#196S&P 500 rank

FDS — FactSet Research Systems Inc.

2-yr score: 53.5/100 (Middle 40%)Financial Services
$319.91+2.45%
Description

FactSet Research Systems Inc. is a financial intelligence firm providing a comprehensive suite of integrated data and analytical software. The company serves the global investment community, with its operations spanning the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific region.

Score breakdownLatest quarter45.9 · Fair
Growth
40.2
Quality / Profitability
54.8
Financial health
66.3
Ratio screener
41.9
Track record: 2-yr avg 53.5 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 60.8 (Good, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Dec 17, 2026 (in 56 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:25 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
21.9
Yield
1.44%
RSI (14)
70.9
vs SMA20
+12.47%
vs SMA50
+11.30%
vs SMA200
+28.32%
Analyst target
$284
-11.1%
7 analysts
AI theoretical price
$295
-7.8%
as of 2026-10-04

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-10-04 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-10-04, FactSet trades at $266 (~$9.46B market cap), down 4.18% on the day and 13.1% over the past month, yet still +16.8% over six months and 6.8% above its 200-day average. The Sept 30 FY26 Q4 print beat (revenue $634.7M, +6.3% YoY; adjusted EPS $4.52), but GAAP EPS has fallen four straight quarters and operating margin has compressed to ~24.7%.

AI sentimentNeutral

The market is genuinely split as of 2026-10-04. The Sept 30 FY26 Q4 beat and constructive FY27 guidance (margins framed as a 'floor') were positive, yet the shares fell 4.18% that day and 13.1% over the month - investors focused on GAAP EPS declining four straight quarters (4.06 → 3.59 → 3.51 → 3.41) and organic ASV growth guided down to 5.0-6.5% from 7.0%. Analyst consensus is 'Hold' (0 strong buy / 3 buy / 20 hold / 7 sell) with a $256.75 consensus target - essentially where the stock trades. The tug-of-war is between a sticky 95%+ retention, 7.5% free-cash-flow yield business and real fear that AI erodes the data-subscription moat.

Quarterly trend

Revenue is a metronome: steady ~6-7% YoY growth for three years, from $542M (Q1 FY24) to $635M (Q4 FY26), with no meaningful acceleration or deceleration quarter to quarter. The story is below the top line. Operating margin has compressed hard - from roughly 33% across FY25 quarters (33.6%, 32.5%, 33.2%, 29.7%) to 24.7% in Q4 FY26 - and GAAP diluted EPS fell four straight quarters (4.06 → 3.59 → 3.51 → 3.41). Note the Q4 FY24 GAAP dip to $2.32 was a one-off (the R&D line spiked to $266M that quarter vs. ~$0 elsewhere), not a trend. Meanwhile free cash flow is growing strongly: FY24 $614.7M → FY25 $617.5M → FY26 $707.5M. Read: stable top line, a deliberate investment-driven margin trough (management calls FY26 the floor), and rising cash generation - earnings quality is intact even as profitability optics deteriorate.

Valuation assessment

Cheap vs. its own history and cheap on cash flow - with an asterisk. At $266 the stock carries an 18.2x TTM GAAP P/E vs. a 5-year average of 30.4x, and about 13.5x forward adjusted EPS ($19.66). P/S is 3.82 vs. a 6.98 5-year average. The negative PEG (-2.54) is an artifact of the trailing GAAP EPS dip and isn't meaningful. A 7.5% FCF yield ($707M FCF / $9.46B cap) is generous for a 95%-retention subscription model. The tension: the low multiple is a value opportunity if the margin trough is cyclical, or a fair price if AI/competition makes mid-single-digit growth and margin recovery a permanent ceiling. On the numbers alone, the multiple embeds a lot of pessimism.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The de-rating from 30x to 18x means much of the bad news is already priced in - the stock is not being valued for growth that hasn't shown up. The asymmetry: if FY27 delivers the guided margin recovery and 6%+ ASV growth, EPS reaccelerates toward the $19.25-19.65 range and the multiple has room to re-rate modestly. If organic ASV slips below 5% or margins fail to recover, the 13.5x forward P/E and 7.5% FCF yield still provide a valuation cushion that limits downside. So this is less 'priced for perfection' and more 'priced for permanent stagnation' - the payoff skew hinges on whether the Nov 10 Investor Day confirms the margin floor and mid-term targets.

