#237S&P 500 rank

EBAY — eBay Inc.

2-yr score: 51.3/100 (Middle 40%)Consumer Cyclical6d
$122.90+1.41%
Description

eBay Inc. manages an extensive global e-commerce ecosystem designed to facilitate transactions between buyers and sellers. This framework primarily encompasses its flagship website, ebay.com, alongside its suite of dedicated mobile applications.

Score breakdownLatest quarter55.1 · Fair
Growth
66.2
Quality / Profitability
55.0
Financial health
55.4
Ratio screener
50.0
Track record: 2-yr avg 51.3 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 50.9 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 28, 2026 (in 6 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:24 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
24.9
Yield
1.16%
RSI (14)
73.5
vs SMA20
+9.33%
vs SMA50
+13.35%
vs SMA200
+19.31%
Analyst target
$122
-0.5%
15 analysts
AI theoretical price
$117
-5.2%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, eBay traded at $107.75 (market cap $47.8B), 8.7% above its 200-day SMA, 1.1% below its 50-day, with RSI at 53.74 after a 4.2% one-week bounce but a -0.79% three-month return. The setup at that date: a genuine revenue reacceleration (+14.8% YoY in Q2 2026, full-year GMV guidance raised to 11.5%-12.5%) set against a trailing P/E of 21.8x versus a 5-year average of 11.68x.

AI sentimentNeutral

Sentiment as of 2026-09-13 is split rather than directional. The bulls have real ammunition: the August 5, 2026 Q2 print beat (revenue $3.13B, +15% YoY; non-GAAP EPS $1.60), GMV rose to $22.4B with C2C up over 20% and focus categories up 26%, advertising grew 25% to $570M, and management raised full-year GMV growth guidance to 11.5%-12.5%. Argus upgraded to Buy with a $133 target (Aug 6) and Rosenblatt initiated at Buy with $120 (Aug 18). But the ratings data is not a consensus slam dunk - the FMP breakdown shows 32 buy, 33 hold, 2 sell with an overall 'Hold' label, and the brief's own tally is roughly 12 Buy/17 Hold/3 Sell. Price action confirms the ambivalence: +4.2% over one week and +5.3% over one month, yet -0.79% over three months and roughly 10% below the 52-week high of $119.31. The market likes the trajectory but has already paid up for it, so good news no longer moves the stock the way it did in H2 2025.

Quarterly trend

The revenue trend is a genuine inflection, not a blip. Quarterly revenue went $2,500M (Q3 2023), $2,562M (Q4 2023), $2,556M (Q1 2024), $2,572M (Q2 2024), $2,576M (Q3 2024), $2,579M (Q4 2024), $2,585M (Q1 2025) - essentially flat for seven quarters, with YoY growth of roughly 1% or less. Then it broke: $2,730M in Q2 2025 (+6.1% YoY), $2,820M in Q3 2025 (+9.5%), $2,965M in Q4 2025 (+14.9%), $3,089M in Q1 2026 (+19.5%) and $3,134M in Q2 2026 (+14.8%). That is six straight quarters of sequential and YoY acceleration - a structural change in the growth rate, driven by C2C, advertising and focus categories, not a seasonal quirk (Q2 2026 revenue exceeded Q4 2025 revenue, which is unusual for a retail-adjacent marketplace). Margins are stable-to-improving on a clean basis: TTM operating margin is 20.5% and TTM gross margin 72.5%, with Q2 2026 gross margin at 73.5% versus 71.6% a year earlier. Note that the YoY margin comparisons are noisy - Q2 2025 operating income of $484M on $2,730M revenue (17.7%) was clearly depressed by one-off costs (net income $368M, EPS $0.78, versus $1.06-$1.35 in the surrounding quarters), while Q1 2025's 23.8% operating margin was unusually high. Earnings quality is good: TTM operating cash flow of $2,972M (Q2 2026 $523M + Q1 2026 $970M + Q4 2025 $583M + Q3 2025 $896M) comfortably exceeds TTM net income of $2,222M, and the deterministic score's accruals ratio of just 0.15% confirms earnings are cash-backed. The one yellow flag inside the trend: Q2 2026 capex jumped to $223M from $72M in Q1 2026, cutting quarterly FCF to $300M - if that step-up is recurring rather than timing, TTM FCF of $2,429M (still up ~72% from the $1,409M prior-year TTM) will be a ceiling rather than a floor.

