#396S&P 500 rank

FRT — Federal Realty Investment Trust

2-yr score: 42.7/100 (Lower 20%)Real Estate8d
$105.77−0.71%
Description

Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) stands out as a premier entity specializing in the acquisition, management, and redevelopment of high-quality retail properties. These assets are strategically situated primarily in prominent coastal metropolitan areas, spanning the Eastern Seaboard from Washington D.C. to Boston, and extending to key West Coast cities such as San Francisco and Los Angeles.

Score breakdownLatest quarter52.9 · Fair
Growth
61.6
Quality / Profitability
63.3
Financial health
66.7
Ratio screener
42.8
Track record: 2-yr avg 42.7 (Weak, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 42.6 (Weak, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 30, 2026 (in 8 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:25 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
21.1
Yield
3.75%
RSI (14)
37.7
vs SMA20
-1.07%
vs SMA50
-5.68%
vs SMA200
-6.21%
Analyst target
$123
+16.2%
10 analysts
AI theoretical price
$130
+22.9%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, FRT trades at $114.36 with RSI-14 at 31.5, sitting below its 20-day (-2.2%) and 50-day (-4.9%) SMAs but still above its 200-day (+2.5%) — a near-term pullback within a longer uptrend. The business is holding up fine: Q2 2026 FFO of $1.88 (+7% YoY), raised full-year core FFO guidance of $7.48-$7.56, ~96% occupancy and a 3% dividend raise.

AI sentimentNeutral

The tape is split. Bulls cite Q2 2026 FFO of $1.88 (+7% YoY), raised 2026 core FFO guidance of $7.48-$7.56 (~6.5% growth), small-shop occupancy of 92.3% (highest since 2007), 15% cash rent spreads on comparables, a 3% dividend raise to $4.64 annualized (59th straight annual increase), and a Buy consensus with a ~$133 average target. Bears point to price weakness into 2026-09-13: -9.1% over 3 months, RSI at 31.5, price under the 20- and 50-day SMAs, and persistent rate-driven pressure on REIT multiples. Fundamentals firm, near-term momentum weak.

Quarterly trend

Revenue climbed steadily from $286.6M (Q3 2023) to $341.1M (Q1 2026) and $335.7M (Q2 2026), with YoY growth running in a stable ~6-8% band (Q3 2025 +6.3%, Q4 2025 +7.9%, Q1 2026 +10.3%, Q2 2026 +7.8%) — a modestly decelerating, not inflecting, uptrend. Reported GAAP EPS is noisy (Q2 2026 $0.99, Q1 2026 $1.83, Q3 2025 $0.69) because REIT earnings swing on property-sale gains and impairments; the cleaner signal is FFO, up ~7% YoY with double-digit rent spreads. This is a steady compounding REIT, not a cyclical trough: growth is durable but not accelerating.

Valuation assessment

As of 2026-09-13, $114.36 is 22.8x TTM EPS vs a 5-year average of 30.8x, and 7.4x TTM sales vs an 8.1x 5-year average — cheap versus its own history. On the REIT-appropriate lens it is 15.2x 2026 guided FFO ($7.52 midpoint) versus a long-run 18-22x band, a genuine discount. PEG of 0.84 and a 3.75% dividend yield support a fair-to-cheap read. Caveat: forward GAAP EPS estimate of $4.26 is below TTM $5.06 because one-off gains roll off — headline forward P/E of ~26.8x overstates the multiple. Value the FFO, not the GAAP EPS.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The pullback to $114.36 looks rate/macro-driven, not earnings-driven: FRT raised 2026 FFO guidance and posted 96% occupancy with 15% rent spreads. So the price arguably discounts a growth stall the operating data does not show. If rates stay elevated, ~15x FFO is a fair clearing level; if rates ease, a re-rate toward 17-18x FFO is the main upside lever. The key tell is whether Q3 and holiday-season leasing data confirm the momentum already in guidance.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13: RSI-14 at 31.5 (near oversold), price 2.2% below the 20-day SMA and 4.9% below the 50-day SMA, yet still 2.5% above the 200-day SMA. That is a near-term downtrend inside a longer-term uptrend — negative momentum with an oversold setup. Returns: -2.3% (1wk), -2.4% (1mo), -9.1% (3mo), +9.5% (6mo). Entry implication: an oversold bounce is possible, but momentum has not turned; confirmation would be RSI reclaiming ~45 or price retaking the 50-day SMA before adding aggressively.

