#337S&P 500 rank

DOW — Dow Inc.

2-yr score: 46.2/100 (Middle 40%)Basic MaterialsToday
$30.38−1.01%
Description

Dow Inc. is a global leader in materials science, delivering diverse solutions for key industries such as packaging, infrastructure development, mobility, and consumer products. The company's reach extends across numerous regions, including the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, India, the Asia Pacific, and Latin America.

Score breakdownLatest quarter65.9 · Good
Growth
83.1
Quality / Profitability
47.6
Financial health
78.8
Ratio screener
63.5
Track record: 2-yr avg 46.2 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 46.4 (Fair, 34 quarters ≈ 8.5 yrs) · next earnings Oct 22, 2026 (today)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:24 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
-16.8
Yield
4.59%
RSI (14)
61.7
vs SMA20
+6.00%
vs SMA50
+2.68%
vs SMA200
-6.15%
Analyst target
$31
+2.7%
5 analysts
AI theoretical price
$33
+8.6%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, Dow traded at $29.03 (market cap ~$21.0B), 32% below its 52-week high of $42.74 and 41% above its low of $20.65, on a 4.59% dividend yield, negative TTM EPS of -$1.70, and ~11.9x next-FY consensus EPS of $2.449. Two quarters into an earnings snapback from the 2025 trough, with a deterministic score of 65.9 ('Good Fundamentals') and a valuation tag of 'Cheap vs. its own history' - but the Q2 2026 balance sheet contains a large discontinuity that the score itself flags.

AI sentimentBearish

The market mood as of 2026-09-13 is clearly negative despite a headline beat. Q2 2026 (reported 2026-07-23) delivered revenue of $12.09B (+20% y/y) and adjusted EPS of $1.44 vs $1.25 consensus, yet the stock fell 1.1% on the print because volumes were -1% overall and -4% in Packaging & Specialty Plastics, and management guided cautiously for H2. KeyBanc's 2026-09-11 initiation at Sector Weight with a $26 target validated the bear case on structurally weak polyethylene pricing. Price action confirms it: -5.04% over 1 month, -14.24% over 3 months, -20.73% over 6 months as of 2026-09-13, with the shares below the 20-, 50- and 200-day averages, and sell-side consensus stuck at Hold with a $35.67 average target (range $26-$45).

Quarterly trend

Revenue flatlined for three years - $10.62B (Q4 2023), $10.92B (Q2 2024), $9.46B (Q4 2025) - then printed $12.09B in Q2 2026 (+19.7% y/y). Margins describe a classic trough: gross margin peaked at 12.5% in Q1 2024, compressed to 5.4% in Q2 2025 and 5.8% in Q4 2025, then rebounded to 6.5% (Q1 2026) and 17.9% (Q2 2026); operating income went from +$704M (Q1 2024) to -$1,044M (Q4 2025) to +$882M (Q2 2026), and net income from +$516M to -$1,543M to +$721M. Free cash flow was negative in four of the six quarters from Q1 2024 through Q2 2025, then turned positive at $621M (Q1 2026) and $699M (Q2 2026). Two important qualifiers: (1) with total volumes -1% y/y and P&SP -4%, a +20% revenue jump is not organic demand - it is price/mix or consolidation; (2) stockholders' equity jumped from $15.25B (2026-03-31) to $24.42B (2026-06-30) while total liabilities fell $7.46B, a discontinuity the deterministic score flags as possibly a divestiture, spin, or acquisition. Treat Q2 2026 as an inflection quarter, not yet a confirmed trend.

