#453S&P 500 rank

GS — The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

2-yr score: 39.2/100 (Lower 20%)Financial Services
$904.72+2.25%
Description

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) operates as a prominent global financial services firm, offering an extensive array of services to corporations, financial institutions, governmental bodies, and individuals worldwide. The company's operations are organized into four primary divisions: Investment Banking, Global Markets, Asset Management, and Consumer & Wealth Management.

Score breakdownLatest quarter56.4 · Fair
Growth
51.7
Quality / Profitability
47.9
Financial health
44.0
Ratio screener
63.8
Track record: 2-yr avg 39.2 (Weak, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 42.5 (Weak, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Jan 19, 2027 (in 89 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:25 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
12.8
Yield
1.80%
RSI (14)
45.6
vs SMA20
+0.81%
vs SMA50
-6.34%
vs SMA200
-5.68%
Analyst target
$1077
+19.0%
6 analysts
AI theoretical price
$1013
+11.9%
as of 2026-10-14

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-10-14 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-10-14, GS trades at $897.37 - roughly 22% below its 52-week high of $1,153.99 and down 23.5% over three months - with RSI at 31.29 and the price beneath its 20-, 50- and 200-day moving averages. That weak tape sits directly opposite the 2026-10-13 Q3 print, which delivered $17.01 diluted EPS versus roughly $13 consensus on $18.68B of net revenues (+23% YoY).

AI sentimentBearish

The tape is decisively negative: as of 2026-10-14 GS is -10.88% over one month and -23.54% over three months, sitting -3.47% below its 20-day SMA and -8.20% below its 200-day. Even a 'crushing' Q3 beat on 2026-10-13 (sixth consecutive beat, EPS ~30% above consensus) only lifted the stock 0.61% on the day - a classic sign that the market is de-rating the whole capital-markets complex rather than reacting to company-specific news. Analysts are only mildly constructive (consensus 'Hold'; 22 buy vs 30 hold and 3 sell) with an average target of ~$1,118-1,131, so the sell-side is not the source of the negativity - price action is.

Quarterly trend

The EPS series is the cleanest signal and it is inflecting upward: $5.53 (Q4'23) -> $11.95 (Q4'24) -> $14.12 (Q1'25) -> $12.25 (Q3'25) -> $14.00 (Q4'25) -> $17.55 (Q1'26) -> $20.98 (Q2'26, a record) -> $17.01 (Q3'26). Q3'26 EPS is +38.9% YoY versus $12.25, and the firm has now posted six consecutive beats. Revenue quality is the debate: Q3'26 net revenues rose 23% YoY to $18.68B (second-best quarter in firm history) on a 72% YoY surge in equities (prime financing, portfolio financing, derivatives) and record advisory fees of $1.65B, while FICC was the soft spot at $3.47B (-1% YoY, -24% QoQ). Bottom line: this is a genuine YoY uptrend, not a one-quarter blip, but QoQ is choppy by nature of capital markets, and the FICC weakness is a real mixed signal. Note that FMP's raw revenue line is internally inconsistent (Q1'26 $17.2B vs Q2'26 $38.4B), almost certainly a reporting-basis change - ignore the apparent -43% QoQ revenue move and rely on the EPS series and the brief's net-revenue figure.

Valuation assessment

As of 2026-10-14 the screen shows a 16.86x trailing P/E and ~13.3x forward P/E (on FMP's next-FY EPS of $67.72), versus a 5-year average P/E of 13.02x - which superficially looks rich. It isn't. FMP's $55.23 TTM EPS does not reconcile with the four most recent reported quarters ($14.00 + $17.55 + $20.98 + $17.01 = $69.54), which puts the true trailing P/E nearer 12.9x - below, not above, the 5-year average. On post-Q3 sell-side numbers (FY26 ~$71.60, FY27 ~$77.00), the stock trades on ~12.5x FY26 and ~11.7x FY27. The 2.54 PEG and $2.53 P/S are distorted by the same revenue-basis artifacts, and the 125.65 P/B is nonsense for a bank actually trading near ~2.2x book ($264.7B market cap / $122.7B equity). Net: fair-to-slightly-cheap against GS's own history for a 13.7% ROE franchise, with a 1.8% dividend yield as a modest floor.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The gap between price and earnings is the entire story. As of 2026-10-14, GS has fallen 23.5% in three months while simultaneously printing a ~30% EPS beat - the market is behaving as if this is peak-cycle earnings and is refusing to pay for the beat, on the theory that record advisory and a 72% equities surge cannot repeat. The counter-argument is that consensus simply has not caught up: FMP's next-FY estimate of $67.72 is BELOW the $69.54 actually earned over the trailing four quarters, and Citizens' post-print numbers ($71.60 FY26 / $77.00 FY27) are higher still. If those hold, the current price is discounting flat-to-down earnings the data do not show. The honest risk is the mirror image - that the market is right and Q3'26 was the high-water mark of this cycle.

