ETR — Entergy Corporation
Entergy Corporation, headquartered in New Orleans, Louisiana, is a prominent American energy company primarily involved in generating and distributing electricity across the United States. Its operations are divided into two main divisions: Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, Entergy traded at $105.33 (market cap ~$49.2B, beta 0.48), with a 2.40% dividend yield, RSI(14) of 41.1, and the shares about 5.2% lower over the prior three months. The company has reaffirmed 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $4.25-$4.45 and is executing against a $67B capital plan through 2030 aimed at Gulf Coast load growth.
Sell-side sentiment is clearly constructive - the ratings mix is 19 Buy / 13 Hold / 0 Sell with a $123.91 consensus target and a $116 recent-target average - but the tape disagrees. As of 2026-09-13 the stock was $105.33, down 1.8% in a week, 2.3% in a month, 5.2% in three months, and essentially flat over six months (-0.24%) despite the June Investor Day and a Q2 2026 beat-and-reaffirm on July 29. That gap between a bullish analyst narrative (data centers, $67B capex, rate base compounding) and a stock that cannot make progress is the classic signature of a name whose story is already in the price and whose incremental buyers are waiting for proof in the EPS line. The 2.40% yield is also thin for a utility, so income buyers are not stepping in to catch the falling knife either.
Revenue is genuinely accelerating, but earnings are not converting. Revenue went from $2,846.9M in Q1 2025 to $3,187.6M in Q1 2026 (+12.0% YoY) and from $3,328.8M to $3,523.6M in Q2 2026 (+5.9% YoY); Q4 2025 was +7.9% YoY and Q3 2025 was +12.5% YoY. Operating income, however, is flat-to-down: Q1 2026 operating income of $572.2M was 18.3% BELOW Q1 2025's $700.1M, and Q4 2025's $480.8M was 28.2% below Q4 2024's $669.6M. Operating margin has compressed YoY in each of the last four quarters - Q1 2026 18.0% vs 24.6%, Q2 2026 23.7% vs 25.2%, Q3 2025 29.1% vs 33.2%, Q4 2025 16.3% vs 24.4% - a consistent, not one-off, trend. Net income is actually up YoY in three of the last four quarters (Q2 2026 $487.8M vs $472.0M; Q1 2026 $390.8M vs $360.8M), yet diluted EPS is flat (Q2 2026 $1.03 vs $1.05; Q1 2026 $0.83 vs $0.82), which tells you shareholder equity growth from stock issuance is diluting away the earnings gains. TTM EPS is $3.96 against a 2027 consensus estimate of just $4.40 - i.e. roughly 11% then ~1% growth. The clear read: this is a capital-cycle story where depreciation, interest and share count are currently growing faster than rate base earnings. It is not a structural decline, but it is also not yet the earnings inflection the multiple assumes.
Expensive. As of 2026-09-13, ETR's 26.6x TTM P/E sits ~28% above its own 5-year average of 20.81x, and 3.65x TTM sales is ~62% above its 5-year average P/S of 2.25x. On forward numbers the picture improves but does not become cheap: applying the 2026 guidance midpoint of $4.35 gives ~24.2x, and the 2027 estimate of $4.40 gives ~23.9x - only a marginal step-down because forward EPS growth is roughly flat. The PEG ratio of -8.37 is a mathematical artifact, not information, but a 24x multiple on ~1% forward EPS growth is a de facto PEG above 20. EV/EBITDA of 14.3x and 2.62x book (book value per share ~$39.54) are both full for a regulated utility carrying $31.5B of long-term debt against $18.4B of equity. The 2.40% dividend yield is well below the ~3% electric-utility norm, so you are being paid less income for more leverage and a premium multiple.
The stock is discounting a data-center and industrial load ramp that has not yet appeared in per-share earnings. Guidance of $4.25-$4.45 for 2026 implies H2 2026 EPS of roughly $2.49 versus $2.04 in H2 2025 - a 22% YoY step-up - after a first half that delivered $1.86 versus $1.87 a year earlier. So management is asking investors to believe in a very back-half-weighted year. Two ways to trade that: if Q3 2026 (late Oct/early Nov) shows the load growth actually hitting the income statement, the 24x forward multiple is defensible and the analyst targets ($116-$126) become reachable; if H2 disappoints, the multiple compresses toward ETR's own 20-21x history, which mechanically points to the low $90s - roughly 13% below the 2026-09-13 price. Asymmetry, as of this date, favors waiting for the print rather than pre-positioning.
As of 2026-09-13, ETR's RSI(14) stood at 41.1 - weak but not oversold (oversold is below 30, so there is no mean-reversion signal here). The price of $105.33 sat 1.46% below its 20-day SMA (~$106.9), 3.94% below its 50-day SMA (~$109.7), and 0.41% below its 200-day SMA (~$105.8), meaning the 200-day has just been lost. Losing the 200-day after a 5.2% three-month decline is a negative tell, not a buy signal; the stock is roughly mid-range within its 52-week band of $87.38-$118.45, with the drift (-1.81% 1wk, -2.34% 1mo) pointing down rather than up. Timing implication: no urgency to chase. A reclaim of the 50-day (~$109.7) would signal the correction is over, while an RSI below 35 with the price holding the $95-$98 area would be a much better risk-reward entry.
- Interest rates: with $31.5B of long-term debt and a capital-intensive build, every move in the long end feeds directly into Entergy's cost of capital and its relative appeal versus fixed income; beta of 0.48 means the rate channel dominates the equity-market channel for this name.
- Utility/AI-power sector rotation: ETR's premium multiple is partly a 'powering data centers' trade; if that theme de-rates across the group, ETR sheds multiple regardless of its own execution.
