ECL — Ecolab Inc.
Ecolab Inc. provides water, hygiene, and infection prevention solutions and services in the United States and internationally. The company operates through four segments: Global Water, Global Institutional & Specialty, Global Pest Elimination, and Global Life Sciences.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, Ecolab traded at $276.18 (market cap $77.7B), a 36.8x trailing P/E on $7.524 TTM EPS, with RSI(14) at 45.29 and the shares pinned between their short- and long-term moving averages. Q2 2026 (reported July 28, 2026) delivered adjusted EPS of $2.09 (+11% YoY) on 5% organic growth with a guidance raise, yet the stock was down ~4.5% over the preceding month.
Sell-side sentiment is decidedly positive: 29 buy ratings against 7 holds and 1 sell, with a $326.13 average price target (recent-avg $331.50) implying roughly 18% upside from the 2026-09-13 close of $276.18. The anchor is the July 28, 2026 Q2 print - adjusted diluted EPS of $2.09 vs. $2.08 consensus, +11% YoY, 5% organic sales growth (4% price, 1% volume), organic operating margin up 40bp to 18.8%, and raised full-year guidance. The tape disagrees with the analysts, though: as of 2026-09-13 ECL was -1.11% over one week and -0.81% over one month, suggesting the beat was already discounted after a run to a 52-week high of $309.27.
Revenue growth has inflected higher, and this is a trend, not a blip: YoY growth was -1.5% in Q1 2025 ($3,695M), +1.0% in Q2 2025 ($4,025M), +4.2% in Q3 2025 ($4,165M), +4.8% in Q4 2025 ($4,196M), +10.0% in Q1 2026 ($4,066M) and +9.7% in Q2 2026 ($4,415M). The important caveat is composition - management framed Q2 2026 organic growth as only 5% (4 points price, 1 point volume), so roughly half the reported acceleration is acquired or FX. The balance sheet corroborates that: total assets jumped from $25.0B (Mar 2026) to $29.9B (Jun 2026) as long-term debt rose from $6.92B to $11.91B with $5.14B of cash parked on the books. Profitability splits in two directions: reported operating margin actually slipped YoY in both H1 2026 quarters (Q1 15.3% vs. 15.9%; Q2 17.2% vs. 17.6%), while company-defined organic operating margin expanded 40bp to 18.8% and adjusted EPS grew 11% versus GAAP EPS growth of just 3.3% ($1.90 vs. $1.84) - a $0.19/share gap from amortization and items that repeat every quarter. TTM operating margin is 17.4%, up only ~26bp from 17.1% a year earlier. Earnings quality is genuinely high: operating cash flow exceeded net income in 11 of the last 12 quarters, the accruals ratio is -0.65%, and TTM free cash flow of $1,874M was up ~19% YoY.
Fair-to-full, not cheap. As of 2026-09-13, the trailing P/E of 36.8x sits about 11% below Ecolab's own 5-year average of 41.18x, but P/S of 4.62x is about 11% above the 5-year average of 4.15x - a genuinely mixed signal rather than a uniform discount. On the $8.155 next-FY consensus EPS, the forward P/E is ~33.9x, which against ~10-11% adjusted EPS growth implies a PEG near 3.0 - a full price for a business compounding organically at mid-single digits. The most honest valuation tells: TTM free cash flow of $1,874M against a $77.7B market cap is a 2.4% FCF yield, and EV/EBITDA is 26.0x. You are paying a quality premium, not a value multiple. Note the reported PEG of -69.4 is statistical noise (the growth input is distorted by Q3 2024, when net income of $736.5M exceeded that quarter's $707.2M operating income on a non-operating gain) and should be discarded.
The stock is being priced on the adjusted earnings story, not the reported one. In Q2 2026, GAAP diluted EPS rose 3.3% YoY while adjusted EPS rose 11% - the $0.19 gap is amortization and recurring charges, not a one-time event. Meanwhile the 9.7% reported revenue growth decomposes into 5% organic (only 1 point of which is volume) plus roughly 4-5 points of acquisitions and FX. So the ~33.9x forward multiple is capitalizing a durable double-digit EPS growth assumption that is currently being propped up by price and purchased revenue. Two things validate that assumption: (1) volume growth accelerating meaningfully above 1%, and (2) the newly raised $5.14B cash pile and $11.91B of long-term debt converting into accretive earnings rather than just amortization. If Q3 2026 (late October 2026) shows volumes still stuck near 1% and GAAP EPS growth in the low single digits, it is the multiple, not the earnings, that adjusts.
Range-bound and directionless as of 2026-09-13. RSI(14) of 45.29 is neutral - neither oversold nor overbought - and the price sat 1.72% below its 20-day SMA (approximately $281), 0.79% below its 50-day SMA (approximately $278), and 1.12% above its 200-day SMA (approximately $273). Returns: -1.11% (1 week), -0.81% (1 month), +4.06% (3 months), +0.73% (6 months) - a stock consolidating in the high-$260s/low-$280s after backing off the $309.27 52-week high and still far above the $243.15 low. There is no timing edge here: RSI 45 is not a buy trigger, and price is trapped between its short and long moving averages. A pullback that holds the 200-day near $273, or an RSI dip below 35, would be the cleaner entry; a close back above the 50-day on volume would confirm the uptrend resuming.
- Raw material and energy cost volatility: Ecolab's 4 points of Q2 2026 organic growth came almost entirely from price, which is a buffer but also means gross margin (44.1% Q2 2026, down from 44.8% in Q2 2025) is exposed if input costs spike faster than pricing is reset.