Technical picture

As of 2026-10-04, RSI(14) stood at 43.3 - neutral, edging weak, not oversold. Price sat 3.47% below the 20-day and 5.88% below the 50-day, but 6.79% above the 200-day: a short-term pullback inside a longer-term uptrend (6-month +16.8%). The month's -13.1% move has reset momentum without capitulating. Timing implication: no compelling technical entry signal yet - not oversold, no bounce. A stabilization near the 200-day, or RSI dipping toward the mid-30s with a reversal candle, would be a better entry trigger than chasing here.

Macro factors
  • AI disruption vs. AI monetization: the same technology that threatens the traditional data-terminal moat is also a tailwind - AI drove 10%+ of Q4 new subscription value and 90%+ of top-50 clients use four-plus AI tools.
  • Capital-markets activity and interest rates: high rates and muted deal/issuance activity squeeze buy-side and sell-side client budgets that feed FactSet's wallet share.
  • Enterprise software/tech spending restraint: slower overall tech budgets keep pricing power and seat expansion under scrutiny even with 95%+ retention.
  • Competitive intensity from Bloomberg, S&P Global, and LSEG/Refinitiv, capping both growth and multiple expansion.
  • Multiples/rotation: data-and-analytics names have de-rated broadly, so FactSet's move from 30x to 18x partly reflects sector multiple compression rather than company-specific deterioration alone.
Key catalysts
  • Investor Day on Nov 10, 2026 - management to detail medium-term financial targets and its margin-recovery/AI roadmap; the key swing factor for the re-rating case.
  • FY27 execution on the 'margin floor' and organic ASV growth of 5.0-6.5%; evidence of margin recovery would validate the cyclical-trough thesis.
  • AI product monetization ramp and deepening Google Cloud / TIFIN.AI partnerships.
  • Contribution from the Sept 22, 2026 BCC Group International acquisition (enterprise real-time market data).
  • Buyback: $356M remaining authorization after repurchasing 552,064 shares for $138M in Q4 FY26.
Key risks
  • The margin compression proves structural (AI-driven disintermediation of the terminal/data model) rather than a deliberate investment-cycle trough.
  • Organic ASV growth decelerates below the guided 5.0-6.5%, pressuring the already-de-rated multiple.
  • Intensifying competition from Bloomberg, S&P Global, and LSEG on pricing and product breadth.
  • Client budget cuts in a weak capital-markets/interest-rate environment.
  • Integration and capital-allocation risk from M&A (BCC) against a balance sheet with $871M long-term debt and a thin 0.599 current ratio (largely a debt-reclassification artifact, but worth watching).
Investment thesis

A high-quality, sticky subscription franchise (95%+ retention, 16% ROIC, 7.5% FCF yield) trading at a de-rated 18x TTM / ~13.5x forward after its multiple was cut roughly in half. The bear case - AI disruption and margin compression - is meaningfully in the price; the bull case rests on management's claim that FY26 margins are the floor and that AI is additive, not cannibalistic. This is a fair, not exceptional, business at a genuinely inexpensive-vs.-its-own-history price: a reasonable patient-holder setup with a slightly favorable skew, but not a high-conviction buy until the margin inflection is proven.

AI theoretical price methodology

Applied ~15x to the FY2027E adjusted EPS midpoint of ~$19.5 (guidance $19.25-19.65) - a modest premium to the current ~13.5x forward but far below the 5-year average 30x P/E, reflecting a de-rated yet still high-quality subscription model - giving ~$292.50, then nudged to ~$295 to reflect a ~6.5% fair FCF yield cross-check on ~$707M FY26 FCF (≈$306/share).

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

Directionally fair, but the backward-looking formula is too harsh on three things it structurally can't see. (1) The 0.599 current ratio that tanks the financial-health/ratio legs is mostly a debt reclassification - long-term debt fell from $1.37B (Feb 2026) to $871M (Aug 2026) with a matching jump in current liabilities - not a liquidity problem. (2) FY26's margin compression (op margin ~33% → 24.7%) is management-guided as a deliberate multi-cloud/investment 'floor,' which the trailing-margin leg reads as pure deterioration. (3) The growth leg underweights cash: FY26 FCF of $707.5M is up ~15% YoY vs. FY25's $617.5M, and the accruals ratio is a healthy -2.02%. I'd nudge the score up ~10-12 points into the mid-50s - still 'Fair Fundamentals,' so no band change, hence Partially Agree rather than Agree. Not full agreement because the formula can't adjudicate the crux: whether the margin trough is cyclical or the onset of structural decline.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.