Valuation assessment

Cheap on assets and sales, moderately cheap on forward earnings - but partly because the denominator is trough-depressed. As of 2026-09-13: P/B 0.843 (below book), P/S 0.508 vs a 5-year average of 0.67 (~24% discount), forward P/E 11.9x on next-FY consensus EPS of $2.449, and a 4.59% dividend yield at the high end of its own history. The 26.8x 5-year average P/E is not a usable benchmark - it is inflated by near-zero trough earnings (TTM P/E is negative at -16.1x, and the 0.12 PEG is meaningless with cyclical/negative EPS). On the deterministic score's own valuation overlay the stock scores 90.2 ('Cheap vs. its own history'). The honest read: you are buying assets and sales at a discount, and forward earnings at a mid-teens discount to the market, in exchange for accepting that the earnings base is unproven.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The tape is not paying for the recovery the sell side models. At $29.03 you pay ~11.9x next-FY EPS of $2.449 and 0.84x book - the market is capitalising a partial recovery but refusing to fund it with multiple expansion, which is why a 20% revenue beat only moved the stock -1.1%. If FY2027 lands at the $2.45 consensus, a 14x multiple is worth ~$34; if volumes stay negative and EPS lands closer to $1.50, you are paying 19x for a cyclical and today's price is fair-to-rich. The Q3 2026 print (late Oct/early Nov 2026) is the swing factor: if the ~$700M 2026 restructuring benefit holds operating margin near Q2's 7.3% through a seasonally softer quarter, the multiple re-rates; if margins fade back toward Q1's -0.3%, the market's scepticism is vindicated.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13 the technical picture was weak but not washed out. RSI(14) stood at 40.19 - soft, not oversold - with price 5.3% below the 20-day (~$30.66), 3.65% below the 50-day (~$30.13) and 8.23% below the 200-day (~$31.63): a clean downtrend with all three moving averages overhead. Trailing returns were -1.39% (1wk), -5.04% (1mo), -14.24% (3mo) and -20.73% (6mo). Timing implication: there is no technical trigger to buy here. A reclaim of the 50-day (~$30.13) or an RSI flush below 30 toward the $26-27 zone (near KeyBanc's $26 target) would offer materially better entries than chasing a falling knife mid-range.

Macro factors
  • Polyethylene and commodity chemical oversupply: new global capacity, notably in China and the Middle East, is holding PE spreads near cash-cost levels - the core of KeyBanc's 2026-09-11 bearish initiation.
  • North American feedstock cost advantage: cheap natural-gas-derived ethane gives Dow a structural edge over naphtha-based European and Asian producers, but that edge is worth far less when global prices are set by oversupply rather than by the marginal producer's cost.
  • Energy and feedstock volatility plus Middle East geopolitics (Iran) as a live input-cost and supply-chain risk for petrochemical producers.
  • Higher-for-longer rates: Dow is capital-intensive (TTM capex ~$4.2B, including a $2.48B spike in Q4 2025) and pays a 4.6% dividend, so it competes directly with bond yields and its Alberta cracker economics are discount-rate sensitive.
  • Weak global industrial and packaging demand, tariffs and trade friction: Q2 2026 volumes were -1% y/y overall and -4% in Packaging & Specialty Plastics, the segment most levered to global trade.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings, expected late Oct/early Nov 2026: the key question is whether the ~$700M 2026 restructuring run-rate holds operating margin near Q2's 7.3% and whether management gives quantitative 2027 margin visibility.
  • Further 'Transform to Outperform' footprint actions - asset closures, divestitures, or an explanation of the Q2 2026 corporate event behind the $9.2B equity increase and $7.5B liability decrease - which would clarify true leverage.
  • A polyethylene price/spread inflection or industry capacity rationalisation announcements, which would re-rate the entire commodity chemical complex.
  • Capital spending normalisation: TTM capex of ~$4.2B, bloated by a single $2.48B Q4 2025 quarter, rolling off would free FCF behind the ~$960M annual dividend.
  • Mix-accretive moves into higher-margin electronics/semiconductor materials (SEMICON Taiwan showcase, early September 2026).
  • Sell-side dispersion resolving one way or the other: consensus average target $35.67 (8 analysts) versus KeyBanc's $26 and a $45 high.
Key risks
  • Polyethylene oversupply persists and the recovery stalls - the structurally bearish PE view behind KeyBanc's $26 target proves right.
  • Dividend coverage: TTM free cash flow of just $436M against roughly $960M of annual cash dividends; a cut would remove the 4.6% yield that currently anchors the valuation.
  • Balance-sheet discontinuity: stockholders' equity +60% in one quarter and current liabilities falling from $10.54B to $1.89B leaves a current ratio of 11.07 that is almost certainly an artifact - meaning the score's 78.8 financial-health leg and 63.5 ratio-screener leg are less reliable than they look.
  • Volume weakness: a +20% revenue quarter with -1% volumes and -4% P&SP volumes may be price or consolidation that does not repeat.
  • Cyclical timing risk: nothing in the data tells you how long the trough lasts - four of six quarters from Q1 2024 to Q2 2025 posted negative free cash flow.
  • Income-holder ownership: a 0.42 beta and a large dividend-seeking shareholder base means a payout cut or a downgrade cycle can force selling well beyond what fundamentals justify.
Investment thesis

