← Back to Rankings

FFord Motor Company

Fundamentals Score: 30.4/100 (Weak Fundamentals) · Consumer Cyclical

Description

Ford Motor Company is a global automotive giant, engaged in the design, production, and servicing of a broad spectrum of vehicles. Its product line encompasses Ford trucks, commercial cars and vans, and sport utility vehicles, in addition to luxury models from its Lincoln brand.

Score Breakdown

Growth
15.7/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
46.2/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
32.0/100
weight: 15%
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral

Live Market DataPrice updated: 2h ago

P/E (TTM)
-7.9
Yield
4.29%
RSI (14)
58.5
vs SMA20
+3.87%
vs SMA50
+3.59%
vs SMA200
+8.29%
Analyst Target
$16
+12.0%
4 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$15
+2.6%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, Ford trades at $13.97 with a 4.3% dividend yield, sitting just below its 20/50-day moving averages and modestly above its 200-day. The Q2 2026 earnings beat and raised guidance point to a possible cyclical trough, but the trailing twelve-month GAAP numbers are still clouded by a large Q4 2025 impairment.

AI Sentiment:Neutral

As of 2026-08-27, sentiment is cautiously neutral: Q2 2026 adjusted EPS of $0.42 beat the ~$0.34 consensus and full-year EBIT guidance was raised to $10–11B, but the stock remains range-bound near $13.97 and the analyst composite is a Hold (18 Buy / 23 Hold / 6 Sell) with an average target of $16.38. Investors are giving Ford credit for the beat but not chasing it, with RSI at 47.15 and the price essentially pinned to its 50-day average.

Quarterly Trend

Revenue has been flat to slightly down rather than growing: Q2 2026 came in at $48.3B, down 3.8% from $50.2B in Q2 2025, and 2025-Q4/2026-Q1 were soft. The underlying profit trend is inflecting up, though: Q2 2026 operating income was $638M vs $435M a year earlier, gross profit jumped to $6.08B from $3.26B, and management raised full-year EBIT to $10–11B. The big distortion is the Q4 2025 net loss of -$11.1B (largely an impairment), which makes TTM EPS look like -$1.86; strip that out and the business is earning positive normalized profits. This is a cyclical trough/early-recovery pattern, not a stable compounder.

Valuation Assessment

As of 2026-08-27, trailing P/E is meaningless at -7.5 because TTM EPS is -$1.85. On forward numbers, Ford trades at roughly 7.6x next-FY EPS of $1.85, essentially in line with its own 5-year average P/E of 7.5x. P/S is 0.296x vs a 5-year average of 0.33x, and the dividend yield is 4.3%. That is cheap-to-fair on operating earnings, but the low ROIC (0.8%) and high debt/equity (4.57) explain why the market will not pay a premium.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

As of 2026-08-27, the price is not fully pricing in the raised 2026 guidance: $13.97 is still below the $16.38 consensus target and only slightly above the lower half of the 52-week range. The market seems to be pricing in a muddle-through — low growth, tariff risk, continued EV losses — rather than a clean recovery. If Ford hits about $1.85 EPS and the multiple merely returns to its 5-year average, fair value is around $14–15; if trade/EV costs deteriorate, the current price is fair to rich. The stock is a bet on execution and macro stability, not on priced-in growth.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI stood at 47.15, putting the stock firmly in neutral territory. Price is 1.04% below the 20-day SMA, 1.05% below the 50-day SMA, and 3.54% above the 200-day SMA, so the trend is range-bound rather than directional. Support is around the 200-day (~$13.50) and the 52-week low ($11.11); resistance is the $15.00 area and then $17.78. For a swing entry, the better trade is either a breakout through $15 on volume or a stabilizing retest of $13.50.

Macro Factors
  • USMCA renegotiation risk: proposed 50% U.S.-content threshold and potential Canadian auto tariff friction could add roughly $2B in annual compliance and supply-chain costs.
  • EV demand realignment: hybrids are taking share from pure BEVs, forcing Ford to slow EV capex and manage multi-billion-dollar Model e losses.
  • Interest rates and auto financing: Ford Credit profitability and consumer affordability remain sensitive to the Fed staying higher for longer.
  • Chinese EV competition: CEO Jim Farley has flagged aggressive Chinese entrants as a decade-long structural threat to global auto pricing.
  • Tariff/trade policy uncertainty across North America could pressure Detroit automakers' cost base and margins.
Key Catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings (expected late October 2026) — the next real test of whether the raised $10–11B EBIT and $6–7B FCF guidance is achievable.
  • Ford Energy strategy under new President Dave Carroll — battery capacity scale-up toward 20 GWh and energy storage/charging partnership announcements.
  • Further analyst upgrades if the Jefferies/Citi 'volume trough' thesis gains traction.
  • Clarity on USMCA/tariff rules that removes a major overhang on Detroit auto stocks.
  • Faster-than-expected narrowing of Model e losses as EV cost-down milestones are hit.
Key Risks
  • Trade policy: stricter USMCA content rules or Canadian tariffs could add billions in costs and disrupt supply chains.
  • Model e remains a significant EBIT drag; slower BEV adoption could prolong the cash burn.
  • High leverage: debt/equity of 4.57 (including Ford Credit) and a thin 1.09 current ratio leave little cushion if the economy weakens.
  • One-off balance-sheet risk: Q4 2025's -$11.1B net loss shows how quickly impairments can erase GAAP earnings.
  • Chinese competition and global price wars could undermine Ford Pro and Ford Blue pricing power.
Investment Thesis

Ford is not a high-conviction buy right now despite the Q2 beat; the trailing fundamentals are genuinely weak, leverage is high, and the cheap multiple is justified by cyclical and structural risk. For income investors the 4.3% yield offers a reason to wait patiently, but I would want to see the Q3 2026 print confirm the raised EBIT/FCF guidance and prove Model e losses are structurally shrinking before treating this as more than a cautious hold.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Blended valuation: applying an 8.0x justified forward P/E (a modest premium to Ford's 7.5x 5-year average, reflecting Ford Pro mix and the raised guidance) to next-FY EPS of $1.85 gives $14.80, and applying the 0.33x average P/S to next-FY revenue per share of about $46.40 gives $15.30; averaging those gives my independent fair value of $15.00, below the Street's $16.38 consensus target.

AI Lean: Cautiously BearishConfidence: Medium

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Partially Agree

The deterministic 30.4 'Weak Fundamentals' score is a fair description of the trailing GAAP reality — revenue is down YoY, TTM EPS is -$1.86, margins are thin, and leverage is high. But I would nudge the score upward, probably into the low-to-mid 40s, because the formula is entirely backward-looking and cannot see that the Q4 2025 loss was a giant one-off impairment, Q2 2026 adjusted EPS beat, full-year EBIT guidance was raised to $10–11B, and FCF guidance is $6–7B. This is a cyclical near-trough situation rather than a confirmed structural decline, so the honest score is still weak/fair, but not as weak as the trailing arithmetic suggests.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.