EXPD — Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. functions as a prominent global logistics and supply chain management enterprise. With a vast operational footprint spanning the Americas, North and South Asia, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and India, the company delivers an extensive portfolio of services to its clients.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, EXPD traded at $192.60, sitting 20.6% above its 200-day moving average and just under the top of its 52-week range ($112.95-$193.15), after a blowout Q2 2026 (reported 2026-08-04) that delivered $2.03 diluted EPS on $3.50B revenue versus roughly $1.68 and $2.9B expected. The business is a debt-free, asset-light freight forwarder earning a 26.6% ROIC, but the stock now trades at ~28x trailing and ~25x forward earnings against a five-year average P/E of 19.6x.
Market sentiment is clearly bullish even though the sell-side is not: the stock is up 35.11% over six months and 15.59% over three months through 2026-09-13, with the Q2 2026 beat driving a 6.38% single-day pop on August 4, 2026 to $181.48 before the rally continued to $192.60. The bull case rests on tight structural airfreight capacity, heavy tech-infrastructure shipping demand, and tariff-driven complexity that is pushing shippers toward Expeditors' high-margin customs brokerage arm. The gap worth noting: analyst consensus remains 'Hold' (5 Buys, 21 Holds, 7 Sells) with a $169.83 consensus target and $176.50 recent average - both below the 2026-09-13 price, implying roughly 8-12% downside in the sell-side's own math. That is a market running well ahead of the analyst community.
The three-year arc is a textbook freight cycle. 2023 was the trough: quarterly revenue of $2.19-$2.28B, operating margins of 8.75%-9.87%, and diluted EPS of just $1.09-$1.16. 2024 was the recovery - revenue climbed every quarter from $2.21B (Q1) to $3.00B (Q3) and EPS rose from $1.17 to $1.68. 2025 then plateaued and softened: revenue stayed in a $2.65-$2.90B band, Q4 2025 was the weak spot (operating margin 8.79%, EPS $1.49 vs $1.68 a year earlier), and net income fell 14.7% YoY that quarter. 2026 is a sharp inflection, not a blip: Q1 2026 revenue grew 4.4% YoY with operating margin steady at 10.59%, then Q2 2026 broke out - revenue $3,502.3M (+32.1% YoY), operating income $349.6M (+41.1%), net income $266.2M (+45.0%), diluted EPS $2.03 (+51.5%), and operating margin of 9.98% versus 9.34% in the year-ago quarter. TTM EPS is $6.95 on TTM net margin of 7.6%. One data caveat: the quarterly gross-profit line is inconsistent across periods ($1,026.1M and $971.8M in the 2026 quarters versus $352.9M-$464.7M in 2025 and $275.0M-$387.6M in 2024), which looks like a reclassification rather than a real 2.5x jump in gross profitability - I would not read anything into that line. The signal I would trust is revenue, operating income, and EPS, and those say growth reaccelerated hard in Q2 2026.
Expensive. As of 2026-09-13 the stock traded at 27.95x TTM earnings versus its own five-year average of 19.59x - a 43% premium - and 2.09x TTM sales versus a 1.54x five-year average, a 36% premium. Forward P/E on the $7.712 next-FY consensus EPS is 24.97x, and the PEG ratio of 2.32 says you are paying more than twice the earnings growth rate for the privilege. The balance-sheet metrics are sterling (ROIC 26.6%, ROE 34.5%, zero long-term debt, $1.03B cash), but quality alone does not justify a multiple this far above the company's own history for a business whose revenue is rate-sensitive. The deterministic valuation context correctly flags this as 'Rich vs. its own history.'
The market is pricing Q2 2026 as a run-rate rather than a peak. At $192.60 on 2026-09-13, the stock sits 13.4% above the $169.83 consensus target and 9.1% above the $176.50 recent average - meaning price has already front-run the estimate revisions that have not yet fully shown up in published numbers. The bull path: Q3 2026 (confirmed for 2026-11-03) confirms airfreight pricing power and customs brokerage demand, analysts revise forward EPS from $7.712 toward $8.00+, and the forward multiple quietly compresses from 25x toward 24x while the price holds. The bear path: the Q2 revenue surge was capacity- and tariff-driven, normalizes in 2027, and the stock is left holding a mid-20s multiple on $6.50-$7.00 of normalized earnings. There is no small disappointment scenario that this price survives comfortably.
As of 2026-09-13, EXPD's RSI(14) stood at 65.31 - firm and rising but not yet overbought (below 70). Price was 2.30% above its 20-day SMA, 6.78% above its 50-day, and 20.60% above its 200-day, a clean stacked uptrend with no sign of trend break. The stock was also at $192.60 against a 52-week high of $193.15, so it was effectively making new highs. Entry-timing implication: this is momentum-favorable but poor risk/reward for a fresh position. Because the 20-day SMA sits only ~2% below spot, any pullback quickly becomes a test of the ~$186-180 zone, and below that there is a long air gap down toward the 200-day. Buying strength here means paying the top of a 52-week range for a cyclical at peak reported earnings.
