#379S&P 500 rank

HII — Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

2-yr score: 43.8/100 (Lower 20%)Industrials7d
$273.95+0.63%
Description

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) stands as a prominent American enterprise specializing in the comprehensive lifecycle management of military vessels, encompassing their design, construction, modernization, and maintenance. The company's diverse operations are segmented into three core divisions: Ingalls Shipbuilding, Newport News Shipbuilding, and Technical Solutions.

Score breakdownLatest quarter40.5 · Weak
Growth
34.1
Quality / Profitability
39.3
Financial health
53.0
Ratio screener
42.1
Track record: 2-yr avg 43.8 (Weak, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 45.6 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 29, 2026 (in 7 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:25 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
16.3
Yield
1.88%
RSI (14)
52.9
vs SMA20
+3.01%
vs SMA50
-2.88%
vs SMA200
-19.21%
Analyst target
$354
+29.0%
4 analysts
AI theoretical price
$299
+9.1%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, HII trades at $279.69, down 32.7% over six months and only ~6% above its 52-week low of $263.62, even though Q2 2026 delivered a large EPS beat and management raised full-year guidance. Trailing P/E is 16.6x, forward P/E is ~15.0x on the $18.66 consensus EPS, and the stock sits 19.5% below its 200-day average.

AI sentimentBearish

Price action, not fundamentals, is driving sentiment as of 2026-09-13. HII is -32.7% over six months, -14.4% over the past month and -2.2% over the past week, meaning the decline actually re-accelerated after the late-July Q2 print. The shares are 5.6% below the 20-day and 6.0% below the 50-day SMA, and 19.5% below the 200-day, versus a 52-week range of $263.62-$460 (the March 2026 peak is now 39% above the current price). The counter-evidence is real but has not yet been rewarded: Q2 2026 revenue rose 10.9% YoY to $3.4B, diluted EPS hit $5.27 versus roughly $3.82 consensus, segment operating income expanded 30.2%, and management lifted shipbuilding revenue guidance by $500M and raised the operating-margin floor to 6.0-6.5%. Wall Street's response has been lukewarm - the FMP rating mix is 11 buy / 15 hold / 1 sell with a 'Hold' consensus label and only three analysts publishing targets (consensus $333). The market is debating whether HII's throughput initiatives convert into cash, not whether the backlog exists.

Quarterly trend

The top line clearly inflected. Revenue went from -2.4% YoY in Q3 2024 and -5.4% YoY in Q4 2024 to +3.5% in Q2 2025, +16.1% in Q3 2025, +15.7% in Q4 2025, +13.4% in Q1 2026 and +10.9% in Q2 2026 - a genuine trend change, not a one-quarter blip, though growth is now decelerating off the Q3 2025 peak. Operating margin tells a trough-and-recovery story: it collapsed to 2.98% in Q3 2024 and 3.66% in Q4 2024 (versus 9.82% in Q4 2023) on fixed-price contract charges, then recovered through 5.89% (Q1 2025), ~5.0% (Q2/Q3 2025), 4.52% (Q4 2025), 5.00% (Q1 2026) to 6.14% in Q2 2026 - the best level since Q4 2023. EPS tracks that: $2.56 in Q3 2024 to $5.27 in Q2 2026, up 36.5% YoY and the highest quarterly figure since Q4 2023's $6.90. The offset is gross margin, which has structurally compressed from ~15.5% in Q4 2023 to 13.2% in Q2 2026 as revenue mix shifted and volume rose. The genuinely weak leg is cash: free cash flow was -$464M in Q1 2026 and -$105M in Q2 2026 (-$569M for H1) versus +$265M in H1 2025, and Q2 2026's -$105M compares badly to Q2 2025's +$727M. Cash fell to $12M at 2026-06-30 from $774M at 2025-12-31. Verdict: an earnings and margin inflection in progress, financed for now off the balance sheet, with cash conversion as the unresolved swing factor.

