#39S&P 500 rank

EXPD — Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

2-yr score: 66.8/100 (Top 10%)Industrials12d
$197.01−0.71%
Description

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. functions as a prominent global logistics and supply chain management enterprise. With a vast operational footprint spanning the Americas, North and South Asia, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and India, the company delivers an extensive portfolio of services to its clients.

Score breakdownLatest quarter68.1 · Good
Growth
73.2
Quality / Profitability
48.1
Financial health
77.7
Ratio screener
72.3
Track record: 2-yr avg 66.8 (Good, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 65.4 (Good, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Nov 3, 2026 (in 12 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:25 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
28.6
Yield
0.99%
RSI (14)
59.3
vs SMA20
+2.39%
vs SMA50
+3.59%
vs SMA200
+19.00%
Analyst target
$189
-3.9%
8 analysts
AI theoretical price
$178
-9.6%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, EXPD traded at $192.60, sitting 20.6% above its 200-day moving average and just under the top of its 52-week range ($112.95-$193.15), after a blowout Q2 2026 (reported 2026-08-04) that delivered $2.03 diluted EPS on $3.50B revenue versus roughly $1.68 and $2.9B expected. The business is a debt-free, asset-light freight forwarder earning a 26.6% ROIC, but the stock now trades at ~28x trailing and ~25x forward earnings against a five-year average P/E of 19.6x.

AI sentimentBullish

Market sentiment is clearly bullish even though the sell-side is not: the stock is up 35.11% over six months and 15.59% over three months through 2026-09-13, with the Q2 2026 beat driving a 6.38% single-day pop on August 4, 2026 to $181.48 before the rally continued to $192.60. The bull case rests on tight structural airfreight capacity, heavy tech-infrastructure shipping demand, and tariff-driven complexity that is pushing shippers toward Expeditors' high-margin customs brokerage arm. The gap worth noting: analyst consensus remains 'Hold' (5 Buys, 21 Holds, 7 Sells) with a $169.83 consensus target and $176.50 recent average - both below the 2026-09-13 price, implying roughly 8-12% downside in the sell-side's own math. That is a market running well ahead of the analyst community.

Quarterly trend

The three-year arc is a textbook freight cycle. 2023 was the trough: quarterly revenue of $2.19-$2.28B, operating margins of 8.75%-9.87%, and diluted EPS of just $1.09-$1.16. 2024 was the recovery - revenue climbed every quarter from $2.21B (Q1) to $3.00B (Q3) and EPS rose from $1.17 to $1.68. 2025 then plateaued and softened: revenue stayed in a $2.65-$2.90B band, Q4 2025 was the weak spot (operating margin 8.79%, EPS $1.49 vs $1.68 a year earlier), and net income fell 14.7% YoY that quarter. 2026 is a sharp inflection, not a blip: Q1 2026 revenue grew 4.4% YoY with operating margin steady at 10.59%, then Q2 2026 broke out - revenue $3,502.3M (+32.1% YoY), operating income $349.6M (+41.1%), net income $266.2M (+45.0%), diluted EPS $2.03 (+51.5%), and operating margin of 9.98% versus 9.34% in the year-ago quarter. TTM EPS is $6.95 on TTM net margin of 7.6%. One data caveat: the quarterly gross-profit line is inconsistent across periods ($1,026.1M and $971.8M in the 2026 quarters versus $352.9M-$464.7M in 2025 and $275.0M-$387.6M in 2024), which looks like a reclassification rather than a real 2.5x jump in gross profitability - I would not read anything into that line. The signal I would trust is revenue, operating income, and EPS, and those say growth reaccelerated hard in Q2 2026.

Valuation assessment

Expensive. As of 2026-09-13 the stock traded at 27.95x TTM earnings versus its own five-year average of 19.59x - a 43% premium - and 2.09x TTM sales versus a 1.54x five-year average, a 36% premium. Forward P/E on the $7.712 next-FY consensus EPS is 24.97x, and the PEG ratio of 2.32 says you are paying more than twice the earnings growth rate for the privilege. The balance-sheet metrics are sterling (ROIC 26.6%, ROE 34.5%, zero long-term debt, $1.03B cash), but quality alone does not justify a multiple this far above the company's own history for a business whose revenue is rate-sensitive. The deterministic valuation context correctly flags this as 'Rich vs. its own history.'

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market is pricing Q2 2026 as a run-rate rather than a peak. At $192.60 on 2026-09-13, the stock sits 13.4% above the $169.83 consensus target and 9.1% above the $176.50 recent average - meaning price has already front-run the estimate revisions that have not yet fully shown up in published numbers. The bull path: Q3 2026 (confirmed for 2026-11-03) confirms airfreight pricing power and customs brokerage demand, analysts revise forward EPS from $7.712 toward $8.00+, and the forward multiple quietly compresses from 25x toward 24x while the price holds. The bear path: the Q2 revenue surge was capacity- and tariff-driven, normalizes in 2027, and the stock is left holding a mid-20s multiple on $6.50-$7.00 of normalized earnings. There is no small disappointment scenario that this price survives comfortably.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, EXPD's RSI(14) stood at 65.31 - firm and rising but not yet overbought (below 70). Price was 2.30% above its 20-day SMA, 6.78% above its 50-day, and 20.60% above its 200-day, a clean stacked uptrend with no sign of trend break. The stock was also at $192.60 against a 52-week high of $193.15, so it was effectively making new highs. Entry-timing implication: this is momentum-favorable but poor risk/reward for a fresh position. Because the 20-day SMA sits only ~2% below spot, any pullback quickly becomes a test of the ~$186-180 zone, and below that there is a long air gap down toward the 200-day. Buying strength here means paying the top of a 52-week range for a cyclical at peak reported earnings.