Macro factors
  • Elevated interest rates continue to cap REIT multiples and raise the cost of capital; FRT's net debt/EBITDA of ~5.4x and its use of exchangeable senior notes mitigate this better than leveraged peers.
  • Structurally tight retail supply — high construction costs discourage new competing centers, a tailwind protecting FRT's supply-constrained coastal markets and supporting rent growth.
  • REIT income competition — with the 10-year yield still elevated, FRT's 3.75% dividend yield competes with bonds, muting multiple expansion.
  • Consumer/retail spending backdrop — back-to-school and holiday sales feed directly into tenant health and FRT's occupancy and rent-spread metrics.
  • Coastal-market concentration — affluent, high-barrier submarkets give pricing power but expose FRT to high-tax, high-regulation and remote-work dynamics (particularly its office/residential mixed-use components).
Key catalysts
  • BofA Securities 2026 Global Real Estate Conference on 2026-09-16 — management commentary on leasing spreads, retail demand and capital deployment could move the stock near-term.
  • Q3 2026 earnings (late Oct/early Nov 2026) — a checkpoint on holiday-season leasing and progress on mixed-use developments in Hoboken and Santana Row.
  • Capital recycling and development deliveries — ~$225M of YTD asset sales at a ~5% blended cap rate funding higher-yielding projects.
  • Potential rate cuts — any easing of the 10-year yields could trigger REIT multiple re-rating toward historical P/FFO levels.
  • Continued FFO guidance beats/raises — the 2026 guide was already raised, and another raise would validate the ~6.5% growth trajectory.
Key risks
  • Rate sensitivity — a persistently high or rising 10-year yield pressures both the multiple and FRT's refinancing economics despite a conservative balance sheet.
  • Tenant credit risk — retail bankruptcies or a consumer slowdown would hit occupancy (currently ~96%) and rent-spread momentum.
  • GAAP earnings optics — forward EPS estimate of $4.26 vs TTM $5.06 can spook screens even though the decline is one-off-driven and FFO is growing.
  • Leverage and equity dilution — D/E of 1.44 and the recent $400M exchangeable note issuance add financial complexity and potential future share dilution.
  • Development execution — a large active pipeline (residential/retail mixed-use) carries cost-overrun, lease-up and interest-rate timing risk.
Investment thesis

FRT is a top-tier, well-managed retail REIT being priced below its own history — 15.2x 2026 guided FFO versus an 18-22x long-run band — with steady ~6-7% FFO growth, ~96% occupancy, 15% rent spreads and a 59-year dividend-increase streak. The recent pullback (RSI 31.5, -9% in 3 months) reflects rate/macro fear rather than operational deterioration, and the 3.75% yield plus a raised guide make it a reasonable accumulate for income-oriented investors. It is not a screaming bargain (elevated rates cap near-term multiple expansion, and momentum is still negative), so this is a solid hold/scale-in, not a high-conviction buy.

AI theoretical price methodology

Used the standard REIT lens, P/FFO: applied a justified ~16.5x multiple to 2027E FFO of ~$7.9 (2026 guidance midpoint of $7.52 grown ~6%), yielding ~$130. The 16.5x sits below FRT's long-run 18-22x band to reflect still-elevated rates, but above the ~15x retail-REIT peer average to reflect FRT's coastal quality premium and its current 15.2x discount.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

My independent read is that the 52.9 'Fair Fundamentals' band understates FRT by roughly 10-13 points because it is dragged down by the ratio screener (42.8), which compares FRT to the full S&P 500 on P/B (2.93), D/E (1.44) and EV/EBITDA (14.3) — metrics that structurally penalize asset-heavy, dividend-paying, levered REITs relative to a tech-tilted index. On REIT-appropriate metrics (15.2x P/FFO, negative accruals ratio of -2.79% i.e. cash flow outrunning net income, ~96% occupancy, 6.5% FFO growth, 59-year dividend growth), the fundamentals-only score of 63.0 is the fairer anchor, implying a 'Good Fundamentals' band. That is a real one-tier qualitative adjustment, not rubber-stamping, so I mark it Partially Agree rather than Agree — but the evidence is not strong enough to disagree outright or call the formula 'wrong' by two tiers.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.