- Air and ocean freight rate cycle: tight structural airfreight capacity plus tech-infrastructure shipping demand is the single largest driver of the Q2 2026 revenue surge - and rate normalization is the largest single threat to it.
- Tariff and trade policy complexity: shifting tariff regimes raise compliance burden and boost Expeditors' high-margin customs brokerage revenue, but an outright trade-volume contraction from tariff escalation would hit forwarding volumes harder than compliance fees help.
- Global trade and manufacturing activity: Expeditors' volumes track world trade and industrial PMIs, so a synchronized slowdown would show up in net revenue (gross profit) quickly.
- Interest rates and cash yield: with $1.03B of cash and equivalents and no long-term debt, falling short-term rates reduce interest income that has been a meaningful EPS contributor.
- Valuation compression risk in industrials/logistics: high-multiple cyclical names de-rate fast when the cycle rolls; EXPD's 28x trailing multiple leaves it exposed to sector rotation out of premium-priced industrials.
- Q3 2026 earnings on 2026-11-03 - the key test of whether Q2's airfreight pricing power and customs brokerage demand persisted through peak shipping season; this is the single most important near-term event.
- Further trade/tariff policy changes that increase supply-chain complexity and drive incremental customs brokerage and compliance revenue.
- The July 2026 expansion of global Aircraft on Ground (AOG) services, moving into higher-margin, time-critical aviation and aerospace logistics.
- Headcount growth to 20,389 full-time equivalents by mid-2026, which supports volume expansion but also raises the cost base if volumes soften.
- Post-Q2 sell-side upward estimate revisions - if the $7.712 forward EPS consensus moves toward $8.00+, the forward multiple compresses without the price falling.
- Freight rate normalization: Q2 2026's 32.1% YoY revenue growth is heavily rate- and capacity-driven, and EXPD has no pricing control over the underlying air/ocean markets - a rate reversal would compress both revenue and the ~10% operating margin that just printed.
- Valuation with no cushion: 27.95x trailing versus a 19.59x five-year average, PEG of 2.32, and analyst targets ($169.83 consensus, $176.50 recent average) sitting 8-12% below the 2026-09-13 price of $192.60.
- Working capital and earnings quality: Q2 2026 net income of $266.2M exceeded operating cash flow of $178.6M by $87.6M - a 1.71% accruals ratio - driven by a receivables build from the revenue surge; this should reverse, but a persistent gap would be a red flag.
- Tariff-driven trade contraction: aggressive trade policy could reduce global freight volumes even while boosting compliance demand, a net negative for a business whose revenue is volume-and-rate leveraged.
- Momentum reversal: with RSI at 65.31 and price 20.60% above the 200-day SMA as of 2026-09-13, a single soft quarter could trigger a sharp de-rating given how far the stock has run.
Expeditors is a genuinely excellent operator - 26.6% ROIC, 34.5% ROE, zero long-term debt, $1.03B in cash, and an asset-light model that converts roughly $0.92B of TTM free cash flow - and Q2 2026 showed real, not cosmetic, reacceleration. But as of 2026-09-13 the stock at $192.60 asks you to pay ~28x trailing and ~25x forward earnings for what is still a cyclical freight forwarder at what looks like a strong point in the rate cycle, against a 19.6x five-year average multiple and a sell-side consensus target 12% below the price. Great business, unattractive entry price - own it on weakness toward the high-$160s/low-$170s, not here.
Applied a 22.5x forward P/E to an estimated forward EPS of $7.90 (modestly above the $7.712 consensus to reflect upward revision momentum after the Q2 2026 beat), a multiple deliberately placed between the 19.6x five-year average and the 28x current trailing P/E - premium justified by 26.6% ROIC, a debt-free balance sheet, and structurally rising customs-brokerage demand, discounted for freight-rate cyclicality. Cross-checked with an implied ~4.0% TTM free-cash-flow yield on $924M of trailing FCF at that valuation, which is reasonable for a high-return, low-capital, but cyclical operator. The result, $178, sits about 7.6% below the 2026-09-13 price of $192.60 and about 5% above the $169.83 sell-side consensus target.
The 68.1 / 'Good Fundamentals' band is a fair read of the underlying business, with two caveats that offset rather than compound. First, the quality/profitability leg of 48.1 is disproportionately dragged by the accruals input: Q2 2026 net income of $266.2M versus operating cash flow of $178.6M equals the 1.71% accruals ratio the formula flags, but that gap is a receivables build from a +32% revenue quarter, not an earnings-quality problem - over the trailing twelve months, operating cash flow ($972.5M) actually exceeds net income ($919.3M). Correcting for that would lift the fundamentals blend a few points, not a tier. Second, and more important directionally, this is a cyclical freight business currently in an up-cycle, so the 73.2 growth score and improving margins are being flattered by tight airfreight capacity and tariff-driven complexity - the mirror image of the trough problem this methodology warns about, and a reason the trailing score may be peaking alongside the cycle. My independent read lands within roughly 5-8 points of 68.1, and no single dated event in the brief (the 2026-08-04 Q2 beat is already inside the trailing data) justifies overriding the mandated mapping, so per the table - Good Fundamentals plus 'Rich vs. its own history' - the lean is Cautiously Bullish.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.