#177S&P 500 rank

HUBB — Hubbell Incorporated

2-yr score: 54.4/100 (Middle 40%)Industrials5d
$460.76+0.31%
Description

Hubbell, Inc. engages in the designing, manufacturing, and sale of electrical and electronic products for non-residential and residential construction, industrial, and utility applications. It operates through the Electrical Solutions and Utility Solutions segments.

Score breakdownLatest quarter47.5 · Fair
Growth
50.1
Quality / Profitability
48.2
Financial health
58.6
Ratio screener
44.5
Track record: 2-yr avg 54.4 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 53.7 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 27, 2026 (in 5 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:25 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
27.2
Yield
1.25%
RSI (14)
45.2
vs SMA20
-1.76%
vs SMA50
-1.29%
vs SMA200
-5.83%
Analyst target
$575
+24.8%
7 analysts
AI theoretical price
$494
+7.2%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, Hubbell trades at $460.40 — roughly 19% below its 52-week high of $565.50 and 14% above its low of $403.82 — after a 10.2% one-month slide that leaves RSI(14) at 44.5 and the stock below its 20-, 50- and 200-day moving averages. The Q2 2026 print (July 29) beat on adjusted EPS and full-year guidance was raised, but the market is still digesting a debt-funded acquisition and 230bp of GAAP operating-margin compression.

AI sentimentNeutral

The tape and the sell side disagree. Fundamentals news is good — Q2 2026 net sales of $1.71B rose 15.3% YoY and adjusted EPS of $5.52 beat the ~$5.40 consensus, prompting management to raise full-year 2026 sales growth guidance to 16–18% with adjusted EPS of $20.25–$20.55. Yet the stock closed down ~2.9% on that print and, as of 2026-09-13, is down 10.24% over the past month and 3.46% over three months. The overhang is the one-two punch of the completed NSI Industries acquisition (June 2026) and the $1.9B senior notes offering that funded it — long-term debt ballooned from $1.04B (Q2 2025) to $4.80B (Q2 2026) in one year. The analyst picture is genuinely mixed rather than bullish: the FMP consensus rating is 'Hold' (7 buy, 9 hold, 1 sell) even though the $548.60 consensus price target implies ~19% upside. Investors like the grid/data-center story but are not paying up while the balance sheet and reported margins are in flux.

Quarterly trend

Top-line direction has clearly inflected upward. YoY revenue growth went -2.4% (Q1 2025), +2.2% (Q2 2025), +4.1% (Q3 2025), +11.9% (Q4 2025), +11.1% (Q1 2026) and +15.3% (Q2 2026, $1,711.8M vs $1,484.3M) — a real acceleration, though from Q4 2025 onward it is partly M&A (DMC Power, plus NSI Industries which only closed in June 2026 and therefore contributed barely one month to the Q2 2026 number). Profitability moved the opposite way, and that is where the reported numbers get misleading. Gross margin fell to 35.8% in Q2 2026 from 37.2% in Q2 2025; operating margin fell to 20.4% from 22.7%; operating income grew only 3.7% against 15.3% revenue growth. That flow-through gap is overwhelmingly deal accounting and mix, not pricing erosion: GAAP diluted EPS slipped to $4.51 from $4.56 YoY, while adjusted EPS rose to $5.52 from $4.56 (+21%), the delta being purchase-accounting amortization and transaction costs. Cash generation confirms the underlying business is intact — TTM free cash flow of $901.4M (Q3 2025–Q2 2026) is up about 14.8% versus the prior TTM $785.3M, and the balance sheet still shows a healthy current ratio of 1.61. Call it a revenue inflection paired with an accounting-driven margin distortion, not a structural margin breakdown — but that distinction only holds if gross margin recovers toward 37% as the acquired mix seasons.

