← Back to Rankings

EGEverest Group, Ltd.

Fundamentals Score: 33.5/100 (Weak Fundamentals) · Financial Services

Description

Everest Group, Ltd., together with subsidiaries, provides reinsurance and insurance products in the United States, Europe, and internationally. It operates in two segment, Insurance and Reinsurance.

Score Breakdown

Growth
13.9/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
51.0/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
45.8/100
weight: 15%
* Debt/equity and current ratio excluded: sector 'Financial Services' runs balance-sheet leverage (deposits, policy reserves) that these industrial-style thresholds aren't built for
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral

Live Market DataPrice updated: 14h ago

P/E (TTM)
8.1
Yield
2.36%
RSI (14)
56.4
vs SMA20
+2.16%
vs SMA50
+2.00%
vs SMA200
+11.10%
Analyst Target
$404
+6.0%
9 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$428
+12.5%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, EG trades at $377.66 with a trailing P/E of 8.04 and a price/book ratio just below 1.0. Q2 2026 showed an improved 92.0% combined ratio and $559m net income, but revenue is deliberately contracting and the analyst consensus is Hold.

AI Sentiment:Neutral

The market is cautiously constructive but not enthusiastic: 8 Buy ratings versus 14 Holds, no Sells, and an average price target near $402-404 versus $377.66. Recent Q2 2026 strength, an improved operating ROE, and a $395m buyback support sentiment, but those are offset by negative top-line growth and softening global reinsurance pricing.

Quarterly Trend

Revenue has clearly decelerated: H1 2026 revenue was $8.03B versus $8.64B in H1 2025, down about 7.1%, and Q2 2026 revenue fell ~10.1% YoY. Earnings are lumpy rather than steadily trending: Q2 2026 EPS was $13.88 versus $16.10 a year earlier, Q1 2026 was $16.21, but Q4 2024 was -$13.80 and Q1/Q3 2025 were weak at $4.90/$6.09. Q2 2026 operating margin improved to roughly 23.8% on $944m operating income, up from 18.5% in Q2 2025. This is a portfolio-inflection story: management is pruning underperforming retail/casualty lines, so part of the volume decline is intentional.

Valuation Assessment

As of 2026-08-27, the stock is cheap on the numbers: trailing P/E of 8.04, P/B of 0.986, P/S of 0.895, and a forward P/E near 7.0x based on next-fiscal-year consensus EPS of $53.54. Those multiples sit well below EG's 5-year average P/E of 11.19 and average P/S of 0.95. The low PEG of 0.055 is not meaningful for a volatile reinsurer. The discount is partly justified by soft pricing, but the valuation is not demanding.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

At $377.66 as of 2026-08-27, the market is paying roughly 7.1x next-fiscal-year consensus EPS of $53.54. That is not pricing in meaningful growth; it is paying a single-digit multiple for underwriting discipline and balance-sheet quality. If Q3-Q4 2026 hold near a 92% combined ratio and buybacks continue, EPS could beat $53.54 and the multiple could re-rate toward 8-9x, creating upside. If reinsurance pricing keeps falling, estimates will drift lower and the low multiple will look fair rather than cheap.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI was 55.99, price was 1.88% above the 20-day SMA, 2.41% above the 50-day SMA, and 10.68% above the 200-day SMA. That is a healthy uptrend but not overbought, and the stock sits toward the top of its 302.44-401.07 52-week range. Implication: the trend is supportive, but the better risk/reward is on a pullback toward the 50-day rather than chasing at $378.

Macro Factors
  • Global reinsurance pricing is softening, with Fitch flagging roughly 6% YoY rate declines as abundant capital and competition pressure the sector.
  • Elevated interest rates support reinsurers' investment income and bond portfolio yields, though future rate cuts would slowly reduce that tailwind.
  • Natural catastrophe frequency/severity and geopolitical conflict losses can swing quarterly results; Q2 2026 cat losses were manageable at around $75m.
  • Capital deployment is a major driver: $395m of buybacks in Q2 and the $2.00 quarterly dividend support per-share value even as revenue shrinks.
  • Portfolio reshaping through divestitures of Mexico, Colombia, and Canada operations, plus the Annapurna Re sidecar, shifts the business toward core reinsurance and away from volatile retail lines.
Key Catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings, expected late October/early November 2026, as evidence on whether the core combined ratio stays near 90-92% and portfolio contraction is stabilizing.
  • January 1, 2027 reinsurance renewals, which will determine whether pricing declines are decelerating or accelerating.
  • Regulatory completion of the Mexico sale to Fairfax and continued aggressive buyback execution.
  • Any large catastrophe or reserve development event would either reinforce or undermine confidence in underwriting quality.
Key Risks
  • Reinsurance rate softening is the biggest structural risk: if pricing keeps falling, deliberate volume cuts may not be fully offset by margin gains.
  • Catastrophe losses and adverse reserve development are inherent to reinsurance; a bad Q3 or Q4 can erase a year of underwriting profit.
  • Execution risk in shrinking the retail portfolio could reduce future float, investment income, or client relationships.
  • Interest rate and credit market moves can hit the large investment portfolio, which supports $62.2B total assets against $15.4B equity.
Investment Thesis

Everest is a well-capitalized, cheap reinsurer with improving underwriting discipline and aggressive shareholder returns, but the fundamental score is weak because trailing growth is negative and the pricing cycle is turning softer. For a patient value investor the risk/reward is attractive at roughly 7x forward earnings and 1x book; for a momentum investor the top-line contraction and Hold consensus argue against chasing. Overall, cautious.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Applied a justified forward P/E of 8.0x to consensus next-fiscal-year EPS of $53.54; 8.0x is well below EG's 5-year average P/E of 11.19 and reflects the softening reinsurance cycle and top-line contraction, while being slightly above the current ~7.0x forward multiple to reflect continued underwriting discipline and buybacks. A cross-check at roughly 1.1x book value on ~$399 BVPS gives about $439, supporting the $428 area.

AI Lean: Cautiously BearishConfidence: Low

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Partially Agree

The deterministic score of 33.5, or 'Weak Fundamentals,' is fair on trailing data: revenue and operating cash flow are down YoY, earnings are volatile, and Q4 2024's large operating loss still drags the trailing record. However, I would rate the underlying business somewhat higher than the formula does. Q2 2026 showed a stronger 92.0% combined ratio and 14.9% operating ROE, the revenue decline is partly intentional portfolio pruning, and the stock trades below book with a 2.4% dividend yield and active buybacks. The formula is entirely backward-looking and cannot see the potential cyclical turn in reinsurance pricing or the benefit of divesting low-ROE retail lines. That qualitative adjustment is roughly 10-15 points, moving the score from 'Weak' toward lower-'Fair,' but not enough to make the fundamentals 'Good.'

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.