← Back to Rankings

HRLHormel Foods Corporation

Fundamentals Score: 54.1/100 (Fair Fundamentals) · Consumer Defensive

Description

Hormel Foods Corporation is a prominent global food company that specializes in the creation, preparation, and supply of a diverse array of meat, nut, and other culinary items. Its extensive clientele spans retail outlets, institutional food providers (foodservice), specialty delis, and various commercial enterprises across the United States and internationally.

Score Breakdown

Growth
51.4/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
41.3/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
96.6/100
weight: 15%
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Favorable (oversold / below trend)

Live Market DataPrice updated: 10h ago

P/E (TTM)
34.2
Yield
4.77%
RSI (14)
28.9
vs SMA20
-7.68%
vs SMA50
-11.86%
vs SMA200
-8.09%
Analyst Target
$25
+13.7%
2 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$23
+7.9%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, HRL trades at $21.275 after a 10.3% one-day selloff on mixed Q3 FY26 results — revenue missed, adjusted EPS beat. The stock sits near the bottom of its 52-week range with an oversold RSI of 21.5, a 4.8% dividend yield, and a forward P/E in the mid-teens.

AI Sentiment:Bearish

The market's immediate reaction to Q3 was clearly negative: the stock fell from $23.71 to $21.275, and the technical picture is deeply oversold. The revenue miss, guided-down organic sales expectations, continued consumer weakness, and a non-cash impairment in International weighed more than the adjusted EPS beat and margin expansion. Wall Street is mostly at Hold, with a split of 6 buy / 17 hold / 7 sell, and the consensus target around $24.33–$26.00 is now only modestly above the current price.

Quarterly Trend

Revenue has been roughly flat-to-stagnant for three years: TTM sales are about $12.15B versus $12.06B a year earlier. YoY revenue growth over the last four quarters was +1.5%, +1.3%, +2.5%, and -2.4%, with the latest quarter hurt by portfolio-shaping exits and lower commodity prices. GAAP earnings are noisy — Q4 FY25 had a -$56M net loss and Q3 FY26 GAAP net income was only $60M due to impairments and one-time items — but the underlying adjusted picture improved: Q3 adjusted EPS of $0.37 beat consensus, adjusted operating margin expanded 60bps to 9.0%, and FY26 adjusted EPS guidance was raised to $1.45–$1.51. This is an inflection on margins, not on top-line growth.

Valuation Assessment

On trailing GAAP earnings, HRL looks expensive at 33.8x, but that is because TTM GAAP EPS of $0.62 is depressed by one-time charges and impairment losses. On forward adjusted earnings, it is much cheaper: using FY26 guidance midpoint of $1.48, the forward P/E is about 14.4x, and using next-FY consensus EPS of $1.50 it is about 14.2x. That is well below HRL's 5-year average P/E of 24.25x. Price-to-sales of 0.96x also sits well under the 5-year average of 1.6x, and price-to-book is 1.09x. Net assessment: fair to moderately cheap on normalized/forward earnings, but not a bargain if revenue keeps shrinking.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

As of 2026-08-27, the market is pricing in continued top-line deterioration and largely ignoring the raised EPS guidance and margin recovery. At $21.275, the stock implies roughly 14.4x forward adjusted EPS — a defensive-staples multiple that already bakes in low growth. The play here is not momentum; it's mean-reversion on margins plus the 4.8% dividend yield. If adjusted EPS lands at $1.48–$1.51 and revenue merely stabilizes, the stock should trade above $21. If sales keep sliding or management cuts guidance, the cheap multiple is justified and the stock could test the $19.70 low.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI(14) was 21.5, firmly in oversold territory. The stock was 12.6% below its 20-day SMA, 14.2% below its 50-day SMA, and 9.3% below its 200-day SMA — every trend measure is down. The 10.3% one-day drop to $21.275 puts HRL just above the 52-week low of $19.70. This is a falling knife from a trend standpoint; buying early could work for long-term income, but the prudent entry is to wait for a close back above the 20-day or at least a successful test of the $19.70–$20.00 zone.

Macro Factors
  • Persistent consumer inflation and value-seeking behavior continue to pressure retail volumes; management does not expect a near-term improvement in consumer spending.
  • Favorable pork input costs are a tailwind to margins, while logistics, fuel, and heat-related turkey feed conversion costs remain elevated.
  • Portfolio-shaping divestitures, including Ceratti in Brazil and low-margin turkey/private-label snack-nut lines, are reducing reported revenue but should improve mix and margins over time.
  • International operations face drags from an Indonesia minority-investment impairment and legal-entity transition issues that disrupted SPAM export recognition.
  • A high dividend yield near 4.8% makes the stock more reliant on dividend safety and interest-rate conditions for valuation support.
Key Catalysts
  • Q4 FY26 results and initial FY27 guidance in late November/early December 2026, which will be the first official look under incoming CEO John Ghingo.
  • Continued adjusted operating margin expansion and supply-chain optimization; management raised FY26 adjusted EPS guidance to $1.45–$1.51.
  • Foodservice growth — 12th consecutive quarter of organic growth — could accelerate and offset retail weakness.
  • Completion of announced divestitures removes low-margin revenue and sets up easier year-over-year comparisons in FY27.
Key Risks
  • Top-line stagnation becomes structural: retail volumes stay weak, private-label competition intensifies, and portfolio exits leave a smaller revenue base.
  • Consumer pressure forces promotional spending that gives back the adjusted margin gains.
  • Further one-time charges or impairments, especially in International, keep hitting GAAP results and shake confidence.
  • CEO transition adds execution risk just as the company tries to finish its portfolio reshaping and re-accelerate growth.
  • A 4.8% dividend yield is attractive only if earnings and free cash flow support it; any dividend caution would likely hit the stock hard.
Investment Thesis

Hormel is not a broken company — adjusted margins are improving, FY26 guidance was raised, the balance sheet is solid, and free cash flow is healthy. But it is also not a growth story: revenue is shrinking in the latest quarter and the consumer environment is weak. At $21.275, the stock offers a reasonable yield and a cheap forward multiple for patient income investors, but there is no compelling reason to chase it until top-line stabilization or a technical base appears. This reads as a hold/accumulate zone rather than a high-conviction buy.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

I applied a 15.5x forward P/E multiple to next-FY consensus EPS of about $1.50, a deliberate discount to HRL's 5-year average P/E of 24.25x to reflect the flat-to-declining revenue outlook, partly offset by margin recovery, strong free cash flow, and the 4.8% dividend yield. That yields $23.25, modestly above the current price but below the analyst consensus target.

AI Lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Partially Agree

My independent read is modestly more constructive than the deterministic score of 54.1 / Fair Fundamentals. The formula's quality/profitability leg is penalized by GAAP operating income that includes non-cash impairments and one-off charges — Q3 FY26 GAAP operating income was only $111M while adjusted operating margin hit 9.0%, and Q4 FY25 had a GAAP operating loss. Adjusted margins are expanding, free cash flow is strong, and financial health is clearly excellent, so I would lift the score into the low 60s. But the top-line picture is genuinely weak: organic sales dipped 2%, and the latest quarter missed revenue consensus. That keeps HRL in Fair-to-Good territory rather than a compelling buy, so I agree with the rough band but not the exact number.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.