GM — General Motors Company
Fundamentals Score: 40.6/100 (Weak Fundamentals) · Consumer Cyclical
General Motors Company, a prominent global automotive enterprise, is engaged in the design, manufacturing, and distribution of a wide array of vehicles—including trucks, crossovers (SUVs), and passenger cars—along with related parts and accessories. Its expansive reach covers numerous regions such as North America, the Asia Pacific, the Middle East, Africa, South America, with significant operations in the United States and China.
Score Breakdown
Live Market DataPrice updated: 1h ago
AI Deep-Dive Analysis
Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market dataAs of 2026-08-27, General Motors trades at $86.18, near the upper end of its 52-week range ($54.33–$91.85), after a Q2 2026 beat and a second guidance raise. The stock screens cheap on forward adjusted EPS, but the deterministic value score lands at 40.6, in Weak Fundamentals.
The live research brief is clearly positive: Q2 2026 adjusted EPS of $3.57 beat consensus, adjusted EBIT rose roughly 30% YoY, and management raised full-year 2026 EBIT, EPS, and free-cash-flow guidance. As of 2026-08-27, the Street consensus is Buy with a price target around $100, and the stock sits near its all-time high after a strong one-year run. Insider selling by the CEO is a minor caution flag but has not changed the overall tone.
Revenue has been essentially flat: TTM revenue is about $185.5B, with Q2 2026 revenue of $48.0B up ~1.9% YoY and Q1 2026 slightly down. The real story is GAAP earnings volatility: Q4 2025 posted a $3.31B net loss and negative gross profit, followed by Q1 2026 EPS of $2.84 and Q2 2026 EPS of $1.39, the latter hit by $2.5B in EV/China charges. On an adjusted basis the trend is inflecting upward—adjusted EBIT rose ~30% YoY and H1 2026 free cash flow was $5.85B versus $0.43B in H1 2025. So the quarterly income statement is noisy, but the operating cash-flow trend is accelerating, not deteriorating.
As of 2026-08-27, GAAP P/E is 43.09 on trailing EPS of $2.09 versus GM's 5-year average P/E of 10.33—that trailing GAAP comparison drives the 'Rich vs. its own history' label. But the P/E is distorted by restructuring charges. Against the guided 2026 adjusted EPS range of $12–$14 and consensus next-FY EPS of $13.39, the stock trades at roughly 6.4–6.6x forward adjusted EPS. Price-to-sales is 0.42 versus the 5-year average of 0.40, so on sales it is roughly fair-to-slightly-rich. PEG is negative and not meaningful here. Net read: expensive on trailing GAAP, cheap on adjusted forward earnings, with the truth depending on the durability of adjusted earnings.
The key is the enormous gap between 43x trailing GAAP EPS and roughly 6.5x guided adjusted EPS. The market is effectively saying management's adjusted earnings and buyback math are more relevant than reported GAAP. If GM prints $12–$14 adjusted EPS, the current price still leaves room toward the consensus target of ~$100. If North American truck/SUV pricing cracks or more EV/China charges pile up, both GAAP and adjusted estimates converge lower, and the low forward multiple will not provide much support.
As of 2026-08-27, RSI stood at 52.65—neutral, not overbought or oversold. Price is 0.84% below its 20-day SMA but 4.5% above the 50-day and 8.54% above the 200-day, so the intermediate trend is up despite a short-term pause near the $91.85 high. A pullback toward the 50-day SMA, roughly the low-$80s, would be a cleaner entry; a decisive breakout above $91.85 would confirm another leg higher. At $86.18, the setup is trend-following rather than a low-risk entry.
- High interest rates and tight auto credit: consumer affordability is stretched, and rising negative equity on auto loans pressures new-vehicle demand and financing profits.
- North American trade friction/counter-tariffs: Canadian counter-tariffs on automotive exports could add cost and disruption to GM's cross-border production footprint.
- EV transition economics: GM is deliberately scaling back EV capital intensity and restructuring China; policy/credit changes and charging buildout affect when EV losses turn to profits.
- Competitive dynamics in full-size ICE trucks/SUVs: GM's margins depend heavily on pricing discipline in North America; a price war or inventory glut would hit its highest-margin products.
- Regulatory and safety overhangs: federal inquiries into component safety and warranty cost trends can create lumpy charges and reputation risk.
- Q3 2026 earnings, expected in late October 2026, and whether North American pricing power and EV-loss reduction targets hold.
- Capital returns: the next $0.18 dividend is payable September 17, 2026, and ongoing buybacks continue to support EPS; any buyback acceleration would be a positive.
- Software/recurring revenue ramp: Super Cruise and OnStar deferred revenue is roughly $4B and scaling toward the targeted $25B digital-services revenue stream by 2030.
- Trade/labor resolution: the Unifor tentative agreement removes near-term strike risk, and easing tariff friction would remove an overhang.
- GAAP-to-adjusted gap: Q4 2025 and Q2 2026 charges show how easily reported earnings can be hit by EV realignment, China restructuring, and warranty/safety items; adjusted EPS may overstate sustainable earnings.
- Auto cycle/pricing risk: GM's earnings are concentrated in North American full-size trucks and SUVs; a consumer slowdown or price war would compress the cash engine.
- High leverage: debt-to-equity is 2.06, long-term debt is $90.7B, and the current ratio is 1.14; GM Financial makes the balance sheet structurally levered.
- Insider selling: CEO Mary Barra sold roughly 318k shares, about 42% of her holding, near $90.38 in late July 2026—a notable reduction near the top of the range.
- Trade/regulatory shocks: fresh tariffs or adverse federal safety findings could hit both costs and sentiment.
GM's underlying business is better than the trailing GAAP income statement suggests—adjusted EBIT, free cash flow, and guidance all inflected upward in the first half of 2026. But at $86.18 near the 52-week high, with a 2.06 debt-to-equity ratio, heavy one-time charges in reported earnings, and a deterministic fundamentals score in Weak territory, I would not chase this stock. The risk/reward becomes more interesting on a pullback or once adjusted earnings durability starts showing up in cleaner GAAP results.
I anchored on price-to-sales because trailing P/E is distorted by charges: TTM revenue per share is roughly $205, GM's 5-year average P/S is 0.40, and I applied 0.41x—a modest premium for improved FCF and software revenue, but a discount for leverage and cyclical/tariff risk—yielding about $84. This cross-checks with roughly 6.3x consensus next-FY EPS of $13.39, a deliberate discount to GM's 5-year average P/E of 10.3x.
AI Review of the Deterministic Score
The 40.6 'Weak Fundamentals' score is a fair backward-looking read on GAAP margins, ROIC, and leverage, but it misses that recent reported quarters were deliberately distorted by EV/China restructuring charges while adjusted EBIT and free cash flow are inflecting higher. I would nudge the score up by roughly 10–15 points into low-50s/Fair territory, not far enough to call GM a strong business—revenue is flat, TTM GAAP margins are thin, and debt-to-equity is high. The 'Rich vs. its own history' valuation label is mostly a trailing-GAAP artifact rather than a clean read on the forward adjusted multiple. Overall I partially agree: the caution is warranted, but the band should probably be Fair rather than Weak if the adjusted-earnings improvements prove durable.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.