- Supply-chain and geopolitical disruption: management cited Middle East-related shipping and supply disruptions as roughly a 1% volume headwind in recent quarters - directly relevant to the already-thin 1% volume growth line.
- Rate/duration sensitivity: with a 0.89 beta but a 36.8x trailing P/E, ECL behaves like a long-duration quality asset - sticky or rising long rates compress the multiple even when operations are fine, which is a plausible explanation for the flat 6-month return.
- End-market bifurcation: softness in heavy industry is being offset by strong Global High-Tech and data-center water/cooling demand, making ECL's growth increasingly dependent on the tech capex cycle rather than broad industrial production.
- FX translation: a large non-US revenue base means dollar strength is a persistent reported-growth headwind, and it is one reason the gap between reported and organic growth numbers can widen or narrow quarter to quarter.
- Q3 2026 earnings, historically late October 2026 - the single most important data point: whether organic volume growth accelerates past 1%, whether organic margin expansion continues, and whether full-year guidance is raised again.
- Deployment of the $5.14B cash balance built in Q2 2026 alongside $11.91B of long-term debt - an acquisition, a paydown, or buybacks will settle the capital allocation question the market has not yet priced.
- Continued Global High-Tech and data-center water/cooling demand plus scaling of the One Ecolab digital/IoT platform, which management frames as the primary offset to industrial softness.
- Price/cost spread: if raw material costs ease while the 4% pricing holds, gross margin recovers from the 44.1% Q2 2026 print and GAAP EPS closes some of the gap to adjusted EPS.
- Sell-side target revisions - if the $326 consensus target drifts toward the $275 low end of the range, sentiment and the multiple follow.
- Volume growth stuck at ~1%: with only 1 point of the 5% organic growth coming from volume, the top line depends on price (which invites customer pushback) and acquisitions (which bring amortization and integration risk).
- The leverage step-up is real and recent: long-term debt nearly doubled sequentially from $6.92B (Mar 2026) to $11.91B (Jun 2026) in a single quarter, taking debt-to-equity to 1.37 and LT debt/equity to 1.18 - the trailing financial-health metrics in the score have not fully absorbed the implications.
- Premium multiple risk: 36.8x trailing, ~33.9x forward, 26.0x EV/EBITDA and a 2.4% FCF yield leave almost no cushion. A slowdown in adjusted EPS growth toward the 3.3% GAAP rate seen in Q2 2026 would likely compress the multiple faster than earnings fall.
- Recurring GAAP-vs-adjusted gap ($0.19/share in Q2 2026): if amortization and charges keep scaling with acquisition activity, reported earnings will keep trailing the narrative investors are actually paying for.
- Exposure to industrial/chemical end-market softness and Middle East supply-chain disruption, both of which hit volume and mix simultaneously.
Ecolab is a genuinely high-quality, pricing-power compounder whose fundamental momentum is improving - revenue growth inflected from -1.5% YoY in Q1 2025 to +9.7% in Q2 2026, adjusted EPS rose 11%, organic operating margin expanded 40bp to 18.8%, free cash flow is up ~19% YoY, and cash generation has exceeded net income in 11 of the last 12 quarters. But at $276.18 on 2026-09-13 you are paying ~33.9x forward earnings and a 2.4% FCF yield for growth that is only half organic and only 1% volume-driven, while the balance sheet just absorbed a ~$5B debt raise. This is a reasonable long-term holding and a name to accumulate on weakness toward the 200-day near $273 - it is not a compelling buy at this price, and the ~18% upside embedded in the $326 sell-side consensus looks too generous.
Two-method cross-check as of 2026-09-13. Method 1: a 33x forward P/E - deliberately below Ecolab's 41.18x five-year average and roughly in line with its 33.9x multiple on FY2026E consensus EPS - applied to my ~$9.00 FY2027E EPS (11% growth off the $8.155 next-FY consensus) gives $297. Method 2: a 2.5% required FCF yield (versus the current 2.4%) on forward free cash flow of ~$2.05B (TTM $1,874M grown 9%) across ~281.4M shares gives $291. The midpoint is $294, roughly 6-7% above the $276.18 price on 2026-09-13 and well below the $326.13 sell-side average, because I will not pay the full historical quality premium for growth that is roughly half acquired rather than organic.
Reading the business first, I come out modestly better than the 55.9 score and its 50.7 fundamentals-only leg: revenue growth inflected from -1.5% YoY (Q1 2025) to +9.7% (Q2 2026), adjusted EPS grew 11%, organic margin expanded 40bp to 18.8%, TTM free cash flow rose ~19% to $1,874M, and the accruals ratio of -0.65% (net income below operating cash flow) is the healthiest possible earnings-quality signal. I would shade the score up toward ~60 - still squarely 'Fair Fundamentals,' which is why this is Agree rather than Partially Agree. The offsets cut both ways: the growth leg (46.5) cannot see that roughly half the reported acceleration is inorganic, the quality leg (50.5) is penalized by GAAP margins that understate economics (Q2 2026 GAAP EPS $1.90 vs. adjusted $2.09), and the financial-health leg (63.7) lags the Q2 2026 balance sheet where long-term debt went from $6.92B to $11.91B in one quarter against a $5.14B cash pile. Importantly, this is not the cyclical-trough misread the methodology warns about - Ecolab is a defensive compounder near the high end of its three-year revenue trend, not a depressed cyclical, so the backward-looking penalty does not apply in either direction. No dated, material event named in the brief (the July 28, 2026 Q2 beat and guidance raise is ordinary earnings news, not an acquisition, restructuring, or restatement) justifies overriding the Fair-Fundamentals/Neutral-valuation mapping, so the mandated Neutral lean stands unchanged.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.