GE — GE Aerospace
Fundamentals Score: 41/100 (Weak Fundamentals) · Industrials
Based in Evendale, Ohio, GE Aerospace is a prominent American aviation enterprise with roots tracing back to its 1878 founding by Thomas Alva Edison. The company specializes in manufacturing and supplying jet and turboprop engines, along with integrated systems, for an extensive range of aircraft, including those in commercial, military, business, and general aviation use.
Score Breakdown
Live Market DataPrice updated: 4h ago
AI Deep-Dive Analysis
Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market dataAs of 2026-08-27, GE Aerospace trades at $342.73, down 3.29% on the day, with a $355.6B market cap and a 40.2x trailing P/E. The company raised 2026 guidance after a strong Q2, but the stock is below its 20- and 50-day moving averages and the backward-looking value score flags weak fundamentals.
The analyst base is still constructive — 24 Buy, 11 Hold, zero Sell, with a consensus target of $418.44 — and management raised full-year guidance after Q2. However, as of 2026-08-27 the stock was down 3.29%, RSI was 41.8, and the research brief explicitly notes valuation fatigue; investors are positive on the franchise but unwilling to chase it at a 40x+ multiple.
Revenue growth has been strong and relatively stable: Q2 2026 revenue of $13.35B was up about 21% YoY, following roughly +25% in Q1 2026, +24% in Q3 2025, and +18% in Q4 2025. The Q4 2023 revenue print of $19.42B is a spinoff distortion and should not be read as organic growth. GAAP operating margin was 18.6% in Q2 2026 versus 23.3% in Q1 2026 and 19.0% in Q2 2025; the research note puts non-GAAP operating margin at 21.7%, down 130bps on cost inflation, R&D spending, and supply-chain friction. Diluted EPS grew roughly 20% YoY to $2.26, but FMP cash-flow data show Q2 2026 GAAP operating cash flow of -$1.61B and free cash flow of -$1.95B, versus the company's cited ~$3.0B adjusted FCF — that gap makes cash conversion the biggest trend to monitor.
As of 2026-08-27, GE is expensive on clean bases: 40.2x trailing EPS, roughly 43x the $7.92 next-fiscal-year consensus EPS, 7.0x sales, 20.2x book, and a 2.26 PEG. The 5-year average P/E of 322.55 is a pre-spin artifact and not useful; the 5-year average P/S of 3.62x versus today's 7.0x is more telling. Analyst targets averaging $418.44 imply investors are underwriting continued double-digit growth and margin recovery, so the stock is priced for high expectations.
At $342.73 with consensus forward EPS of $7.92, the market is paying about 43x forward earnings — essentially the high end of management's raised 2026 guidance plus further upside. The recent -3.29% pullback suggests the stock is not chasing good news; it is waiting for proof that margins re-expand and cash flow catches up to reported earnings. If margins stabilize, the multiple can hold; if they compress further or cash conversion stays weak, there is meaningful downside from multiple re-rating even if EPS grows.
As of 2026-08-27, RSI(14) stood at 41.8 — soft but not oversold. The stock was -5.4% below its 20-day SMA and -4.9% below its 50-day SMA, while still +6.9% above its 200-day SMA. That is a pullback within a longer uptrend rather than a breakdown; entry timing would be better after a reclaim of the 20-day or a stabilisation nearer the 200-day.
- Global flight-hour growth and resilient travel demand directly drive GE's high-margin commercial services aftermarket.
- Elevated geopolitical tensions and higher global defense budgets support the defense segment, though award timing is lumpy.
- Aerospace supply-chain fragility, tier-2/tier-3 constraints, and skilled-labor shortages continue to limit throughput.
- Industrial cost inflation and heavy R&D investment are compressing near-term operating margins.
- Interest-rate and discount-rate pressure weighs on high-multiple, long-duration stocks; GE's cash generation limits balance-sheet risk but not multiple risk.
- Q3 2026 earnings in late October 2026 — evidence that spare-part delinquencies are easing and non-GAAP operating margins are re-expanding would be a major positive.
- LEAP production ramp and GE9X early-shipment/quality milestones, which would validate OE execution.
- Continued buybacks or a meaningful dividend increase, which could support the stock if earnings hold.
- New defense contract awards or a further increase in the commercial services backlog.
- Valuation risk: at 40x+ trailing and ~43x forward earnings, any miss on guidance could trigger sharp multiple compression.
- Cash-flow and earnings-quality risk: positive accruals and a negative GAAP Q2 2026 operating cash flow print suggest reported earnings are running ahead of actual cash generation.
- Supply-chain and margin risk: R&D growth, inflation, and parts delinquencies are pressuring the 21.7% non-GAAP margin.
- Cyclicality risk: a downturn in air travel or defense budgets would hit both original equipment sales and the high-margin aftermarket.
GE Aerospace is a best-in-class franchise with a huge services backlog, 20%+ operating margins, and strong revenue momentum. But as of 2026-08-27, the stock is priced for flawless execution, while recent GAAP cash flow and margin data point to real friction; the reward-to-risk is unattractive at $342.73 until margin and cash conversion improve or the multiple comes down.
Applied a 38x forward P/E multiple to the $7.92 next-fiscal-year consensus EPS, yielding $300.88; 38x is a premium compounder multiple justified by high ROE, 20%+ margins, and the services backlog, but it is a clear discount to the current ~43x forward multiple, and the resulting ~6.2x forward P/S is still rich but below the current 7.0x.
AI Review of the Deterministic Score
The 41 'Weak Fundamentals' score is harsher than my independent read: a business with 20.8% operating margins, 46.6% ROE, 20%+ revenue growth, and a roughly $170B services backlog is not a weak business. But the formula is right to flag cash conversion — the positive 3.12% accruals ratio, the -$1.61B GAAP operating cash flow quarter, the 0.98 current ratio, and 1.09 debt-to-equity are genuine cautions. Because much of the weak look traces to spinoff-distorted history and a single negative cash quarter rather than structural deterioration, I would move the score into the low-to-mid 50s, or roughly one band higher into Fair; that is a partial disagreement, not a full override.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.