#318S&P 500 rank

GDDY — GoDaddy Inc.

2-yr score: 47.4/100 (Middle 40%)Technology7d
$108.22−0.53%
Description

GoDaddy Inc., founded in 2014 and based in Tempe, Arizona, operates internationally as a developer and provider of cloud-based technological solutions. The company serves a wide array of clients, including small businesses, individuals, organizations, developers, designers, and domain investors, assisting them in building and maintaining their online presence.

Score breakdownLatest quarter45.3 · Fair
Growth
50.7
Quality / Profitability
68.7
Financial health
31.2
Ratio screener
35.7
Track record: 2-yr avg 47.4 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 48.7 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 29, 2026 (in 7 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:25 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
15.9
Yield
N/A
RSI (14)
61.9
vs SMA20
+6.95%
vs SMA50
+8.90%
vs SMA200
+17.58%
Analyst target
$94
-13.4%
7 analysts
AI theoretical price
$120
+10.9%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, GoDaddy traded at $98.07 (≈$13.0B market cap) after a +28.6% three-month rebound but a -3.2% pullback over the prior week, sitting mid-range between its $71.59 52-week low and $148.19 high. RSI(14) of 52.6 with price 0.49% above the 20-day, 4.07% above the 50-day and 2.61% above the 200-day SMA describes a neutral-to-mildly-constructive tape, while a 14.4x trailing P/E sits far below the stock's own 5-year average of 30.7x.

AI sentimentNeutral

Sentiment is genuinely split. The bullish side has hard numbers: Q2 2026 (reported 2026-07-30) delivered $1.30B revenue (+6.6% YoY, beating ~$1.29B consensus) and $1.83 adjusted EPS versus $1.69 expected, with normalized EBITDA margins up more than 200bps; management reaffirmed a ~$1.8B full-year free cash flow target and >33% normalized EBITDA margin, and repurchased 9.8M shares for $851.8M (a 7% gross share reduction YTD). The bearish side is structural, not cyclical: Wells Fargo downgraded GDDY to Underweight in late August 2026 on AI-driven search shifts and domain pricing pressure, and a securities fraud class action tied to a February 2026 disclosure miss still lingers. The analyst mix (22 buy-equivalent vs. 16 hold/sell across 38 ratings, with a 4-analyst price-target consensus of just $90.25) captures the standoff — the stock has re-rated off the lows but nobody is willing to pay up until the AI question is answered.

Quarterly trend

Revenue growth has decelerated and then stabilized: quarterly YoY was +10.3% in Q3 2025, then +6.8% (Q4 2025), +6.1% (Q1 2026) and +6.6% (Q2 2026) — a step down out of double digits into a durable ~6-7% band, which looks like maturation rather than deterioration. The real story is margin: operating margin has climbed from 15.6% in Q3 2023 to 27.1% in Q2 2026 (+1,150bps over three years), and every one of the last four quarters expanded YoY (Q2 2026 at 27.1% vs. 21.9% a year earlier). Diluted EPS went from $1.01 in Q2 2024 to $1.83 in Q2 2026, and trailing-twelve-month free cash flow rose to roughly $1.70B from ~$1.45B a year prior (+17%), with the accruals ratio at -2.53% (cash earnings running ahead of reported net income — a quality positive). Note the GAAP noise: Q4 2023 showed $7.85 EPS on a $1.11B net income one-off and Q1 2024 showed $2.76, so the clean run-rate is the $1.4-1.8 quarterly progression, not those spikes. Verdict: a mid-single-digit top line with strongly inflecting margins and compounding cash flow — a quality compounder slowing at the top, not a business rolling over.

Valuation assessment

Cheap against essentially every reference point in the data, as of 2026-09-13. Trailing P/E is 14.4x versus a 5-year average of 30.7x; P/S is 2.54x versus a 5-year average of 3.98x; PEG is 0.79. On FY2027 consensus EPS of $7.402 the forward P/E is roughly 13.2x, and trailing FCF of ~$1.70B on a $13.0B market cap is a ~13% free-cash-flow yield with EV/EBITDA at 11.1x. The honest caveat is that a 14x multiple on a 6%-growth business is not automatically mispriced — the market is discounting terminal-value risk from AI agents disintermediating domains and web presence. So: cheap versus its own history, yes; cheap for an identifiable structural reason, also yes. The gap between 14.4x and the 5-year average of 30.7x is roughly half multiple compression and half a genuine change in the perceived durability of the franchise.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The price is not front-running growth that hasn't shown up — the opposite. At ~14x trailing and ~13x forward earnings, with EPS compounding in the mid-to-high teens and ~13% of market cap generated in free cash flow annually, the tape is pricing stagnation or slow erosion, not execution. Three things determine which side is right: (1) whether revenue growth holds near 6% in H2 2026 against the toughest aftermarket comparables; (2) whether Airo ($50M bookings run-rate as of the 2026-07-30 update) and developer-API adoption convert into ARPU gains rather than just new logos; and (3) the buyback — a 7% gross share reduction YTD mechanically adds several points to EPS even with flat net income. If earnings keep beating while the multiple stays at 14x, then the multiple, not the earnings, is what eventually has to move — but that repricing requires the AI fear to fade first, which is a sentiment event, not an earnings event.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) was 52.56 — dead neutral, with no overbought or oversold signal. Price sat 0.49% above the 20-day SMA (~$97.6), 4.07% above the 50-day (~$94.2) and 2.61% above the 200-day (~$95.6), so all three averages are stacked below price in a mild uptrend. That follows +28.63% over three months and +20.75% over six, with a small -3.2% pullback in the most recent week. Sitting at the midpoint of a $71.59-$148.19 52-week range, there is no timing edge here: it is neither a capitulation entry nor a breakout. A pullback toward the 50-day (~$94) would offer a modestly better entry; a decisive break below the 200-day (~$95.6) would signal that the three-month recovery is failing.

