← Back to Rankings

HONAHoneywell Aerospace Inc

Fundamentals Score: 50.2/100 (Fair Fundamentals) · Industrials

Description

Honeywell Aerospace, Inc. engages in the provision of aerospace and defense critical systems and technologies. It operates through the following segments: Electronic Solutions, Engines & Power Systems, and Control Systems.

Score Breakdown

Growth
43.3/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
53.0/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
63.1/100
weight: 15%
* Operating cash flow YoY comparison unavailable - excluded from growth score
* Debt/equity excluded: negative stockholders' equity makes the ratio mathematically distorted
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Favorable (oversold / below trend)

Live Market DataPrice updated: 3h ago

P/E (TTM)
65.4
Yield
N/A
RSI (14)
36.2
vs SMA20
-4.74%
vs SMA50
-19.68%
vs SMA200
N/A
Analyst Target
$235
+51.9%
17 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$170
+9.8%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, Honeywell Aerospace trades at $160.75 after a roughly 23% post-earnings drop, with RSI at 37.5 and the stock near the low end of its 52-week range. The market is skeptical of near-term supply-chain execution despite a robust $18.2B backlog.

AI Sentiment:Bearish

The maiden standalone earnings report in early August 2026 triggered a sharp selloff: FY26 organic sales growth guidance was cut from 7%-9% to 4%-5%, adjusted EBIT was guided flat, and Q2 2026 net income fell roughly 70% YoY due to $329M in transaction costs, $200M in standalone interest, and supply-chain constraints. Sell-side firms have been recalibrating targets — Jefferies went to $175 — so sentiment remains defensive and HONA is firmly in a 'show-me' phase.

Quarterly Trend

Revenue is still growing but decelerating: Q2 2026 grew 5.4% YoY versus Q1 2026's 6.8%. The bigger issue is margin compression: operating margin fell from 23.6% in Q2 2025 to 12.8% in Q2 2026, while gross margin slipped from 36.5% to 35.0%. This is not a one-quarter blip — both 2026 quarters show the squeeze, and management's guidance cut confirms continuation. Demand itself is strong with backlog up 9% YoY to $18.2B, so this looks more like a supply-constrained trough than a structural demand collapse.

Valuation Assessment

As of 2026-08-27, the reported TTM P/E of 67.8x and P/S of 5.74x are misleading because they only reflect the first two post-spin quarters and are depressed by transaction costs and spin-related interest. They look rich versus the 3-year average P/E of 26.7x, but that average comes from a different pre-spin capital structure. On consensus FY27 EPS of $8.10, the forward P/E is roughly 19.8x, which is reasonable if execution recovers. The trailing PEG of 4.16 is not meaningful given the one-off charges distorting current EPS.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

At $160.75, the stock is no longer pricing in aggressive growth; it is discounting guidance failure and supply-chain stigma. However, consensus EPS of $8.10 still embeds a meaningful earnings recovery by FY27. If management proves throughput in Q3/Q4, the stock can re-rate toward the $175-$200 area. If supply-chain drag persists, estimates will come down and the ~20x forward multiple offers limited downside cushion.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI was 37.5 — weak but not deeply oversold. Price was 7.15% below its 20-day SMA and 20.84% below its 50-day SMA, reflecting a clear short- and medium-term downtrend following the post-earnings gap. Support sits near the 52-week low of $150.03. A short-term bounce is possible, but the trend remains down until HONA can reclaim its 20-day moving average.

Macro Factors
  • Persistent aerospace tier-2/tier-3 supplier bottlenecks and skilled-labor shortages are capping output despite record end-demand.
  • Higher-for-longer interest rates amplify the burden of HONA's new standalone debt, including roughly $200M in annual interest expense.
  • Elevated global defense spending and strong commercial aftermarket demand support the $18.2B backlog.
  • Post-spinoff dynamics — index inclusion, shareholder turnover, and limited trading history — are adding volatility and valuation uncertainty.
Key Catalysts
  • September 2026 investor conferences (Jefferies, Vertical Research, Morgan Stanley) where management defends guidance and supply-chain strategy.
  • Q3/Q4 2026 operational execution — early evidence that capital deployed into the supply base accelerates deliveries and restores margins.
  • Continued conversion of the $18.2B commercial aerospace backlog (+9% YoY).
  • Any FY27 guidance reset that reflects supply-chain improvement and aftermarket momentum.
Key Risks
  • Supply-chain constraints persist longer than expected, forcing another guidance cut and further margin compression.
  • High leverage and negative stockholders' equity of -$5.7B leave limited balance-sheet flexibility.
  • Post-spin overhang: passive rebalancing, legacy shareholder selling, or thin trading data could keep volatility elevated.
  • OEM production disruptions or defense program delays could slow backlog conversion and revenue growth.
Investment Thesis

Honeywell Aerospace is a high-quality aerospace franchise with strong demand, a growing backlog, and long-term aftermarket tailwinds, but near-term financials are genuinely impaired by supply-chain limits, spin-off costs, and a heavier standalone balance sheet. As of 2026-08-27, risk/reward is balanced: the stock is no longer priced for perfection, but it needs execution proof before it becomes a compelling buy.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Calculated by applying a 21x forward P/E to consensus FY27 EPS of $8.10 — a discount to the old 26.7x average to reflect the weaker standalone balance sheet and current margin compression, but a premium to today's ~19.8x forward multiple to reflect the strong backlog and aftermarket growth. Cross-check: $170.10 implies roughly 2.9x forward revenue, a reasonable multiple for a mid-single-digit-growth aerospace supplier with 36% gross margins.

AI Lean: NeutralConfidence: Low

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Partially Agree

The 50.2 'Fair' score is a defensible backward-looking read, but it underweights important context: Q2 net income was hit by $329M in spin-related transaction costs and a new $200M annual interest burden, while negative equity is largely a spinoff artifact. The formula also cannot credit the $18.2B backlog (+9% YoY) or the fact that demand is strong and margins are being compressed by temporary supply constraints rather than fading competitive position. I would nudge the fair score into the low-to-mid 60s — roughly one tier higher — because the trailing data are depressed by unusual non-operating factors, but I would not fully override the score given the genuine margin deterioration and execution risk.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.