- State and federal regulation: cost recovery through the LPSC, APSC, MPSC, PUCT and FERC formula rates determines whether the $67B capital plan earns its allowed return on schedule or gets stranded in lag.
- Gulf Coast weather and storm cost recovery: hurricane season and storm-resilience riders create recurring, lumpy cost events that swing quarterly results and require regulatory approvals to recover.
- Gulf Coast hyperscaler/industrial capex cycle: the industrial and data-center load pipeline is the single biggest input to the growth premium; a slowdown in announced projects would undercut the entire thesis.
- Q3 2026 earnings (expected late October/early November 2026) - the critical test of whether the back-half EPS ramp embedded in $4.25-$4.45 guidance actually arrives, plus updated data-center/industrial load metrics.
- Regulatory decisions on transmission buildout, rider cost recoveries and clean-generation investments across Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi and Texas - timing here determines cash flow and financing needs.
- Continued execution and formalization of the $67B 2030 capital plan outlined at the June 2026 Investor Day, including any new large-load contracts or special tariffs for hyperscale customers.
- FOMC/long-end rate moves - a meaningful decline in long yields would reduce financing drag and mechanically support utility multiples, including ETR's.
- Potential equity issuance to fund negative free cash flow - a negative catalyst given EPS is already being diluted away despite mid-single-digit revenue growth.
- Valuation risk is the headline: 26.6x TTM and ~24x forward versus a 20.81x own 5-year average, with forward EPS growth of roughly 1% on the 2027 estimate - a multiple compression to even 21x forward takes the stock to about $92.
- Balance-sheet and cash-flow stress: debt/equity of 1.877, long-term debt of $31.5B, current ratio 0.876, quick ratio 0.663, and negative free cash flow in 10 of the last 12 quarters (-$935M in Q2 2026, -$1.42B in Q1 2026) mean the $67B program must be debt- and equity-financed into a market that may not always be accommodating.
- Dilution: net income rose 3-8% YoY in three of the last four quarters, yet diluted EPS went nowhere - the equity base grew from $15.30B (Q4 2024) to $18.45B (Q2 2026) and the benefits are being shared with new shares.
- Margin compression: operating margin has fallen YoY in each of the last four quarters, with Q1 2026 at 18.0% versus 24.6% a year earlier - a persistent trend, not a blip.
- Regulatory and storm-recovery risk: a disallowed or delayed cost recovery in any of the four state jurisdictions, or an adverse FERC formula-rate outcome, would hit both earnings and the growth narrative at the same time.
- Guidance-execution risk: H2 2026 must deliver ~$2.49 in EPS versus $2.04 in H2 2025, an unusually back-loaded ask.
Entergy is a solidly positioned Gulf Coast regulated utility with a real and scarce asset - a large industrial and data-center load pipeline plus a $67B capital plan that should compound rate base for years. But that is precisely what you are already paying for. At $105.33 on 2026-09-13, the stock trades at ~24x forward earnings against its own 5-year average of 20.8x, yields only 2.40%, generates negative free cash flow every quarter, carries 1.88x debt-to-equity, and has translated 6-12% revenue growth into flat-to-down diluted EPS. The growth is real; the earnings aren't. Until the load story shows up in per-share earnings - and the back-half-weighted 2026 guidance is the next test - the risk/reward is skewed toward multiple compression rather than upside, and the soft technicals (200-day SMA just lost, RSI 41) suggest the market is already beginning to reprice that premium. I would not be a buyer at $105.
I used a justified-forward-P/E approach: a $4.38 forward EPS base (2026 guidance midpoint of $4.35 weighted 60%, 2027 consensus of $4.40 weighted 40%) times a 21.0x multiple - roughly a 1x premium to ETR's own 5-year average TTM P/E of 20.81x, justified by above-average rate-base growth but capped by 1.88x debt/equity, negative FCF requiring external financing, and a 2.40% yield below the utility norm - giving $92.00. Cross-checks support that level: 2.3x book value per share of $39.54 gives ~$91, and a 20x multiple on 2028 earnings power (~$5.07 at an 8% CAGR from $4.35, discounted back at 8%) gives roughly $87.
My independent read is somewhat more constructive than the 40.9 / 'Weak Fundamentals' band, though not dramatically so, and I would land closer to 52-55 (Fair Fundamentals) - a roughly 12-15 point adjustment. The specific, identifiable flaw: 50% of the composite is a ratio screener benchmarked against the full S&P 500 2015-2025 population, which structurally penalizes any regulated utility mid-buildout. A current ratio of 0.876, quick ratio of 0.663 and debt-to-equity of 1.877 are normal for a capital-intensive regulated utility financed with long-term debt and recovered through rates - they are not evidence of distress, and the negative free cash flow is the mechanical consequence of a deliberately large $67B capex program, not a cash burn. On the other side, the formula is right and I would not argue against it on the things that matter: operating margin has compressed YoY in four straight quarters, ROIC of 3.6% is thin against a utility's cost of capital, and 'Rich vs. its own history' is a fair label for a 26.6x TTM / ~24x forward multiple versus a 20.81x five-year average. Note also that the cyclical-trough carve-out does not apply here - this is a regulated utility experiencing a capital-cycle cash-flow trough, not a commodity business with depressed, mean-reverting margins, so I would not excuse the weak FCF on cyclicality grounds. Finally, no dated, material, score-invisible event (acquisition, restatement, bankruptcy, etc.) appears in the research brief, so I am applying the band/valuation mapping table exactly as written, which yields the Bearish lean above.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.