is a levered, capital-intensive REIT ($9.28B of long-term debt at 2026-06-30, FMP debt-to-equity of 1.316), so falling yields both cut refinancing costs and expand REIT valuation multiples; the July 2026 Brookfield JV reduces reliance on the debt and equity markets.
- Long-term demographics: the expanding over-80 U.S. population is the structural demand driver for outpatient medical visits, and the secular shift of care out of hospitals into lower-cost outpatient settings favors DOC's medical office portfolio.
- Life-science funding and lab supply: biotech venture funding, lab vacancy and construction in core clusters (South San Francisco, Boston, San Diego) drive tenant credit and re-leasing spreads - the single largest swing factor in DOC's growth story.
- Private-market cap rates and the transaction bid: the $2.1B Brookfield minority-stake JV validated private-market pricing and gives DOC a recycling channel; a widening cap-rate environment would both slow that program and pressure the public multiple.
- Healthcare reimbursement and ACA/payer policy: rate changes and subsidy decisions affect health-system tenant economics, which flow through to rent-paying capacity and leasing demand.
- Q3 2026 earnings, expected early-to-mid November 2026: lab leasing retention, NOI growth, development lease-up and any further revision to FY26 FFO guidance of $1.73-$1.77 - the next real information event.
- Deployment of Brookfield JV proceeds into development or acquisitions: additional JV, monetization or buyback announcements would extend the capital-recycling narrative and support a multiple re-rate.
- Dividend cadence: the $0.10167 monthly payment ($1.22 annualized, 5.93% yield as of 2026-09-13, with the September payment payable September 25, 2026) - a raise or an accelerated buyback would signal management confidence.
- A dovish rate path: REITs are among the highest-beta sectors to falling yields, and a 5.9% yield becomes progressively more attractive as cash yields decline.
- A life-science leasing inflection - a pick-up in large-block lab deals or biotech funding would directly answer the biggest bear case on the stock.
- GAAP headline risk: Q2 2026 net income of just $63.2M ($0.08/sh) against a trailing P/E of 58, and a -$117.1M net loss booked in Q3 2025. Recurring impairments keep the headline valuation optics ugly and can spook screen-based buyers.
- Operating margin compression: margin fell to 16.2% in Q2 2026 from 18.9% a year earlier (and to 15.5% from 19.2% in Q1) despite double-digit revenue growth - if property operating costs and D&A keep outrunning rent growth, FFO growth stalls.
- Cash-flow volatility: free cash flow was -$522.5M in Q2 2026 on $883.6M of capex. That is investment rather than deterioration, but it means the dividend and development program depend on capital recycling (the Brookfield JV) rather than internally generated cash.
- Life-science tenant credit and lab oversupply: pockets of tenant distress or renewed vacancy in core clusters would hit occupancy, re-leasing spreads and the credibility of the ~4% FFO growth story.
- Leverage and rate sensitivity: $9.28B of long-term debt and a 1.316 debt-to-equity ratio at 2026-06-30 leave DOC exposed to refinancing costs and cap-rate expansion; a 100bp move in cap rates is worth several turns of equity value.
- Dividend coverage: roughly 70% of FFO and likely 75%+ of AFFO - comfortable, but with limited cushion if FFO growth reverses.
DOC is an income holding, not a compounder, and it is priced as one: 11.6x the midpoint of raised 2026 FFO guidance, a 5.93% dividend yield covered ~70% by FFO, a balance sheet materially de-risked by the July 2026 $2.1B Brookfield JV (long-term debt down to $9.28B from $10.14B six months earlier), and revenue growth that has accelerated for four straight quarters to +11.1% year over year. The offset is that the profit line has not followed - operating margin compressed from 18.9% to 16.2% year over year and Q2 free cash flow was -$522.5M on heavy development spend - so you are buying an improving top line, not yet an improving bottom line. At $20.30 as of 2026-09-13 you are paid ~5.9% to wait for a re-rate toward $22; that is a reasonable but not compelling risk/reward, and I would want either the mid-to-high $19s or hard evidence of margin stabilization before calling it a buy.
I used a P/FFO relative valuation, the standard lens for a REIT: management's raised 2026 FFO guidance midpoint of $1.75 times a justified 12.5x multiple (below the 13-15x healthcare-REIT average to reflect DOC's life-science tenant-credit exposure, above the current ~11.6x to reflect the Brookfield-de-risked balance sheet and accelerating revenue) gives $21.88, cross-checked against a required-yield calculation ($1.22 annualized dividend divided by 5.6% equals $21.79) and a 2027E FFO of roughly $1.82 at 12.25x ($22.30); blending those three inputs lands at $22.00 as of 2026-09-13.
My independent read lands close enough to the 53.3 / 'Fair Fundamentals' score that I would not move the band, so this is Agree rather than Partially Agree - the model's 50/50 blend of a 53.4 ratio-screener score and a 53.2 fundamentals score is a defensible description of a REIT that is cheap on cash flow, mediocre on trailing growth, and carrying real leverage. Two caveats cut in opposite directions and roughly cancel. Upward: the formula is entirely backward-looking and weights trailing operating cash flow (TTM $1,231.1M versus $1,244.6M the prior year, a mild decline) and trailing margins, which mechanically penalizes a company whose revenue YoY growth has accelerated four consecutive quarters (+0.8% to +3.1% to +7.1% to +11.1%) and that just raised FFO guidance - it does correctly credit the -1.37% accruals ratio as a sign that cash generation is running ahead of reported net income. Downward: the financial-health pillar leans on a 2.516 current ratio and a 1.316 debt-to-equity ratio, neither of which is the right lens for a REIT carrying $9.28B of long-term debt, and the -$522.5M Q2 2026 free cash flow on $883.6M of capex is largely invisible in an annualized FCF trend leg. Netting those, my fair score is roughly 58-60, still 'Fair Fundamentals.' One footnote on the model's own note about stockholders' equity dropping 3% in Q1 2025 versus a 40% jump a year earlier: that is the Physicians Realty merger anniversary, and it does distort the revenue and equity growth legs the formula relies on - which is an argument for trusting the band more than the precise number.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.