Technical picture

As of 2026-10-14: RSI(14) 31.29 (approaching oversold), price -3.47% vs the 20-day SMA (~$930 implied), -10.23% vs the 50-day and -8.20% vs the 200-day - below all three, so this is a confirmed downtrend, not a range. Momentum is back-loaded to the downside: -0.71% 1-week, -10.88% 1-month, -23.54% 3-month, but only -2.06% 6-month, meaning the damage is concentrated in the last quarter rather than a year-long bleed. Entry-timing implication: this is a 'falling knife' profile - oversold enough to bounce, but no moving average reclaimed; the first real evidence of a turn would be a close back above the 20-day on improving volume.

Macro factors
  • Interest rates / 'higher for longer': fuels prime brokerage, portfolio financing and restructuring demand, but also pressures wholesale credit - GS booked a $368M provision for credit losses in Q3'26.
  • Capital-markets reopening: broad corporate appetite for M&A, IPOs and equity financing produced record $1.65B advisory fees in Q3'26; debt capital markets remain cyclically choppy.
  • Financials sector rotation and beta: GS's beta of 1.284 means it amplifies index moves, and the 3-month -23.5% drawdown looks like a sector de-rating rather than company-specific deterioration.
  • Regulatory capital (Basel III endgame) and funding costs, which directly affect buyback capacity and return-on-equity math.
  • Wealth/asset-management consolidation - integration of recent acquisitions (LCN Capital Partners, NEOS Investments) and the pace of private-equity realizations.
Key catalysts
  • Q4 2026 earnings on 2027-01-19 - the next test of the six-quarter beat streak and the first look at any FY2027 framing.
  • Leadership succession: reports that President/COO John Waldron could succeed David Solomon as early as late 2027-2028, with Solomon potentially moving to executive chairman - a clarity event either way.
  • M&A and IPO pipeline execution plus private-equity realizations; successful integration of LCN Capital Partners and NEOS Investments.
  • Continued capital return: $4.49B returned to shareholders in Q3'26 and a $5.00 quarterly dividend declared, payable 2026-12-30.
  • Fed rate decisions and any broadening of capital-markets activity.
Key risks
  • FICC fragility: down 1% YoY and 24% QoQ to $3.47B in Q3'26 - if the equities/advisory strength normalizes while FICC stays soft, the earnings base is thinner than it looks.
  • Credit deterioration if rates stay high: the $368M Q3'26 credit-loss provision is the early warning line.
  • Momentum/multiple risk: as of 2026-10-14 the stock is below its 20/50/200-day SMAs with -23.5% three-month momentum; oversold can stay oversold and the downtrend has not broken.
  • Earnings-quality noise: a $450M (~$1.00/share) Goldman Sachs Gives contribution hit Q3 GAAP results, and FMP's own data feed contains material inconsistencies (revenue basis change, a broken Q3'26 balance-sheet line showing $2.18B total assets vs $2,127B the prior quarter).
  • Regulatory capital changes and political/regulatory scrutiny of large banks, plus succession uncertainty.
Investment thesis

This is a strong operating business sitting in a bad tape. Six straight earnings beats, a 38.9% YoY EPS jump in Q3'26, record advisory fees and a 72% equities surge argue the franchise is performing materially better than a 22% drawdown from the 52-week high implies, and at roughly 12-13x trailing/forward earnings GS is at or below its own 5-year average multiple of 13.02x rather than at a premium. The catch is cyclicality and timing: FICC is shrinking, credit provisions are rising, and the technical trend is still down, so a buyer here is purchasing good fundamentals into unresolved momentum. That is a reasonable long-horizon entry, not a tactical all-clear - which is why the lean is Neutral rather than bullish.

AI theoretical price methodology

Justified forward P/E: I applied a 13.5x multiple - a modest premium to GS's 5-year average P/E of 13.02x, reflecting the structurally improved revenue mix (record advisory, 72% equities growth) and 13.7% ROE - to a next-twelve-month EPS estimate of $75.00, which blends Citizens' post-Q3 FY2026 estimate of $71.60 and FY2027 estimate of $77.00 weighted toward FY2027. That yields $1,012.50, about 13% above the 2026-10-14 price of $897.37 and below the sell-side consensus target of ~$1,118-1,131.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The formula's 56.4 / 'Fair Fundamentals' band undersells the business, and the 'Rich vs. its own history' tag is questionable. Two of the three notes flag genuine data artifacts: a -43% revenue quarter that looks like a reporting-basis change (FMP shows Q1'26 revenue of $17.2B vs $38.4B in Q2'26) and a -98% QoQ equity drop that is almost certainly a broken balance-sheet line (the same period shows total assets of $2.18B vs $2,127B the prior quarter). Those distortions depress the growth and financial-health pillars, while the P/B of 125.65 in the ratio screener is nonsensical for a bank actually trading near ~2.2x book ($264.7B market cap / $122.7B equity). The 'Rich' valuation label rests on a TTM P/E of 16.86 built off a $55.23 TTM EPS that does not reconcile with the four most recent reported quarters (~$69.54); on a clean trailing basis GS is ~12.9x, i.e. below its own 5-year average. Adjusting for those, my independent read would put the underlying score in the mid-60s - roughly one band higher ('Good') - and the valuation context closer to Neutral than Rich. That is roughly a 10-point upward revision, so I agree with the score's direction but not its precise level or its 'Rich' tag. I have not deviated from the mandated band/valuation mapping, which puts a Fair-band name at a Neutral overall lean.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.