← Back to Rankings

GPCGenuine Parts Company

Fundamentals Score: 54.1/100 (Fair Fundamentals) · Consumer Cyclical

Description

Genuine Parts Company, established in Atlanta, Georgia in 1928, functions as a prominent global distributor specializing in automotive and industrial replacement parts, alongside associated materials. The company’s operations are segmented into its Automotive Parts Group and Industrial Parts Group.

Score Breakdown

Growth
61.2/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
44.8/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
57.3/100
weight: 15%
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)

Live Market DataPrice updated: 3h ago

P/E (TTM)
529.3
Yield
4.26%
RSI (14)
60.2
vs SMA20
+1.64%
vs SMA50
+6.86%
vs SMA200
+14.88%
Analyst Target
$146
+6.3%
6 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$140
+1.4%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, Genuine Parts trades at $136.70, down 2.0% from the prior close but still well above its 200-day moving average, with a 4.26% dividend yield. The stock is a reasonably valued, margin-compressed distributor awaiting a planned 2027 split into auto and industrial businesses.

AI Sentiment:Neutral

As of 2026-08-27, the stock is up ~14% above its 200-day SMA, but the day's price action was down 2.0% and Wall Street is split: roughly 10 buys vs. 12 holds vs. 1 sell, with a consensus target around $145.75. The Q2 2026 beat and reaffirmed $7.50-$8.00 adjusted EPS guidance offset worries about softer automotive demand, margin compression, and spin-off execution costs.

Quarterly Trend

Revenue growth has picked up from +4.1% YoY in Q4 2025 to +6.8% in Q1 2026 and +6.0% in Q2 2026, though acquisitions and FX contributed roughly 2.6 points of that Q2 growth. The profit trend is weaker: operating margin was 5.14% in Q2 2026 vs. 6.85% a year earlier, so operating income fell ~20% despite the sales gain; gross margin was roughly flat at ~37.8%. Q4 2025's $609M net loss and 0.8% operating margin were impairment/restructuring-driven, not the underlying trend. Net/net, this is steady revenue growth with structurally lower margins, not a classic cyclical trough.

Valuation Assessment

As of 2026-08-27, the 525.8x TTM P/E is not a usable number—TTM EPS is only $0.24 due to the Q4 2025 impairment. On management's 2026 adjusted EPS midpoint of $7.75, GPC trades at 17.6x forward earnings; on consensus next-year EPS of $7.74 it is about 17.7x. That is roughly fair, not cheap: revenue growth is mid-single-digit, operating margin is near the low end of its recent range, and the 4.26% dividend yield is the main valuation support. Price/sales of 0.75x is slightly below the 5-year average of 0.88x, but the deterministic label 'Rich vs. its own history' is distorted by the trailing P/E.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

At $136.70 as of 2026-08-27, the market is looking through the ugly trailing GAAP earnings and pricing roughly $7.50-$8.00 of adjusted EPS—a normalized, not heroic, outcome. If management hits the upper half of guidance and the spin-off unlocks a sum-of-parts premium, there is modest upside to the low-$140s/low-$150s. If auto demand weakens and actual EPS lands near $7.50, the current price is already full value. The practical takeaway: judge GPC on adjusted forward EPS, not on the 526x TTM P/E.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI(14) stood at 60.4, so momentum is positive but not overbought. Price was 2.21% above the 20-day SMA, 8.6% above the 50-day SMA (~$126), and 14.35% above the 200-day SMA (~$119.5). The trend is up, but the stock sits closer to the 52-week high of $151.57 than to its lows, so the easy bounce off the bottom has already happened. Better technical entries would be a pullback toward $126-$128 or a decisive breakout above $151.57.

Macro Factors
  • High interest rates and persistent inflation are pressuring discretionary auto-parts spending, especially the DIY customer; this is the main consumer headwind.
  • Industrial MRO demand is more resilient; the Motion/industrial segment is growing faster and is the more stable part of the portfolio.
  • GPC's moderately leveraged balance sheet (D/E 1.47) faces refinancing and interest-cost pressure, especially with the pending separation creating two new capital structures.
  • European automotive weakness and vendor/supply-chain disruptions add margin and revenue noise.
  • The aging U.S. vehicle fleet underpins secular replacement demand, partially offsetting cyclical consumer softness.
Key Catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings expected mid-to-late October 2026; the key question is whether North American auto demand improves and whether adjusted EPS tracks toward the upper half of the $7.50-$8.00 range.
  • Investor Days for both Global Automotive and Global Industrial in H2 2026—these should provide spin-off financial targets and capital structures and are the main near-term valuation catalyst.
  • Completion of the tax-free separation into two public companies in early 2027 could unlock a sum-of-parts premium.
  • Any meaningful Fed rate cuts would reduce consumer financing costs and make GPC's 4.26% dividend yield more attractive.
Key Risks
  • Spin-off execution risk: separation costs, stranded overhead, and two smaller balance sheets could absorb more cash and management attention than expected.
  • Automotive segment pressure: softer DIY demand and European weakness would hit the largest part of the business and could push 2026 EPS to the low end of guidance.
  • Thin and declining operating margin (5.14% in Q2 2026, down from 6.85% a year earlier) leaves little room for cost inflation or pricing missteps.
  • Dividend/FCF mismatch: TTM free cash flow of ~$759M is modestly below the roughly $800M dividend bill implied by the 4.26% yield.
Investment Thesis

As of 2026-08-27, GPC is a Hold rather than a compelling buy. The 4.26% dividend, low beta, and steady revenue growth limit downside, but operating margins are compressing, forward EPS is roughly flat, and the spin-off creates execution uncertainty. Buyers should wait for either a lower price near the 50-day SMA or evidence that auto margins stabilize before paying $136.70.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Calculated by applying an 18x forward P/E to management's 2026 adjusted EPS midpoint of $7.75. I used 18x—a small premium to GPC's ~17.6x current forward multiple—for the low beta (0.65), 4.26% dividend yield, and spin-off optionality, but kept it below a broad-market multiple because operating margins are at the low end of recent history and next-year EPS is roughly flat.

AI Lean: NeutralConfidence: Low

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Agree

My independent read aligns with the 54.1 'Fair Fundamentals' score. The growth score of 61.2 is understandable given 6% revenue growth and a strong FCF recovery, but it flatters the underlying P&L—operating income fell ~20% YoY. The quality score of 44.8 correctly captures weak margins, and the negative accruals ratio is a positive earnings-quality signal. This is a margin-compressed distributor with a pending spin-off, not a deeply cyclical trough that the backward-looking formula is unfairly punishing, so I would not move the score materially; the fair band is right.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.