#406S&P 500 rank

HCA — HCA Healthcare, Inc.

2-yr score: 42.4/100 (Lower 20%)Healthcare5d
$459.40−1.36%
Description

HCA Healthcare, Inc., operating through its subsidiaries, delivers a comprehensive array of healthcare services throughout the United States. The organization manages a network of general and acute care hospitals that provide a full spectrum of medical and surgical care, encompassing inpatient services, intensive care, cardiac treatment, diagnostic procedures, and emergency services.

Score breakdownLatest quarter32.8 · Weak
Growth
36.8
Quality / Profitability
54.0
Financial health
39.1
Ratio screener
21.7
Track record: 2-yr avg 42.4 (Weak, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 45.2 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 27, 2026 (in 5 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:25 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
15.3
Yield
0.76%
RSI (14)
60.1
vs SMA20
+3.24%
vs SMA50
+7.01%
vs SMA200
+3.29%
Analyst target
$461
+0.4%
10 analysts
AI theoretical price
$448
-2.5%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, HCA traded at $426.94 (market cap ~$92.4B) on a 14.25x trailing P/E with RSI(14) at 59.6 — a stock up 10.3% over three months but still down 19.9% over six months after a July 2026 guidance cut tied to expiring ACA subsidies, and still 5.28% below its 200-day moving average.

AI sentimentNeutral

Sentiment is split between a genuinely damaged forward earnings story and a still-constructive street view. On 2026-07-24 HCA reported Q2 2026 revenue of $20.23B (+8.7% YoY) but cut FY2026 guidance to $6.3-6.7B net income and $28.70-30.50 adjusted EPS, citing a ~$400M Q2 pretax hit and a widened $1.0-1.2B full-year ACA-related uninsured/EBITDA headwind. Analysts recalibrated targets downward (JPMorgan $490 to $425, Goldman Sachs $558 to $485) but kept ratings intact — the breakdown is 29 Buy / 15 Hold / 2 Sell with a $455.19 consensus target, only ~6-7% above the 2026-09-13 price. The tape reflects that ambivalence: -19.89% over six months (the guidance reset), but +10.27% over three months and +5.42% in the single week into 2026-09-13, i.e. the market has stopped panicking without becoming optimistic. Core utilization remains solid (same-facility admissions +2.5%, equivalent admissions +2.7% in Q2 2026), which is why this reads Neutral rather than Bearish.

Quarterly trend

Revenue growth is steady and intact, not accelerating or decelerating: $16.21B (Q3'23) to $17.30B (Q4'23) to $17.34B (Q1'24) to $17.49B (Q2'24) to $17.49B (Q3'24) to $18.29B (Q4'24) to $18.32B (Q1'25) to $18.61B (Q2'25) to $19.16B (Q3'25) to $19.51B (Q4'25) to $19.11B (Q1'26) to $20.23B (Q2'26) — a consistent mid-single-to-high-single-digit YoY cadence, with Q2'26 at +8.7%. The inflection is in margins, not revenue. Operating margin ran 13.78% in Q3'24, 15.56% in Q4'24, 15.58% in Q1'25, 15.95% in Q2'25, 15.47% in Q3'25 and 16.29% in Q4'25 — a real expansion phase — then compressed to 14.98% in Q1'26 (-60bps YoY) and 15.16% in Q2'26 (-79bps YoY). That is the ACA payer-mix shift showing up, and it is a genuine new trend, not a one-quarter blip, because management explicitly widened the full-year headwind to $1.0-1.2B. Earnings per share still grew (Q2'26 diluted EPS $7.62 vs $6.83 in Q2'25, +11.6%) even though net income rose only 2.8% ($1,699M vs $1,653M) — the gap is almost entirely share-count reduction from buybacks, a durable but non-operating source of EPS growth. The one genuine yellow flag: operating cash flow fell to $2,335M in Q2'26 from $4,210M in Q2'25 (-44.5%), though Q2'25 looks elevated versus Q1'25 ($1,651M) and Q3'25 ($4,416M); on a trailing-four-quarter basis OCF is $11.12B versus $11.94B a year earlier (-6.8%), which is a mild deterioration, not a collapse. Trailing FCF is $5.997B (Q3'25 $3,128M + Q4'25 $870M + Q1'26 $895M + Q2'26 $1,104M).