Valuation assessment

Modestly rich, but no longer absurd. As of 2026-09-13, EBAY traded at $107.75 on 21.8x trailing EPS of $4.971 and 3.98x TTM sales, versus its own 5-year averages of 11.68x trailing P/E and 3.07x P/S - an 87% P/E premium and 30% P/S premium to its own history, which is exactly why the deterministic score's valuation overlay reads 'Rich vs. its own history.' On forward numbers the picture softens considerably: consensus forward EPS of $6.139 puts the stock at 17.6x, and next-FY revenue of $12.53B implies roughly +12.9% growth off FY2025's $11.1B (with EPS up roughly 20%+ off the depressed FY2025 base). The trailing PEG of 2.951 is ugly, but it is being computed against one-off-distorted historical EPS. TTM free cash flow of $2,429M is a 5.1% FCF yield on the $47.8B market cap, which is a real valuation floor for a business now compounding revenue at low-to-mid teens with 20%+ operating margins. Verdict: you are paying a full price for the reacceleration, roughly 1.4-1.5x what eBay used to cost on earnings, but not an indefensible one given the growth shift and the cash generation.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The stock is being priced on the reacceleration continuing, not on what has already been reported. As of 2026-09-13, at 21.8x trailing EPS ($4.971) and 17.6x the forward consensus EPS of $6.139, the market has already banked the move from ~1% revenue growth (Q1 2025) to ~15% (Q2 2026) and the raised 11.5%-12.5% GMV guide. That leaves an asymmetric setup: the multiple is doing most of the work, so a Q3 print that shows GMV growth settling into the low single digits or ad growth decelerating from 25% would compress the multiple faster than earnings would fall - this is a re-rating stock, and re-ratings unwind quickly. Conversely, if advertising keeps compounding at 25% (now only ~2.7% of GMV, so plenty of headroom) and Depop's resale volumes layer on top of the raised GMV guide, EPS estimates have room to move up from the current $6.139 and the elevated P/S can be defended. Practical read: the price is not ahead of estimates, but it is ahead of the previous decade's growth reality, so treat each quarterly GMV print as a referendum on the multiple rather than on the quarter.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, the tape is constructive but stalled. RSI(14) stood at 53.74 - dead neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The $107.75 price was 3.19% above its 20-day SMA (~$104.4) and 8.68% above its 200-day SMA (~$99.1), keeping the longer-term uptrend intact, but it was 1.07% below its 50-day SMA (~$108.9) - a mild short-term headwind - and the three-month return of -0.79% versus +17.97% over six months confirms the stock has been digesting a big H2 2025/early 2026 run rather than trending. It sits roughly 10% below the 52-week high of $119.31 and 38% above the low of $78.03. Entry-timing implication: there is no urgency and no oversold setup to exploit. A pullback into the mid-$90s to low-$100s (toward the 200-day) would offer materially better risk/reward, while a decisive close above $119.31 would signal the consolidation is resolved upward. Buying into the middle of this range is paying a premium for a coin-flip on direction.

Macro factors
  • Recommerce and value-seeking consumer behavior remain structural tailwinds - secondhand, collectibles and resale are holding up better than general discretionary retail, which is why eBay's C2C (+20%+) and focus categories (+26%) are outgrowing the broader sector.
  • Higher-for-longer rates raise the discount rate applied to a re-rated growth multiple and increase eBay's own financing costs, though the company is a net cash generator (TTM FCF $2,429M) with long-term debt already reduced from $6.97B in late 2023 to $5.14B at 2026-06-30, so this is a multiple risk more than a solvency risk.
  • Marketplace tax and reporting regulation (stricter 1099-K and similar compliance thresholds) adds administrative friction to the C2C seller base, but it also formalizes and validates the platform - a small net negative operationally that partially offsets the C2C growth story.
  • Competitive intensity in the categories eBay is targeting: Temu, Shein, TikTok Shop and Amazon continue to pressure low-ASP and collectible/resale pricing, and any change to cross-border de minimis and tariff treatment would hit the international half of the marketplace directly.
  • FX and consumer confidence in eBay's international markets (a large share of GMV) feed directly into reported revenue and take rate; a stronger dollar or a European/UK consumer slowdown would blunt the +15% YoY revenue trajectory the current multiple depends on.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings, expected Wednesday, November 4, 2026 - the first clean read on whether the raised 11.5%-12.5% GMV growth guide and the ~25% advertising growth rate are being sustained, plus early Depop integration metrics.
  • Depop: the $1.4B acquisition closed 2026-07-30, adding fashion resale and Gen Z share; any disclosed revenue contribution, take-rate accretion or synergy framing at Q3 or Q4 would be new information the current model has no history for.
  • Advertising monetization - first-party ads grew 25% YoY to $570M, still only ~2.7% of GMV; each incremental point of ad take rate is high-margin revenue that lifts operating margin past the current 20.5% TTM level.
  • eBay Live scaling - 8x YoY GMV growth across initial international markets; if live commerce proves durable it is a direct answer to the TikTok Shop/Whatnot competitive threat.
  • Continued capital return: with $2.4B+ of TTM free cash flow, buybacks (shareholders' equity has fallen from $6.4B in Dec 2023 to $4.67B in Jun 2026) and the 1.16% dividend remain a structural EPS tailwind, and analyst target revisions (Argus $133, Rosenblatt $120, consensus $117.68) can keep momentum alive.
Key risks
  • Valuation risk is the headline: 21.8x trailing P/E and 3.98x sales versus 5-year averages of 11.68x and 3.07x. The stock's 20%+ YTD total return came largely from multiple expansion, so any deceleration in GMV or ad growth compresses the multiple faster than earnings fall.
  • Core marketplace competition - Amazon, Temu, Shein and TikTok Shop continue to attack precisely the low-ASP, C2C and collectibles categories where eBay's +20% C2C growth is coming from; this growth rate is the single most important assumption in the current price.
  • Depop integration and the $1.4B price tag: resale economics are thin-margin and fashion resale is crowded. Execution missteps or an overpay would show up as goodwill impairment and would undercut the recommerce narrative the bull case leans on.
  • Free cash flow strain from the capex step-up (Q2 2026 capex $223M vs. $72M in Q1 2026, cutting quarterly FCF to $300M) combined with a thin current ratio of 1.019 and debt-to-equity of 1.528 - the balance sheet has little slack if capex stays elevated or FCF seasonality turns unfavorable (Q2 2025 produced -$441M of FCF).
  • Insider signal and estimate fragility - CEO Jamie Iannone sold 22,220 shares on 2026-09-10 (a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 plan, so not a red flag on its own), and with the stock priced for continued acceleration, modest estimate cuts would land harder than usual given the wide analyst dispersion (targets range $92 to $145).
Investment thesis