Valuation assessment

As of 2026-09-13, at $460.40 the stock trades at 27.2x trailing EPS of $16.97 versus a five-year average trailing P/E of 26.4x — roughly a 3% premium to its own history — and at 6.24x book with a P/S of 3.91x against a five-year average of 3.32x. Those are full numbers for a business running a 14.5% trailing net margin. The forward math is more interesting: on consensus FY2026 EPS of $20.458 (which lines up almost exactly with management's guided $20.25–$20.55 range), the stock sits at 22.5x forward — below its own historical average multiple and roughly a 1.2 PEG on guided ~19% EPS growth (the 3.14x trailing PEG is distorted by a subdued trailing base). EV/EBITDA is the least flattering lens: 20.1x on an enterprise value of roughly $28.7B (market cap $24.3B plus ~$4.4B net debt) over ~$1.4B trailing EBITDA, inflated on both numerator (new debt) and denominator (acquisition amortization). Bottom line: fairly valued to modestly cheap on forward earnings, full on trailing metrics and EV/EBITDA. Delivery of guidance is already in the price.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market is paying about 22.5x forward for a company that just raised guidance to 16–18% sales growth and $20.25–$20.55 adjusted EPS, leaving roughly 19% of headroom to the $548.60 consensus target — a base case that is priced but not stretched. The exploitable wrinkle is the GAAP-versus-adjusted gap: headline EPS fell YoY in Q2 2026 ($4.51 vs $4.56) while adjusted EPS rose 21% ($5.52 vs $4.56). Screen-based and headline-driven investors see a deteriorating earner; the cash flow statement and adjusted numbers say the opposite. That kind of accounting fog is typically where mispricing lives, and it should persist through the integration period. The asymmetry: if the late-October Q3 report shows organic utility and data-center demand still compounding plus early NSI margin contribution, the multiple can re-rate toward 25–26x forward on the same $20.46 estimate (~$510–$530). If the growth turns out to be almost entirely bought rather than organic, the stock has support closer to 20x forward, near the $403.82 52-week low.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 44.53 — mildly weak, but nowhere near oversold — with the price 1.5% below its 20-day SMA (approximately $467), 4.25% below its 50-day (approximately $481) and 5.34% below its 200-day (approximately $486). The stock is down 10.24% over the past month, yet essentially flat over the past week (-0.07%) and only -3.46% over three months, which reads as a sharp pullback inside a broader consolidation rather than a fresh downtrend. Losing all three moving averages argues against chasing, while a mid-40s RSI means there is no capitulation signal to buy either. Practical entry timing: no urgency — a reclaim of the 50-day near $481 would confirm the pullback is finished, whereas a break of the $403.82 52-week low would signal a genuine de-rating rather than noise.

Macro factors
  • Grid modernization and electrification capex super-cycle: multi-year utility transmission and distribution spending and grid automation are the core demand engine for the Utility Solutions segment, and the July 2026 guidance raise to 16–18% sales growth leans directly on it.
  • Data-center and AI power demand: hyperscaler buildouts are driving outsized traction in Electrical Solutions (rough-in components, power distribution), which is the highest-visibility growth leg of the story.
  • Interest rates and cost of capital: the June 2026 $1.9B senior notes offering converts rate levels into a permanent P&L item, and with D/E at 1.37 and net debt around $4.4B, a high-for-longer rate backdrop pressures both interest expense and the multiple the market will pay.
  • Tariffs and input-cost inflation (copper, aluminum, transformer components): management is leaning on pricing power and factory productivity, but the Q2 2026 gross margin decline to 35.8% from 37.2% shows how thin the buffer is if pricing lags cost.
  • Industrial sector rotation and low beta: HUBB's beta of 0.889 makes it a defensive-industrial holding, which tends to lag in risk-on rotations even when its own fundamentals are improving.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings, expected October 27–30, 2026: the first report with a full quarter of NSI Industries contribution. The key tells are organic utility/data-center order rates and whether the 16–18% sales growth and $20.25–$20.55 adjusted EPS guidance is reaffirmed.
  • Dividend of $1.42 per share paid September 15, 2026 (record date August 31, 2026) — a modest 1.25% yield, but a continuity signal for income holders.
  • NSI Industries and DMC Power integration: evidence of cost synergies and a gross margin recovery back toward 37% would validate the deal strategy and quiet deleveraging concerns.
  • Deleveraging path after the $4.8B long-term debt load: any FCF-driven debt reduction or refinancing commentary would be a re-rating trigger given D/E of 1.37.
  • Further data-center or utility capex announcements from hyperscalers and regulated utilities, which feed directly into Electrical Solutions and Utility Solutions backlogs.
Key risks
  • Balance-sheet transformation: long-term debt jumped from $1.044B (Q2 2025) to $4.804B (Q2 2026) to fund NSI, taking D/E to 1.37 and net debt to roughly $4.43B — on the order of 3x trailing EBITDA. Integration missteps or a rate shock hit harder from here than they did a year ago.
  • Margin erosion: operating margin fell to 20.4% in Q2 2026 from 22.7% a year earlier and gross margin to 35.8% from 37.2%. If that is mix and amortization it reverses; if synergies disappoint, the 2026 EPS guide is at risk.
  • Valuation leaves no cushion for a miss: 27.2x trailing earnings, 6.24x book, 20.1x EV/EBITDA and a consensus rating of only 'Hold' with one sell rating among the tracked analysts.
  • Cyclical end-market exposure: utility T&D capex and data-center construction are strong now, but a slowdown in either would hit the growth narrative quickly, and the mandated 16–18% growth guidance provides no room for moderation.
  • Multi-deal integration execution: absorbing NSI Industries and DMC Power simultaneously, while defending margins against tariffs and input cost inflation, is a lot of operating risk concentrated in a short window.
Investment thesis

