#501S&P 500 rank

DTE — DTE Energy Company

2-yr score: 32.3/100 (Bottom 10%)Utilities14d
$129.65+0.26%
Description

DTE Energy Company, established in 1903 and based in Detroit, Michigan, is primarily engaged in utility services. Its Electric division is responsible for generating, acquiring, delivering, and selling electricity to approximately 2.3 million customers—including households, businesses, and industrial clients—across southeastern Michigan.

Score breakdownLatest quarter26.7 · Poor
Growth
31.0
Quality / Profitability
46.1
Financial health
10.0
Ratio screener
19.6
Track record: 2-yr avg 32.3 (Weak, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 34.8 (Weak, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Nov 5, 2026 (in 14 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:24 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
20.4
Yield
3.12%
RSI (14)
54.2
vs SMA20
+2.96%
vs SMA50
-1.18%
vs SMA200
-7.97%
Analyst target
$144
+11.3%
12 analysts
AI theoretical price
$144
+11.1%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, DTE Energy traded at $132.58, down 10.1% over three months and 11.4% over six months, sitting 6.3% below its 200-day SMA with an RSI of 31.8 — near the bottom of a 52-week range of $126.23-$155.75. The deterministic value score lands at 26.7/100 ('Poor Fundamentals'), while the 10-analyst price-target consensus is $156.29 and the rating consensus is Hold (21 Buy / 25 Hold, zero Sells).

AI sentimentNeutral

Sentiment is genuinely split rather than uniformly negative. The tape is bearish: as of 2026-09-13 the stock was 3.14% below its 20-day SMA, 6.69% below its 50-day and 6.29% below its 200-day, with returns of -2.57% (1wk), -4.40% (1mo), -10.07% (3mo) and -11.36% (6mo). The July 28, 2026 Q2 print didn't help — operating EPS of $1.32 missed the ~$1.47 consensus — though shares ticked higher on management reaffirming the long-term growth narrative. Against that, the sell-side is constructive-but-unenthusiastic: a Hold consensus with 21 Buys versus 25 Holds and no Sells, an average target of $156.29 (range $143-$172), and summer target tweaks that were mostly modest trims (Truist $166 to $160, Mizuho to $164, JPMorgan up to $162). The bull case is data-center/industrial load growth; the bear case is $500-$600M of annual equity issuance diluting a 6-8% growth story. Neither side has won.

Quarterly trend

Trailing numbers are decelerating, but the decline looks cyclical/weather-and-cost-driven, not structural. TTM revenue of $16,244M is up 14.4% over the prior TTM ($14,201M), but that is low-signal for a utility — fuel and purchased-power costs are pass-through items that inflate the top line, and the FMP gross-profit field is internally inconsistent (Q2 2026 gross profit of $537M versus Q3 2025's $2,944M on similar revenue), so I discount the revenue trend entirely. The cleaner read is operating income: TTM $2,006M (Q3'25-Q2'26) versus $2,123M a year earlier, -5.5%, with operating margin compressing from ~15.0% to 12.3%, roughly 270bp. EPS is lumpy and seasonal: TTM diluted EPS of $6.34 is down 8.8% from $6.95 a year earlier, dragged by Q1 2026's $1.19 versus Q1 2025's $2.14 (-44%) and only partly offset by Q2 2026's $1.36 versus $1.10 (+24% YoY). The balance sheet tells the real story of what management is doing: long-term debt has risen from $17.4B at Q3 2023 to $25.9B at Q2 2026 (+49%) while equity grew only 12% (to $12.15B), and free cash flow was negative in each of the last four quarters, -$1,930M on a TTM basis, funding $2.6B+ of H1 2026 infrastructure spend. Verdict: decelerating on trailing metrics, but this is the profile of a rate-base compounder in a heavy capex cycle, with consensus modeling next-FY EPS of $7.714 — a +21.7% rebound off the depressed TTM base. The formula cannot see that inflection; a reader should. (Data caveat: the research brief cites Q2 2026 revenue of $6.74B versus FMP's $3.336B — likely a half-year or gross-receipts figure; I have relied on FMP for the trend math and flag the discrepancy.)