eBay is a better business in September 2026 than it was in 2024 - revenue growth went from ~1% YoY in Q1 2025 to ~15% in Q2 2026, advertising is compounding at 25%, GMV guidance was raised to 11.5%-12.5%, Depop adds a real resale/Gen Z channel, and it throws off $2.4B of TTM free cash flow - but the stock already reflects most of that improvement. At $107.75 on 2026-09-13 you pay 21.8x trailing earnings against a five-year average of 11.68x, and my own fair-value work lands near $116.50, roughly 8% above the price. That is a decent holding with modest upside and no valuation cushion, not a compelling new-money buy; the honest posture is to own it if you like the reacceleration, and to add on a pullback toward the 200-day SMA (~$99) rather than chase here. This is analysis, not personalized financial advice.

AI theoretical price methodology

Blended two independent methods as of 2026-09-13. (1) Forward P/E: applied a justified 19.0x - above eBay's old 11-13x no-growth range but below where a 25%-growth advertising mix would warrant alone, and capped to reflect a still-competitive core - to consensus forward EPS of $6.139, giving $116.60. (2) FCF yield: TTM free cash flow of $2,429M over ~444M shares is $5.47/share; capitalizing that at a 4.7% required yield gives $116.40. Averaging the two produces $116.50, roughly 8% above the $107.75 price at that date and modestly below the $117.68 consensus target.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

Applying the mapping table exactly: band = Fair Fundamentals and valuation_context.label = 'Rich vs. its own history' (the 'Fair' row is Neutral regardless of valuation), so the lean is Neutral. I checked the one permitted deviation - a single, dated, structurally invisible event - and neither the 2026-07-30 Depop close ($1.4B, only ~3% of the $47.8B market cap) nor the Q2 beat/guidance raise (already partly reflected in price and estimates) clears that bar, so I did not deviate. On the score itself, my independent read would nudge the 55.1 up only modestly, to roughly 57-59, well inside the ~10-point threshold for 'Agree.' The growth leg (66.2) does capture the Q1/Q2 2026 inflection rather than missing it, and the quality leg (55.0) looks slightly harsh: a 20.5% TTM operating margin, 14.4% ROIC, a near-zero accruals ratio (0.15% as of 2026-06-30) and TTM operating cash flow of $2,972M versus TTM net income of $2,222M describe clean, cash-backed earnings. The formula's genuine blind spots here are the raised 11.5%-12.5% GMV guide, the 25% ad growth, and the fact that eBay is at a growth inflection rather than a cyclical trough - but because the trailing data already contains six quarters of acceleration, the backward-looking design is not materially penalizing it in this case. The offsetting caveat is that the score's valuation overlay (6.4, 'Rich') is doing real work that the fundamental band ignores, and I agree with it: this is a Fair business at a rich-vs-its-own-history price.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.