Macro factors
  • Sector rotation: institutional capital continues to favor AI infrastructure and hardware over legacy software and web services, compressing multiples for front-end web platforms regardless of their cash generation.
  • AI disruption anxiety: the market fears AI agents and answer engines reduce the need for domains and traditional web-traffic acquisition — the explicit basis of Wells Fargo's late-August 2026 Underweight rating.
  • Rates and leverage optics: ~$3.76B of debt against $1.16B of cash (~$2.6B net, roughly 1.5x EBITDA) is serviceable, but with stockholders' equity of just $6.7M, any rate-driven risk-off move hits a levered, thinly-capitalized balance sheet harder than the cash-flow math alone suggests.
  • SMB macro health: GoDaddy's customer base is small businesses and entrepreneurs, so soft SMB formation and discretionary spending pressure new domain registrations and commerce attach rates.
  • Domain pricing and aftermarket cyclicality: registry price increases on .com and a softer secondary-domain market can swing the high-margin aftermarket line, which is the hardest YoY comparable in H2 2026.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings (expected late October/early November 2026): scrutiny of whether ~6% top-line growth holds against tougher aftermarket comps, plus confirmation of the >33% normalized EBITDA margin and ~$1.8B FCF targets.
  • Airo and developer-platform monetization: adoption metrics beyond the $50M bookings run-rate, and evidence that AI-attached products lift ARPU faster than core domain volumes.
  • Continued buyback: 9.8M shares ($851.8M) repurchased through late July 2026; sustaining that pace compounds EPS independent of revenue growth.
  • Securities class-action milestones, including the 2026-10-20 lead-plaintiff deadline; a settlement or dismissal removes a headline overhang.
  • Analyst re-rating: at ~13x forward earnings, any evidence the AI-disruption fear is overdone could drive multiple expansion rather than earnings-driven upside — a much larger lever than the ~6% growth rate.
Key risks
  • AI disintermediation of domains and web presence — the core structural bear case; if it is right, no multiple is cheap enough, and this is the single largest swing factor.
  • Revenue growth has already halved from ~10.3% (Q3 2025) to ~6-7%, and H2 2026 laps the toughest aftermarket comparables.
  • Balance sheet optics: $6.7M stockholders' equity, D/E of 573%, and a 0.63 current ratio. Leverage is serviceable on cash flow, but there is essentially no book cushion and the headline ratios look alarming to screens.
  • Securities fraud class action tied to a February 2026 disclosure miss keeps legal cost and management-credibility risk alive.
  • Persistent multiple compression: if the software de-rating continues, a 14x stock can trade at 11x on flat estimates regardless of how well the company executes.
Investment thesis

GoDaddy is a genuinely high-quality cash machine priced as if its terminal value is in question: 27.1% Q2 2026 operating margins (up from 15.6% in Q3 2023), 19.2% ROIC, ~$1.70B trailing free cash flow growing 17% YoY, ~14x trailing earnings, a ~13% free-cash-flow yield, and a buyback shrinking the share count 7% a year. That is objectively cheap — but the cheapness is bolted to an unresolved AI-disintermediation question the data cannot settle, and Wells Fargo's late-August Underweight is a serious articulation of it. I would frame GDDY as fairly-to-attractively valued with a real, unresolved risk: enough value to own or add on weakness for a patient 2-3 year holder, not enough clarity to be aggressive at $98, and the margin expansion plus buyback provide a mid-teens EPS-compounding floor while the market waits to find out whether the AI fear is real.

AI theoretical price methodology

I applied 16x to FY2027 consensus EPS of $7.402 (a deliberate discount to GoDaddy's 5-year average P/E of 30.7x but a premium to the current ~13x forward, justified by 27% operating margins, 19.2% ROIC, a ~13% free-cash-flow yield, and a 7%-per-year share-count reduction offset by genuine AI terminal-value risk), which yields ~$118. Cross-checking with 12.5x EV/EBITDA on ~$1.5B of forward EBITDA (between FMP's GAAP-derived ~$1.41B and management's ~$1.73B normalized target) less ~$2.6B net debt gives ~$122; averaging the two methods lands at ~$120, roughly 22% above the 2026-09-13 price of $98.07 and above the 4-analyst consensus target of $90.25.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The 45.3 / 'Fair Fundamentals' score understates GoDaddy because two of its heaviest drags are buyback artifacts rather than business deterioration. The ratio screener (35.7) and financial health (31.2) pillars both punish a P/B of 1,917x and D/E of 573%, but those exist only because GoDaddy has repurchased itself down to $6.7M of book equity while generating ~$1.70B of trailing FCF and holding $1.16B of cash; net debt of ~$2.6B is roughly 1.5x EBITDA and easily serviced. A 0.63 current ratio is also normal for a business whose current liabilities are largely deferred revenue rather than cash claims. Meanwhile quality/profitability earned a legitimate 68.7 (27.1% Q2 2026 operating margin, 19.2% ROIC, accruals ratio of -2.53% meaning cash earnings exceed reported net income), and the 50.7 growth score is a fair read on a genuine mid-single-digit top line. My independent read would put this closer to ~57-60, roughly a 12-point lift into the 'Good Fundamentals' band, driven almost entirely by correcting the capital-structure distortions the fixed formula cannot contextualize. I stop short of a larger upward revision because the AI-disintermediation risk is a real, unresolved terminal-value question that deserves a discount, and the deterministic notes flagging the -71% and -97% equity swings are a legitimate caution about how the equity-based legs are computed.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.