Valuation assessment

Fair, leaning slightly cheap - not a screaming value. As of 2026-09-13 the trailing P/E of 16.65x sits essentially on top of the 5-year average of 16.13x, and P/S of 0.836 is a hair below the 5-year average of 0.86 - which is precisely why the deterministic overlay labels valuation 'Neutral vs. its own history.' On forward numbers the picture is better: $279.69 against consensus EPS of $18.66 is ~15.0x, versus 24.7x on the same estimate at the March 2026 peak of $460. The PEG of 0.647 looks cheap, but treat it with suspicion - the 'growth' is partly cyclical recovery off a 2024 margin trough, not a durable 15%+ compounding rate. The bear case on multiple: 5.0% net margin, 9.0% ROIC versus a cost of capital probably in the 8-9% range, negative H1 free cash flow, and $2.7B of long-term debt against $12M of cash all argue HII deserves a discount to LMT/NOC/GD. The bull case: a multi-year Navy backlog, raised guidance, and a 1.876% dividend yield. Net, roughly 15-16x forward earnings is the right neighbourhood for this business.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The key fact is that estimates went up while the price went down. Q2 2026 EPS of $5.27 beat the ~$3.82 consensus by ~38%, and management raised FY shipbuilding revenue guidance by $500M and lifted the operating-margin floor to 6.0-6.5%. Yet the stock is -14.4% over the past month. Re-rating from ~25x to ~15x forward explains the entire $460-to-$280 move - so the market is not pricing in an earnings miss, it is pricing in execution and cash-conversion doubt (H1 2026 FCF of -$569M, cash down to $12M). That is the swing variable: HII's cash flow is heavily seasonal, with Q1 the burn quarter (-$462M in Q1 2025, -$277M in Q1 2024) and Q4 the inflow quarter (+$516M in Q4 2025, +$277M in Q4 2024), so H2 2026 will decide whether the negative H1 was timing or a problem. If H2 converts and guidance holds at the Q3 print in late October/early November 2026, a 15x forward multiple on rising estimates has room to normalise toward 16-17x. If H2 cash flow disappoints again, the stock is a value trap and 15x on earnings that aren't converting to cash is not cheap at all.

Technical picture

Unambiguously a downtrend, and not yet oversold enough to call a bottom. As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 34.16 - weak, but above the 30 oversold threshold - with price -5.63% versus the 20-day SMA, -6.00% versus the 50-day and -19.50% versus the 200-day. The 52-week range is $263.62-$460 and the $279.69 price is only ~6% above the low, so support is close and thin. Returns confirm persistent selling pressure: -2.18% over one week, -14.42% over one month, -6.04% over three months and -32.72% over six months - the one-month figure being worse than the three-month figure shows the decline re-accelerated recently rather than basing. There is no technical reversal signal here: no RSI divergence, no reclaim of the 20-day, no higher low. Entry-timing implication: this is a falling knife; a patient buyer would want either an RSI print below 30 with a reversal candle, or a clean reclaim of the 50-day (~$298 area) before treating the level as a floor. Note the reported beta of 0.225 is almost certainly a stale artefact given the stock lost a third of its value in six months.

Macro factors
  • Defense budget and geopolitics: heightened U.S.-Iran tensions and oil above $100/barrel reinforce structural demand for naval power and fleet expansion, which underpins HII's multi-year carrier and submarine backlog - a genuine tailwind that operates on a multi-year, not quarterly, timescale.
  • Interest rates: elevated rates raise the discount applied to long-duration defense cash flows and increase the cost of the ~$2.7B of long-term debt HII carries, a modest structural headwind for a capital-intensive prime.
  • Sector rotation and risk-off: broad industrial/defense equity rotation away from cyclicals has compressed HII's multiple even as earnings estimates rose, decoupling price from fundamentals.
  • Supply chain and labor: persistent inflation, skilled-trades shortages, collective bargaining agreements extended through 2031 at Ingalls, and HII's plan to outsource over 2 million work hours to relieve single-yard bottlenecks - all of which carry execution and cost risk.
  • Shipyard capacity and industrial-base constraints: the U.S. Navy's own ability to fund, schedule and absorb new hulls (CVN-82 keel laying now targeted for 2027) sets a ceiling on how quickly HII can convert backlog into revenue and cash.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings, tentatively late October/early November 2026 - the single most important near-term event, testing whether the raised 6.0-6.5% operating-margin guidance and $500M revenue raise are maintained, and whether H2 free cash flow reverses the -$569M H1 burn.
  • Carrier and submarine program milestones - further CVN-82 (USS William J. Clinton) awards after the $336.1M September 2026 long-lead contract, Block VI Virginia-class and Block II Columbia-class execution, each a potential de-risking or de-risking-busting data point.
  • Proof points on the throughput plan - HII has targeted ~15% shipyard throughput improvement in 2026 via outsourcing and AI-enabled production; evidence it is landing would directly address the margin and cash-conversion bear case.
  • FY2027 defense appropriations and any supplemental naval funding, which would extend backlog visibility beyond the current program set.
  • Dividend and capital-return sustainability - with $12M of cash at 2026-06-30 against a ~$207M annual dividend (1.876% yield), any change in capital-return policy would be a meaningful signal.
Key risks
  • Cash conversion is the dominant risk: H1 2026 free cash flow of -$569M versus +$265M in H1 2025, Q2 2026 FCF of -$105M versus +$727M a year earlier, and cash collapsing to $12M from $774M in six months. A repeat in H2 would call the earnings quality and the dividend into question.
  • Structurally thin margins: 5.0% net margin, 5.2% operating margin and 12.6% gross margin TTM leave almost no cushion, so a single fixed-price contract charge can swing quarterly EPS by 30%+ as it did in Q3-Q4 2024.
  • Gross margin compression from ~15.5% in Q4 2023 to 13.2% in Q2 2026 - revenue is growing on lower-margin mix, so top-line strength does not translate proportionally into profit.
  • Balance sheet leanness: $2.7B long-term debt against $12M cash, current ratio of 1.23, and a 1.88% positive accruals ratio (net income running ahead of operating cash flow) - a caution flag on reported earnings quality.
  • ROIC of 9.0% versus ROE of 11.9% suggests returns are only marginally above the cost of capital, limiting the case for a premium multiple.
  • Execution risk on the throughput/outsourcing plan and persistent labor and supplier constraints at single-yard sites such as Newport News, which could delay revenue recognition or add cost.
  • Technical and sentiment risk: the stock is in a confirmed downtrend with no reversal signal, and a break below the $263.62 52-week low could invite further momentum-driven selling.
Investment thesis