Valuation assessment

Fair, with a slight cash-flow tilt toward cheap but no real earnings cushion. As of 2026-09-13 the stock traded at 14.25x trailing EPS versus a 5-year average trailing P/E of 13.63x — a small premium to its own history, not the discount the headline number implies — and at roughly 14.4-14.5x forward earnings ($29.60 FY2026 guidance midpoint; $29.47 next-FY consensus). P/S of 1.185 is modestly below the 5-year average of 1.25. PEG of 0.582 looks cheap, but treat it skeptically: it is being flattered by buyback-driven EPS growth rather than organic operating leverage. On cash, EV/EBITDA of 9.02x is right in the middle of the 8-10x hospital-operator band, and trailing FCF of ~$6.0B on a $92.4B market cap is a ~6.0% free-cash-flow yield — genuinely attractive in absolute terms. P/B (-14.47x) and debt/equity (-7.42x) are mathematically meaningless here because stockholders' equity is negative (-$6.58B at 2026-06-30), the product of years of buybacks rather than distress. Net verdict: you are paying a history-average multiple for a business whose earnings are currently being shaved by policy, with a solid cash-flow yield as the offset.

Price vs. earnings playbook

At $426.94 on 2026-09-13, the market is capitalizing roughly the midpoint of the cut FY2026 guidance at ~14.4x — that is neither a recession multiple nor a growth multiple, it is a 'show me' multiple. The setup is binary around one question: is the $1.0-1.2B ACA headwind the full extent of the damage, or the first installment? If Q3 2026 (late October) confirms the uninsured impact has stabilized, EPS estimates stop falling, the buyback keeps compounding a shrinking share count, and a 15x multiple on $30+ of EPS puts $450 back in play — which is where the 200-day moving average and the analyst consensus cluster both sit. If guidance is cut a second time, the market will question the 2027-2028 Medicaid supplemental payment outlook as well and the reference point becomes the $353.99 52-week low. Note that price has already partially priced in the recovery: the stock is +10.27% over three months while estimates were falling, meaning the multiple did the work, not the earnings. That is the risk in owning it here — you are paying up for a stabilization that has not yet been reported.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) was 59.59 — firm momentum, nowhere near overbought. Price was 2.85% above the 20-day SMA (~$415) and 5.42% above the 50-day SMA (~$405), but 5.28% BELOW the 200-day SMA (~$451). That combination — above the short/intermediate averages, below the long one — is a classic repair pattern inside a still-unresolved downtrend, not a confirmed uptrend. The 52-week range is $353.99-$556.52, so the price sits ~21% off the low and ~23% off the high. Timing implication: the +5.42% one-week move into 2026-09-13 is momentum chasing a beaten-down name, and the ~$450 200-day line is the natural resistance/decision point — coincidentally the same zone as the consensus price target. A decisive close above ~$450 would flip the trend structure bullish; failure there keeps this range-bound between roughly $400 and $450 until the October print. Buying today means buying the middle of that range.

Macro factors
  • ACA exchange subsidy expiration: the enhanced federal subsidies lapsed, driving an uninsured/self-pay mix shift that management sized at a ~$400M Q2 2026 pretax hit and a $1.0-1.2B full-year EBITDA headwind — this is the single dominant swing factor on HCA's 2026-2027 margins.
  • Medicaid and state supplemental payment reform: state-directed payment and supplemental funding programs face structural change heading into 2027-2028; this is a multi-year reimbursement risk that the trailing financials cannot yet show.
  • Interest burden and leverage: $38.87B of long-term debt against $60.53B of total assets and only $1.01B of cash and equivalents, with total liabilities ($63.67B) exceeding total assets ($60.53B). Much of the debt is fixed-rate, but refinancing costs and a current ratio of 0.781 leave a thin liquidity cushion.
  • Labor cost inflation: nursing and allied-health wage pressure remains the persistent margin swing factor for all acute-care operators, and it is why the 2024-2025 margin expansion (13.78% to 16.29% operating margin across Q3'24-Q4'25) is not guaranteed to resume once ACA pressure eases.
  • Defensive sector positioning versus policy risk: hospital operators screen as relatively defensive with solid underlying utilization (Q2 2026 same-facility admissions +2.5%), but the sector is being re-rated on policy uncertainty rather than demand, which caps multiple expansion regardless of volume trends.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings, expected late October 2026 — the decisive test of whether the ACA-related uninsured impact has stabilized at $1.0-1.2B or requires a further guidance cut; also the first read on whether the Q2 2026 operating cash flow step-down ($2.34B vs $4.21B in Q2 2025) was a collections timing issue or a real deterioration.
  • Fall 2026 investor and health care conference presentations (September 2026 onward) — management updates on ambulatory/outpatient expansion following the August 2026 creation of the Ambulatory Operations Group under Charles Gressle, and on cost-control programs.
  • Any federal legislative action to extend or restore ACA exchange subsidies, which would reverse the payer-mix headwind directly and likely trigger an EPS estimate revision cycle upward.
  • Continued share repurchase execution — the EPS math is heavily buyback-driven (Q2 2026 net income +2.8% but EPS +11.6%), so sustained repurchase capacity is itself an earnings catalyst, contingent on the cash flow trend holding.
  • Regulatory clarity on 2027-2028 Medicaid supplemental/state-directed payments — resolution either way removes a large overhang on the multiple.
Key risks
  • Payer mix deterioration runs worse than the current $1.0-1.2B estimate, forcing a second FY2026 guidance cut and pulling 2027 consensus EPS down with it; the stock has no valuation cushion to absorb this, trading at 14.25x versus a 13.63x 5-year average.
  • Medicaid supplemental payment and state-directed payment reform in 2027-2028, which is a structural reimbursement risk the trailing financials cannot quantify and the deterministic score cannot see.
  • Balance-sheet fragility masked by the buyback story: stockholders' equity of -$6.58B (2026-06-30), $38.87B of long-term debt, current ratio of 0.781, and only $1.01B of cash. Negative equity is a capital-allocation choice, not distress, but it does mean there is no book-value floor under the shares and no equity buffer if cash generation turns.
  • Cash flow quality: Q2 2026 operating cash flow of $2,335M versus $4,210M in Q2 2025 (-44.5%), with trailing-four-quarter OCF down 6.8% YoY. If this reflects slower collections from a higher self-pay/uninsured mix rather than timing, buyback capacity and the FCF yield both shrink.
  • Margin trajectory has already turned: operating margin compressed ~79bps YoY in Q2 2026 (15.16% vs 15.95%). If the 2024-2025 expansion phase does not resume, EPS growth becomes almost entirely a share-count story, which is a materially lower-quality earnings stream than the market is paying for.
Investment thesis