Macro factors
  • Air and ocean freight rate cycle: tight structural airfreight capacity plus tech-infrastructure shipping demand is the single largest driver of the Q2 2026 revenue surge - and rate normalization is the largest single threat to it.
  • Tariff and trade policy complexity: shifting tariff regimes raise compliance burden and boost Expeditors' high-margin customs brokerage revenue, but an outright trade-volume contraction from tariff escalation would hit forwarding volumes harder than compliance fees help.
  • Global trade and manufacturing activity: Expeditors' volumes track world trade and industrial PMIs, so a synchronized slowdown would show up in net revenue (gross profit) quickly.
  • Interest rates and cash yield: with $1.03B of cash and equivalents and no long-term debt, falling short-term rates reduce interest income that has been a meaningful EPS contributor.
  • Valuation compression risk in industrials/logistics: high-multiple cyclical names de-rate fast when the cycle rolls; EXPD's 28x trailing multiple leaves it exposed to sector rotation out of premium-priced industrials.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings on 2026-11-03 - the key test of whether Q2's airfreight pricing power and customs brokerage demand persisted through peak shipping season; this is the single most important near-term event.
  • Further trade/tariff policy changes that increase supply-chain complexity and drive incremental customs brokerage and compliance revenue.
  • The July 2026 expansion of global Aircraft on Ground (AOG) services, moving into higher-margin, time-critical aviation and aerospace logistics.
  • Headcount growth to 20,389 full-time equivalents by mid-2026, which supports volume expansion but also raises the cost base if volumes soften.
  • Post-Q2 sell-side upward estimate revisions - if the $7.712 forward EPS consensus moves toward $8.00+, the forward multiple compresses without the price falling.
Key risks
  • Freight rate normalization: Q2 2026's 32.1% YoY revenue growth is heavily rate- and capacity-driven, and EXPD has no pricing control over the underlying air/ocean markets - a rate reversal would compress both revenue and the ~10% operating margin that just printed.
  • Valuation with no cushion: 27.95x trailing versus a 19.59x five-year average, PEG of 2.32, and analyst targets ($169.83 consensus, $176.50 recent average) sitting 8-12% below the 2026-09-13 price of $192.60.
  • Working capital and earnings quality: Q2 2026 net income of $266.2M exceeded operating cash flow of $178.6M by $87.6M - a 1.71% accruals ratio - driven by a receivables build from the revenue surge; this should reverse, but a persistent gap would be a red flag.
  • Tariff-driven trade contraction: aggressive trade policy could reduce global freight volumes even while boosting compliance demand, a net negative for a business whose revenue is volume-and-rate leveraged.
  • Momentum reversal: with RSI at 65.31 and price 20.60% above the 200-day SMA as of 2026-09-13, a single soft quarter could trigger a sharp de-rating given how far the stock has run.
Investment thesis

Expeditors is a genuinely excellent operator - 26.6% ROIC, 34.5% ROE, zero long-term debt, $1.03B in cash, and an asset-light model that converts roughly $0.92B of TTM free cash flow - and Q2 2026 showed real, not cosmetic, reacceleration. But as of 2026-09-13 the stock at $192.60 asks you to pay ~28x trailing and ~25x forward earnings for what is still a cyclical freight forwarder at what looks like a strong point in the rate cycle, against a 19.6x five-year average multiple and a sell-side consensus target 12% below the price. Great business, unattractive entry price - own it on weakness toward the high-$160s/low-$170s, not here.

AI theoretical price methodology

Applied a 22.5x forward P/E to an estimated forward EPS of $7.90 (modestly above the $7.712 consensus to reflect upward revision momentum after the Q2 2026 beat), a multiple deliberately placed between the 19.6x five-year average and the 28x current trailing P/E - premium justified by 26.6% ROIC, a debt-free balance sheet, and structurally rising customs-brokerage demand, discounted for freight-rate cyclicality. Cross-checked with an implied ~4.0% TTM free-cash-flow yield on $924M of trailing FCF at that valuation, which is reasonable for a high-return, low-capital, but cyclical operator. The result, $178, sits about 7.6% below the 2026-09-13 price of $192.60 and about 5% above the $169.83 sell-side consensus target.

AI lean: Cautiously BullishConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

The 68.1 / 'Good Fundamentals' band is a fair read of the underlying business, with two caveats that offset rather than compound. First, the quality/profitability leg of 48.1 is disproportionately dragged by the accruals input: Q2 2026 net income of $266.2M versus operating cash flow of $178.6M equals the 1.71% accruals ratio the formula flags, but that gap is a receivables build from a +32% revenue quarter, not an earnings-quality problem - over the trailing twelve months, operating cash flow ($972.5M) actually exceeds net income ($919.3M). Correcting for that would lift the fundamentals blend a few points, not a tier. Second, and more important directionally, this is a cyclical freight business currently in an up-cycle, so the 73.2 growth score and improving margins are being flattered by tight airfreight capacity and tariff-driven complexity - the mirror image of the trough problem this methodology warns about, and a reason the trailing score may be peaking alongside the cycle. My independent read lands within roughly 5-8 points of 68.1, and no single dated event in the brief (the 2026-08-04 Q2 beat is already inside the trailing data) justifies overriding the mandated mapping, so per the table - Good Fundamentals plus 'Rich vs. its own history' - the lean is Cautiously Bullish.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.