HII is a genuinely improving business with a badly damaged stock price, and the honest read is that the improvement has not yet been proven where it matters - cash. Revenue growth re-accelerated to double digits, Q2 2026 EPS of $5.27 beat by ~38%, guidance was raised, and the multi-year Navy backlog is as visible as it gets. But H1 2026 free cash flow of -$569M, cash down to $12M from $774M, a 5.0% net margin and 9.0% ROIC mean you are paying 15x forward earnings for a business that is not currently converting profit into cash, while the stock sits in a confirmed downtrend with no technical floor. This is a wait-for-proof situation, not a buy-the-dip - I would want to see H2 2026 cash conversion and the Q3 guidance reaffirmation before committing, which puts me closer to bearish than bullish at $279.69. If H2 converts cleanly, the 15x forward multiple has real room to normalise and the March 2026 de-rating will look overdone; if it does not, this is a value trap.

AI theoretical price methodology

I applied a 16.0x forward P/E - essentially in line with HII's own 5-year average TTM P/E of 16.13x, and a modest discount to large-cap defense primes - to the consensus forward EPS of $18.66, giving $298.56, rounded to $299. The multiple is deliberately held at (not above) the historical average because HII's 5.0% net margin, 9.0% ROIC and negative H1 2026 free cash flow argue against a premium, while the raised 6.0-6.5% margin guidance and visible backlog argue against a discount; a cross-check on 12x forward EV/EBITDA (~$1.23B EBITDA on $13.4B guided revenue against a $13.7B enterprise value) lands at roughly $306, confirming the $299 figure is not an outlier. This sits below the FMP analyst consensus target of $333, reflecting my view that the market will not re-rate the multiple until cash conversion is demonstrated.

AI lean: BearishConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

My independent read is that the deterministic score of 40.5 ('Weak Fundamentals') is directionally right but mechanically too harsh, and I would move it up roughly 12 points to ~52 - still within a weak/borderline-fair band, so the band survives the adjustment. The reason is structural: the score is entirely backward-looking and its two heaviest legs are the accruals ratio (65% of the quality pillar) and OCF YoY (30% of the growth pillar), both of which are distorted by HII's extreme cash-flow seasonality - Q1 is the burn quarter (-$462M in 2025, -$277M in 2024) and Q4 is the inflow quarter (+$516M in 2025, +$277M in 2024), so a mid-year snapshot catches the company at its seasonal worst. The formula also cannot see the Q2 2026 inflection: EPS of $5.27 versus ~$3.82 consensus, revenue +10.9% YoY, operating margin recovering to 6.14% from the 2.98% Q3 2024 trough, and raised full-year guidance with the margin floor lifted to 6.0-6.5%. That is the classic trough pattern the score is blind to. Counterbalancing that, I think the score's skepticism is partly earned and I would not push it higher than ~52: H1 2026 FCF of -$569M versus +$265M a year earlier is deterioration, not just seasonality, $12M of cash against $2.7B of debt is genuinely thin, ROIC of 9.0% is barely above cost of capital, and a +1.88% accruals ratio does mean reported profit is running ahead of operating cash - exactly the condition the Sloan anomaly is designed to flag. On the deviation test: the September 2026 CVN-82 long-lead award ($336.1M) is ordinary-course program funding for a shipbuilder and the Q2 beat is already inside the trailing data, so neither qualifies as a dated, material event that would justify moving off the mapping table.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.