HCA is a genuinely good operator — 18.5% ROIC, ~$6.0B trailing free cash flow (about a 6% yield at the 2026-09-13 price of $426.94), and a buyback program shrinking the share count fast enough to produce 11.6% EPS growth in a quarter where net income grew 2.8%. But good business is not the same as good entry point. The earnings stream is being reset by an ACA subsidy lapse whose full extent is still unproven, margins have already compressed year-over-year for two straight quarters, the balance sheet carries negative equity and $38.9B of debt, and the stock trades at 14.25x trailing earnings versus a 13.63x five-year average — you are paying a full price for a story that is one bad print away from being repriced. I would not buy here; I would wait for the late-October Q3 2026 report to confirm whether the uninsured headwind has stabilized, and would want either that confirmation or a pullback toward the low-$400s before treating this as a value opportunity rather than a value trap in progress.

AI theoretical price methodology

Applied a 14.7x forward P/E — a modest premium to the 5-year average trailing P/E of 13.63x, justified by 18.5% ROIC, a ~6% trailing FCF yield, and ~3%/yr share-count reduction from buybacks, but capped by ACA and Medicaid reimbursement uncertainty — to FY2027E EPS of ~$30.50 (built from the $29.47 next-FY consensus plus buyback accretion as the ACA headwind partially annualizes), giving $448. Cross-checked two ways: 9.2x EV/EBITDA on ~$15.3B of forward EBITDA less ~$43B net debt yields ~$457/share, and $6.0B of trailing FCF at a 6.2% yield on 216.5M shares implies ~$448/share — so $448 is the center of a reasonably tight $445-460 cluster rather than a single-method artifact.

AI lean: BearishConfidence: Low
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The mechanical 32.8 / 'Weak Fundamentals' band overstates the problem, and I would move it to roughly 44-46 ('Fair Fundamentals') — a one-tier adjustment, hence Partially Agree rather than Disagree. The drag is structural, not operational: the ratio screener score of 21.7 carries 50% of the overall weight and is built on metrics that break for HCA — D/E and P/B are nulled out by negative stockholders' equity (-$6.58B), which is the residue of deliberate buybacks rather than financial distress, and current ratio 0.781 and quick ratio 0.694 penalize a business that runs on predictable insurer receivables. Meanwhile quality/profitability at 54.0 is actually respectable: ROIC 18.5%, operating margin 15.5%, and an accruals ratio of -1.05% (cash flow running ahead of reported net income, the conservative pattern). Growth at 36.8 is understated relative to reported revenue growth of +8.7% YoY in Q2 2026 because the operating-cash-flow leg is measured against an unusually strong $4.21B Q2 2025 base. Where the formula is right to be cautious: it is entirely backward-looking and cannot distinguish a transient policy shock (ACA subsidy lapse, $1.0-1.2B of EBITDA headwind that could reverse with legislation) from permanent impairment — but equally, it cannot see the genuine forward risk that 2027-2028 Medicaid supplemental payment reform turns this into a multi-year margin problem. Netting those two unseen factors, I land modestly above the formula rather than far below it. Note the mechanical consequence of my disagreement: the mandated table maps the given band (Weak) plus 'Neutral vs. its own history' to Bearish, whereas my normalized band of Fair would map to Neutral. I have followed the table as instructed and recorded that gap here rather than deviating on a judgment call.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.