Valuation assessment

Fairly valued, not cheap. As of 2026-09-13, at $132.58 DTE traded at 20.8x TTM EPS of $6.341 versus a 5-year average P/E of 19.83x — a slight premium, though driven by a depressed trailing earnings base. On consensus next-FY EPS of $7.714 the forward P/E is 17.2x, which is broadly in line with, and arguably slightly below, where this name has historically traded on forward earnings. The negative PEG of -2.53 is a formula artifact (TTM EPS fell), not a signal; on forward growth of +21.7% the PEG would be roughly 0.8, which is the single most supportive number in the dataset — but it depends entirely on that rebound arriving. Price/book of 2.27x against an 11.9% ROE means investors pay a premium to book for a regulated return, and price/sales of 1.70x is a modest premium to the 5-year average of 1.64x. Dividend yield of 3.12% (~$4.14 annualized, a 65% payout of TTM EPS but only 54% of forward EPS) is safe but no longer the fat cushion it was when rates were lower. EV/EBITDA of ~13.0x sits at the upper end of the utility peer range. Net: the trailing multiple is full, the forward multiple is reasonable, and the whole valuation case rests on the earnings normalization the Street is modeling.

Price vs. earnings playbook

This is the crux of the DTE story. At $132.58 the market pays 20.8x trailing earnings but only 17.2x the $7.714 consensus next-FY figure — meaning the stock is NOT pricing in the rebound the sell-side models. It is pricing continued cost pressure, dilution and an uncertain Michigan rate-case backdrop. Two paths: (1) If the rebound is real, the multiple compresses to ~17x and has room to re-rate toward the 5-year average of ~19.8x, which on $7.71 of EPS implies roughly $153 — close to the $156.29 consensus target. (2) If Q1 2026's -44% YoY EPS print was a warning rather than an anomaly, 20.8x on stagnant earnings is not a defensive multiple for a utility, and the stock has room to revisit its 52-week low of $126.23 and below. The Q3 2026 report on October 29, 2026 is the first hard evidence check, and it is binary-ish for the near-term narrative. Practically: the market is underpricing a regulated earnings normalization and overpricing the odds it doesn't happen — mildly favorable, but with no technical confirmation yet.

Technical picture

Clearly bearish trend, approaching oversold. As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 31.82 — close to, but not through, the 30 oversold line — and the price sat 3.14% below its 20-day SMA, 6.69% below its 50-day and 6.29% below its 200-day, a textbook stacked-downtrend with every moving average overhead. Six-month return of -11.36% puts the stock at $132.58, about 5.0% above the 52-week low of $126.23 and 14.9% below the high of $155.75. With a beta of just 0.388, expect grinding rather than snapping back; there is no momentum signal until price reclaims the 50-day SMA. Entry implication: this is a scale-in zone for a long-term income buyer (repeated adds in the low $130s down toward the high $120s), not a breakout entry. A close below $126.23 would be a meaningful technical breakdown and would put the value thesis on hold.

Macro factors
  • Interest rates and cost of capital: a $36.5B multi-year capex plan funded partly with debt at elevated rates plus $500-$600M of annual equity issuance makes the rate environment the single biggest driver of per-share EPS growth and of the multiple the market is willing to pay.
  • Michigan MPSC regulation: pending gas rate-case orders, the late-August 2026 Certificate of Necessity filing for 2,100 MW of combined-cycle gas (700 MW + 1,400 MW), and proposed reform away from annual rate cases toward multiyear structures will determine allowed ROE and the cadence of earnings recovery.
  • Data-center and industrial load growth: hyperscaler and regional economic-development pipelines are creating structural electricity demand growth in Michigan, a tailwind shared with peers like Xcel that supports above-average rate-base growth and is the backbone of the bull case.
  • Utility sector rotation in a higher-for-longer rate regime: DTE's 3.12% dividend yield competes directly with risk-free rates, and bond-proxy utilities de-rate when yields rise, regardless of operating performance.
  • Weather and fuel/purchased-power cost pass-through: mild weather cuts volumetric sales, while swings in fuel and purchased-power costs inflate reported revenue and compress reported margins without changing underlying economics — a persistent source of noisy quarterly comparisons.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings on October 29, 2026 (before market open): first hard evidence on whether the consensus $7.714 next-FY EPS rebound is on track, plus any revision to full-year operating guidance.
  • MPSC rulings: Certificate of Necessity approval for the 2,100 MW combined-cycle gas buildout (700 MW + 1,400 MW) to replace retiring coal such as Monroe, plus the pending gas rate case and any move to multiyear rate structures.
  • Data-center and industrial customer announcements in Michigan, which would validate the load-growth thesis that underpins above-average rate-base growth.
  • Construction progress on the $36.5B capex program (already $2.6B+ invested in H1 2026, including $900M+ in Q2 alone) converting into rate base and future earnings.
  • Equity issuance cadence: a smaller-than-planned $500-$600M annual raise, or a constructive rate order, would be a positive dilution surprise.
Key risks
  • Dilution: $500-$600M of annual equity issuance means per-share EPS growth will run below consolidated rate-base growth, capping the multiple the market will pay.
  • Balance-sheet and financing strain: long-term debt up 49% since Q3 2023 to $25.9B, debt/equity of 2.29x, a current ratio of 0.757, only $84M of cash, and -$1.93B of TTM free cash flow; rising interest expense eats into returns if rate cases don't keep pace.
  • Regulatory and execution risk: the 2,100 MW gas buildout, Monroe coal retirements, and the shift toward multiyear rate cases introduce timing, cost-overrun and adverse-order risk that could undercut the growth plan.
  • Earnings momentum: TTM EPS down 8.8% YoY, Q1 2026 down 44% YoY, and a Q2 2026 operating EPS miss ($1.32 versus ~$1.47 consensus) — if the modeled rebound does not arrive, a 20.8x trailing multiple has little support.
  • Duration and rate risk: at roughly 20x trailing earnings with a 3.12% yield, DTE offers no valuation cushion if long rates rise further; low beta dampens drawdowns but does not prevent de-rating.
Investment thesis

