← Back to Rankings

DOWDow Inc.

Fundamentals Score: 68.3/100 (Good Fundamentals) · Basic Materials

Description

Dow Inc. is a global leader in materials science, delivering diverse solutions for key industries such as packaging, infrastructure development, mobility, and consumer products. The company's reach extends across numerous regions, including the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, India, the Asia Pacific, and Latin America.

Score Breakdown

Growth
83.1/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
47.6/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
78.8/100
weight: 15%
* Stockholders' equity moved +60% between 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 (vs. +3% for the same quarter a year earlier) in its reported financials - possibly a divestiture, spinoff, or major acquisition rather than organic performance. Growth/trend comparisons spanning this point may be distorted.
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral

Live Market DataPrice updated: 3h ago

P/E (TTM)
-16.8
Yield
4.15%
RSI (14)
47.4
vs SMA20
-1.76%
vs SMA50
+1.20%
vs SMA200
-3.43%
Analyst Target
$35
+16.4%
9 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$35
+15.3%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, DOW trades at $30.33, just below its 20-day SMA, with RSI 47.2 and price roughly 3% below its 200-day SMA. The Q2 2026 earnings beat and upgraded >$1.3B self-help target make the fundamental story look like an improving cyclical, while the sell-side consensus remains a Hold.

AI Sentiment:Neutral

Market sentiment is mixed-to-cautiously optimistic: Q2 2026 earnings beat and management raised cost-savings targets, but the stock remains range-bound near the lower half of its 52-week range, analyst consensus is Hold, and a 4.1% single-day drop on August 25 shows lingering cyclical-demand fear.

Quarterly Trend

The three-year trend is a classic chemical trough and nascent inflection. Revenue ground down from ~$10.9B per quarter in 2024 to $9.46B in Q4 2025, then inflected sharply: Q1 2026 revenue was $9.79B and Q2 2026 jumped to $12.09B (+19.7% YoY). Operating income went from ~$700M in early 2024 to losses through 2025, hit by a $1.04B operating loss in Q4 2025, then rebounded to $882M in Q2 2026. Net income swung from -$835M in Q2 2025 to +$721M in Q2 2026, and gross margin expanded from 5.4% to 17.9% YoY. TTM figures are still negative due to the deep 2025 losses, so this is one strong quarter, not yet a proven multi-quarter trend.

Valuation Assessment

As of 2026-08-27, the trailing P/E is meaningless at -16.8x because TTM EPS is -$1.70. The cleaner read: forward P/E is ~12.2x on the next-fiscal-year EPS estimate of $2.48, P/S is 0.53x versus the 5-year average of 0.67x, P/B is 0.88x against book value of roughly $33.80 per share, and the dividend yield is 4.15%. That is cheap versus DOW's own history, but the low TTM operating margin (-0.1%) and ROIC (0.5%) explain why the market is not paying a mid-cycle multiple yet.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

As of 2026-08-27, the market is pricing a muted, sub-normal earnings cycle: $30.33 is only ~12.2x forward EPS, not a big premium for the recovery Q2 hinted at. If next-year EPS actually lands near $2.48, a mid-cycle multiple supports the mid-$30s. If demand stalls and EPS falls back to ~$1.50, the stock would be trading over 20x forward earnings and the support would shift to book value and the dividend. In short, this is a show-me cyclical recovery, not a momentum stock.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI was 47.19, neutral rather than oversold or overbought. Price was 1.44% below the 20-day SMA, 0.99% above the 50-day SMA, and 2.9% below the 200-day SMA. That is a range-bound, trendless technical picture. Entry timing implication: no urgency; the stock is not breaking out, and a patient buyer would prefer either a confirmed break above the 200-day or a retest of the lower $20s.

Macro Factors
  • Global industrial production and PMI weakness: DOW's volumes track packaging, housing, autos, and general manufacturing, and sluggish global growth is the main demand headwind.
  • Interest rates: high borrowing costs continue to pressure construction and durable-goods end markets; central-bank easing would be a meaningful tailwind.
  • Chemical supply/demand balance: new global capacity, especially in polyethylene, has kept commodity chemical spreads depressed.
  • Energy and feedstock costs: movements in ethane, naphtha, and natural gas directly affect Dow's cost position and margin spreads.
  • Trade policy and FX: tariffs and a strong dollar can pressure export competitiveness and international earnings.
Key Catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings (expected late October 2026): confirmation that the upgraded >$1.3B self-help savings and the H2 EBITDA uplift from the Barry shutdown and Terneuzen restart are showing up in results.
  • Further cost and asset-optimization actions under the 'Transform to Outperform' program.
  • A turn in global macro data, interest-rate cuts, or China stimulus that re-rates cyclical demand expectations.
  • Continued free-cash-flow generation protecting the $0.35 quarterly dividend and supporting a higher multiple.
Key Risks
  • Prolonged chemical oversupply and weak global demand keep margins below mid-cycle, making the current EPS recovery short-lived.
  • Execution risk on the $1.3B self-help program, Terneuzen restart, or Barry shutdown benefits.
  • Dividend risk if free cash flow deteriorates again; the 4.15% yield is attractive but TTM GAAP profitability is still negative.
  • The reported +60% sequential jump in stockholders' equity in Q2 2026 raises book-value and balance-sheet comparability questions that the market has not yet fully explained.
Investment Thesis

DOW is a reasonable contrarian/cyclical value at $30.33: it trades below book, yields 4.15%, and Q2 2026 showed a sharp profit and cash-flow inflection while management's self-help program is running ahead of plan. The caveat is that the macro demand recovery is unproven and the balance sheet has an unusual recent equity jump, so this is a patient, cycle-aware investment rather than a high-conviction compounder.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Fair value is approximately 14.0x next-fiscal-year EPS of $2.477, which gives $34.68 and rounds to $35.00; that multiple is a mid-cycle multiple for a low-beta, 4.1%-yielding commodity chemical company, slightly below the consensus target's implied 14.6x but above the current 12.2x forward P/E, and it aligns with roughly 1.0x book value on ~$33.80 per share.

AI Lean: BullishConfidence: Low

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Agree

The 68.3 'Good' score is broadly fair. The backward-looking formula already captures Q2 2026's growth and cash-flow inflection, while the low quality/profitability sub-score correctly flags still-depressed TTM margins and ROIC. I would not move the score materially; if anything, the unexplained +60% sequential equity jump is a reason to treat the financial-health strength cautiously rather than upgrade the score. This is a cyclical recovering from a trough, and the cheap valuation context supports a Bullish lean.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.