This is a genuinely good industrial sitting in a genuinely awkward phase, priced fairly rather than cheaply. The demand backdrop — grid modernization plus data-center electrification — is one of the better secular stories in industrials, revenue growth has inflected from -2.4% to +15.3% YoY, TTM free cash flow of $901.4M is up ~15%, and the 22.5x forward multiple on $20.46 of FY2026 earnings is defensible. But the balance sheet changed character in a single quarter, GAAP operating margin compressed 230bp, headline EPS actually declined YoY, the consensus rating is a tepid 'Hold,' and the stock is trading below its 200-day. At $460.40 as of 2026-09-13 this is a hold and accumulate-on-weakness, not a buy: the late-October Q3 print is the real test of whether Hubbell is compounding or merely acquiring. Not personalized advice — just how the data reads.

AI theoretical price methodology

I applied a 24x forward P/E — a deliberate ~9% discount to Hubbell's 26.4x five-year average trailing multiple, justified by the tripled debt load and integration risk offset by accelerating growth — to consensus FY2026 EPS of $20.458, giving $491; cross-checked with 17.5x EV/EBITDA on FY2026E EBITDA of roughly $1.75B ($6.87B guided revenue at ~21.5% operating margin plus ~$270M of D&A), which yields an enterprise value of ~$30.6B, less ~$4.43B net debt and divided by ~52.8M shares, or ~$497. The midpoint is $494, about 7% above the 2026-09-13 price of $460.40 and deliberately below the $548.60 sell-side consensus, which implicitly assumes a full re-rating back to the five-year average multiple.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The 47.5 / 'Fair Fundamentals' band is in roughly the right territory but I'd score it low-to-mid 50s — a roughly 8–10 point upward adjustment, which is why this is a partial rather than full agreement. The gap is structural: the formula is entirely trailing, and it is reading Hubbell's M&A integration period as deterioration. Q2 2026 GAAP diluted EPS actually fell to $4.51 from $4.56 YoY while adjusted EPS rose 21% to $5.52 from $4.56; operating margin compressed to 20.4% from 22.7%. The formula's margin-level, margin-trend and accruals legs penalize all of that even though it is driven by purchase-accounting amortization, deal costs and acquired mix rather than pricing or demand erosion. Meanwhile revenue is accelerating hard (-2.4% YoY in Q1 2025 to +15.3% in Q2 2026) and next-FY consensus EPS of $20.458 puts the stock at 22.5x forward against a five-year average trailing P/E of 26.4x — forward information a backward-looking model cannot see. Offsetting that, I would mark the financial-health leg (58.6) lower rather than higher: long-term debt tripled to $4.804B in a year and net debt is roughly $4.4B. Two notes on the mechanics: this is not the cyclical-trough case the methodology warns about — demand is booming and guidance was raised in July 2026, so the low score is not a disguised entry signal, it is mostly accounting fog. I also considered deviating from the mandated Neutral mapping under the special-event rule (the June 2026 NSI Industries close and the $1.9B notes offering), but their directional impact is ambiguous — growth-accretive but GAAP-margin- and leverage-dilutive — and they are already partly visible in the reported numbers, so I applied the band/valuation table as written: Fair Fundamentals maps to Neutral.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.