GEV — GE Vernova Inc.
Fundamentals Score: 71.7/100 (Good Fundamentals) · Industrials
GE Vernova Inc. is an energy enterprise primarily engaged in generating electricity. Its business activities are categorized into three main divisions: Power, Wind, and Electrification.
Score Breakdown
Live Market DataPrice updated: 17m ago
AI Deep-Dive Analysis
Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market dataAs of 2026-08-27, GE Vernova trades at $953.83 with a market cap around $254B, recovering from a ~14% pullback after a strong Q2 2026 beat and raise. The stock is below its 20- and 50-day moving averages but above its 200-day, with the fundamental story still driven by a $176B backlog and AI/grid electrification demand.
The market is bullish on fundamentals rather than momentum: analysts carry a Buy consensus (22 Buy, 7 Hold, 0 Sell) with a $1,256.29 average target, Q2 2026 revenue rose 22% and management raised FY2026 guidance, and data-center electrification orders already exceed $5B YTD in 2026. As of 2026-08-27, sentiment is also helped by the price having cooled from the highs, easing the entry multiple while the outlook stays intact.
The trend is inflecting upward, not just a blip. Revenue went from roughly flat/single-digit growth in 2024 to 16% YoY in Q1 2026 and 22% YoY in Q2 2026 ($11.10B), while quarterly free cash flow jumped from $194M in Q2 2025 to $5.11B in Q2 2026. Operating income improved to $655M in Q2 2026 from $378M a year earlier. The important caveat is that Q4 2025 and Q1 2026 net income included large non-operating gains, so trailing GAAP EPS is not a clean measure; the operating/FCF trajectory is the better signal. Wind orders fell 40% YoY, but Power and Electrification are accelerating enough to raise the whole company.
As of 2026-08-27, the stock is not cheap on clean earnings: the reported trailing P/E of 27.1x is optically low only because one-off gains inflated TTM EPS. Against next-FY consensus EPS of $30.69, the forward P/E is about 31x, and the TTM P/S ratio is 6.1x, with P/B near 21.4x. The 47.4x five-year P/E average is unreliable since the stock has less than three years of public history. Overall, this is a fair-to-slightly-rich valuation for a company growing revenue ~20% with a $176B backlog, but it leaves no room for a growth stumble.
The market is pricing in continued conversion of the backlog into high-margin Power/Electrification revenue: roughly 31x next-FY EPS. If the gas turbine 20GW output milestone is hit and FCF guidance keeps being raised, the post-pullback $953 price will look like a reasonable entry. If Wind losses deepen or the AI/data-center ordering pace slows, the multiple can compress quickly—the recent 14% correction shows how fast this stock can re-rate even without bad news.
As of 2026-08-27, the 14-day RSI was 42.5, price was 4.37% below the 20-day SMA and 7.79% below the 50-day SMA, but still 8.91% above the 200-day SMA. That is a normal pullback within an uptrend rather than an overbought or confirmed downtrend. The $949 area is both the recent low and the low analyst target, so it is the key support; reclaiming $1,000 would stabilize the short-term picture.
- AI/data-center electrification is the dominant demand driver: data-center-related orders surpassed $5B YTD 2026, more than double all of 2025.
- Electric grid and gas-turbine capacity are structurally short; GEV's 116GW gas backlog and expansion toward 20GW annual output by late 2026 are key supply-side catalysts.
- Interest rates still influence utility capex and renewable project economics, though the urgency of power demand reduces the drag.
- Wind market weakness and supply-chain/labor constraints are a sector-wide headwind, particularly for GEV's Wind segment.
- Regulatory support for grid investment and transmission buildout remains positive but can also bring permitting/tariff risks.
- Q3 2026 earnings (late October 2026) and evidence that gas turbine output reaches the 20GW annualized milestone.
- Further backlog growth and manufacturing expansion updates for gas turbines and high-voltage transformers.
- A clean CFO transition: Claire McDonough starts January 2027, then formal handover in April 2027.
- Continued AI/data-center order momentum pushing 2026/2027 FCF guidance higher.
- Wind segment losses and a 40% YoY order decline; a deeper restructure or impairment would pressure consolidated margins.
- Valuation risk: at ~31x forward EPS and 6.1x sales, any earnings deceleration or margin miss could trigger a sharp de-rating.
- Execution risk in scaling gas turbine, HVDC, and transformer capacity against tight supply chains and labor availability.
- Quarterly FCF is lumpy and boosted by prepayments/working capital; investors should not annualize the recent $5B+ quarters blindly.
- GAAP EPS is inflated by one-off gains, so anchoring to the trailing P/E understates the price being paid for ongoing operations.
As of 2026-08-27, GE Vernova is one of the more direct high-quality industrial plays on the AI-driven electrification supercycle, with a $176B backlog, accelerating revenue/FCF, and a raised 2026 outlook. The bull case is intact, but the valuation already anticipates strong execution; I would treat any further weakness toward the $949-$1,000 support area as an opportunity to build a position rather than a reason to abandon the thesis.
Calculated by applying a 35x multiple to the next-FY consensus EPS of $30.685—roughly 25% below the stated 47.4x five-year P/E average to reflect GEV's short public history, Wind drag, and one-off-inflated trailing earnings—which yields a fair value above the current pullback price but below the Street's $1,256 average target.
AI Review of the Deterministic Score
The 71.7 'Good Fundamentals' score is a fair read of the trailing data. My independent read would shade the score a little higher—the $176B backlog, raised guidance, and Q2 FCF step-change are forward indicators a purely backward-looking model cannot fully credit. But Wind losses, a 4.4% TTM operating margin, and the fact one-off gains distort headline GAAP income justify capping it at the Good band, not Strong. The difference is within a few points, so I agree with the score rather than pushing it up a tier.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.