This is a cyclical trough value, not a broken business: 0.84x book, 0.51x sales, ~11.9x forward earnings, a 4.59% yield, a North American feedstock cost advantage, $700M of self-help restructuring, and two consecutive quarters of positive FCF ($621M and $699M) against four negative quarters in the prior six. But the recovery is not self-sustaining yet - volumes are still shrinking, PE oversupply is a real structural overhang, and the Q2 2026 revenue and balance-sheet jumps may be partly inorganic, which is exactly why the deterministic score reads better than the business feels. At $29.03 with a $33 fair value (~14% upside) plus the dividend, the risk/reward is decent for a patient, income-tolerant investor, but I would not call it an urgent buy without either a technical basing signal or PE price confirmation.

AI theoretical price methodology

I applied a 13.5x P/E - below the company's 26.8x 5-year average (unusable, distorted by near-zero trough earnings) but above the current 11.9x forward - to next-FY consensus EPS of $2.449, giving $33.06, rounded to $33.00. The 13.5x reflects a 0.42-beta, cost-advantaged, 4.6%-yielding commodity chemical producer sitting at a cyclical inflection rather than a mid-cycle peak. Two independent cross-checks converge on the same zone: 1.0x book value is ~$34.4/share (implied by the $20.97B market cap at 0.843x P/B), and a 4.0% required yield on the ~$1.33 annual dividend is ~$33.29.

AI lean: BullishConfidence: Low
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

Mapping the table mechanically, band 'Good Fundamentals' plus 'Cheap vs. its own history' gives Bullish, and I am not deviating - there is no single dated event in the brief (no announced acquisition, bankruptcy, restatement or fraud) that justifies overriding it. That said, I would take the 65.9 number down roughly 10-15 points to a 'Fair' ~52-55, which is why this is Partially Agree rather than Agree. The growth leg (83.1) is flattered by a Q2 2026 revenue jump of +19.7% that came with volumes of -1% and P&SP volumes of -4%; the financial-health leg (78.8) and the ratio screener are flattered by a current ratio of 11.07 that is an artifact of current liabilities collapsing from $10.54B to $1.89B in one quarter and equity jumping +60% to $24.42B - the score's own notes flag this as possibly a divestiture/spin/acquisition. The one leg that is honest is quality/profitability at 47.6 (TTM operating margin -0.1%, ROIC 0.5%, accruals ratio -0.99%, which is genuinely clean cash conversion). The formula's structural blind spot cuts the other way too: it is entirely backward-looking, and this is a commodity chemical company at a cyclical trough (Q2 2026 operating income of $882M versus $9M a year earlier), not one in structural decline - so a mechanically low trailing score would be just as wrong as the inflated one. Net: right band, ~10-15 points too generous, and the low confidence rating reflects that the balance-sheet discontinuity contaminates the very legs driving the score.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.