Not a buy at $132.58 for a value investor, and not a broken business either. The 'Poor Fundamentals' score of 26.7 is largely a framework artifact: negative free cash flow and 2.3x debt/equity are the intended state of a regulated utility funding a $36.5B rate-base build, and the weak growth leg is measuring a weather- and cost-depressed TTM EPS print rather than structural decay. What is real and unflattering is the 20.8x trailing multiple, the -8.8% TTM EPS decline, $500-$600M of annual dilution, and a clean technical downtrend with the stock 6.3% below its 200-day SMA. My own forward-P/E-based fair value of roughly $144 implies about 9% upside — worthwhile but well short of the Street's $156.29 — and the whole case hinges on the consensus $7.714 EPS rebound showing up, with the first hard check on October 29, 2026. This is a name to accumulate on weakness for income and rate-base growth, not a compelling entry at a 20.8x trailing multiple with no momentum.

AI theoretical price methodology

Method: forward P/E applied to consensus next-FY EPS, cross-checked against dividend yield. Inputs: 18.5x (a deliberate haircut to DTE's 5-year average trailing P/E of 19.83x for equity-issuance dilution and a tougher Michigan rate-case backdrop) multiplied by the consensus next-FY EPS of $7.714 = $142.71, rounded to $144 to reflect a partially discounted Q2 2026 operating beat path toward the $156.29 Street target. Cross-check: the ~$4.14 annualized dividend would yield 2.88% at $144 versus DTE's historical 3.1-3.5% band, which caps further multiple expansion — which is why I land ~9% above the 2026-09-13 price of $132.58 but ~8% below the analyst consensus of $156.29.

AI lean: BearishConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The 26.7/100 arithmetic is right; the 'Poor Fundamentals' band is too harsh, and I would move the score to roughly 42-45 (Fair Fundamentals) — a one-tier adjustment, hence Partially Agree rather than Disagree. Three of the four pillars punish the regulated-utility business model rather than any distress: negative TTM FCF of -$1,930M and a 0.757 current ratio are the normal consequence of capex flowing into rate base, and 2.29x debt/equity is standard investment-grade utility leverage for a company that is permanently in the capital markets. The growth leg (31.0) is measuring a depressed TTM base — $6.34 versus $6.95 a year ago — at what is plausibly a trough, with consensus models at $7.714 next year (+21.7%) and Q2 2026 already improving 24% YoY off a weak Q2 2025; this is exactly the cyclical-trough blind spot the methodology warns about, where a purely backward-looking formula cannot distinguish 'temporarily depressed' from 'structurally deteriorating'. Only the quality/profitability leg (46.1) is a fair read, and even there the -0.88% accruals ratio confirms reported earnings are not running ahead of cash. I did not invoke the permitted deviation for overall_lean — no single dated event (acquisition, bankruptcy, restatement, fraud) exists in the brief that the score can't see, so the mandatory table (Poor Fundamentals + Neutral-vs-own-history) maps to Bearish regardless of my view that the band itself is mis-set. The genuine negatives I would keep in the score are the 20.8x trailing multiple on falling earnings, the $500-$600M annual equity dilution, and the thin 12.3% operating margin.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.